Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2015

01.09.2015

Reflecting on Diagnostic Errors: Taking a Second Look is Not Enough

verfasst von: Sandra D. Monteiro, PhD, Jonathan Sherbino, MD, Ameen Patel, MD, Ian Mazzetti, MD, Geoffrey R. Norman, PhD, Elizabeth Howey, BSc

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 9/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

An experimenter controlled form of reflection has been shown to improve the detection and correction of diagnostic errors in some situations; however, the benefits of participant-controlled reflection have not been assessed.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of the current study is to examine how experience and a self-directed decision to reflect affect the accuracy of revised diagnoses.

DESIGN

Medical residents diagnosed 16 medical cases (pass 1). Participants were then given the opportunity to reflect on each case and revise their diagnoses (pass 2).

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-seven medical Residents in post-graduate year (PGY) 1, 2 and 3 were recruited from Hamilton Health Care Centres.

MAIN MEASURES

Diagnoses were scored as 0 (incorrect), 1 (partially correct) and 2 (correct). Accuracies and response times in pass 1 were analyzed using an ANOVA with three factors—PGY, Decision to revise yes/no, and Case 1–16, averaged across residents. The extent to which additional reflection affected accuracy was examined by analyzing only those cases that were revised, using a repeated measures ANOVA, with pass 1 or 2 as a within subject factor, and PGY and Case or Resident as a between-subject factor.

KEY RESULTS

The mean score at pass 1 for each level was PGY1, 1.17 (SE 0.50); PGY2, 1.35 (SE 0.67) and PGY3, 1.27 (SE 0.94). While there was a trend for increased accuracy with level, this did not achieve significance. The number of residents at each level who revised at least one diagnosis was 12/19 PGY1 (63 %), 9/11 PGY2 (82 %) and 8/17 PGY3 (47 %). Only 8 % of diagnoses were revised resulting in a small but significant increase in scores from Pass 1 to 2, from 1.20/2 to 1.22 /2 (t = 2.15, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Participants did engage in self-directed reflection for incorrect diagnoses; however, this strategy provided minimal benefits compared to knowing the correct answer. Education strategies should be directed at improving formal and experiential knowledge.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans JSB. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:255–278.CrossRefPubMed Evans JSB. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:255–278.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans JSB, Stanovich KE. Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013;8(3):223–241.CrossRefPubMed Evans JSB, Stanovich KE. Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013;8(3):223–241.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman D, Frederick S. Representativeness revisited: attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002:49–81.CrossRef Kahneman D, Frederick S. Representativeness revisited: attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002:49–81.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanovich KE, West RF. On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;94(4):672.CrossRefPubMed Stanovich KE, West RF. On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;94(4):672.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Croskerry P, Sinclair D. Emergency medicine: a practice prone to error. CJEM. 2001;3(4):271–276.PubMed Croskerry P, Sinclair D. Emergency medicine: a practice prone to error. CJEM. 2001;3(4):271–276.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Croskerry P. Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decision making. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(1):110–120.CrossRefPubMed Croskerry P. Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decision making. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(1):110–120.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Croskerry P. Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process theory of reasoning. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14(1):27–35.CrossRef Croskerry P. Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process theory of reasoning. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14(1):27–35.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chisholm CD, Weaver CS, Whenmouth L, Giles B. A task analysis of emergency physician activities in academic and community settings. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(2):117–122.CrossRefPubMed Chisholm CD, Weaver CS, Whenmouth L, Giles B. A task analysis of emergency physician activities in academic and community settings. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(2):117–122.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Graber ML, Gordon R, Franklin N. Reducing diagnostic errors in medicine: what’s the goal? Acad Med. 2002;77(10):981–992.CrossRefPubMed Graber ML, Gordon R, Franklin N. Reducing diagnostic errors in medicine: what’s the goal? Acad Med. 2002;77(10):981–992.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiff GD, Bates DW. Can electronic clinical documentation help prevent diagnostic errors? N Engl J Med. 2010;362(12):1066–1069.CrossRefPubMed Schiff GD, Bates DW. Can electronic clinical documentation help prevent diagnostic errors? N Engl J Med. 2010;362(12):1066–1069.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Redelmeier DA. The cognitive psychology of missed diagnoses. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(2):115–120.CrossRefPubMed Redelmeier DA. The cognitive psychology of missed diagnoses. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(2):115–120.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sherbino J, Dore KL, Siu E, Norman GR. The effectiveness of cognitive forcing strategies to decrease diagnostic error: an exploratory study. Teach Learn Med. 2011;23(1):78–84.CrossRefPubMed Sherbino J, Dore KL, Siu E, Norman GR. The effectiveness of cognitive forcing strategies to decrease diagnostic error: an exploratory study. Teach Learn Med. 2011;23(1):78–84.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sherbino J, Kulasegaram K, Howey E, Norman G. Ineffectiveness of cognitive forcing strategies to reduce biases in diagnostic reasoning: a controlled trial. CJEM. 2012;15:1–7. Sherbino J, Kulasegaram K, Howey E, Norman G. Ineffectiveness of cognitive forcing strategies to reduce biases in diagnostic reasoning: a controlled trial. CJEM. 2012;15:1–7.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sherbino J, Dore KL, Wood TJ, Young ME, Gaissmeier W, Krueger S, Norman GR. The relationship between response time and diagnostic accuracy. Acad Med. 2011;87:785–791.CrossRef Sherbino J, Dore KL, Wood TJ, Young ME, Gaissmeier W, Krueger S, Norman GR. The relationship between response time and diagnostic accuracy. Acad Med. 2011;87:785–791.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Norman GR, Sherbino J, Dore K, Young M, Gaissmeier W, Monteiro S, Kreuger S. The etiology of diagnostic errors: a controlled trial of system 1 vs. system 2 reasoning. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):277–284.CrossRefPubMed Norman GR, Sherbino J, Dore K, Young M, Gaissmeier W, Monteiro S, Kreuger S. The etiology of diagnostic errors: a controlled trial of system 1 vs. system 2 reasoning. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):277–284.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Monteiro SD, Sherbino JD, Ilgen JS, Dore KL, Wood TJ, Young ME, Bandiera G, et al. Disrupting diagnostic reasoning: do interruptions, instructions, and experience affect the diagnostic accuracy and response time of residents and emergency physicians? Acad Med. 2015;89(2):277–284. Monteiro SD, Sherbino JD, Ilgen JS, Dore KL, Wood TJ, Young ME, Bandiera G, et al. Disrupting diagnostic reasoning: do interruptions, instructions, and experience affect the diagnostic accuracy and response time of residents and emergency physicians? Acad Med. 2015;89(2):277–284.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ilgen JS, Bowen JL, McIntyre LA, Banh KV, Barnes D, Coates WC, Druck J, Fix ML, Rimple D, Yarris LM, Eva KW. The impact of instruction to use first impressions or directed search on candidate diagnostic performance and the utility of vignette-based assessment. Acad Med. 2013;88:535–541.CrossRef Ilgen JS, Bowen JL, McIntyre LA, Banh KV, Barnes D, Coates WC, Druck J, Fix ML, Rimple D, Yarris LM, Eva KW. The impact of instruction to use first impressions or directed search on candidate diagnostic performance and the utility of vignette-based assessment. Acad Med. 2013;88:535–541.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mamede S, Schmidt HG, Rikers RMJP, Penaforte JC, Coelho-Filho JM. Influence of perceived difficulty of cases on physicians’ diagnostic reasoning. Influence of perceived difficulty of cases on physicians’ diagnostic reasoning. Acad Med. 2008;83(12):1210–1216.CrossRefPubMed Mamede S, Schmidt HG, Rikers RMJP, Penaforte JC, Coelho-Filho JM. Influence of perceived difficulty of cases on physicians’ diagnostic reasoning. Influence of perceived difficulty of cases on physicians’ diagnostic reasoning. Acad Med. 2008;83(12):1210–1216.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mamede S, Schmidt H, Penaforte JC. Effects of reflective practice on the accuracy of medical diagnosis. Med Educ. 2008;42:468–475.CrossRefPubMed Mamede S, Schmidt H, Penaforte JC. Effects of reflective practice on the accuracy of medical diagnosis. Med Educ. 2008;42:468–475.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mamede S, van Gog T, van den Berge K, Rikers RM, van Saase JL, van Guldener C, Schmidt HG. Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. JAMA. 2010;304(11):1198–1203.CrossRefPubMed Mamede S, van Gog T, van den Berge K, Rikers RM, van Saase JL, van Guldener C, Schmidt HG. Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. JAMA. 2010;304(11):1198–1203.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zwaan L, Thijs A, Wagner C, van der Wal G, Timmermans DR. Relating faults in diagnostic reasoning with diagnostic errors and patient harm. Acad Med. 2012;87(2):149–156.CrossRefPubMed Zwaan L, Thijs A, Wagner C, van der Wal G, Timmermans DR. Relating faults in diagnostic reasoning with diagnostic errors and patient harm. Acad Med. 2012;87(2):149–156.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Eva KW, Cunnington JP, Reiter HI, Keane DR, Norman GR. How can I know what I don’t know? Poor self assessment in a well-defined domain. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2004;9(3):211–224.CrossRef Eva KW, Cunnington JP, Reiter HI, Keane DR, Norman GR. How can I know what I don’t know? Poor self assessment in a well-defined domain. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2004;9(3):211–224.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat La Rochelle JS, Durning SJ, Pangaro LN, Artino AR, van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth L. Authenticity of instruction and student performance: a prospective randomised trial. Med Educ. 2011;45(8):807–817.CrossRefPubMed La Rochelle JS, Durning SJ, Pangaro LN, Artino AR, van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth L. Authenticity of instruction and student performance: a prospective randomised trial. Med Educ. 2011;45(8):807–817.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman CP, Gatti GG, Franz TM, Murphy GC, Wolf FM, Heckerling, et al. Do physicians know when their diagnoses are correct? J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(4):334–339.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Friedman CP, Gatti GG, Franz TM, Murphy GC, Wolf FM, Heckerling, et al. Do physicians know when their diagnoses are correct? J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(4):334–339.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Reflecting on Diagnostic Errors: Taking a Second Look is Not Enough
verfasst von
Sandra D. Monteiro, PhD
Jonathan Sherbino, MD
Ameen Patel, MD
Ian Mazzetti, MD
Geoffrey R. Norman, PhD
Elizabeth Howey, BSc
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3369-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2015

Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Perioperative Checkpointhemmer-Therapie verbessert NSCLC-Prognose

28.05.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Eine perioperative Therapie mit Nivolumab reduziert das Risiko für Rezidive und Todesfälle bei operablem NSCLC im Vergleich zu einer alleinigen neoadjuvanten Chemotherapie um über 40%. Darauf deuten die Resultate der Phase-3-Studie CheckMate 77T.

Positiver FIT: Die Ursache liegt nicht immer im Dickdarm

27.05.2024 Blut im Stuhl Nachrichten

Immunchemischer Stuhltest positiv, Koloskopie negativ – in solchen Fällen kann die Blutungsquelle auch weiter proximal sitzen. Ein Forschungsteam hat nachgesehen, wie häufig und in welchen Lokalisationen das der Fall ist.

GLP-1-Agonisten können Fortschreiten diabetischer Retinopathie begünstigen

24.05.2024 Diabetische Retinopathie Nachrichten

Möglicherweise hängt es von der Art der Diabetesmedikamente ab, wie hoch das Risiko der Betroffenen ist, dass sich sehkraftgefährdende Komplikationen verschlimmern.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.