Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Häufige urologisch-sexualmedizinische Themen in der Praxis sind das Thema des MMW-Webinars am 5. Juni von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. Konkret geht es um die Frage, wann bei Harnwegsinfektionen auf Antibiotika verzichtet werden kann, und um ein Update zur Therapie von Libido- und Potenzstörungen des Mannes. Der dritte Vortrag behandelt sexuell übertragbare Krankheiten. Stellen Sie Ihre Fragen an die Experten und sammeln Sie 2 CME-Punkte. Jetzt gleich anmelden!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Surgery Today
Erschienen in: Surgery Today 6/2013

01.06.2013 | Review Article

The management of a remnant pancreatic stump for preventing the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy: current evidence and our strategy

verfasst von: Isamu Makino, Hirohisa Kitagawa, Hisatoshi Nakagawara, Hidehiro Tajima, Itasu Ninomiya, Sachio Fushida, Takashi Fujimura, Tetsuo Ohta

Erschienen in: Surgery Today | Ausgabe 6/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is the most common surgical procedure for treating benign and malignant lesions in the body or tail of the pancreas. Although the mortality rate related to DP has recently been reduced, the postoperative morbidity remains high. The most frequent and dismal complication occurring after DP is the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF). Several resection methods and closure techniques for treating remnant pancreas have been developed in an effort to reduce the incidence of complications, especially POPF. However, the optimal procedure has not yet been established. In this review, we summarize the current clinical data and evidence for surgical techniques and perioperative management strategies for preventing POPF after DP. Finally, we introduce our non-closure technique for managing remnant pancreatic stumps.
Literatur
1.
Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–37.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z’graggen K. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1310–4.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Colemanet J. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg. 1993;217:430–5.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Fernandez-del CC, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg. 1995;130:295–9.CrossRef
5.
van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, et al. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 2005;242:781–8 (discussion 788).
6.
Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sitzmann JV, Hruban RH, Goodman SN, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas: 201 patients. Ann Surg. 1995;221:721–31.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Neoptolemos JP, Russell RC, Bramhall S, Theis B. Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1370–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Reeh M, Nentwich MF, Bogoevski D, Koenig AM, Gebauer F, Tachezy M, et al. High surgical morbidity following distal pancreatectomy: still an unsolved problem. World J Surg. 2011;35:1110–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS, Beckett L, Bold RJ. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg. 2002;183:237–41.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Yoshioka R, Saiura A, Koga R, Seki M, Kishi Y, Morimura R, et al. Risk factors for clinical pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: analysis of consecutive 100 patients. World J Surg. 2010;34:121–5.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Kelly KJ, Greenblatt DY, Wan Y, Rettammel RJ, Winslow E, Cho CS, et al. Risk stratification for distal pancreatectomy utilizing ACS-NSQIP: preoperative factors predict morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:250–61.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’graggen K, Hinz U, Wagner M, Bachmann J, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2007;245:573–82.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Pannegeon V, Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, Vullierme MP, Kianmanesh R, Belghiti J. Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: predictive risk factors and value of conservative treatment. Arch Surg. 2006;141(11):1071–6.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Ziegler KM, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Schmidt CM, Bishop SN, Moreno J, et al. Pancreatic surgery: evolution at a high-volume center. Surgery. 2010;148:702–10.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF, Cheow PC, Ong HS, Chan WH, et al. Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg. 2008;143:956–65.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Ridolfini MP, Alfieri S, Gourgiotis S, Di Miceli D, Rotondi F, Quero G, et al. Risk factors associated with pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, which technique of pancreatic stump closure is more beneficial? World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:5096–100.PubMed
17.
Balzano G, Zerbi A, Cristallo M, Di Carlo V. The unsolved problem of fistula after left pancreatectomy: the benefit of cautious drain management. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:837–42.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Ferrone CR, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, Berger D, Zheng H, Rawal B, et al. Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1691–7.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Harris LJ, Abdollahi H, Newhook T, Sauter PK, Crawford AG, Chojnacki KA, et al. Optimal technical management of stump closure following distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective review of 215 cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:998–1005.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Balzano G, Zerbi A, Cristallo M, Di Carlo V. The unsolved problem of fistula after left pancreatectomy: the benefit of cautious drain management. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:837–42.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Nagai S, Fujii T, Kodera Y, Kanda M, Sahin TT, Kanzaki A, et al. Recurrence pattern and prognosis of pancreatic cancer after pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2329–37.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, Mascetta G, Salvia R, Falconi M, et al. Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions. Dig Surg. 2004;21:54–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8–13.
24.
Bassi C, Butturini G, Falconi M, Salvia R, Sartori N, Caldiron E, et al. Prospective randomised pilot study of management of the pancreatic stump following distal resection. HPB. 1999;1:203–7.
25.
Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, Büchler MW, Seiler CM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 2005;92:539–46.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zhou W, Lv R, Wang X, Mou Y, Cai X, Herr I. Stapler vs suture closure of pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2010;200:529–36.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, et al. Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377:1514–22.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y, Hori Y, Ueda T, Takeyama Y, et al. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic dissector or conventional division in distal pancreatectomy for non-fibrotic pancreas. Br J Surg. 1999;86:608–11.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Sugo H, Mikami Y, Matsumoto F, Tsumura H, Watanabe Y, Futagawa S. Comparison of ultrasonically activated scalpel versus conventional division for the pancreas in distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001;8:349–52.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Okabayashi T, Hanazaki K, Nishimori I, Sugimoto T, Yoshioka R, Dabanaka K, et al. Pancreatic transection using a sharp hook-shaped ultrasonically activated scalpel. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;393:1005–8.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Matsumoto T, Ishio T, Sasaki A, Aramaki M, Bandoh T, Kawano K, et al. Pancreatic resection with ultrasonically activated scalpel: preliminary observations. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49:635–8.PubMed
32.
Truty MJ, Sawyer MD, Que FG. Decreasing pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy: saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:998–1007.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Blansfield JA, Rapp MM, Chokshi RJ, Woll NL, Hunsinger MA, Sheldon DG, et al. Novel method of stump closure for distal pancreatectomy with a 75 % reduction in pancreatic fistula rate. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:524–8.
34.
Kawai M, Tani M, Yamaue H. Transection using bipolar scissors reduces pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:366–72.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Hartwig W, Duckheim M, Strobel O, Dovzhanskiy D, Bergmann F, Hackert T, et al. LigaSure for pancreatic sealing during distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg. 2010;34:1066–70.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Nagakawa Y, Tsuchida A, Saito H, Tohyama Y, Matsudo T, Kawakita H, et al. The VIO soft-coagulation system can prevent pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:359–65.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Ikegami T, Maeda T, Kayashima H, Oki E, Yoshizumi T, Sakaguchi Y, et al. Soft coagulation, polyglycolic acid felt, and fibrin glue for prevention of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Surg Today. 2011;41:1224–7.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Moriura S, Kimura A, Ikeda S, Iwatsuka Y, Ikezawa T, Naiki K. Closure of the distal pancreatic stump with a seromuscular flap. Surg Today. 1995;25:992–4.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Kluger Y, Alfici R, Abbley B, Soffer D, Aladgem D. Gastric serosal patch in distal pancreatectomy for injury: a neglected technique. Injury. 1997;28:127–9.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Wagner M, Gloor B, Ambühl M, Worni M, Lutz JA, Angst E, et al. Roux-en-Y drainage of the pancreatic stump decreases pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:303–8.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Oláh A, Issekutz A, Belágyi T, Hajdú N, Romics L Jr. Randomized clinical trial of techniques for closure of the pancreatic remnant following distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 2009;96:602–7.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Suzuki Y, Kuroda Y, Morita A, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y, Kawamura T, et al. Fibrin glue sealing for the prevention of pancreatic fistulas following distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 1995;130:952–5.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Ohwada S, Ogawa T, Tanahashi Y, Nakamura S, Takeyoshi I, Ohya T, et al. Fibrin glue sandwich prevents pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg. 1998;22:494–8.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Velanovich V. The use of tissue sealant to prevent fistula formation after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1222.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Mita K, Ito H, Fukumoto M, Murabayashi R, Koizumi K, Hayashi T, et al. A fibrin adhesive sealing method for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:604–8.PubMed
46.
Yamamoto M, Hayashi MS, Nguyen NT, Nguyen TD, McCloud S, Imagawa DK. Use of Seamguard to prevent pancreatic leak following distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2009;144:894–9.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Thaker RI, Matthews BD, Linehan DC, Strasberg SM, Eagon JC, Hawkins WG. Absorbable mesh reinforcement of a stapled pancreatic transection line reduces the leak rate with distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:59–65.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Ochiai T, Sonoyama T, Soga K, Inoue K, Ikoma H, Shiozaki A, et al. Application of polyethylene glycolic acid felt with fibrin sealant to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula in pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:884–90.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Fingerhut A, Veyrie N, Ata T, Alexakis N, Leandros E. Use of sealants in pancreatic surgery: critical appraisal of the literature. Dig Surg. 2009;26:7–14.PubMedCrossRef
50.
D’Andrea AA, Costantino V, Sperti C, Pedrazzoli S. Human fibrin sealant in pancreatic surgery: it is useful in preventing fistulas? A prospective randomized study. Ital J Gastroenterol. 1994;26:283–6.PubMed
51.
Suc B, Msika S, Fingerhut A, Fourtanier G, Hay JM, Holmières F, The French Associations for Surgical Research, et al. Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2003;237:57–65.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Tashiro S, Murata E, Hiraoka T, Nakakuma K, Watanabe E, Miyauchi Y. New technique for pancreaticojejunostomy using a biological adhesive. Br J Surg. 1987;74:392–4.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Tran K, Van Eijck C, Di Carlo V, Hop WC, Zerbi A, Balzano G, et al. Occlusion of the pancreatic duct versus pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2002;236:422–8.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Kim MP, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, Coleman JA, et al. Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:766–74.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Renou C, Grandval P, Ville E, Laugier R. Endoscopic treatment of the main pancreatic duct: correlations among morphology, manometry, and clinical follow-up. Int J Pancreatol. 2000;27:143–9.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Abe N, Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y, Yamaguchi Y, Yanagida O, Masaki T, et al. Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting for prophylaxis of pancreatic fistula development after distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg. 2006;191:198–200.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Abe N, Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y, Yamaguchi T, Mori T, Atomi Y. Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting: a novel prophylactic measure against pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:373–6.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Fischer CP, Bass B, Fahy B, Aloia T. Transampullary pancreatic duct stenting decreases pancreatic fistula rate following left pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:244–8.PubMed
59.
Rieder B, Krampulz D, Adolf J, Pfeiffer A. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy and stenting for preoperative prophylaxis of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:536–42.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Oida T, Mimatsu K, Kawasaki A, Kanou H, Kuboi Y, Kida K, Amano S. Transduodenal pancreatic juice drainage for preventing pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:177–82.PubMed
61.
Büchler M, Friess H, Klempa I, Hermanek P, Sulkowski U, Becker H, et al. Role of octreotide in the prevention of postoperative complications following pancreatic resection. Am J Surg. 1992;163:125–30.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Lange JR, Steinberg SM, Doherty GM, Langstein HN, White DE, Shawker TH, et al. A randomized, prospective trial of postoperative somatostatin analogue in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Surgery. 1992;112:1033–8.PubMed
63.
Pederzoli P, Bassi C, Falconi M, Camboni MG. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of complications of elective pancreatic surgery. Italian Study Group. Br J Surg. 1994;81:265–9.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Friess H, Beger HG, Sulkowski U, Becker H, Hofbauer B, Dennler HJ, et al. Randomized controlled multicentre study of the prevention of complications by octreotide in patients undergoing surgery for chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1995;82:1270–3.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Montorsi M, Zago M, Mosca F, Capussotti L, Zotti E, Ribotta G, et al. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic resections: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial. Surgery. 1995;117:26–31.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Sohn TA, et al. Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2000;232:419–29.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Gouillat C, Chipponi J, Baulieux J, Partensky C, Saric J, Gayet B. Randomized controlled multicentre trial of somatostatin infusion after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1456–62.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Sarr MG. The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not decrease pancreas-specific complications after elective pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:556–65.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Suc B, Msika S, Piccinini M, Fourtanier G, Hay JM, Flamant Y, French Associations for Surgical Research, et al. Octreotide in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications following elective pancreatic resection: a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2004;139:288–95.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Hesse UJ, DeDecker C, Houtmeyers P, Demetter P, Ceelen W, Pattyn P, et al. Prospectively randomized trial using perioperative low-dose octreotide to prevent organ-related and general complications after pancreatic surgery and pancreatico-jejunostomy. World J Surg. 2005;29:1325–8.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Shan YS, Sy ED, Tsai ML, Tang LY, Li PS, Lin PW. Effects of somatostatin prophylaxis after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: increased delayed gastric emptying and reduced plasma motilin. World J Surg. 2005;29:1319–24.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Koti RS, Gurusamy KS, Fusai G, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery: a Cochrane review. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12:155–65.CrossRef
73.
Borja-Cacho D, Al-Refaie WB, Vickers SM, Tuttle TM, Jensen EH. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:758–65.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Al-Taan OS, Stephenson JA, Briggs C, Pollard C, Metcalfe MS, Dennison AR. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: a review of present results and future prospects. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12:239–43.
75.
Ammori BJ, Ayiomamitis GD. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a UK experience and a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2084–99.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, Nakeeb A, Schmidt MC, Merchant NB, et al. Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg. 2008;248:438–46.PubMed
77.
Velanovich V. Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:95–8.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Eom BW, Jang JY, Lee SE, Han HS, Yoon YS, Kim SW. Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1334–8.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Mehta SS, Doumane G, Mura T, Nocca D, Fabre JM. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution case–control study. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:402–7.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Nakamura Y, Uchida E, Aimoto T, Matsumoto S, Yoshida H, Tajiri T. Clinical outcome of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:35–41.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Vijan SS, Ahmed KA, Harmsen WS, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Nagorney DM, et al. Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study. Arch Surg. 2010;145:616–21.PubMedCrossRef
82.
Abu Hilal M, Hamdan M, Di Fabio F, Pearce NW, Johnson CD. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1670–4.
83.
Matsumoto T, Shibata K, Ohta M, Iwaki K, Uchida H, Yada K, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy: a nonrandomized comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18:340–3.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Kooby DA, Hawkins WG, Schmidt CM, Weber SM, Bentrem DJ, Gillespie TW, et al. A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate? J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:779–87.PubMedCrossRef
85.
DiNorcia J, Schrope BA, Lee MK, Reavey PL, Rosen SJ, Lee JA, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy offers shorter hospital stays with fewer complications. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1804–12.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Kim SC, Park KT, Hwang JW, Shin HC, Lee SS, Seo DW, et al. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2261–8.PubMedCrossRef
87.
Kitagawa H, Ohta T, Tani T, Tajima H, Nakagawara H, Ohnishi I, et al. Nonclosure technique with saline-coupled bipolar electrocautery in management of the cut surface after distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:377–83.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The management of a remnant pancreatic stump for preventing the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy: current evidence and our strategy
verfasst von
Isamu Makino
Hirohisa Kitagawa
Hisatoshi Nakagawara
Hidehiro Tajima
Itasu Ninomiya
Sachio Fushida
Takashi Fujimura
Tetsuo Ohta
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Surgery Today / Ausgabe 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0370-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2013

Surgery Today 6/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Case Report

Acquired hemophilia A caused by factor VIII inhibitors: report of a case

Original Article

Regulatory T cells in the blood: a new marker of surgical stress

Case Report

Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma presenting as an asymptomatic appendiceal tumor: report of a case

Original Article

High expression of cancer stem cell markers in cholangiolocellular carcinoma

Original Article

Intrapleural chemotherapy improves the survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients with positive pleural lavage cytology

Case Report

Invasive Aspergillus infection localized to the gastric wall: report of a case

Leitlinien kompakt für die Allgemeinmedizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Facharzt-Training Allgemeinmedizin

Die ideale Vorbereitung zur anstehenden Prüfung mit den ersten 49 von 100 klinischen Fallbeispielen verschiedener Themenfelder

Mehr erfahren

Neu im Fachgebiet Allgemeinmedizin

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

Wie der Klimawandel gefährliche Pilzinfektionen begünstigt

24.05.2024 Candida-Mykosen Nachrichten

Dass sich invasive Pilzinfektionen in letzter Zeit weltweit häufen, liegt wahrscheinlich auch am Klimawandel. Ausbrüche mit dem Hefepilz Candida auris stellen eine zunehmende Gefahr für Immungeschwächte dar – auch in Deutschland.

Für erste Kopie der Patientenakte sollen Ärzte kein Geld mehr erhalten

Recht für Ärzte Nachrichten

Praxen und Kliniken müssen die erste Kopie einer Patientenakte künftig kostenlos zur Verfügung stellen. Die bisherige Regelung, die noch eine Vergütung vorsieht, wird geändert.

So wirken verschiedene Alkoholika auf den Blutdruck

23.05.2024 Störungen durch Alkohol Nachrichten

Je mehr Alkohol Menschen pro Woche trinken, desto mehr steigt ihr Blutdruck, legen Daten aus Dänemark nahe. Ob es dabei auch auf die Art des Alkohols ankommt, wurde ebenfalls untersucht.

Update Allgemeinmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise