Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2021

28.07.2020 | Original Article

Robotic ileocolic resection with intracorporeal anastomosis for Crohn’s disease

verfasst von: H. Hande Aydinli, Marissa Anderson, Amanda Hambrecht, Mitchell A. Bernstein, Alexis L. Grucela

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The robotic platform can overcome limitations of the laparoscopic approach, particularly in the facilitation of intracorporeal anastomosis creation. We aim to share our institutional experience with robotic ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease (CD) and compare it to a laparoscopic cohort. We identified patients who underwent ileocolic resection for CD with a purely robotic (R) or laparoscopic (L) approach between February 2015 and 2018. Chart review was performed and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data was collected. A total of 47 patients with a mean age of 35.2 years old were identified and 61% were female. Seventy percent [n = 33, (23 females, 69.6%)] of the cases were performed robotically and 30% of the cases [n = 14, (6 females, 42.8%)] were performed laparoscopically. The groups were well matched for age, gender, BMI as well as disease related factors (CD duration; clinical classification and location), perioperative immunosuppression, and surgical history. Time to bowel function was shorter by about 1 day in the robotic group (R: 1.9 ± 0.88 days vs. L: 2.7 ± 0.8 days, p = 0.003). Mean operative time was longer in the robotic group by 51 min and this difference was significant (p = 0.03), however 30.3% of patients underwent ureteral stent placement, which can account for added time in robotic cases. There were less conversions in the robotic group [R: 1(4.3%) vs. L: 1(7%)], but this was not significant. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. Complication (L: 21.4% vs. R: 15.1%, p = 0.605) and reoperation rates (L: 0% vs. R: 3.03%, p = 0.429) were similar. Robotic ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease is as safe and feasible as the laparoscopic approach. This was accomplished with no leaks, major morbidity or mortality and comparable length of stay, with 1 day shorter return of bowel function, and with a lower overall complication rate. The robotic approach offers advantages in Crohn’s disease which should be studied further in prospective studies.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F et al (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 19:117–119PubMedCrossRef Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F et al (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 19:117–119PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrara F, Piagnerelli R, Scheiterle M, Di Mare G, Gnoni P, Marrelli D et al (2016) Laparoscopy versus robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: a single-center initial experience. Surg Innov 23:374–380PubMedCrossRef Ferrara F, Piagnerelli R, Scheiterle M, Di Mare G, Gnoni P, Marrelli D et al (2016) Laparoscopy versus robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: a single-center initial experience. Surg Innov 23:374–380PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3195–3202PubMedCrossRef Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3195–3202PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller PE, Dao H, Paluvoi N, Bailey M, Margolin D, Shah N et al (2016) Comparison of 30-day postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic vs. robotic colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 223:369–373PubMedCrossRef Miller PE, Dao H, Paluvoi N, Bailey M, Margolin D, Shah N et al (2016) Comparison of 30-day postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic vs. robotic colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 223:369–373PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruurda JP, Draaisma WA, van Hillegersberg R, Borel Rinkes IH, Gooszen HG, Janssen LW et al (2005) Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a four-year single-center experience. Dig Surg 22:313–320PubMedCrossRef Ruurda JP, Draaisma WA, van Hillegersberg R, Borel Rinkes IH, Gooszen HG, Janssen LW et al (2005) Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a four-year single-center experience. Dig Surg 22:313–320PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1627–1632PubMedCrossRef Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1627–1632PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, Ikeda Y, Takahashi I, Abe R et al (2002) Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surg Endosc 16:1187–1191PubMedCrossRef Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, Ikeda Y, Takahashi I, Abe R et al (2002) Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surg Endosc 16:1187–1191PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Morpurgo E, Contardo T, Molaro R, Zerbinati A, Orsini C, D'Annibale A (2013) Robotic-assisted intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a case control study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:414–417PubMedCrossRef Morpurgo E, Contardo T, Molaro R, Zerbinati A, Orsini C, D'Annibale A (2013) Robotic-assisted intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a case control study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:414–417PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cleary RK, Mullard AJ, Ferraro J, Regenbogen SE (2018) The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 32:1515–1524PubMedCrossRef Cleary RK, Mullard AJ, Ferraro J, Regenbogen SE (2018) The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 32:1515–1524PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarta C, Bishawi M, Bergamaschi R (2013) Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis: a review. Tech Coloproctol 17:479–485PubMedCrossRef Tarta C, Bishawi M, Bergamaschi R (2013) Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis: a review. Tech Coloproctol 17:479–485PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lujan HJ, Plasencia G, Rivera BX, Molano A, Fagenson A, Jane LA et al (2018) Advantages of robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28:36–41PubMedCrossRef Lujan HJ, Plasencia G, Rivera BX, Molano A, Fagenson A, Jane LA et al (2018) Advantages of robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28:36–41PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Orcutt ST, Balentine CJ, Marshall CL, Robinson CN, Anaya DA, Artinyan A et al (2012) Use of a Pfannenstiel incision in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery is associated with a lower risk of wound complications. Tech Coloproctol 16:127–132PubMedCrossRef Orcutt ST, Balentine CJ, Marshall CL, Robinson CN, Anaya DA, Artinyan A et al (2012) Use of a Pfannenstiel incision in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery is associated with a lower risk of wound complications. Tech Coloproctol 16:127–132PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro R, Keler U, Segev L, Sarna S, Hatib K, Hazzan D (2016) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefits in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 30:3823–3829PubMedCrossRef Shapiro R, Keler U, Segev L, Sarna S, Hatib K, Hazzan D (2016) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefits in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 30:3823–3829PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Grams J, Tong W, Greenstein AJ, Salky B (2010) Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 24:1886–1891PubMedCrossRef Grams J, Tong W, Greenstein AJ, Salky B (2010) Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 24:1886–1891PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Samia H, Lawrence J, Nobel T, Stein S, Champagne BJ, Delaney CP (2013) Extraction site location and incisional hernias after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: should we be avoiding the midline? Am J Surg 205:264–267 (Discussion 8)PubMedCrossRef Samia H, Lawrence J, Nobel T, Stein S, Champagne BJ, Delaney CP (2013) Extraction site location and incisional hernias after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: should we be avoiding the midline? Am J Surg 205:264–267 (Discussion 8)PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S, Piagnerelli R, Annecchiarico M, Coratti F et al (2015) Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study. Surg Endosc 29:1512–1521PubMedCrossRef Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S, Piagnerelli R, Annecchiarico M, Coratti F et al (2015) Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study. Surg Endosc 29:1512–1521PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bandzar S, Gupta S, Platt MO (2013) Crohn’s disease: a review of treatment options and current research. Cell Immunol 286:45–52PubMedCrossRef Bandzar S, Gupta S, Platt MO (2013) Crohn’s disease: a review of treatment options and current research. Cell Immunol 286:45–52PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Heimann TM, Swaminathan S, Greenstein AJ, Greenstein AJ, Khaitov S, Steinhagen RM et al (2017) Can laparoscopic surgery prevent incisional hernia in patients with Crohn’s disease: a comparison study of 750 patients undergoing open and laparoscopic bowel resection. Surg Endosc 31:5201–5208PubMedCrossRef Heimann TM, Swaminathan S, Greenstein AJ, Greenstein AJ, Khaitov S, Steinhagen RM et al (2017) Can laparoscopic surgery prevent incisional hernia in patients with Crohn’s disease: a comparison study of 750 patients undergoing open and laparoscopic bowel resection. Surg Endosc 31:5201–5208PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cirocchi R, Cesare Campanile F, Di Saverio S, Popivanov G, Carlini L, Pironi D et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for obstructing right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Visc Surg 154:387–399PubMedCrossRef Cirocchi R, Cesare Campanile F, Di Saverio S, Popivanov G, Carlini L, Pironi D et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for obstructing right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Visc Surg 154:387–399PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Fleshman J, Anvari M, Stryker SJ et al (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059PubMedCrossRef Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Fleshman J, Anvari M, Stryker SJ et al (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P et al (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236:759–766 (Discussion 67)PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P et al (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236:759–766 (Discussion 67)PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Gasche C, Scholmerich J, Brynskov J, D'Haens G, Hanauer SB, Irvine EJ et al (2000) A simple classification of Crohn’s disease: report of the Working Party for the World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna 1998. Inflamm Bowel Dis 6:8–15PubMedCrossRef Gasche C, Scholmerich J, Brynskov J, D'Haens G, Hanauer SB, Irvine EJ et al (2000) A simple classification of Crohn’s disease: report of the Working Party for the World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna 1998. Inflamm Bowel Dis 6:8–15PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolejs SC, Waters JA, Ceppa EP, Zarzaur BL (2017) Laparoscopic versus robotic colectomy: a national surgical quality improvement project analysis. Surg Endosc 31:2387–2396PubMedCrossRef Dolejs SC, Waters JA, Ceppa EP, Zarzaur BL (2017) Laparoscopic versus robotic colectomy: a national surgical quality improvement project analysis. Surg Endosc 31:2387–2396PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Reitz ACW, Lin E, Rosen SA (2018) A single surgeon’s experience transitioning to robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 32(8):3525–3532PubMedCrossRef Reitz ACW, Lin E, Rosen SA (2018) A single surgeon’s experience transitioning to robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 32(8):3525–3532PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Casillas MA Jr, Leichtle SW, Wahl WL, Lampman RM, Welch KB, Wellock T et al (2014) Improved perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations. Am J Surg 208:33–40PubMedCrossRef Casillas MA Jr, Leichtle SW, Wahl WL, Lampman RM, Welch KB, Wellock T et al (2014) Improved perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations. Am J Surg 208:33–40PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Park JJ, Marecik SJ, Blumetti J, Abcarian H (2010) Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum 53:1000–1006PubMedCrossRef deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Park JJ, Marecik SJ, Blumetti J, Abcarian H (2010) Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum 53:1000–1006PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL (2007) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1701–1708PubMedCrossRef Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL (2007) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1701–1708PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99:1219–1226PubMedCrossRef Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99:1219–1226PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang J, Park YA, Baik SH, Sohn SK, Lee KY (2016) A comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery in the treatment of right-sided colon cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26:497–502PubMedCrossRef Kang J, Park YA, Baik SH, Sohn SK, Lee KY (2016) A comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery in the treatment of right-sided colon cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26:497–502PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Benlice C, Aytac E, Costedio M, Kessler H, Abbas MA, Remzi FH et al (2017) Robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy: a case-matched comparison from the ACS-NSQIP. Int J Med Robot 13(3):e1783CrossRef Benlice C, Aytac E, Costedio M, Kessler H, Abbas MA, Remzi FH et al (2017) Robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy: a case-matched comparison from the ACS-NSQIP. Int J Med Robot 13(3):e1783CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hanna MH, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ, Mills S (2016) Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy. Surg Endosc 30:2792–2798PubMedCrossRef Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hanna MH, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ, Mills S (2016) Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy. Surg Endosc 30:2792–2798PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Parisi A, Scrucca L, Desiderio J, Gemini A, Guarino S, Ricci F et al (2017) Robotic right hemicolectomy: analysis of 108 consecutive procedures and multidimensional assessment of the learning curve. Surg Oncol 26:28–36PubMedCrossRef Parisi A, Scrucca L, Desiderio J, Gemini A, Guarino S, Ricci F et al (2017) Robotic right hemicolectomy: analysis of 108 consecutive procedures and multidimensional assessment of the learning curve. Surg Oncol 26:28–36PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Liao G, Zhao Z, Lin S, Li R, Yuan Y, Du S et al (2014) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol 12:122PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Liao G, Zhao Z, Lin S, Li R, Yuan Y, Du S et al (2014) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol 12:122PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Solaini L, Bazzocchi F, Cavaliere D, Avanzolini A, Cucchetti A, Ercolani G (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32:1104–1110PubMedCrossRef Solaini L, Bazzocchi F, Cavaliere D, Avanzolini A, Cucchetti A, Ercolani G (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32:1104–1110PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Rondelli F, Trastulli S, Avenia N, Schillaci G, Cirocchi R, Gulla N et al (2012) Is laparoscopic right colectomy more effective than open resection? A meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies. Colorectal Dis 14:e447–e469PubMedCrossRef Rondelli F, Trastulli S, Avenia N, Schillaci G, Cirocchi R, Gulla N et al (2012) Is laparoscopic right colectomy more effective than open resection? A meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies. Colorectal Dis 14:e447–e469PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Vignali A, Elmore U, Lemma M, Guarnieri G, Radaelli G, Rosati R (2017) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomoses following laparoscopic right colectomy in obese patients: a case-matched study. Dig Surg 35(3):236–242PubMedCrossRef Vignali A, Elmore U, Lemma M, Guarnieri G, Radaelli G, Rosati R (2017) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomoses following laparoscopic right colectomy in obese patients: a case-matched study. Dig Surg 35(3):236–242PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Magistro C, Lernia SD, Ferrari G, Zullino A, Mazzola M, De Martini P et al (2013) Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy for colon cancer: is there any advantage in short-term outcomes? A prospective comparative assessment in our center. Surg Endosc 27:2613–2618PubMedCrossRef Magistro C, Lernia SD, Ferrari G, Zullino A, Mazzola M, De Martini P et al (2013) Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy for colon cancer: is there any advantage in short-term outcomes? A prospective comparative assessment in our center. Surg Endosc 27:2613–2618PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KH, Ho J, Akmal Y, Nelson R, Pigazzi A (2013) Short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 27:1986–1990PubMedCrossRef Lee KH, Ho J, Akmal Y, Nelson R, Pigazzi A (2013) Short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 27:1986–1990PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Mirnezami AH, Mirnezami R, Venkatasubramaniam AK, Chandrakumaran K, Cecil TD, Moran BJ (2010) Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 12:1084–1093PubMedCrossRef Mirnezami AH, Mirnezami R, Venkatasubramaniam AK, Chandrakumaran K, Cecil TD, Moran BJ (2010) Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 12:1084–1093PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat D'Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C et al (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2162–2168PubMedCrossRef D'Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C et al (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2162–2168PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat DeNoto G, Rubach E, Ravikumar TS (2006) A standardized technique for robotically performed sigmoid colectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 16:551–556CrossRef DeNoto G, Rubach E, Ravikumar TS (2006) A standardized technique for robotically performed sigmoid colectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 16:551–556CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic ileocolic resection with intracorporeal anastomosis for Crohn’s disease
verfasst von
H. Hande Aydinli
Marissa Anderson
Amanda Hambrecht
Mitchell A. Bernstein
Alexis L. Grucela
Publikationsdatum
28.07.2020
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01125-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.