Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2006

01.02.2006 | Original Article

Noninvasive cerclage for the management of cervical incompetence: a prospective study

verfasst von: Ganesh Acharya, Bettina Eschler, Martin Grønberg, Martha Hentemann, Tom Ottersen, Jan Martin Maltau

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 5/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a noninvasive cerclage pessary in the management of cervical incompetence. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of all pregnant women treated for cervical incompetence during a 4-year period. Women with known risk factors for preterm delivery had transvaginal ultrasonography every 2–3 weeks after 17–19 weeks of gestation. Those with progressive shortening of cervix diagnosed before 30 weeks were treated with a cerclage pessary when the cervical length was ≤25 mm. The pessary was electively removed at 34–36 weeks. The course and outcome of pregnancy were recorded. Results: Thirty-two women were treated with a cerclage pessary. There were nine twin and two triplet pregnancies. Fifteen (47%) had two or more risk factors for preterm delivery. The mean gestational age at cerclage was 23 (17–29) weeks, cervical length 17 (5–25) mm. Two women required delivery before the onset of labor due to severe intrauterine growth restriction and one due to HELLP syndrome. These were excluded from further analysis. In the remaining 29 women, the interval between cerclage and delivery was 10.4 (2–19) weeks, mean gestational age at delivery 34 (22–42) weeks, and birth weight 2,255 (410–4,045) g. Thirteen (45%) women delivered before 34 weeks. There were a total of 35 live-born infants and four intrapartum fetal deaths (all between 22 and 25 weeks gestation). All women complained of increased vaginal discharge, but no other significant complications were observed that could be attributed to the use of pessary. Conclusion : Cerclage pessary may be useful in the management of cervical incompetence. Whether it can be a noninvasive alternative to surgical cerclage merits further investigation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Harger JH (2002) Cerclage and cervical insufficiency: an evidence-based analysis. Obstet Gynecol 100:1313–1327CrossRefPubMed Harger JH (2002) Cerclage and cervical insufficiency: an evidence-based analysis. Obstet Gynecol 100:1313–1327CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A et al (1996) The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 334:567–572PubMedCrossRef Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A et al (1996) The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 334:567–572PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH (1998) Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12:312–317CrossRefPubMed Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH (1998) Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12:312–317CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V (1998) Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18–22 weeks’ gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 92:902–907PubMedCrossRef Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V (1998) Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18–22 weeks’ gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 92:902–907PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Guzman ER, Mellon C, Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Walters C, Gipson K (1998) Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks gestation in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 92:31–37PubMedCrossRef Guzman ER, Mellon C, Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Walters C, Gipson K (1998) Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks gestation in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 92:31–37PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, Dang K, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC et al (2000) Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length ≤15 mm have nearly 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1458–1467CrossRefPubMed Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, Dang K, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC et al (2000) Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length ≤15 mm have nearly 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1458–1467CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, Bekedam DJ, van Geijn HP (2001) Final results of the cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1106–1112CrossRefPubMed Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, Bekedam DJ, van Geijn HP (2001) Final results of the cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1106–1112CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat To MS, Palaniappan V, Skentou C, Gibb D, Nicolaides HK (2002) Elective cerclage vs. ultrasound-indicated cerclage in high-risk pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:475–477PubMedCrossRef To MS, Palaniappan V, Skentou C, Gibb D, Nicolaides HK (2002) Elective cerclage vs. ultrasound-indicated cerclage in high-risk pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:475–477PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Groom KM, Bennett PR, Golara M, Thalon A, Shennan AH (2004) Elective cervical cerclage versus serial ultrasound surveillance of cervical length in a population at high risk for preterm delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 112:158–161CrossRefPubMed Groom KM, Bennett PR, Golara M, Thalon A, Shennan AH (2004) Elective cervical cerclage versus serial ultrasound surveillance of cervical length in a population at high risk for preterm delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 112:158–161CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lazar P, Gueguen S, Dreyfus J, Reynaud R, Pontonnier G, Papiernik E (1984) Multicentred controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at moderate risk of preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91:724–730PubMed Lazar P, Gueguen S, Dreyfus J, Reynaud R, Pontonnier G, Papiernik E (1984) Multicentred controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at moderate risk of preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91:724–730PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rush RW, Isaacs S, McPherson K, Jones L, Chalmers I, Grant A (1984) A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91:731–735PubMed Rush RW, Isaacs S, McPherson K, Jones L, Chalmers I, Grant A (1984) A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91:731–735PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rust OA, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Benham BN, Balducci J (2000) A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:830–835CrossRefPubMed Rust OA, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Benham BN, Balducci J (2000) A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:830–835CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage (1993) Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Multicentre Randomised trial of cervical cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100:516–23 MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage (1993) Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Multicentre Randomised trial of cervical cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100:516–23
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassan SS, Romero R, Maymon E, Berry SM, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC et al (2001) Does cervical cerclage prevent preterm delivery in patients with a short cervix? Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1325–1331CrossRefPubMed Hassan SS, Romero R, Maymon E, Berry SM, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC et al (2001) Does cervical cerclage prevent preterm delivery in patients with a short cervix? Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1325–1331CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Drakeley AJ, Roberts D, Alfirevic Z (2003) Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obstet Gynecol 102:621–627CrossRefPubMed Drakeley AJ, Roberts D, Alfirevic Z (2003) Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obstet Gynecol 102:621–627CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen J, Iams JD, Hauth JC (2003) Vaginal sonography and cervical incompetence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:586–96CrossRefPubMed Owen J, Iams JD, Hauth JC (2003) Vaginal sonography and cervical incompetence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:586–96CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat To MS, Alfirevic Z, Heath VCF, Cicero S, Cacho AM, Williamson PR, Nicolaides KH (2004) Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 363:1849–1853CrossRefPubMed To MS, Alfirevic Z, Heath VCF, Cicero S, Cacho AM, Williamson PR, Nicolaides KH (2004) Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 363:1849–1853CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Berghella V, Odibo AO, Tolosa JE (2004) Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:1311–1317CrossRefPubMed Berghella V, Odibo AO, Tolosa JE (2004) Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:1311–1317CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Roman AS, Rebarber A, Pereira L, Sfakianaki AK, Mulholland J, Berghella V (2005) The efficacy of sonographically indicated cerclage in multiple gestations. J Ultrasound Med 24:763–768PubMed Roman AS, Rebarber A, Pereira L, Sfakianaki AK, Mulholland J, Berghella V (2005) The efficacy of sonographically indicated cerclage in multiple gestations. J Ultrasound Med 24:763–768PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cross RG (1959) Treatment of habitual abortion due to cervical incompetence. Lancet 2:127CrossRef Cross RG (1959) Treatment of habitual abortion due to cervical incompetence. Lancet 2:127CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Oster S, Javert CT (1966) Treatment of the incompetent cervix with Hodge pessary. Obstet Gynecol 28:206–208PubMed Oster S, Javert CT (1966) Treatment of the incompetent cervix with Hodge pessary. Obstet Gynecol 28:206–208PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Vitsky M (1968) Pessary treatment of the incompetent cervical os. Obstet Gynecol 31:732–733PubMedCrossRef Vitsky M (1968) Pessary treatment of the incompetent cervical os. Obstet Gynecol 31:732–733PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Seyffarth K (1978) Noninvasive cerclage using support pessaries for prevention and therapy of premature birth. Zentralbl Gynäkol 100:1566–1570PubMed Seyffarth K (1978) Noninvasive cerclage using support pessaries for prevention and therapy of premature birth. Zentralbl Gynäkol 100:1566–1570PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Quaas L, Hillemanns HG, du Bois A, Schillinger H (1990) The Arabin cerclage pessary-alternative to surgery. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilk 50:429–433CrossRef Quaas L, Hillemanns HG, du Bois A, Schillinger H (1990) The Arabin cerclage pessary-alternative to surgery. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilk 50:429–433CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Arabin B, Halbesma JR, Vork F, Hubener M, van Eyck J (2003) Is treatment with vaginal pessaries an option in patients with a sonographically detected short cervix? J Perinat Med 31:122–133CrossRefPubMed Arabin B, Halbesma JR, Vork F, Hubener M, van Eyck J (2003) Is treatment with vaginal pessaries an option in patients with a sonographically detected short cervix? J Perinat Med 31:122–133CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Förster VF, During R, Schwarzlos G (1998) Treatment of cervix incompetence—cerclage versus pessary. Zentralbl Gynäkol 108:230–237 Förster VF, During R, Schwarzlos G (1998) Treatment of cervix incompetence—cerclage versus pessary. Zentralbl Gynäkol 108:230–237
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Newcomer J (2000) Pessaries for the treatment of incompetent cervix and premature delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 55:443–448CrossRefPubMed Newcomer J (2000) Pessaries for the treatment of incompetent cervix and premature delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 55:443–448CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hibbard JU, Tart M, Moawd AH (2000) Cervical length at 16–22 weeks’ gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 96:972–978CrossRefPubMed Hibbard JU, Tart M, Moawd AH (2000) Cervical length at 16–22 weeks’ gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 96:972–978CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Guzman ER, Forster JK, Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Walters C, Gipson P (1998) Pregnancy outcomes in women treated with elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12:323–327CrossRefPubMed Guzman ER, Forster JK, Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Walters C, Gipson P (1998) Pregnancy outcomes in women treated with elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12:323–327CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Iams JD (2004) Abnormal cervical competence. In: Creasy RK, Resnik R, Iams JD (eds). Maternal-fetal medicine: principles and practice (fifth edition). Saunders, Elsevier Inc., USA, pp 603–622 Iams JD (2004) Abnormal cervical competence. In: Creasy RK, Resnik R, Iams JD (eds). Maternal-fetal medicine: principles and practice (fifth edition). Saunders, Elsevier Inc., USA, pp 603–622
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Berghella V, Odibo AO, To MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM (2005) Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol 106:181–189PubMed Berghella V, Odibo AO, To MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM (2005) Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol 106:181–189PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Noninvasive cerclage for the management of cervical incompetence: a prospective study
verfasst von
Ganesh Acharya
Bettina Eschler
Martin Grønberg
Martha Hentemann
Tom Ottersen
Jan Martin Maltau
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2006
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 5/2006
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0082-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2006

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Alter der Mutter beeinflusst Risiko für kongenitale Anomalie

28.05.2024 Kinder- und Jugendgynäkologie Nachrichten

Welchen Einfluss das Alter ihrer Mutter auf das Risiko hat, dass Kinder mit nicht chromosomal bedingter Malformation zur Welt kommen, hat eine ungarische Studie untersucht. Sie zeigt: Nicht nur fortgeschrittenes Alter ist riskant.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

26.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

24.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.