Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 2/2015

01.02.2015 | Original Article

Outcomes and their predictors in lumbar spinal stenosis: a 12-year follow-up

verfasst von: B. Adamova, S. Vohanka, L. Dusek, J. Jarkovsky, R. Chaloupka, J. Bednarik

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this prospective observational cohort study was to evaluate long-term outcomes in patients with mild-to-moderate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and to analyse the predictors of clinical outcomes.

Methods

A group of 53 patients were re-examined after a median period of 139 months. Evaluations were made of subjective clinical outcome, objective clinical outcome and its predictors, any correlation between subjective and objective outcome, and the development of changes in radiological and electrophysiological parameters after 12 years.

Results

Satisfactory objective and subjective clinical outcomes were recorded in 54.7 and 43.4 % of patients, respectively. No statistically significant correlation between objective and subjective clinical outcome was found (Spearman coefficient = 0.225, p = 0.132). Patients with isolated unsatisfactory subjective outcome exhibited the highest Functional Comorbidity Index of all subgroups. Electrophysiological and radiological findings did not demonstrate statistically significant changes after 12-year follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed only the lowest transverse diameter of spinal canal ≦13.6 mm as an independent predictor of unsatisfactory clinical outcome (OR = 5.51).

Conclusions

Satisfactory objective and subjective clinical outcomes were disclosed in about half of the patients with mild-to-moderate LSS in a 12-year follow-up. The number of comorbid diseases had an unfavourable effect on subjective evaluation of clinical outcome. The lowest transverse diameter of spinal canal proved to be the only independent predictor of deterioration of clinical status in LSS patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kreiner DS, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL et al (2013) An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update). Spine J 13:734–743PubMedCrossRef Kreiner DS, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL et al (2013) An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update). Spine J 13:734–743PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Benoist M (2002) The natural history of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis. Joint Bone Spine 69:450–457PubMedCrossRef Benoist M (2002) The natural history of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis. Joint Bone Spine 69:450–457PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnsson KE, Rosen I, Uden A (1992) The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 279:82–86PubMed Johnsson KE, Rosen I, Uden A (1992) The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 279:82–86PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 25:1424–1435PubMedCrossRef Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 25:1424–1435PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Keller RB et al (1996) The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, part III. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21:1787–1794PubMedCrossRef Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Keller RB et al (1996) The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, part III. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21:1787–1794PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2000) Surgical and non surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine 25:556–562PubMedCrossRef Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2000) Surgical and non surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine 25:556–562PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2005) Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30:936–943PubMedCrossRef Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2005) Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30:936–943PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurri H, Slätis P, Soini J et al (1998) Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of long-term outcome 12 years after operative and conservative treatment. J Spinal Disord 11:110–115PubMedCrossRef Hurri H, Slätis P, Soini J et al (1998) Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of long-term outcome 12 years after operative and conservative treatment. J Spinal Disord 11:110–115PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Simotas AC, Dorey FJ, Hansraj KK, Cammisa F Jr (2000) Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis. Spine 25:197–203PubMedCrossRef Simotas AC, Dorey FJ, Hansraj KK, Cammisa F Jr (2000) Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis. Spine 25:197–203PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD et al (2010) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine 35:1329–1338PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD et al (2010) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine 35:1329–1338PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M et al (2007) Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine 32:1–8PubMedCrossRef Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M et al (2007) Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine 32:1–8PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Slätis P, Malmivaara A, Heliövaara M et al (2011) Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J 20:1174–1181PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Slätis P, Malmivaara A, Heliövaara M et al (2011) Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J 20:1174–1181PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kovacs FM, Urrútia G, Alarcón JD (2011) Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Spine 36:E1335–E1351PubMedCrossRef Kovacs FM, Urrútia G, Alarcón JD (2011) Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Spine 36:E1335–E1351PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Siebert E, Prüss H, Klingebiel R, Failli V, Einhäupl KM, Schwab JM (2009) Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 5:392–403PubMedCrossRef Siebert E, Prüss H, Klingebiel R, Failli V, Einhäupl KM, Schwab JM (2009) Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 5:392–403PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Strömqvist B, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Jönsson B, Sanden B, Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons (2013) Swespine: the Swedish spine register: the 2012 report. Eur Spine J 22:953–974PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Strömqvist B, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Jönsson B, Sanden B, Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons (2013) Swespine: the Swedish spine register: the 2012 report. Eur Spine J 22:953–974PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsutsui S, Kagotani R, Yamada H, Hashizume H, Minamide A, Nakagawa Y, Iwasaki H, Yoshida M (2013) Can decompression surgery relieve low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with degenerative lumbar scoliosis? Eur Spine J 22:2010–2014PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tsutsui S, Kagotani R, Yamada H, Hashizume H, Minamide A, Nakagawa Y, Iwasaki H, Yoshida M (2013) Can decompression surgery relieve low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with degenerative lumbar scoliosis? Eur Spine J 22:2010–2014PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sobottke R, Aghayev E, Röder C, Eysel P, Delank SK, Zweig T (2012) Predictors of surgical, general and follow-up complications in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age as emerged from the Spine Tango Registry. Eur Spine J 21:411–417PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sobottke R, Aghayev E, Röder C, Eysel P, Delank SK, Zweig T (2012) Predictors of surgical, general and follow-up complications in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age as emerged from the Spine Tango Registry. Eur Spine J 21:411–417PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Strömqvist F, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B, Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons (2012) Dural lesions in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcome. Eur Spine J 21:825–828PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Strömqvist F, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B, Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons (2012) Dural lesions in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcome. Eur Spine J 21:825–828PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Haig AJ, Tong HC, Yamakawa KS et al (2006) Predictors of pain and function in persons with spinal stenosis, low back pain, and no back pain. Spine 31:2950–2957PubMedCrossRef Haig AJ, Tong HC, Yamakawa KS et al (2006) Predictors of pain and function in persons with spinal stenosis, low back pain, and no back pain. Spine 31:2950–2957PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Micankova Adamova B, Vohanka S, Dusek L, Jarkovsky J, Bednarik J (2012) Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 21:2611–2619PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Micankova Adamova B, Vohanka S, Dusek L, Jarkovsky J, Bednarik J (2012) Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 21:2611–2619PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Micankova Adamova B, Vohanka S, Hnojcikova M, Okacova I, Dusek L, Bednarik J (2013) Neurological impairment score in lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 22:1897–1906PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Micankova Adamova B, Vohanka S, Hnojcikova M, Okacova I, Dusek L, Bednarik J (2013) Neurological impairment score in lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 22:1897–1906PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Groll DL, To T, Bombardier C, Wright JG (2005) The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome. J Clin Epidemiol 58:595–602PubMedCrossRef Groll DL, To T, Bombardier C, Wright JG (2005) The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome. J Clin Epidemiol 58:595–602PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearson A, Lurie J, Tosteson T, Zhao W, Abdu W, Weinstein JN (2012) Who should have surgery for spinal stenosis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT. Spine 37:1791–1802PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pearson A, Lurie J, Tosteson T, Zhao W, Abdu W, Weinstein JN (2012) Who should have surgery for spinal stenosis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT. Spine 37:1791–1802PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F et al (2006) Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine 31:E648–E663PubMedCrossRef Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F et al (2006) Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine 31:E648–E663PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Athiviraham A, Wali ZA, Yen D (2011) Predictive factors influencing clinical outcome with operative management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 11:613–617PubMedCrossRef Athiviraham A, Wali ZA, Yen D (2011) Predictive factors influencing clinical outcome with operative management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 11:613–617PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Brick GW et al (1995) Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction after laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 20:1155–1160PubMedCrossRef Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Brick GW et al (1995) Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction after laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 20:1155–1160PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng LC, Tafazal S, Sell P (2007) The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 16:199–206PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ng LC, Tafazal S, Sell P (2007) The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 16:199–206PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Outcomes and their predictors in lumbar spinal stenosis: a 12-year follow-up
verfasst von
B. Adamova
S. Vohanka
L. Dusek
J. Jarkovsky
R. Chaloupka
J. Bednarik
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3411-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

European Spine Journal 2/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.