Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 11/2008

01.11.2008 | Review

A systematic review of paracetamol for non-specific low back pain

verfasst von: Reece A. Davies, Christopher G. Maher, Mark J. Hancock

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 11/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of paracetamol (acetaminophen) in the treatment of pain and disability in patients with non-specific low back pain. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy of paracetamol in the treatment of pain and disability in patients with non-specific low back pain. A search for randomized controlled trials was conducted using the Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases. Trials were eligible if they were randomized controlled trials comparing paracetamol to no treatment, placebo or another treatment in patients with non-specific low back pain. Two of the authors independently assessed trials for methodological quality on the PEDro Scale and extracted data. Continuous pain and disability data were converted to a common 0–10 scale; ordinal data were dichotomized (e.g., no pain, pain). The data was analyzed using the MIX version 1.61 meta-analysis software. Out of 205 unique articles found in the searches, 7 eligible trials were identified. The trials enrolled a total of 676 participants with 5 investigating acute low back pain, 1 investigating chronic low back pain and 1 investigating both. No trial provided data comparing paracetamol to placebo and only one trial compared paracetamol to no treatment. In general the trials were small (only 1 trial had >25 subjects per group) and of low methodological quality (only 2 had a score above 6 on the quality scale). All but one of the trials provided imprecise estimates of the effects of treatment with confidence intervals spanning clinically important beneficial and also harmful effects of paracetamol. No trial reported a statistically significant difference in favor of paracetamol. There is insufficient evidence to assess the efficacy of paracetamol in patients with low back pain. There is a clear need for large, high quality randomized controlled trials evaluating paracetamol, to provide reliable evidence of paracetamol’s effectiveness in patients with low back pain and to establish the validity of the recommendations in clinical guidelines.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group (2003) Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain: a guide for clinicians. Australian Academic Press Pty Ltd., Bowen Hills Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group (2003) Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain: a guide for clinicians. Australian Academic Press Pty Ltd., Bowen Hills
2.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Delcambre B, Jeantet M, Laversin S et al (2000) Diagnosis, management and follow-up of patients with chronic low back pain (quick reference guide for clinicians). Agence Nationale d’Accréditation et d’Évaluation en Santé, Paris Delcambre B, Jeantet M, Laversin S et al (2000) Diagnosis, management and follow-up of patients with chronic low back pain (quick reference guide for clinicians). Agence Nationale d’Accréditation et d’Évaluation en Santé, Paris
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Egger M, Bartlett C, Holenstein F, Sterne J (2003) How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technol Assess 7:1–76PubMed Egger M, Bartlett C, Holenstein F, Sterne J (2003) How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technol Assess 7:1–76PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gow P, Griffiths R, Grimes P et al (2004) New Zealand acute low back pain guide. ACC, Wellington Gow P, Griffiths R, Grimes P et al (2004) New Zealand acute low back pain guide. ACC, Wellington
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hackett GI, Seddon D, Kaminski D (1988) Electroacupuncture compared with paracetamol for acute low back pain. Practitioner 232:163–164PubMed Hackett GI, Seddon D, Kaminski D (1988) Electroacupuncture compared with paracetamol for acute low back pain. Practitioner 232:163–164PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hickey RF (1982) Chronic low back pain: a comparison of diflunisal with paracetamol. N Z Med J 95:312–314PubMed Hickey RF (1982) Chronic low back pain: a comparison of diflunisal with paracetamol. N Z Med J 95:312–314PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M (2003) Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 83:713–721PubMed Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M (2003) Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 83:713–721PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Milgrom C, Finestone A, Lev B, Wiener M, Floman Y (1993) Overexertional lumbar and thoracic back pain among recruits: a prospective study of risk factors and treatment regimens. J Spinal Disord 6:187–193PubMedCrossRef Milgrom C, Finestone A, Lev B, Wiener M, Floman Y (1993) Overexertional lumbar and thoracic back pain among recruits: a prospective study of risk factors and treatment regimens. J Spinal Disord 6:187–193PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Stein D, Peri T, Edelstein E, Elizur A, Floman Y (1996) The efficacy of amitriptyline and acetaminophen in the management of acute low back pain. Psychosomatics 37:63–70PubMed Stein D, Peri T, Edelstein E, Elizur A, Floman Y (1996) The efficacy of amitriptyline and acetaminophen in the management of acute low back pain. Psychosomatics 37:63–70PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, Gil del Real MT, Hutchinson A et al (2006) European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 15:S169–S191. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-1071-2 PubMedCrossRef Van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, Gil del Real MT, Hutchinson A et al (2006) European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 15:S169–S191. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-006-1071-2 PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L, The Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2003) Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 28:1290–1299. doi:10.1097/00007632-200306150-00014 PubMedCrossRef van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L, The Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2003) Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 28:1290–1299. doi:10.​1097/​00007632-200306150-00014 PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A systematic review of paracetamol for non-specific low back pain
verfasst von
Reece A. Davies
Christopher G. Maher
Mark J. Hancock
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 11/2008
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0783-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2008

European Spine Journal 11/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.