Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 5/2013

01.05.2013 | Original Article

The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device

verfasst von: Gerrit J. Bouma, Martin Barth, Darko Ledic, Milorad Vilendecic

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 5/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

With lumbar discectomy for disc herniation, surgeons must choose between limited nucleus removal associated with higher reherniation risk or more aggressive nucleus removal associated with increased back pain and disc degeneration. This trade-off is particularly challenging in patients with large anular defects, which carry the highest risk of reherniation. We examined the effect of an anular closure device on reherniation and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Seventy-five primary discectomy patients had a limited discectomy followed by implantation of an anular closure device and were followed-up to 2 years. Anular defect size and volume of removed nucleus was recorded at surgery. Reherniations were reported, pain and function were monitored throughout, and imaging was performed at annual visits.

Results

The overall symptomatic reherniation rate was 1.4 %, and the asymptomatic reherniation rate was 1.5 % at 12 months and 5.1 % at 24 months. Both rates compare favorably with literature reports which include symptomatic rates ranging between 2 and 18 % (up to 27 % for patients with large anular defects) and an asymptomatic rate of 13 %.

Conclusions

The low reherniation rate in patients at high-risk of reherniation based on anular defect size, despite discectomy being only limited, suggests that an anular closure device may reduce reherniation risk. Clinical outcomes for pain and function at 1 and 2 years post-operatively compared favorably with literature reports. Further study in a randomized controlled trial is required to confirm these results.
Fußnoten
1
Revision surgery and device removal was performed on one patient prior to the 12 month time point (see description of symptomatic reherniation). Presentation of clinical outcomes does not include this patient; data from 40 patients in Cohort B were analyzed at 12 months.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray DT, Deyo RA, Kreuter W, Mirza SK, Heagerty PJ, Comstock BA, Chan L (2006) Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery. Spine 31:1957–1963PubMedCrossRef Gray DT, Deyo RA, Kreuter W, Mirza SK, Heagerty PJ, Comstock BA, Chan L (2006) Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery. Spine 31:1957–1963PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Carragee EJ, Spinnickie AO, Alamin TF, Paragioudakis S (2006) A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect. Spine 31:653–657PubMedCrossRef Carragee EJ, Spinnickie AO, Alamin TF, Paragioudakis S (2006) A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect. Spine 31:653–657PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, Kim D (2003) Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:102–108PubMed Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, Kim D (2003) Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:102–108PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Findlay GF, Hall BI, Musa BS, Oliveira MD, Fear SC (1998) A 10-year follow-up of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy. Spine 23:1168–1171PubMedCrossRef Findlay GF, Hall BI, Musa BS, Oliveira MD, Fear SC (1998) A 10-year follow-up of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy. Spine 23:1168–1171PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Feltes CH, Smisson HF III, Johnston KW, Vogel RL, Robinson JS Jr (2004) Correlation of the amount of disc removed in a lumbar microdiscectomy with long-term outcome. Spine 29:2521–2524PubMedCrossRef Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Feltes CH, Smisson HF III, Johnston KW, Vogel RL, Robinson JS Jr (2004) Correlation of the amount of disc removed in a lumbar microdiscectomy with long-term outcome. Spine 29:2521–2524PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kowalski JM, Olsewski JM, Simmons ED Jr (1995) Results of intervertebral diskectomy without fusion at L4–5 versus L5–S1. J Spinal Disord 8:457–463PubMedCrossRef Kowalski JM, Olsewski JM, Simmons ED Jr (1995) Results of intervertebral diskectomy without fusion at L4–5 versus L5–S1. J Spinal Disord 8:457–463PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Loupasis GA, Stamos K, Katonis PG, Sapkas G, Korres DS, Hartofilakidis G (1999) Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine 24:2313–2317PubMedCrossRef Loupasis GA, Stamos K, Katonis PG, Sapkas G, Korres DS, Hartofilakidis G (1999) Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine 24:2313–2317PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariconda M, Galasso O, Secondulfo V, Rotonda GD, Milano C (2006) Minimum 25-year outcome and functional assessment of lumbar discectomy. Spine 31:2593–2599PubMedCrossRef Mariconda M, Galasso O, Secondulfo V, Rotonda GD, Milano C (2006) Minimum 25-year outcome and functional assessment of lumbar discectomy. Spine 31:2593–2599PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Thome C, Barth M, Scharf J, Schmiedek P (2005) Outcome after lumbar sequestrectomy compared with microdiscectomy: a prospective randomized study. J Neurosurg Spine 2:271–278PubMedCrossRef Thome C, Barth M, Scharf J, Schmiedek P (2005) Outcome after lumbar sequestrectomy compared with microdiscectomy: a prospective randomized study. J Neurosurg Spine 2:271–278PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tureyen K (2003) One-level one-sided lumbar disc surgery with and without microscopic assistance: 1-year outcome in 114 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg 99:247–250PubMed Tureyen K (2003) One-level one-sided lumbar disc surgery with and without microscopic assistance: 1-year outcome in 114 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg 99:247–250PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Watters WC III, McGirt MJ (2009) An evidence-based review of the literature on the consequences of conservative versus aggressive discectomy for the treatment of primary disc herniation with radiculopathy. Spine J 9:240–257PubMedCrossRef Watters WC III, McGirt MJ (2009) An evidence-based review of the literature on the consequences of conservative versus aggressive discectomy for the treatment of primary disc herniation with radiculopathy. Spine J 9:240–257PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K (2001) Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine 26:652–657PubMedCrossRef Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K (2001) Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine 26:652–657PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat McGirt MJ, Eustacchio S, Varga P, Vilendecic M, Trummer M, Gorensek M, Ledic D, Carragee EJ (2009) A prospective cohort study of close interval computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging after primary lumbar discectomy: factors associated with recurrent disc herniation and disc height loss. Spine 34:2044–2051PubMedCrossRef McGirt MJ, Eustacchio S, Varga P, Vilendecic M, Trummer M, Gorensek M, Ledic D, Carragee EJ (2009) A prospective cohort study of close interval computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging after primary lumbar discectomy: factors associated with recurrent disc herniation and disc height loss. Spine 34:2044–2051PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Keskimaki I, Seitsalo S, Osterman H, Rissanen P (2000) Reoperations after lumbar disc surgery: a population-based study of regional and interspecialty variations. Spine 25:1500–1508PubMedCrossRef Keskimaki I, Seitsalo S, Osterman H, Rissanen P (2000) Reoperations after lumbar disc surgery: a population-based study of regional and interspecialty variations. Spine 25:1500–1508PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin BI, Mirza SK, Flum DR, Wickizer TM, Heagerty PJ, Lenkoski AF, Deyo RA (2012) Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation. Spine J 12:89–97PubMedCrossRef Martin BI, Mirza SK, Flum DR, Wickizer TM, Heagerty PJ, Lenkoski AF, Deyo RA (2012) Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation. Spine J 12:89–97PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Moliterno JA, Knopman J, Parikh K, Cohan JN, Huang QD, Aaker GD, Grivoyannis AD, Patel AR, Hartl R, Boockvar JA (2010) Results and risk factors for recurrence following single-level tubular lumbar microdiscectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 12:680–686PubMedCrossRef Moliterno JA, Knopman J, Parikh K, Cohan JN, Huang QD, Aaker GD, Grivoyannis AD, Patel AR, Hartl R, Boockvar JA (2010) Results and risk factors for recurrence following single-level tubular lumbar microdiscectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 12:680–686PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Barth M, Weiss C, Thome C (2008) Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 1: evaluation of clinical outcome. Spine 33:265–272PubMedCrossRef Barth M, Weiss C, Thome C (2008) Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 1: evaluation of clinical outcome. Spine 33:265–272PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GL, Datoo G, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A (2009) Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery 64:338–344PubMedCrossRef McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GL, Datoo G, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A (2009) Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery 64:338–344PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Barth M, Diepers M, Weiss C, Thome C (2008) Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 2: radiographic evaluation and correlation with clinical outcome. Spine 33:273–279PubMedCrossRef Barth M, Diepers M, Weiss C, Thome C (2008) Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 2: radiographic evaluation and correlation with clinical outcome. Spine 33:273–279PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ambrossi GL, McGirt MJ, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Long DM (2009) Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after single-level lumbar discectomy: incidence and health care cost analysis. Neurosurgery 65:574–578PubMedCrossRef Ambrossi GL, McGirt MJ, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Long DM (2009) Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after single-level lumbar discectomy: incidence and health care cost analysis. Neurosurgery 65:574–578PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker SL, Xu R, McGirt MJ, Witham TF, Long DM, Bydon A (2010) Long-term back pain after a single-level discectomy for radiculopathy: incidence and health care cost analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 12:178–182PubMedCrossRef Parker SL, Xu R, McGirt MJ, Witham TF, Long DM, Bydon A (2010) Long-term back pain after a single-level discectomy for radiculopathy: incidence and health care cost analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 12:178–182PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Spengler DM (1982) Lumbar discectomy. Results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy. Spine 7:604–607PubMedCrossRef Spengler DM (1982) Lumbar discectomy. Results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy. Spine 7:604–607PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Fardon DF, Milette PC (2001) Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine 26:E93–E113PubMedCrossRef Fardon DF, Milette PC (2001) Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine 26:E93–E113PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lebow RL, Adogwa O, Parker SL, Sharma A, Cheng J, McGirt MJ (2011) Asymptomatic same-site recurrent disc herniation after lumbar discectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study with 2-year serial imaging. Spine 36:2147–2151PubMedCrossRef Lebow RL, Adogwa O, Parker SL, Sharma A, Cheng J, McGirt MJ (2011) Asymptomatic same-site recurrent disc herniation after lumbar discectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study with 2-year serial imaging. Spine 36:2147–2151PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8:131–140PubMedCrossRef Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8:131–140PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Hilibrand A, Albert T, Fischgrund J (2008) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine 33:2789–2800PubMedCrossRef Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Hilibrand A, Albert T, Fischgrund J (2008) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine 33:2789–2800PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Arts MP, Brand R, van den Akker ME, Koes BW, Bartels RH, Peul WC (2009) Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 302:149–158PubMedCrossRef Arts MP, Brand R, van den Akker ME, Koes BW, Bartels RH, Peul WC (2009) Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 302:149–158PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Teli M, Lovi A, Brayda-Bruno M, Zagra A, Corriero A, Giudici F, Minoia L (2010) Higher risk of dural tears and recurrent herniation with lumbar micro-endoscopic discectomy. Eur Spine J 19:443–450PubMedCrossRef Teli M, Lovi A, Brayda-Bruno M, Zagra A, Corriero A, Giudici F, Minoia L (2010) Higher risk of dural tears and recurrent herniation with lumbar micro-endoscopic discectomy. Eur Spine J 19:443–450PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device
verfasst von
Gerrit J. Bouma
Martin Barth
Darko Ledic
Milorad Vilendecic
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2656-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2013

European Spine Journal 5/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.