Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2021

02.11.2020

Lessons learnt from the first 200 unselected consecutive cases of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct stones at a district general hospital

verfasst von: Mahmoud Al-Ardah, Rebecca E. Barnett, Simon Morris, Tarig Abdelrahman, Michael Nutt, Tamsin Boyce, Ashraf Rasheed

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The management of choledocholithiasis evolves with diagnostic imaging and therapeutic technology, facilitating a laparoscopic approach. We review our first 200 cases of laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct, highlighting challenges and lessons learnt.

Methods

We retrospectively studied the first 200 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration between 2006 and 2019. The database contains demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, diagnostic modalities, operative techniques, duration and outcomes.

Results

We compared two approaches: transcystic vs. transcholedochal in our 200 cases. Choledocholithiasis was suspected preoperatively in 163 patients. 21 cases found no stones. Of the remainder, 111/179 cases were completed via the transcystic route and the remaining were completed transcholedochally (68/179); 25% of the transcholedochal cases were converted from a transcystic approach. CBD diameter for transcystic route was 8.2 vs. 11.0 mm for transcholedochal. Total clearance rate was 84%. Retained or recurrent stones were noted in 7 patients. Length of stay was 5.8 days, 3.5 days in the transcystic route vs. 9.4 days after transcholedochal clearance. Eight patients required re-operation for bleeding or bile leak. No mortalities were recorded in this cohort, but 2 cases (1%) developed a subsequent CBD stricture.

Conclusion

Concomitant laparoscopic common bile duct clearance with cholecystectomy is feasible, safe and effective in a district general hospital, despite constraints of time and resources. The transcystic route has a lower complication rate and shorter hospital stay, and hence our preference of this route for all cases. Advancements in stone management technology will allow wider adoption of this technique, benefitting more patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Stinton LM, Myers RP, Shaffer EA (2010) Epidemiology of gallstones. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 39(2):157–69, viiCrossRef Stinton LM, Myers RP, Shaffer EA (2010) Epidemiology of gallstones. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 39(2):157–69, viiCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ko CW, Lee SP (2002) Epidemiology and natural history of common bile duct stones and prediction of disease. Gastrointest Endosc 56(6 Suppl):S165–S169CrossRef Ko CW, Lee SP (2002) Epidemiology and natural history of common bile duct stones and prediction of disease. Gastrointest Endosc 56(6 Suppl):S165–S169CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (1998) Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Results of a consensus development conference. Surg Endosc 12(6):856–864 Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (1998) Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Results of a consensus development conference. Surg Endosc 12(6):856–864
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Topal B et al (2010) Hospital cost categories of one-stage versus two-stage management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24(2):413–416CrossRef Topal B et al (2010) Hospital cost categories of one-stage versus two-stage management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24(2):413–416CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003327 Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003327
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Vitale GC et al (1984) Computerized 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring and esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the reflux patient. A comparative study. Ann Surg 200(6):724–728CrossRef Vitale GC et al (1984) Computerized 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring and esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the reflux patient. A comparative study. Ann Surg 200(6):724–728CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat NICE (2014) Gallstone disease: diagnosis and management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence NICE (2014) Gallstone disease: diagnosis and management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes M et al (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351(9097):159–161CrossRef Rhodes M et al (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351(9097):159–161CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Costi R et al (2014) Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 20(37):13382–13401CrossRef Costi R et al (2014) Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 20(37):13382–13401CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng Y et al (2012) Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol 47(6):655–663CrossRef Feng Y et al (2012) Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol 47(6):655–663CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Urbach DR et al (2001) Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 15(1):4–13CrossRef Urbach DR et al (2001) Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 15(1):4–13CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Czerwonko ME et al (2019) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration in the emergency is as effective and safe as in elective setting. J Gastrointest Surg 23(9):1848–1855CrossRef Czerwonko ME et al (2019) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration in the emergency is as effective and safe as in elective setting. J Gastrointest Surg 23(9):1848–1855CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hua J et al (2017) Five hundred consecutive laparoscopic common bile duct explorations: 5-year experience at a single institution. Surg Endosc 31(9):3581–3589CrossRef Hua J et al (2017) Five hundred consecutive laparoscopic common bile duct explorations: 5-year experience at a single institution. Surg Endosc 31(9):3581–3589CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lilly MC, Arregui ME (2001) A balanced approach to choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 15(5):467–472CrossRef Lilly MC, Arregui ME (2001) A balanced approach to choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 15(5):467–472CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones T et al (2019) Holmium laser lithotripsy improves the rate of successful transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Langenbecks Arch Surg 404(8):985–992CrossRef Jones T et al (2019) Holmium laser lithotripsy improves the rate of successful transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Langenbecks Arch Surg 404(8):985–992CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Xia HT et al (2018) A novel laparoscopic transcystic approach using an ultrathin choledochoscope and holmium laser lithotripsy in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: an appraisal of their safety and efficacy. Am J Surg 215(4):631–635CrossRef Xia HT et al (2018) A novel laparoscopic transcystic approach using an ultrathin choledochoscope and holmium laser lithotripsy in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: an appraisal of their safety and efficacy. Am J Surg 215(4):631–635CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Varban O et al (2010) Video. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and holmium laser lithotripsy: a novel approach to the management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24(7):1759–1764CrossRef Varban O et al (2010) Video. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and holmium laser lithotripsy: a novel approach to the management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24(7):1759–1764CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fang L et al (2018) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: surgical indications and procedure strategies. Surg Endosc 32(12):4742–4748CrossRef Fang L et al (2018) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: surgical indications and procedure strategies. Surg Endosc 32(12):4742–4748CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen XM et al (2013) Transcystic approach with micro-incision of the cystic duct and its confluence part in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(12):977–981CrossRef Chen XM et al (2013) Transcystic approach with micro-incision of the cystic duct and its confluence part in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(12):977–981CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gough V et al (2012) Intrahepatic choledochoscopy during trans-cystic common bile duct exploration; technique, feasibility and value. Surg Endosc 26(11):3190–3194CrossRef Gough V et al (2012) Intrahepatic choledochoscopy during trans-cystic common bile duct exploration; technique, feasibility and value. Surg Endosc 26(11):3190–3194CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR (2013) T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD005641 Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR (2013) T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD005641
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bekheit M et al (2019) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic transcystic versus transcholedochal common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. BJS Open 3(3):242–251CrossRef Bekheit M et al (2019) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic transcystic versus transcholedochal common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. BJS Open 3(3):242–251CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Estelles Vidagany N et al (2016) Eleven years of primary closure of common bile duct after choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 30(5):1975–1982CrossRef Estelles Vidagany N et al (2016) Eleven years of primary closure of common bile duct after choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 30(5):1975–1982CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Khaled YS et al (2013) Laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy followed by primary duct closure is feasible and safe for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 27(11):4164–4170CrossRef Khaled YS et al (2013) Laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy followed by primary duct closure is feasible and safe for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 27(11):4164–4170CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng Q et al (2016) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: advantages over laparoscopic choledochotomy. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0162885CrossRef Feng Q et al (2016) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: advantages over laparoscopic choledochotomy. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0162885CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hajibandeh S et al (2019) Laparoscopic transcystic versus transductal common bile duct exploration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 43(8):1935–1948CrossRef Hajibandeh S et al (2019) Laparoscopic transcystic versus transductal common bile duct exploration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 43(8):1935–1948CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Quaresima S et al (2017) A 23 year experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. HPB (Oxford) 19(1):29–35CrossRef Quaresima S et al (2017) A 23 year experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. HPB (Oxford) 19(1):29–35CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SY et al (2019) Recurrence of common bile duct stones following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a multicenter study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 26(12):578–582CrossRef Park SY et al (2019) Recurrence of common bile duct stones following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a multicenter study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 26(12):578–582CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HM, Min SK, Lee HK (2014) Long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis: 15-year experience from a single center. Ann Surg Treat Res 86(1):1–6CrossRef Lee HM, Min SK, Lee HK (2014) Long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis: 15-year experience from a single center. Ann Surg Treat Res 86(1):1–6CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Decker G et al (2003) One hundred laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 17(1):12–18CrossRef Decker G et al (2003) One hundred laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 17(1):12–18CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan KK et al (2010) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: our first 50 cases. Ann Acad Med Singapore 39(2):136–142PubMed Tan KK et al (2010) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: our first 50 cases. Ann Acad Med Singapore 39(2):136–142PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu J et al (2018) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 32(12):4893–4899CrossRef Zhu J et al (2018) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 32(12):4893–4899CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Khanzada Z, Morgan R (2013) A laparoscopic approach to CBD stones. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(6):502–506CrossRef Khanzada Z, Morgan R (2013) A laparoscopic approach to CBD stones. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(6):502–506CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Chue KM et al (2018) A predictive nomogram to identify factors influencing the success of a concomitant laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. HPB (Oxford) 20(4):313–320CrossRef Chue KM et al (2018) A predictive nomogram to identify factors influencing the success of a concomitant laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. HPB (Oxford) 20(4):313–320CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Waage A et al (2003) Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 17(8):1181–1185CrossRef Waage A et al (2003) Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 17(8):1181–1185CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Aawsaj Y, Light D, Horgan L (2016) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: 15-year experience in a district general hospital. Surg Endosc 30(6):2563–2566CrossRef Aawsaj Y, Light D, Horgan L (2016) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: 15-year experience in a district general hospital. Surg Endosc 30(6):2563–2566CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Jameel M, Darmas B, Baker AL (2008) Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(1):29–35CrossRef Jameel M, Darmas B, Baker AL (2008) Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(1):29–35CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Berci G, Morgenstern L (1994) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. A multi-institutional SAGES study. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 8(10):1168–1174; discussion 1174–1175 Berci G, Morgenstern L (1994) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. A multi-institutional SAGES study. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 8(10):1168–1174; discussion 1174–1175
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly MD (2010) Results of laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 80(10):694–698CrossRef Kelly MD (2010) Results of laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 80(10):694–698CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Griniatsos J et al (2005) Cost-effective method for laparoscopic choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 75(1–2):35–38CrossRef Griniatsos J et al (2005) Cost-effective method for laparoscopic choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 75(1–2):35–38CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Lessons learnt from the first 200 unselected consecutive cases of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct stones at a district general hospital
verfasst von
Mahmoud Al-Ardah
Rebecca E. Barnett
Simon Morris
Tarig Abdelrahman
Michael Nutt
Tamsin Boyce
Ashraf Rasheed
Publikationsdatum
02.11.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08127-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.