nach oben

Lung

Erschienen in:

11.11.2020 | STATE OF THE ART REVIEW

Pulmonary Complications of Cardiac Surgery

verfasst von: Tristan George Tanner, Mai O. Colvin

Erschienen in: Lung | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Cardiothoracic surgery posits an arrangement of large, significant hemodynamic, and physiologic alterations upon the human body, which predisposes a patient to develop pathology. The care of these patients in the postoperative realm requires an astute physician with deep understanding of the cardiopulmonary system, who is able to address subtle developing problems promptly, before the patient suffers further sequelae. In this review, we describe the presentation and management of an assortment of important complications which occur in the pulmonary system. In addition, we aim to shed better light upon how the physiology of a patient responds to the condition of cardiothoracic surgery.

Szelowski LA, Puri NK, Singh R et al (2015) Current trends in preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care of the adult cardiac surgery patient. Curr Probl Surg 52(1):531. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpsurg.2014.10.001CrossRef

Lawrence VA, Hilsenbeck SG, Mulrow CD et al (1995) Incidence and hospital stay for cardiac and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery. J Gen Intern Med 10:671–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602761CrossRefPubMed

Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C et al (2010) Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiol J Am Soc Anesthesiol 113(6):1338–1350. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0aCrossRef

Mazo V, Sabaté S, Canet J et al (2014) Prospective external validation of a predictive score for postoperative pulmonary complications. Anesthesiol J Am Soc Anesthesiol 121(2):219–231. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000334CrossRef

Schlensak C, Doenst T, Preußer S et al (2001) Bronchial artery perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass does not prevent ischemia of the lung in piglets: assessment of bronchial artery blood flow with fluorescent microspheres. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 19(3):326–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00581-4CrossRefPubMed

Den Hengst WA, Gielis JF, Lin JY et al (2010) Lung ischemia-reperfusion injury: a molecular and clinical view on a complex pathophysiological process. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 299(5):H1283–H1299. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00251.2010CrossRef

Engels GE, Dodonov M, Rakhorst G et al (2014) The effect of pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass on lung function in elderly patients. Int J Artif Organs 37(9):679–687. https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000352CrossRefPubMed

Salameh A, Greimann W, Vollroth M et al (2017) Lung protection in cardio-pulmonary bypass. J Physiol Pharmacol 68(1):99–116. https://doi.org/10.17169/refubium-23521CrossRefPubMed

Buggeskov KB, Sundskard MM, Jonassen T et al (2016) Pulmonary artery perfusion versus no pulmonary perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with COPD: a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open Respir Res 3(1):e000146. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000146CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Rezkalla SH, Kloner RA (2002) No-reflow phenomenon. Circulation 105(5):656–662. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc0502.102867CrossRefPubMed

11.

Whitlock RP, Chan S, Devereaux PJ et al (2008) Clinical benefit of steroid use in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J 29(21):2592–2600. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn333CrossRefPubMed

12.

Ranucci M, Balduini A, Ditta A et al (2009) A systematic review of biocompatible cardiopulmonary bypass circuits and clinical outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 87(4):1311–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.09.076CrossRefPubMed

13.

de Amorim CG, Malbouisson LM, da Silva FC et al (2014) Leukocyte depletion during CPB: effects on inflammation and lung function. Inflammation 37(1):196–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-013-9730-zCrossRefPubMed

14.

Schaub C, Thomas O, Åkervall F et al (2013) Protamine dosage effects on complement activation and sonoclot coagulation analysis after cardiac surgery. Cardiovasc Syst 1(1):1. https://doi.org/10.7243/2052-4358-1-1CrossRef

15.

Nybo M, Madsen JS (2008) Serious anaphylactic reactions due to protamine sulfate: a systematic literature review. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 103(2):192–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2008.00274.xCrossRefPubMed

16.

Welsby IJ, Newman MF, Phillips-Bute B et al (2005) Hemodynamic changes after protamine administration: association with mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesthesiology 102(2):308–314CrossRef

17.

Valchanov K, Florian F, Shane G et al (2019) Three cases of anaphylaxis to protamine: management of anticoagulation reversal. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 33(2):482–486. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2018.03.014CrossRefPubMed

18.

Williams B, Wehman B, Mazzeffi MA et al (2018) Acute intracardiac thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism after cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review of reported cases. Anesth Analg 126(2):425–434. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002259CrossRefPubMed

19.

Boer C, Meesters MI, Milojevic M et al (2018) 2017 EACTS/EACTA guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 32(1):88–120. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2017.06.026CrossRefPubMed

20.

Mehta RH, Sheng S, O’Brien SM et al (2009) Reoperation for bleeding in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2(6):583–90. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.858811CrossRefPubMed

21.

Mazer C, David RP, Whitlock DA et al (2018) Six-month outcomes after restrictive or liberal transfusion for cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 379(13):1224–1233. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1808561CrossRefPubMed

22.

Bolliger D, Andreas B, Joachim ME (2019) Patient blood management in cardiac surgery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 9(3):215–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-019-00343-yCrossRef

23.

Vlaar APJ, Hofstra JJ, Determann RM et al (2011) The incidence, risk factors, and outcome of transfusion-related acute lung injury in a cohort of cardiac surgery patients: a prospective nested case-control study. Blood 117(16):4218–4225. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-10-313973CrossRefPubMed

24.

Fung YL, Silliman CC (2009) The role of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of transfusion-related acute lung injury. Transfus Med Rev 23(4):266–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2009.06.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Gillinov AM, Bator JM, Zehr KJ et al (1993) Neutrophil adhesion molecule expression during cardiopulmonary bypass with bubble and membrane oxygenators. Ann Thorac Surg 56(4):847–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(93)90342-fCrossRefPubMed

26.

Jindani A, Aps C, Neville E et al (1993) Postoperative cardiac surgical care: an alternative approach. Br Heart J 69:59–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.69.1.59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Jain V, Rao TL, Kumar P et al (1996) Radiographic pulmonary abnormalities after different types of cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 5:592–595

28.

Light RW, Rogers JT, Moyers RJ et al (2002) Prevalence and clinical course of pleural effusions at 30 days after coronary artery and cardiac surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:1567–1571. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200203-184OCCrossRefPubMed

29.

Canbaz S, Turgut N, Halici U et al (2004) Electrophysiological evaluation of phrenic nerve injury during cardiac surgery—a prospective, controlled, clinical study. BMC Surg 4(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-4-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Dimopoulou I, Daganou M, Dafni U et al (1998) Phrenic nerve dysfunction after cardiac operations: electrophysiologic evaluation of risk factors. Chest 113(1):8–14. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.113.1.8CrossRefPubMed

31.

Ailawadi G, Chang HL, O’Gara PT et al (2017) Pneumonia after cardiac surgery: experience of the National Institutes of Health/Canadian Institutes of Health research cardiothoracic surgical trials network. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 153(6):1384–1391.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.055CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Kollef MH, Sharpless L, Vlasnik J et al (1997) The impact of nosocomial infections on patient outcomes following cardiac surgery. Chest 112(3):666–675. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.112.3.666CrossRefPubMed

33.

Knapik P, Ciesla D, Borowik D et al (2011) Prolonged ventilation post cardiac surgery-tips and pitfalls of the prediction game. J Cardiothorac Surg 6(1):158. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-6-158CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Totonchi Z, Baazm F, Chitsazan M et al (2014) Predictors of prolonged mechanical ventilation after open heart surgery. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 6(4):211CrossRef

35.

Trouillet JL, Combes A, Vaissier E et al (2009) Prolonged mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery: outcome and predictors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138(4):948–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.05.034CrossRefPubMed

36.

Milot J, Perron J, Lacasse Y et al (2001) Incidence and predictors of ARDS after cardiac surgery. Chest 119(3):884–888. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.119.3.884CrossRefPubMed

37.

Asimakopoulos G, Taylor KM, Smith PL et al (1999) Prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117(3):620–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70348-XCrossRefPubMed

38.

Ng CS, Wan S, Yim AP et al (2002) Pulmonary dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Chest 121(4):1269–1277. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.121.4.1269CrossRefPubMed

39.

Gunnarsson L, Strandberg A, Brismar B et al (1989) Atelectasis and gas exchange impairment during enflurane/nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 33(8):629–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1989.tb02981.xCrossRefPubMed

40.

Gunnarsson L, Tokics L, Gustavsson H et al (1991) Influence of age on atelectasis formation and gas exchange impairment during general anaesthesia. BJA Br J Anaesth 66(4):423–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/66.4.423CrossRefPubMed

41.

Tenling A, Hachenberg T, Tyden H et al (1998) Atelectasis and gas exchange after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiol J Am Soc Anesthesiol 89(2):371–378

42.

Pasquina P, Merlani P, Granier JM et al (2004) Continuous positive airway pressure versus noninvasive pressure support ventilation to treat atelectasis after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 99(4):1001–1008. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000130621.11024.97CrossRefPubMed

43.

Pasquina P, Walder B (2003) Prophylactic respiratory physiotherapy after cardiac surgery: systematic review. BMJ 327(7428):1379. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7428.1379CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Labidi M, Baillot R, Dionne B et al (2009) Pleural effusions following cardiac surgery: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical features. Chest 136(6):1604–1611. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-0689CrossRefPubMed

45.

Feng T, Robert RS, White LK et al (2018) Coronary artery bypass graft readmission rates and risk factors—a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 54:7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.022CrossRefPubMed

46.

Imazio M (2012) The post-pericardiotomy syndrome. Curr Opin Pulm Med 18(4):366–374. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835311a2CrossRefPubMed

47.

Imazio M, Brucato A, Rovere ME et al (2011) Contemporary features, risk factors, and prognosis of the post-pericardiotomy syndrome. Am J Cardiol 108(8):1183–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.025CrossRefPubMed

48.

Alraies MC, Al Jaroudi E, Shabrang C et al (2014) Clinical features associated with adverse events in patients with post-pericardiotomy syndrome following cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol 114(9):1426–1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.078CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Bielsa S, Corral E, Bagüeste P et al (2016) Characteristics of pleural effusions in acute idiopathic pericarditis and post-cardiac injury syndrome. Ann Am Thorac Soc 13(2):298–300. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201510-668LECrossRefPubMed

50.

Pleural effusions in acute idiopathic pericarditis and postcardiac injury syndrome | Ovid. n.d. Accessed 13 Dec 2019. https://oce-ovid-com.elibrary.einstein.yu.edu/article/00063198-201707000-00010/HTML

51.

Hansen LS, Hjortdal VE, Jakobsen CJ et al (2017) Early, dedicated follow-up and treatment of pleural effusions enhance the recovery rate after open cardiac surgery: results from a randomized, clinical trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 51(1):58–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw233CrossRefPubMed

52.

Beatty AL, Schiller NB, Whooley MA (2012) Six-minute walk test as a prognostic tool in stable coronary heart disease: data from the heart and soul study. Arch Intern Med 172(14):1096–1102. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Tauriainen T, Kinnunen EM, Koski-Vähälä J et al (2017) Outcome after procedures for retained blood syndrome in coronary surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 51(6):1078–1085. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx015CrossRefPubMed

54.

Light RW, Lee YCG (2015) Pneumothorax, chylothorax, hemothorax, and fibrothorax. In: Murray & Nadel’s textbook of respiratory medicine, 6th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1439–1460

55.

Sirch J, Ledwon M, Puski T et al (2016) Active clearance of chest drainage catheters reduces retained blood. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151:832–838.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.015CrossRefPubMed

56.

Balzer F, Von Heymann C, Boyle EM et al (2016) Impact of retained blood requiring reintervention on outcomes after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 152(2):595–601.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.086CrossRefPubMed

57.

Boyle EM Jr, Gillinov AM, Cohn WE et al (2015) Retained blood syndrome after cardiac surgery: a new look at an old problem. Innovations (Phila) 10(5):296–303. https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000200CrossRef

58.

Abbasa S, Abbasa A, Aminb S et al (2014) Phrenic nerve injury from ice slush placed during multi-cardiac valve repair/replacement. J Cardiovasc Dis 12(4):97–100

59.

Tripp L, Bolton L, Randolph CJ (1998) Phrenic nerve injury following cardiac surgery: a review. J Card Surg 13:218–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.1998.tb01265.xCrossRefPubMed

60.

Efthimiou J, Butler J, Woodham C et al (1991) Diaphragm paralysis following cardiac surgery: role of phrenic nerve cold injury. Ann Thorac Surg 52(4):1005–1008CrossRef

61.

Islam M, Levitus M, Eisen L et al (2020) Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis and management of acute respiratory failure. Lung 198:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-019-00309-1CrossRefPubMed

62.

He S, Chen B, Li W et al (2014) Ventilator-associated pneumonia after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148(6):3148–3155.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.107CrossRefPubMed

63.

Bardia A, Blitz D, Dai F et al (2019) Preoperative chlorhexidine mouthwash to reduce pneumonia after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 158(4):1094–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.01.014CrossRefPubMed

64.

Cassidy MR, Rosenkranz P, McCabe K et al (2013) I COUGH: reducing postoperative pulmonary complications with a multidisciplinary patient care program. JAMA Surg 148(8):740–745. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.358CrossRefPubMed

65.

Miskovic A, Lumb AB (2017) Postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth 118(3):317–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex002CrossRefPubMed

66.

Kogan A, Preisman S, Levin S et al (2014) Adult respiratory distress syndrome following cardiac surgery. J Card Surg 29(1):41–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12264CrossRefPubMed

67.

Chen SW, Chang CH, Chu PH et al (2016) Risk factor analysis of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome in valvular heart surgery. J Crit Care 31(1):139–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.11.002CrossRefPubMed

68.

Wolf M, Drubbel V, Hendriks JMH et al (2009) Red blood cell accumulation in a rat model of pulmonary ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Cardiovasc Surg 50(3):351–356

69.

Intraoperative mechanical ventilation and postoperative pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery | Ovid. n.d. Accessed 8 Dec 2019. https://oce-ovid-com.elibrary.einstein.yu.edu/article/00000542-201911000-00021/HTML

70.

Lagier D, Fischer F, Fornier W et al (2019) Effect of open-lung vs conventional perioperative ventilation strategies on postoperative pulmonary complications after on-pump cardiac surgery: the PROVECS randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 45(10):1401–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05741-8CrossRefPubMed

71.

Lagier D, Fischer F, Fornier W et al (2018) A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2967-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

72.

Zochios V, Klein AA, Gao F (2018) Protective invasive ventilation in cardiac surgery: a systematic review with a focus on acute lung injury in adult cardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 32(4):1922–1936. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2017.10.031CrossRefPubMed

73.

Hendriks MMC, Aarts JT, Svircevic V (2017) Post pull pneumothorax following cardiac surgery. Neth J Crit Care 25:100–103

74.

Kearney TJ, Shabot MM (1995) Pulmonary artery rupture associated with the Swan-Ganz catheter. Chest 108(5):1349–1352. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.108.5.1349CrossRefPubMed

75.

Lafita V, Borge MA, Demos TC (2007) Pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysm: etiology, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Semin Interv Radiol 24(01):119–123. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-971202CrossRef

76.

Ziccardi MR, Khalid N (2019) Pulmonary artery catheterization. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482170/

Titel: Pulmonary Complications of Cardiac Surgery
verfasst von: Tristan George Tanner
Mai O. Colvin
Publikationsdatum: 11.11.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Lung / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0341-2040
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1750
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-020-00405-7

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Pulmonary Complications of Cardiac Surgery

Abstract

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Bei seelischem Stress sind Checkpoint-Hemmer weniger wirksam

Antikörper mobilisiert Neutrophile gegen Krebs

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

Update Innere Medizin

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

Follow-Up Functional Class and 6-Minute Walk Distance Identify Long-Term Survival in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

A Multidisciplinary Lung Cancer Program: Does It Reduce Delay Between Diagnosis and Treatment?

Correction to: Influence of Cystic Fibrosis‑Related Diabetes on Mental Health in Adults: A Single‑Center Study

Correction to: Postoperative Adverse Events are Associated with Oncologic Recurrence Following Curative‑intent Resection for Lung Cancer

Update 2020: Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Infectious Complications in Lung Transplant Recipients

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Bei seelischem Stress sind Checkpoint-Hemmer weniger wirksam

Antikörper mobilisiert Neutrophile gegen Krebs

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

Update Innere Medizin