Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Medical Oncology 1/2024

01.01.2024 | Review Article

Estrogen receptor positive breast cancer: contemporary nuances to sequencing therapy

verfasst von: Jenna Schlefman, Christiana Brenin, Trish Millard, Patrick Dillon

Erschienen in: Medical Oncology | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The treatment landscape of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer has evolved dramatically in recent years. While the combination of endocrine therapy and a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor is accepted as standard first-line treatment in most settings without visceral crisis, newer therapies have challenged traditional treatment models where cytotoxic chemotherapy was previously felt to be the only second-line option at time of progression. The incorporation of next-generation sequencing has led to the identification of molecular targets for therapeutic agents, including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and ESR1, though similar pathways can be targeted even in the absence of a mutation, such as with use of inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin. Current data also supports the use of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors beyond progression, even prior to the patient’s first introduction to chemotherapy. The abundance of therapeutic options not only delay time to cytotoxic chemotherapy and antibody–drug conjugate initiation, but has resulted in improvement in breast cancer survivorship. Many unanswered questions remain, however, as to the most efficacious way to sequence these novel agents. To assist in this decision-making, we will review the existing data on systemic therapy and propose a treatment paradigm.
Literatur
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yap YS, Eralp Y, Im S-A, Azim HA, Rihani J, Volkov N, et al. Outcomes with first-line (1L) ribociclib (RIB) + endocrine therapy (ET) vs physician’s choice combination chemotherapy (combo CT) by age in pre/perimenopausal patients (pts) with aggressive HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC): a subgroup analysis of the RIGHT Choice trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:1063. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.1063.CrossRef Yap YS, Eralp Y, Im S-A, Azim HA, Rihani J, Volkov N, et al. Outcomes with first-line (1L) ribociclib (RIB) + endocrine therapy (ET) vs physician’s choice combination chemotherapy (combo CT) by age in pre/perimenopausal patients (pts) with aggressive HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC): a subgroup analysis of the RIGHT Choice trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:1063. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2023.​41.​16_​suppl.​1063.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu Y-S, Mahidin EIBM, Azim H, ERALP Y, Yap Y-S, Im S-A, et al. Abstract GS1-10: Primary results from the randomized Phase II RIGHT Choice trial of premenopausal patients with aggressive HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib + endocrine therapy vs physician’s choice combination chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2023;83:GS1-10-GS1. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.Sabcs22-gs1-10 Lu Y-S, Mahidin EIBM, Azim H, ERALP Y, Yap Y-S, Im S-A, et al. Abstract GS1-10: Primary results from the randomized Phase II RIGHT Choice trial of premenopausal patients with aggressive HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib + endocrine therapy vs physician’s choice combination chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2023;83:GS1-10-GS1. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1158/​1538-7445.​Sabcs22-gs1-10
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sledge GW, Neuberg D, Bernardo P, Ingle JN, Martino S, Rowinsky EK, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193). J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:588–92. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.08.013.CrossRef Sledge GW, Neuberg D, Bernardo P, Ingle JN, Martino S, Rowinsky EK, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193). J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:588–92. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2003.​08.​013.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, Boer K, Bondarenko IM, Kulyk SO, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71159-3.CrossRefPubMed Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, Boer K, Bondarenko IM, Kulyk SO, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:25–35. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(14)71159-3.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Cristofanilli M, Turner NC, Bondarenko I, Ro J, Im SA, Masuda N, et al. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:425–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00613-0.CrossRefPubMed Cristofanilli M, Turner NC, Bondarenko I, Ro J, Im SA, Masuda N, et al. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:425–39. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(15)00613-0.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, Fasching PA, De Laurentiis M, Im SA, et al. Phase III randomized study of ribociclib and fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-3. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2465–72. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9909.CrossRef Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, Fasching PA, De Laurentiis M, Im SA, et al. Phase III randomized study of ribociclib and fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-3. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2465–72. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2018.​78.​9909.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu YS, Im SA, Colleoni M, Franke F, Bardia A, Cardoso F, et al. Updated overall survival of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in pre- and perimenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer in MONALEESA-7: a phase III randomized clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:851–9. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3032.CrossRefPubMed Lu YS, Im SA, Colleoni M, Franke F, Bardia A, Cardoso F, et al. Updated overall survival of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in pre- and perimenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer in MONALEESA-7: a phase III randomized clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:851–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1158/​1078-0432.​CCR-21-3032.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, Jerusalem G, De Laurentiis M, Im S, et al. Ribociclib plus fulvestrant for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer in the phase III randomized MONALEESA-3 trial: updated overall survival. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:1015–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.353.CrossRefPubMed Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, Jerusalem G, De Laurentiis M, Im S, et al. Ribociclib plus fulvestrant for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer in the phase III randomized MONALEESA-3 trial: updated overall survival. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:1015–24. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​annonc.​2021.​05.​353.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Goetz MPT, Juobe MJ et al. MONARCH 3: Interim overall survival results of abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in patients with HR+, HER2– advanced breast cancer. ESMO Congress 2022. Presented September 9, 2022. Goetz MPT, Juobe MJ et al. MONARCH 3: Interim overall survival results of abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in patients with HR+, HER2– advanced breast cancer. ESMO Congress 2022. Presented September 9, 2022.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Finn RS, Rugo HS, Dieras VC, Harbeck N, Im S-A, Gelmon KA, et al. Overall survival (OS) with first-line palbociclib plus letrozole (PAL+LET) versus placebo plus letrozole (PBO+LET) in women with estrogen receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer (ER+/HER2− ABC): Analyses from PALOMA-2. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:11. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.17_suppl.LBA1003.CrossRef Finn RS, Rugo HS, Dieras VC, Harbeck N, Im S-A, Gelmon KA, et al. Overall survival (OS) with first-line palbociclib plus letrozole (PAL+LET) versus placebo plus letrozole (PBO+LET) in women with estrogen receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer (ER+/HER2− ABC): Analyses from PALOMA-2. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:11. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2022.​40.​17_​suppl.​LBA1003.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Nijhof AVO-, Wortelboer N, Noort Vvd, Swinkels ACP, Blommestein HM, Beeker A, et al. Primary outcome analysis of the phase 3 SONIA trial (BOOG 2017-03) on selecting the optimal position of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). J Cli Onco. 2023;41:LBA1000-LBA. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.17_suppl.LBA1000 Nijhof AVO-, Wortelboer N, Noort Vvd, Swinkels ACP, Blommestein HM, Beeker A, et al. Primary outcome analysis of the phase 3 SONIA trial (BOOG 2017-03) on selecting the optimal position of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). J Cli Onco. 2023;41:LBA1000-LBA. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2023.​41.​17_​suppl.​LBA1000
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Rugo HS, Lerebours F, Ciruelos E, Drullinsky P, Ruiz-Borrego M, Neven P, et al. Alpelisib plus fulvestrant in <em>PIK3CA</em>-mutated, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer after a CDK4/6 inhibitor (BYLieve): one cohort of a phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:489–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00034-6.CrossRefPubMed Rugo HS, Lerebours F, Ciruelos E, Drullinsky P, Ruiz-Borrego M, Neven P, et al. Alpelisib plus fulvestrant in <em>PIK3CA</em>-mutated, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer after a CDK4/6 inhibitor (BYLieve): one cohort of a phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:489–98. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(21)00034-6.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston SR, Kilburn LS, Ellis P, Dodwell D, Cameron D, Hayward L, et al. Fulvestrant plus anastrozole or placebo versus exemestane alone after progression on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (SoFEA): a composite, multicentre, phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:989–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70322-X.CrossRefPubMed Johnston SR, Kilburn LS, Ellis P, Dodwell D, Cameron D, Hayward L, et al. Fulvestrant plus anastrozole or placebo versus exemestane alone after progression on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (SoFEA): a composite, multicentre, phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:989–98. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(13)70322-X.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Bidard FC, Kaklamani VG, Neven P, Streich G, Montero AJ, Forget F, et al. Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) versus standard endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III EMERALD trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:3246–56. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00338.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bidard FC, Kaklamani VG, Neven P, Streich G, Montero AJ, Forget F, et al. Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) versus standard endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III EMERALD trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:3246–56. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​22.​00338.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalinsky K, Accordino MK, Chiuzan C, Mundi PS, Sakach E, Sathe C, et al. Randomized phase II trial of endocrine therapy with or without ribociclib after progression on cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer: MAINTAIN trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.02392.CrossRefPubMed Kalinsky K, Accordino MK, Chiuzan C, Mundi PS, Sakach E, Sathe C, et al. Randomized phase II trial of endocrine therapy with or without ribociclib after progression on cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer: MAINTAIN trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​22.​02392.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Mainor CB, Barrows ED, Wang H, Lynce F, Ashai N, Collins JM, et al. A phase I trial of palbociclib (palbo) and bosutinib (bos) with fulvestrant (fulv) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) refractory to an aromatase inhibitor (AI) and a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:1079. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.1079.CrossRef Mainor CB, Barrows ED, Wang H, Lynce F, Ashai N, Collins JM, et al. A phase I trial of palbociclib (palbo) and bosutinib (bos) with fulvestrant (fulv) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) refractory to an aromatase inhibitor (AI) and a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:1079. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2023.​41.​16_​suppl.​1079.CrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer EL RY, Wagle N, et al. Palbociclib after CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy (PACE): a randomized phase II study of fulvestrant, palbociclib, and avelumab for endocrine pre-treated ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer. 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Abstract GS3-06. Presented December 8, 2022. Mayer EL RY, Wagle N, et al. Palbociclib after CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy (PACE): a randomized phase II study of fulvestrant, palbociclib, and avelumab for endocrine pre-treated ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer. 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Abstract GS3-06. Presented December 8, 2022.
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Adapted with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Breast Cancer 4..2023. © 2023 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. The NCCN Guidelines® and illustrations herein may not be reproduced in any form for any purpose without the express written permission of NCCN. To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org. The NCCN Guidelines are a work in progress that may be refined as often as new significant data becomes available. [ Adapted with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Breast Cancer 4..2023. © 2023 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. The NCCN Guidelines® and illustrations herein may not be reproduced in any form for any purpose without the express written permission of NCCN. To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org. The NCCN Guidelines are a work in progress that may be refined as often as new significant data becomes available. [
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Oshaughnessy JA, Blum J, Moiseyenko V, Jones SE, Miles D, Bell D, et al. Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) vs. a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2001;12:1247–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012281104865.CrossRefPubMed Oshaughnessy JA, Blum J, Moiseyenko V, Jones SE, Miles D, Bell D, et al. Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) vs. a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2001;12:1247–54. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1023/​a:​1012281104865.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Seidman AD, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Harris L, Muss H, Marcom PK, et al. Randomized phase III trial of weekly compared with every-3-weeks paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer, with trastuzumab for all HER-2 overexpressors and random assignment to trastuzumab or not in HER-2 nonoverexpressors: final results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 9840. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1642–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.11.6699.CrossRefPubMed Seidman AD, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Harris L, Muss H, Marcom PK, et al. Randomized phase III trial of weekly compared with every-3-weeks paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer, with trastuzumab for all HER-2 overexpressors and random assignment to trastuzumab or not in HER-2 nonoverexpressors: final results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 9840. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1642–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2007.​11.​6699.CrossRefPubMed
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Gasparini G, Dal Fior S, Panizzoni GA, Favretto S, Pozza F. Weekly epirubicin versus doxorubicin as second line therapy in advanced breast cancer. A randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Oncol. 1991;14:38–44.CrossRefPubMed Gasparini G, Dal Fior S, Panizzoni GA, Favretto S, Pozza F. Weekly epirubicin versus doxorubicin as second line therapy in advanced breast cancer. A randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Oncol. 1991;14:38–44.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien ME, Wigler N, Inbar M, Rosso R, Grischke E, Santoro A, et al. Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:440–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdh097.CrossRefPubMed O’Brien ME, Wigler N, Inbar M, Rosso R, Grischke E, Santoro A, et al. Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:440–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​annonc/​mdh097.CrossRefPubMed
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin M, Ruiz A, Munoz M, Balil A, Garcia-Mata J, Calvo L, et al. Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: final results of the phase III Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM) trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:219–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70041-4.CrossRefPubMed Martin M, Ruiz A, Munoz M, Balil A, Garcia-Mata J, Calvo L, et al. Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: final results of the phase III Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM) trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:219–25. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(07)70041-4.CrossRefPubMed
87.
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Bardia A. A closer look at sacituzumab govitecan-hziy. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2020;18:715–7. Bardia A. A closer look at sacituzumab govitecan-hziy. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2020;18:715–7.
95.
Metadaten
Titel
Estrogen receptor positive breast cancer: contemporary nuances to sequencing therapy
verfasst von
Jenna Schlefman
Christiana Brenin
Trish Millard
Patrick Dillon
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2024
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Medical Oncology / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-023-02255-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Medical Oncology 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Perioperative Checkpointhemmer-Therapie verbessert NSCLC-Prognose

28.05.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Eine perioperative Therapie mit Nivolumab reduziert das Risiko für Rezidive und Todesfälle bei operablem NSCLC im Vergleich zu einer alleinigen neoadjuvanten Chemotherapie um über 40%. Darauf deuten die Resultate der Phase-3-Studie CheckMate 77T.

Positiver FIT: Die Ursache liegt nicht immer im Dickdarm

27.05.2024 Blut im Stuhl Nachrichten

Immunchemischer Stuhltest positiv, Koloskopie negativ – in solchen Fällen kann die Blutungsquelle auch weiter proximal sitzen. Ein Forschungsteam hat nachgesehen, wie häufig und in welchen Lokalisationen das der Fall ist.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.