Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2019

18.12.2018 | Review Paper

Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research

verfasst von: Thomas W. Concannon, PhD, Sean Grant, PhD, Vivian Welch, PhD MSc, Jennifer Petkovic, PhD, Joseph Selby, MD MPH, Sally Crowe, PG Dip, Anneliese Synnot, MPH, Regina Greer-Smith, MPH, Evan Mayo-Wilson, DPhil, Ellen Tambor, MA, Peter Tugwell, MD MsC, for the Multi Stakeholder Engagement (MuSE) Consortium

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Stakeholder engagement is increasingly common in health research, with protocols for engaging multiple stakeholder groups becoming normative in patient-centered outcomes research. Previous work has focused on identifying relevant stakeholder groups with whom to work and on working with stakeholders in evidence implementation. This paper draws on the expertise of a team from four countries—Canada, Australia, the UK, and the USA—to provide researchers with practical guidance for carrying out multi-stakeholder–engaged projects: we present a list of questions to assist in selecting appropriate roles and modes of engagement; we introduce a matrix to help summarize engagement activities; and we provide a list of online resources. This guidance, matrix, and list of resources can assist researchers to consider more systematically which stakeholder groups to involve, in what study roles, and by what modes of engagement. By documenting how stakeholders are paired up with specific roles, the matrix also provides a potential structure for evaluating the impact of stakeholder engagement.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV. The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA 2014;312(15):1513–1514.CrossRef Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV. The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA 2014;312(15):1513–1514.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, et al. Community-Based Participatory Research: Assessing the Evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 99. AHRQ Publication 04-E022. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004. Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, et al. Community-Based Participatory Research: Assessing the Evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 99. AHRQ Publication 04-E022. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cottrell E, Whitlock E, Kato E, et al. Defining the benefits of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Research White Paper. AHRQ Publication No. 14-EHC006-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. Cottrell E, Whitlock E, Kato E, et al. Defining the benefits of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Research White Paper. AHRQ Publication No. 14-EHC006-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat INVOLVE. Briefing notes for researchers: involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh, UK: INVOLVE; 2012. INVOLVE. Briefing notes for researchers: involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh, UK: INVOLVE; 2012.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14(1):1.CrossRef Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14(1):1.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T, et al. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(12):1692–1701.CrossRef Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T, et al. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(12):1692–1701.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: A systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect 2015;18(5):1151–1166.CrossRef Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: A systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect 2015;18(5):1151–1166.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Forsythe LP, Ellis LE, Edmundson L, et al. Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: Description and lessons learned. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31(1):13–21.CrossRef Forsythe LP, Ellis LE, Edmundson L, et al. Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: Description and lessons learned. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31(1):13–21.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shea B, Santesso N, Qualman A, Heiberg T, Leong A, Judd M, Consumer-driven health care: building partnerships in research. Health Expect 2005;8(4):352–359.CrossRef Shea B, Santesso N, Qualman A, Heiberg T, Leong A, Judd M, Consumer-driven health care: building partnerships in research. Health Expect 2005;8(4):352–359.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat de Wit M, Kirwan JR, Tugwell P, et al.. Successful stepwise development of patient research partnership: 14 years’ experience of actions and consequences in outcome measures in rheumatology (OMERACT). Patient 2017;10(2):141–152.CrossRef de Wit M, Kirwan JR, Tugwell P, et al.. Successful stepwise development of patient research partnership: 14 years’ experience of actions and consequences in outcome measures in rheumatology (OMERACT). Patient 2017;10(2):141–152.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Urquhart-Secord R, Craig JC, Hemmelgarn B, et al.. Patient and caregiver priorities for outcomes in hemodialysis: an international nominal group technique study. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 68(3):444–458.CrossRef Urquhart-Secord R, Craig JC, Hemmelgarn B, et al.. Patient and caregiver priorities for outcomes in hemodialysis: an international nominal group technique study. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 68(3):444–458.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A. Evaluating patients and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. J Comp Eff Res 2015;4(2):133–145.CrossRef Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A. Evaluating patients and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. J Comp Eff Res 2015;4(2):133–145.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullins CD, Abdulhalim AM, Lavallee DC. Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. JAMA 2012;307(15):1587–1588.CrossRef Mullins CD, Abdulhalim AM, Lavallee DC. Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. JAMA 2012;307(15):1587–1588.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA, et al. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27(8):985–991.CrossRef Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA, et al. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27(8):985–991.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Deverka PA, Lavallee DC, Desai PJ, et al. Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: Defining a framework for effective engagement. J Comp Eff Res 2012;1(2):181–194.CrossRef Deverka PA, Lavallee DC, Desai PJ, et al. Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: Defining a framework for effective engagement. J Comp Eff Res 2012;1(2):181–194.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank L, Forsythe L, Ellis L, et al. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual Life Res 2015;24(5):1033–1041.CrossRef Frank L, Forsythe L, Ellis L, et al. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual Life Res 2015;24(5):1033–1041.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tugwell P, Robinson V, Grimshaw J, Santesso N. Systematic reviews and knowledge translation. Bull World Health Organ 2006;84(8):643–51.CrossRef Tugwell P, Robinson V, Grimshaw J, Santesso N. Systematic reviews and knowledge translation. Bull World Health Organ 2006;84(8):643–51.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiller C, Winters M, Hanson HM, Ashe MC. A framework for stakeholder identification in concept mapping and health research: a novel process and its application to older adult mobility and the built environment. BMC Public Health 2013;13:428.CrossRef Schiller C, Winters M, Hanson HM, Ashe MC. A framework for stakeholder identification in concept mapping and health research: a novel process and its application to older adult mobility and the built environment. BMC Public Health 2013;13:428.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Haire C, McPheeters M, Nakamoto EK, et al. Methods for engaging stakeholders to identify and prioritize future research needs. Methods Future Research Needs Report No. 4. AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC044-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. O’Haire C, McPheeters M, Nakamoto EK, et al. Methods for engaging stakeholders to identify and prioritize future research needs. Methods Future Research Needs Report No. 4. AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC044-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Esposito D, Heeringa J, Bradley K, Croake S, Kimmey L. PCORI Dissemination and Implementation Framework. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research; 2015. Esposito D, Heeringa J, Bradley K, Croake S, Kimmey L. PCORI Dissemination and Implementation Framework. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research; 2015.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Morain SR, Concannon TW, Wittenberg E. HIV, breast cancer and vaccines: what to high-profile cases reveal about stakeholder engagement in research? J Comp Eff Res 2017;6(1):43–49.CrossRef Morain SR, Concannon TW, Wittenberg E. HIV, breast cancer and vaccines: what to high-profile cases reveal about stakeholder engagement in research? J Comp Eff Res 2017;6(1):43–49.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gradinger F, Britten N, Wyatt K, et al.. Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review. Health Expect 2015;18(5):661–675.CrossRef Gradinger F, Britten N, Wyatt K, et al.. Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review. Health Expect 2015;18(5):661–675.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Concannon TW. Can Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Improve Health Care? BMJ 2015;351:h3859.CrossRef Concannon TW. Can Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Improve Health Care? BMJ 2015;351:h3859.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Jull J, Mazereeuw M, Sheppard A, Kewayosh A, Steiner R, Graham ID. Tailoring and field-testing the use of a knowledge translation peer support shared decision making strategy with First Nations, Inuit and Métis people making decisions about their cancer care: a study protocol. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4(6). DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0085-3 Jull J, Mazereeuw M, Sheppard A, Kewayosh A, Steiner R, Graham ID. Tailoring and field-testing the use of a knowledge translation peer support shared decision making strategy with First Nations, Inuit and Métis people making decisions about their cancer care: a study protocol. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4(6). DOI https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s40900-018-0085-3
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute of Medicine. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009. Institute of Medicine. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Harvard Business School Press. The Essentials of Negotiation. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing; 2005. Harvard Business School Press. The Essentials of Negotiation. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing; 2005.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Malhotra D, Bazerman MH. Negotiation Genius. New York: Bantam Books; 2008. Malhotra D, Bazerman MH. Negotiation Genius. New York: Bantam Books; 2008.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2011. Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2011.
Metadaten
Titel
Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research
verfasst von
Thomas W. Concannon, PhD
Sean Grant, PhD
Vivian Welch, PhD MSc
Jennifer Petkovic, PhD
Joseph Selby, MD MPH
Sally Crowe, PG Dip
Anneliese Synnot, MPH
Regina Greer-Smith, MPH
Evan Mayo-Wilson, DPhil
Ellen Tambor, MA
Peter Tugwell, MD MsC
for the Multi Stakeholder Engagement (MuSE) Consortium
Publikationsdatum
18.12.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4738-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.