Introduction
Sciatica due to lumbar disk herniation (LDH) represents one of the most frequent indications for lumbar spine surgery [
1]. While patient satisfaction and rates of improvement in pain and functional impairment are usually very high after microdiscectomy, reoperations due to recurrent LDH (rLDH) are not uncommon, with incidences ranging between 2 and 11% [
2‐
8]. Reoperations for rLDH can incur high direct and indirect health care-associated costs, as well as additional complications and morbidity [
6,
7,
9].
While risk factors for primary LDH have been relatively well-established, the literature is rather sparse on risk factors for rLDH. Still, several studies have investigated risk factors or potential etiologies for rLDH, however with often inconsistent results, low statistical power, or low effect sizes for certain potential risk factors [
3,
7,
10‐
14]. Knowledge of robust risk factors for reherniation with a clinically relevant effect size would be clinically beneficial, especially if those risk factors were modifiable, such as “lifestyle” factors like smoking and body weight [
15].
Multiple studies have assessed the effect of weight or Body mass index (BMI) on the incidence of rLDH. While some papers were able to detect an association between overweight and higher reoperation rates [
14,
16], other studies identified no effect [
3,
11‐
13,
17,
18]. Some investigators have identified a positive association among smoking and reoperation rate [
3,
11,
13], while one paper found no difference [
12]. However, the main limitation for almost all of these studies investigating the association of “lifestyle” factors smoking and body weight on rLDH demonstrated low sample sizes and consequently low statistical power, which is why additional studies with prospective and larger patient cohorts have been called for [
3,
13]. In addition, no studies have assessed the influence of these risk factors on time to recurrence.
Identifying such risk factors and etiologies may not only help to better understand the nature of rLDH, but–in case of modifiable risk factors–may also lead to lower reoperation rates through optimal pre and postoperative patient management. Thus, any robust, modifiable “lifestyle” risk factor for rLDH would be clinically valuable. We evaluate the effect of BMI and smoking on the incidence and timing of rLDH after microdiscectomy.
Discussion
Using a large patient sample from a prospective institutional registry, the association of the two “lifestyle” factors body weight–captured as BMI–and active smoking with the incidence and timing of symptomatic rLDH requiring reoperation was evaluated. Out of all patients, around five percent necessitated reoperation for recurrent herniation. Both active smoking and overweight led to consistent and clinically relevant increases in the incidence of rLDH. Multivariable logistic and survival modeling corroborated these findings. A combination of the two risk factors led to the highest odds of developing rLDH requiring reoperation. However, active smoking and overweight do not appear to influence the timing of rLDH requiring surgical treatment.
Symptomatic recurrent disk herniation is relatively common after primary microdiscectomy, often requires patients to undergo redo surgery which puts them at excess risk for other surgical and medical complications, and also incurs high direct and indirect health care costs [
9]. The reoperation rate of 5.5% after primary tubular microdiscectomy conforms with values ranging between 3 and 13% in the contemporary literature [
2‐
8]. Preoperative risk assessment can be beneficial for improved patient counseling and individualized risk–benefit discussion [
15,
27], although patient-specific risk factors for reherniation would only very rarely dissuade from surgery once a clear indication for surgery is given. This is why–apart from potentially contributing to the understanding of the etiopathology of recurrence–risk factors are the most clinically relevant if they are modifiable [
15].
Several studies have investigated the effect of BMI or smoking on rLDH, with conflicting results. Most of these studies have included smaller cohorts of less than 300 patients and correspondingly even fewer patients with rLDH, with consequently less powerful effect estimates [
3,
11,
14,
18]. A meta-analysis conducted by Huang et al. [
13] demonstrated an increased risk for rLDH in smokers (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.53–2.58), and no effect of overweight (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.57–2.16) based on only two studies, with relatively low heterogeneity. Our findings demonstrate a recurrence-promoting effect of both overweight and active smoking with higher statistical power and prospective data, which corresponds to the results of the majority of studies [
3,
11,
13,
18]. Furthermore, the accumulative effect of the two risk factors observed in our data further corroborates their potential to causatively promote rLDH (“biological gradient”) [
28].
Still, the nature of the effect of smoking on rLDH pathophysiology remains poorly understood. In an experimental biological study with mice, smoking has been shown to lead to misalignment and lesions of the annulus fibrosus [
29]. In addition, the vasoconstrictor effect of nicotine may also inhibit the synthesis of proteoglycans, consequently leading to a more vulnerable disk [
30,
31]. Lastly, chronic cough as a consequence of smoking was also shown to increase intradiscal pressure and therefore potentially lead to recurrent disk herniations, especially when also considering the effects of smoking on wound healing in other domains [
32‐
34].
The effect of overweight on rLDH in the literature remains more unclear [
3,
4,
11,
13,
14,
16‐
18]. Overweight and especially obesity have been well-described to be an independent risk factor for degenerative disease, including disk herniation as well as degenerative disk disease and spondylolysis [
35‐
39]. These effects may be partially explained by the elevated mechanical load on the spine that comes along with obesity, especially with abdominal obesity [
40]. Obese patients also tend to undergo changes in posture and flexibility of the thoracolumbar spine, resulting in postures that increase the mechanical load on the spine [
41]. On the other hand, adipose tissue produces and releases adipokines such as leptin and adiponectin, which in turn induce inflammatory and degrading processes leading to disk degeneration [
42,
43]. A study investigating glycosaminoglycan (GAG) concentration in the nucleus pulposus found decreased GAG levels in obese patients [
44], which may correspond to morphological finding in degenerated intervertebral disk [
44,
45]. Overall, obese patients also empirically appear to be less likely to experience clinically meaningful symptomatic improvement after discectomy [
46,
47].
While several studies have previously investigated factors associated with rLDH, none have analyzed the timing of recurrence. In our study, active smokers and overweight patients did not significantly differ in the speed of their progression to rLDH compared to their non-smoking and normal-weight counterparts.
In combination with the literature, our findings suggest that both overweight–especially obesity–and active smoking independently promote symptomatic rLDH requiring reoperation. The effect sizes, which were reproduced through multiple analytical methods, further corroborate the potential clinical relevance of our findings: Active smoking led to approximately 1.6-fold increased absolute risk of recurrence, while overweight and obesity led to approximately 1.8-fold and 2.3-fold increased absolute risks of recurrence, respectively. Reoperations for recurrence are inconvenient and costly, and any preventative measures to prevent recurrence requiring redo surgery ought to be considered. In recent years, even implantable devices have been trialed to reduce the risk of symptomatic reherniation requiring surgery, with mixed results [
23]. Lifestyle risk factors that are modifiable and that have a robust and clinically relevant effect could be very valuable in reducing the incidence of rLDH. Further studies evaluating structured interventions for weight loss and smoking cessation before discectomy should be carried out to assess if these measures can be truly clinically impactful.
Strengths and limitations
The main strengths of this analysis are that its source data originate from a prospective institutional registry, and that the statistical power is very high due to available sample size with complete data. Furthermore, reoperations were systematically tracked. Moreover, we observed large and consistent effect sizes for the associations of BMI and smoking with rLDH, among multiple statistical methods, and there is at least some biological plausibility to support the main findings [
28].
The main limitation however remains the retrospective nature of this specific analysis, as selection bias cannot be ruled out, although all data was collected prospectively and all patients with sufficient data were included. Even though we examined a large prospective cohort, the sample size and consequently power for analysis of time to recurrence was comparatively low. All data stem from a single center, therefore center bias cannot be ruled out. On the other hand, single-surgeon or single-institution study designs eliminate variability in indications or techniques as factors contributing to recurrence. For example, out of surgeon preference, our cohort includes only tubular discectomy cases, which however have been demonstrated to lead to equal outcomes compared to conventional microdiscectomy [
48]. Because of local insurance regulation restrictions, patients aged > 80, with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score > 2 or with a body mass index (BMI) > 35 were not allowed to be operated on in such a setting. Because of these local insurance regulations, patients with very severe comorbidities or very elderly patients were not included in this study, thus our findings concerning obesity can not be extrapolated to patients suffering from class II or III obesity. Because Gadolinium was not routinely used in patients with a clinical suspicion of LDH recurrence, it may be possible that some clinically judged rLDHs had a scar tissue component. To assess the incidence of the modifiable risk factors in a “non-regulated” environment we looked at 100 consecutive spine surgeries in a random time period by one of the authors (JPM), and found a higher incidence of smoking (36%) and a much higher BMI (mean 33.7 ± 7.7, range 21–54, median 32). We also did not study the effects of smoking cessation or smoking quantity on LDH recurrence, nor those of diabetes mellitus or other potentially relevant variables such as disk height or type of job. Lastly, as with primary LDH, many recurrent herniations are asymptomatic [
10], but we did not track patients with recurrent pain in whom redo surgery was not deemed indicated. Consequently, our findings may not necessarily extrapolate to those asymptomatic cases, but can instead only be applied to patients with symptomatic rLDH.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.