The endocardial endothelial cells and the endothelial cells of intramyocardial capillaries regulate the contractile state of cardiomyocytes via autocrine and paracrine signaling involving NO and endothelin-1. Furthermore, co-culture of cardiac endothelial cells with cardiomyocytes protects those cardiomyocytes from hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis through neuregulin-erbB4 signaling [
55]. This indicates that cardiac endothelial cells exert direct anti-apoptotic effects in addition to their role in oxygen supply, which is needed for cardiomyocyte survival. Cardiac endothelial cells also guide cardiomyocyte organization and promote physiological coupling of cardiomyocytes and their synchronized contraction via influencing the expression of the principal gap junction protein connexin 43 [
56]. On the other hand, upon inflammation [
57] and mechanical load [
58,
59], endothelial cells may contribute to cardiomyocyte hypertrophy via the release of endothelin-1. Cardiomyocytes in turn can affect the coronary vasculature via multiple paracrine signals including endothelin-1 and fibroblast growth factor 2 [
60,
61]. In addition, cardiomyocytes affect long-term growth and development of coronary arterial, venous, and lymphatic trees in which the paracrine release of VEGF-A by cardiomyocytes is of particular importance [
60,
62]. This cardiomyocyte-vascular crosstalk plays a critical role in the vascular adaptation, which takes place during myocardial hypertrophy. An imbalance between vasculature and cardiomyocyte growth may lead to progressive cardiac dysfunction and heart failure [
60]. In brief, the above findings indicate the delicate balance between endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes and imply that changes due to endothelial dysfunction or deterioration may contribute to cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and HFpEF.
Particularly, the contribution of cardiomyocyte stiffness in diastolic LV stiffness and HFpEF is established. Besides intracellular calcium dysregulation, involving dysfunction of the sarcoplasmic reticular adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-driven pump (SERCA), phospholamban (PLB), and/or ryanodine receptor (RYR) 2, cardiomyocyte stiffness is mainly regulated by the giant sarcomeric protein titin [
63]. Titin spans the sarcomere from the Z disk to the M line and functions as a molecular spring supporting early diastolic recoil and late diastolic distensibility of cardiomyocytes [
64]. Evidence that solely titin stiffness is sufficient to induce diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF, independent of extensive collagen deposition, follows from recent experimental studies. Chung et al. generated mice with a deletion of nine immunoglobulin-like domains from the proximal tandem immunoglobulin segment of the titin spring region, which resulted in overall titin stiffness [
6•]. These knockout mice developed HFpEF despite unaltered myocardial collagen content. In addition, Hamdani et al. [
65] recently demonstrated the importance of titin stiffness in the induction of diastolic dysfunction independently of cardiac fibrosis in a rat model of the metabolic syndrome. Besides shortage of titin length by experimental deletion of immunoglobulin-like domains [
6•] or by oxidative stress-induced formation of disulfide bridges within the titin molecule [
66], titin stiffness is also attributed to isoform shifts or posttranscriptional modifications like phosphorylation or oxidation [
64]. Protein kinase Cα phosphorylates titin at its proline, glutamate, valine, and lysine (PEVK) titin region and raises the stiffness of cardiomyoctes from normal myocardium [
67], but not from cardiomyocytes isolated from an animal model of HFpEF [
68]. On the other hand, the protein kinase extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 [
69] and Ca
2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II [
70] phosphorylate titin and lower cardiomyocyte stiffness, though their pathophysiological relevance for HFpEF needs to be further clarified. In HFpEF patients, titin at the stiff N2B isoform is hypophosphorylated [
71]. Protein kinases A [
72] and G [
73,
74••] phosphorylate titin at its N2B segment, and lower cardiomyocyte stiffness, which implies that ß adrenergic stimulation, NO, and natriuretic peptides may decrease cardiomyocyte stiffness. With respect to Ca
2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and its involvement in NO synthesis as a result of Ca
2+-dependent activation of eNOS [
75], it is tempting to speculate that Ca
2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II may further contribute to the relaxation of titin via triggering NO release. Due to the potential risk of arrhythmic death, the induction of protein kinase A via ß adrenergic stimulation is excluded as therapeutical option. Blocking the breakdown of the downstream NO target cGMP via sildenafil has not been successful in HFpEF patients despite promising experimental studies (see infra). In contrast, favorable effects in improving diastolic dysfunction in patients with HFpEF have recently been found by the use of the neprilysin inhibitor (LCZ696), which inhibits the breakdown of natriuretic peptides. Neprilysin activity is induced in obese patients [
76]. The finding that IL-1ß induces neprilysin activity [
77] may explain the increased neprilysin and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) paradox in obese HFpEF patients, which is associated with increased inflammation [
78].