nach oben

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Erschienen in:

01.01.2009 | original article

Does Mesorectal Preservation Protect the Ileoanal Anastomosis after Restorative Proctocolectomy?

verfasst von: Andreas D. Rink, Irina Radinski, Karl-Heinz Vestweber

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and aims

The technique of rectal dissection during restorative proctocolectomy might influence the rate of septic complications. The aim of this study was to analyze the morbidity of restorative proctocolectomy in a consecutive series of patients who had rectal dissection with complete preservation of the mesorectum.

Patients and methods

One hundred thirty-one patients who had restorative proctocolectomy for chronic inflammatory bowel disease with handsewn ileopouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and preservation of the mesorectal tissue were analyzed by chart reviews and a follow-up investigation at a median of 85 (14–169) months after surgery.

Results

Only one of 131 patients had a leak from the IPAA, and one patient had a pelvic abscess without evidence of leakage, resulting in 1.5% local septic complications. All other complications including the pouch failure rate (7.6%) and the incidence of both fistula (6.4%) and pouchitis (47.9%) were comparable to the data from the literature.

Conclusion

The low incidence of local septic complications in this series might at least in part result from the preservation of the mesorectum. As most studies do not specify the technique of rectal dissection, this theory cannot be verified by an analysis of the literature and needs further approval by a randomized trial.

Michelassi F, Lee J, Rubin M, Fichera A, Kasza K, Karrison T et al. Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study. Ann Surg 2003;238:433–441. discussion 442–445.PubMed

Delaney CP, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Church JM, Hull TL et al. Prospective, age-related analysis of surgical results, functional outcome, and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 2003;238:221–228.PubMed

Tekkis PP, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Remzi FH, Senagore AJ, Wu JS et al. Evaluation of the learning curve in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. Ann Surg 2005;241:262–268. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000152018.99541.f1.PubMedCrossRef

Fazio VW, Tekkis PP, Remzi F, Lavery IC, Manilich E, Connor J et al. Quantification of risk for pouch failure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery. Ann Surg 2003;238:605–14. discussion 614–617.PubMed

Sagap I, Remzi FH, Hammel JP, Fazio VW. Factors associated with failure in managing pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)—a multivariate analysis. Surgery 2006;140:691–703. discussion 703–704 doi:10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.015.PubMedCrossRef

Korsgen S, Keighley MR. Causes of failure and life expectancy of the ileoanal pouch. Int J Colorectal Dis 1997;12:4–8. doi:10.1007/s003840050069.PubMedCrossRef

Heuschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, Autschbach F, Stern J, Lucas M et al. Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 2002;235(2):207–216. doi:10.1097/00000658-200202000-00008.PubMedCrossRef

Tulchinsky H, Hawley PR, Nicholls J. Long-term failure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 2003;238:229–234.PubMed

Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Remzi FH et al. A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann Surg 2006;244:18–26. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000225031.15405.a3.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Grobler SP, Hosie KB, Keighley MR. Randomized trial of loop ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1992;79:903–906. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800790916.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Kienle P, Weitz J, Benner A, Herfarth C, Schmidt J. Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and ileoanal pouch procedure with and without protective ileostomy. Surg Endosc 2003;17:716–720. doi:10.1007/s00464-002-9159-1.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Sugerman HJ, Sugerman EL, Meador JG, Newsome HH Jr, Kellum JM Jr, DeMaria EJ. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion. Ann Surg 2000;232:530–541. doi:10.1097/00000658-200010000-00008.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Carlsen E, Schlichting E, Guldvog I, Johnson E, Heald RJ. Effect of the introduction of total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85(4):526–529. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00601.x.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Kapiteijn E, Putter H, van de Velde CJ. Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands. Br J Surg 2002;89(9):1142–1149. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02196.x.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982;69(10):613–616. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800691019.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 1999;44(1):77–80.PubMedCrossRef

17.

de Oca J, Sanchez-Santos R, Rague JM, Biondo S, Pares D, Osorio A et al. Long-term results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2003;9:171–175. doi:10.1097/00054725-200305000-00004.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Bauer JJ, Gorfine SR, Gelernt IM, Harris MT, Kreel I. Restorative proctocolectomy in patients older than fifty years. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:562–565. doi:10.1007/BF02055379.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, Oakley JR, Lavery IC, Milsom JW et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 1995;222:120–127. doi:10.1097/00000658-199508000-00003.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Keighley MR, Grobler S, Bain I. An audit of restorative proctocolectomy. Gut 1993;34:680–684. doi:10.1136/gut.34.5.680.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Krausz MM, Duek SD. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: twenty years follow-up in 174 patients. Isr Med Assoc J 2005;7:23–27.PubMed

22.

Mathey P, Ambrosetti P, Morel P, Robert J, Schmidlin F, Marti MC et al. Experience suisse de l'anastomose ileo-anale avec reservoir (AIA). Complications et resultats fonctionnels. Ann Chir 1993;47:1020–1025.PubMed

23.

Romanos J, Samarasekera DN, Stebbing JF, Jewell DP, Kettlewell MG, Mortensen NJ. Outcome of 200 restorative proctocolectomy operations: the John Radcliffe Hospital experience. Br J Surg 1997;84:814–818. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800840623.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Carmon E, Keidar A, Ravid A, Goldman G, Rabau M. The correlation between quality of life and functional outcome in ulcerative colitis patients after proctocolectomy ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:228–232. doi:10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00445.x.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Heuschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, Lucas M, Heuschen G, Herfarth C. One- or two-stage procedure for restorative proctocolectomy: rationale for a surgical strategy in ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 2001;234:788–794. doi:10.1097/00000658-200112000-00010.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ Jr, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Veidenheimer MC. Long-term results of the ileoanal pouch procedure. Arch Surg 1993;128:500–503. discussion 503–4.PubMed

27.

McMullen K, Hicks TC, Ray JE, Gathright JB, Timmcke AE. Complications associated with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg 1991;15:763–766. discussion 766–767 doi:10.1007/BF01665312.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Nivatvongs S, Devine RM, Litchy WJ et al. Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa. Ann Surg 1997;225:666–676. discussion 676–677 doi:10.1097/00000658-199706000-00004.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Young CJ, Solomon MJ, Eyers AA, West RH, Martin HC, Glenn DC et al. Evolution of the pelvic pouch procedure at one institution: the first 100 cases. Aust N Z J Surg 1999;69:438–442. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01552.x.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Ikeuchi H, Shoji Y, Kusunoki M, Yanagi H, Noda M, Yamamura T. Clinical results after restorative proctocolectomy without diverting ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004;19:234–438. doi:10.1007/s00384-003-0538-4.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Farouk R, Dozois RR, Pemberton JH, Larson D. Incidence and subsequent impact of pelvic abscess after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1239–1243. doi:10.1007/BF02258220.PubMedCrossRef

32.

MacRae HM, McLeod RS, Cohen Z, O'Connor BI, Ton EN. Risk factors for pelvic pouch failure. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:257–262. doi:10.1007/BF02050412.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Björk J, Akerbrant H, Iselius L, Svenberg T, Oresland T, Pahlman L et al. Outcome of primary and secondary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:984–992. doi:10.1007/BF02235487.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Remzi FH, Church JM, Bast J, Lavery IC, Strong SA, Hull TL et al. Mucosectomy vs. stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: functional outcome and neoplasia control. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1590–596. doi:10.1007/BF02234377.PubMedCrossRef

35.

von Roon AC, Tekkis PP, Clark SK, Heriot AG, Lovegrove RE, Truvolo S et al. The impact of technical factors on outcome of restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:952–961. doi:10.1007/s10350-006-0872-z.CrossRef

36.

Dayton MT, Larsen KR, Christiansen DD. Similar functional results and complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with indeterminate vs ulcerative colitis. Arch Surg 2002;137:690–694. discussion 694–695 doi:10.1001/archsurg.137.6.690.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Pescatori M, Mattana C, Castagneto M. Clinical and functional results after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1988;75:321–324. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800750410.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Schluender SJ, Mei L, Yang H, Fleshner PR. Can a meta-analysis answer the question: is mucosectomy and handsewn or double-stapled anastomosis better in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis? Am Surg 2006;72:912–916.PubMed

39.

Gecim IE, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH, Devine RM, Dozois RR. Does technique of anastomosis play any role in developing late perianal abscess or fistula? Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1241–1245. doi:10.1007/BF02237428.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Yu CS, Pemberton JH, Larson D. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with indeterminate colitis: long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1487–1496. doi:10.1007/BF02236726.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Johnson E, Carlsen E, Nazir M, Nygaard K. Morbidity and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Eur J Surg 2001;167:40–45.PubMed

42.

Pishori T, Dinnewitzer A, Zmora O, Oberwalder M, Hajjar L, Cotman K et al. Outcome of patients with indeterminate colitis undergoing a double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:717–721. doi:10.1007/s10350-003-0116-4.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Svaninger G, Nordgren S, Oresland T, Hulten L. Incidence and characteristics of pouchitis in the Kock continent ileostomy and the pelvic pouch. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;28:695–700. doi:10.3109/00365529309098275.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Meagher AP, Farouk R, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Pemberton JH. J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients. Br J Surg 1998;85:800–803. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00689.x.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Simchuk EJ, Thirlby RC. Risk factors and true incidence of pouchitis in patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomoses. World J Surg 2000;24:851–856. doi:10.1007/s002680010136.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Mowschenson PM, Critchlow JF, Peppercorn MA. Ileoanal pouch operation: long-term outcome with or without diverting ileostomy. Arch Surg 2000;135:463–465. discussion 465–466 doi:10.1001/archsurg.135.4.463.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Thalheimer A, Bueter M, Kortuem M, Thiede A, Meyer D. Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomy in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1011–1017. doi:10.1007/s10350-006-0541-2.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Platell C, Barwood N, Makin G. Clinical utility of a de-functioning loop ileostomy. ANZ J Surg 2005;75:147–151. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03317.x.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Riesener KP, Lehnen W, Hofer M, Kasperk R, Braun JC, Schumpelick V. Morbidity of ileostomy and colostomy closure: impact of surgical technique and perioperative treatment. World J Surg 1997;21:103–108. doi:10.1007/s002689900201.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Garcia-Botello SA, Garcia-Armengol J, Garcia-Granero E, Espi A, Juan C, Lopez-Mozos F et al. A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown. Dig Surg 2004;21:440–446. doi:10.1159/000083471.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E, Arrigain S, Church JM, Preen M et al. Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:243–250. doi:10.1007/s10350-004-0771-0.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Phang PT, Hain JM, Perez-Ramirez JJ, Madoff RD, Gemlo BT. Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown. Am J Surg 1999;177:463–466. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00091-4.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Salemans JM, Nagengast FM, Lubbers EJ, Kuijpers JH. Postoperative and long-term results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis coli. Dig Dis Sci 1992;37:1882–1889. doi:10.1007/BF01308083.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Jarvinen HJ, Luukkonen P. Experience with restorative proctocolectomy in 201 patients. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1993;82:159–164.PubMed

55.

Braun J, Treutner KH, Schumpelick V. Stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with resection of the anal transition zone. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:142–147. doi:10.1007/BF00298536.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Everett WG. Experience of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir. Br J Surg 1989;76:77–81. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800760125.PubMedCrossRef

57.

McCourtney JS, Finlay IG. Totally stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1997;84:808–812. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800840621.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ, van Deventer SJ, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2004;240:984–891. discussion 991–992. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000145923.03130.1c.

59.

Panis Y, Bonhomme N, Hautefeuille P, Valleur P. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with mesorectal excision for rectal cancer complicating familial adenomatous polyposis. Eur J Surg 1996;162:817–821.PubMed

60.

Hueting WE, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Sexual function and continence after ileo pouch anal anastomosis: a comparison between a meta-analysis and a questionnaire survey. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004;19:215–218. doi:10.1007/s00384-003-0543-7.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Damgaard B, Wettergren A, Kirkegaard P. Social and sexual function following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:286–289. doi:10.1007/BF02055604.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Dozois RR, Nelson H, Metcalf AM. Fonction sexuelle apres anastomose ileo-anale. Ann Chir 1993;47:1009–1013.PubMed

63.

Tiainen J, Matikainen M, Hiltunen KM. Ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis, sexual dysfunction, and fertility. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999;34:185–188. doi:10.1080/00365529950173069.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Rink AD, Nagelschmidt M, Radinski I, Vestweber KH. Evaluation of vector manometry for characterization of functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23(8):807–815. doi:10.1007/s00384-008-0473-5.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Atkinson KG, Owen DA, Wankling G. Restorative proctocolectomy and indeterminate colitis. Am J Surg 1994;167:516–518. doi:10.1016/0002-9610(94)90248-8.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Foley EF, Schoetz DJ Jr, Roberts PL, Marcello PW, Murray JJ, Coller JA et al. Rediversion after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Causes of failures and predictors of subsequent pouch salvage. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:793–798. doi:10.1007/BF02049833.PubMedCrossRef

67.

Gullberg K, Liljeqvist L. Stapled ileoanal pouches without loop ileostomy: a prospective study in 86 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2001;16:221–227. doi:10.1007/s003840100289.PubMedCrossRef

68.

Hulten L. Problems after ileo-pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. How can we prevent it? What can we do. Neth J Med 1994;45:80–85.PubMed

69.

Lake JP, Firoozmand E, Kang JC, Vassiliu P, Chan LS, Vukasin P et al. Effect of high-dose steroids on anastomotic complications after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8:547–551. doi:10.1016/j.gassur.2004.01.002.PubMedCrossRef

70.

McIntyre PB, Pemberton JH, Beart RW Jr, Devine RM, Nivatvongs S. Double-stapled vs. handsewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:430–433. doi:10.1007/BF02076186.PubMedCrossRef

71.

Poggioli G, Marchetti F, Selleri S, Laureti S, Stocchi L, Gozzetti G. Redo pouches: salvaging of failed ileal pouch-anal anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:492–496. doi:10.1007/BF02050016.PubMedCrossRef

72.

Schippers E, Braun J, Willis S, Schumpelick V. Die direkte ileumpouchanale Anastomose bei der Colitis ulcerosa: Funktion und Komplikationen nach Stapler-Technik. Zentralbl Chir 1998;123:381–387.PubMed

73.

Setti-Carraro P, Ritchie JK, Wilkinson KH, Nicholls RJ, Hawley PR. The first 10 years’ experience of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Gut 1994;35:1070–1075. doi:10.1136/gut.35.8.1070.PubMedCrossRef

74.

Ziv Y, Church JM, Fazio VW, King TM, Lavery IC. Effect of systemic steroids on ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:504–508. doi:10.1007/BF02058701.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Does Mesorectal Preservation Protect the Ileoanal Anastomosis after Restorative Proctocolectomy?
verfasst von: Andreas D. Rink
Irina Radinski
Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2009
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2009
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0665-x

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Does Mesorectal Preservation Protect the Ileoanal Anastomosis after Restorative Proctocolectomy?

Abstract

Background and aims

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background and aims

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2009

Rectal and Pouch Recurrences After Surgical Treatment for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Learning from Adverse Events and Near Misses

Death after Bowel Resection: Patient Disease, Not Surgeon Error

Outcome of Right Colectomy for Cancer in Octogenarians

Predicting Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction: An Old Problem Revisited

Multiagent Chemotherapy for Isolated Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Single-centered Retrospective Study

Update Chirurgie