Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2010

01.09.2010 | Epidemiology

BRCA2 N372H polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 44,903 subjects

verfasst von: Li-Xin Qiu, Lei Yao, Kai Xue, Jian Zhang, Chen Mao, Bo Chen, Ping Zhan, Hui Yuan, Xi-Chun Hu

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 2/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Published data on the association between BRCA2 N372H polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between them. A total of 22 studies including 22,515 cases and 22,388 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant associations were found between BRCA2 N372H polymorphism and breast cancer risk when all studies pooled into the meta-analysis (NH versus NN: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.97–1.05; HH versus NN: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.97–1.13; dominant model: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.98–1.05; and recessive model: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.98–1.13). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, still no significant associations were found for Caucasians, Asians, or Africans. When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risk was found for 372H allele based on population-based studies (HH versus NN: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.01–1.21; dominant model: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00–1.10; recessive model: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.00–1.18). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the BRCA2 372H allele may be a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer. However, large sample and representative population-based studies with homogeneous breast cancer patients and well matched controls are warranted to confirm this finding.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108CrossRefPubMed Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK (2000) Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer. N Engl J Med 343:78–85CrossRefPubMed Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK (2000) Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer. N Engl J Med 343:78–85CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J (1995) Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 378:789–792CrossRefPubMed Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J (1995) Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 378:789–792CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pharoah PD, Antoniou A, Bobrow M (2002) Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention. Nat Genet 31:33–36CrossRefPubMed Pharoah PD, Antoniou A, Bobrow M (2002) Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention. Nat Genet 31:33–36CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Healey CS, Dunning AM, Teare MD (2000) A common variant in BRCA2 is associated with both breast cancer risk and prenatal viability. Nat Genet 26:362–364CrossRefPubMed Healey CS, Dunning AM, Teare MD (2000) A common variant in BRCA2 is associated with both breast cancer risk and prenatal viability. Nat Genet 26:362–364CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Spurdle AB, Hopper JL, Chen X (2002) The BRCA2 372 HH genotype is associated with risk of breast cancer in Australian women under age 60 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:413–416PubMed Spurdle AB, Hopper JL, Chen X (2002) The BRCA2 372 HH genotype is associated with risk of breast cancer in Australian women under age 60 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:413–416PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox DG, Hankinson SE, Hunter DJ (2005) No association between BRCA2 N372H and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:1353–1354CrossRefPubMed Cox DG, Hankinson SE, Hunter DJ (2005) No association between BRCA2 N372H and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:1353–1354CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia-Closas M, Egan KM, Newcomb PA, Brinton LA, Titus-Ernstoff L, Chanock S (2006) Polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and risk of breast cancer: two population-based studies in USA and Poland, and meta-analyses. Hum Genet 119:376–388CrossRefPubMed Garcia-Closas M, Egan KM, Newcomb PA, Brinton LA, Titus-Ernstoff L, Chanock S (2006) Polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and risk of breast cancer: two population-based studies in USA and Poland, and meta-analyses. Hum Genet 119:376–388CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pharoah P for The Breast Cancer Association Consortium (2006) Commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphisms and breast cancer: results from the breast cancer association consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1382–1396CrossRef Pharoah P for The Breast Cancer Association Consortium (2006) Commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphisms and breast cancer: results from the breast cancer association consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1382–1396CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Seymour IJ, Casadei S, Zampiga V (2008) Disease family history and modification of breast cancer risk in common BRCA2 variants. Oncol Rep 19:783–786PubMed Seymour IJ, Casadei S, Zampiga V (2008) Disease family history and modification of breast cancer risk in common BRCA2 variants. Oncol Rep 19:783–786PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishitobi M, Miyoshi Y, Ando A (2003) Association of BRCA2 polymorphism at codon 784 (Met/Val) with breast cancer risk and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 9:1376–1380PubMed Ishitobi M, Miyoshi Y, Ando A (2003) Association of BRCA2 polymorphism at codon 784 (Met/Val) with breast cancer risk and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 9:1376–1380PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Menzel HJ, Sarmanova J, Soucek P (2004) Association of NQO1 polymorphism with spontaneous breast cancer in two independent populations. Br J Cancer 90:1989–1994CrossRefPubMed Menzel HJ, Sarmanova J, Soucek P (2004) Association of NQO1 polymorphism with spontaneous breast cancer in two independent populations. Br J Cancer 90:1989–1994CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Millikan RC, Player JS, Decotret AR, Tse CK, Keku T (2005) Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, medical exposure to ionizing radiation, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2326–2334CrossRefPubMed Millikan RC, Player JS, Decotret AR, Tse CK, Keku T (2005) Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, medical exposure to ionizing radiation, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2326–2334CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cochran WG (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10:101–129CrossRef Cochran WG (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10:101–129CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748PubMed Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188CrossRefPubMed DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobias A (1999) Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta-analysis estimate. Stata Tech Bull 8:15–17 Tobias A (1999) Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta-analysis estimate. Stata Tech Bull 8:15–17
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634PubMed Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
BRCA2 N372H polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 44,903 subjects
verfasst von
Li-Xin Qiu
Lei Yao
Kai Xue
Jian Zhang
Chen Mao
Bo Chen
Ping Zhan
Hui Yuan
Xi-Chun Hu
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2010
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0767-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2010

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.