Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health 2/2020

30.01.2019 | Original Paper

The Effect of Religious Beliefs on the Attitude of Aesthetic Surgery Operation in Islam

verfasst von: Ümran Muslu, Emre Demir

Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship between individuals’ attitudes about acceptance of aesthetic surgery (e.g. rhinoplasty, autoplasty, blepharoplasty, and mammaplasty) and some of the worship practices in Islamic religion such as performing prayer, fasting, and going to pilgrimage. Although many people think that aesthetic surgery is inappropriate in Islamic religion, no studies in the literature were found to have investigated this issue. This study collected data through a questionnaire administered to 96 patients who applied to our Plastic Surgery Clinic and underwent various surgical operations and 96 patients who were recommended plastic surgery but rejected to have one; the questionnaire aimed to identify the participants’ frequency of religious worship practices and appropriateness of aesthetic surgery to their beliefs. The participants responded on the frequency of religious worship levels according to the options in the questionnaire. The “Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale” was utilized in order to identify their attitudes towards aesthetic surgery. Levels of performing prayers, fasting, and going to pilgrimage in the groups that accepted surgery and in the groups that rejected surgery were significantly different (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, p < 0.001). In two different groups, the Acceptance of Aesthetic Surgery Scale scores were significantly different within the prayer groups and fasting groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p < 0.001). While the group that accepted surgery indicated no significant differences between those who thought about going to pilgrimage and who did not (p = 0.650), there was a significant difference in the group that rejected surgery (p < 0.001). While 14.6% of the participants in the group that accepted surgery considered aesthetic surgery a sin, this proportion was 56.3% in the group that rejected surgery, and this difference was significant (p < 0.001). In both surgery groups, there were differences in the scale scores of those who considered aesthetic surgery a sin and those who did not (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). There was a significant relationship between worship practices, one of the biggest indicators of the level of belief in Islamic religion, and aesthetic surgery attitudes. However, despite the fact that belief levels affect the decision of having an operation in plastic surgery, in case of serious health problems, the decision of having an operation becomes more important religious beliefs.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adamson, P. A., & Litner, J. A. (2007). Otoplasty technique. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America,40, 305–318.CrossRef Adamson, P. A., & Litner, J. A. (2007). Otoplasty technique. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America,40, 305–318.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Atiyeh, B. S., Kadry, M., Hayek, S. N., & Musharafieh, R. S. (2008). Aesthetic surgery and religion: Islamic law perspective. Aesth Plast Surg,32, 1–10.CrossRef Atiyeh, B. S., Kadry, M., Hayek, S. N., & Musharafieh, R. S. (2008). Aesthetic surgery and religion: Islamic law perspective. Aesth Plast Surg,32, 1–10.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bakhshaee, M., Asghari, M., Sharifian, M. R., Ashtiyani, S. J., & Rasoulian, B. (2018). Islamic attitudes and rhinoplasty. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology,30(2), 91–96.PubMedPubMedCentral Bakhshaee, M., Asghari, M., Sharifian, M. R., Ashtiyani, S. J., & Rasoulian, B. (2018). Islamic attitudes and rhinoplasty. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology,30(2), 91–96.PubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Coştu, Yakup. (2009). Approach to religion by the normative and popular: “A test on the religious orientation scale”. Journal of Divinity Faculty of Hitit University,8(15), 119–139. Coştu, Yakup. (2009). Approach to religion by the normative and popular: “A test on the religious orientation scale”. Journal of Divinity Faculty of Hitit University,8(15), 119–139.
Zurück zum Zitat Damiano, R. F., Costa, L. A., Viana, M. T. S. A., Moreira-Almeida, A., Lucchetti, A. L. G., & Lucchetti, G. (2016). Brazilian scientific articles on “Spirituality, Religion and Health”. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo),43(1), 11–16.CrossRef Damiano, R. F., Costa, L. A., Viana, M. T. S. A., Moreira-Almeida, A., Lucchetti, A. L. G., & Lucchetti, G. (2016). Brazilian scientific articles on “Spirituality, Religion and Health”. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo),43(1), 11–16.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ellison, C. G., & Levin, J. S. (1998). The religion-health connection: Evidence, theory, and future directions. Health Education & Behavior,25, 700–720.CrossRef Ellison, C. G., & Levin, J. S. (1998). The religion-health connection: Evidence, theory, and future directions. Health Education & Behavior,25, 700–720.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fromm, Erich. (1976). To have or to be?. New York: Harper & Row. Fromm, Erich. (1976). To have or to be?. New York: Harper & Row.
Zurück zum Zitat Henderson-King, D., & Henderson-King, E. (2005). Acceptances of cosmetic surgery: Scale development and validation. Body Image,2, 137–149.CrossRef Henderson-King, D., & Henderson-King, E. (2005). Acceptances of cosmetic surgery: Scale development and validation. Body Image,2, 137–149.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Karaca, S., Karakoç, A., Onan, N., & Kadıoğlu, H. (2017). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale (ACSS). Journal of Psychiatric Nursing,8(1), 17–22. Karaca, S., Karakoç, A., Onan, N., & Kadıoğlu, H. (2017). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale (ACSS). Journal of Psychiatric Nursing,8(1), 17–22.
Zurück zum Zitat Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lucchetti, G., & Lucchetti, A. L. (2014). Spirituality, religion, and health: Over the last 15 years of field research (1999–2013). The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine,48(3), 199–215.CrossRef Lucchetti, G., & Lucchetti, A. L. (2014). Spirituality, religion, and health: Over the last 15 years of field research (1999–2013). The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine,48(3), 199–215.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Muslu, Ü. (2018). The evolution of breast reduction publications: A bibliometric analysis. Aesth Plast Surg.,42(3), 679–691.CrossRef Muslu, Ü. (2018). The evolution of breast reduction publications: A bibliometric analysis. Aesth Plast Surg.,42(3), 679–691.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York: Guilford. Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York: Guilford.
Zurück zum Zitat Sloan, R. P., Bagiella, E., & Powell, T. (1999). Religion, spirituality, and medicine. Lancet,353, 664–667.CrossRef Sloan, R. P., Bagiella, E., & Powell, T. (1999). Religion, spirituality, and medicine. Lancet,353, 664–667.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sönmez, A. Ö. (2016). The religiosity scales developed on the measurability of religiosity. SEFAD,36, 557–578.CrossRef Sönmez, A. Ö. (2016). The religiosity scales developed on the measurability of religiosity. SEFAD,36, 557–578.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Effect of Religious Beliefs on the Attitude of Aesthetic Surgery Operation in Islam
verfasst von
Ümran Muslu
Emre Demir
Publikationsdatum
30.01.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Religion and Health / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00767-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Journal of Religion and Health 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe