Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Häufige urologisch-sexualmedizinische Themen in der Praxis sind das Thema des MMW-Webinars am 5. Juni von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. Konkret geht es um die Frage, wann bei Harnwegsinfektionen auf Antibiotika verzichtet werden kann, und um ein Update zur Therapie von Libido- und Potenzstörungen des Mannes. Der dritte Vortrag behandelt sexuell übertragbare Krankheiten. Stellen Sie Ihre Fragen an die Experten und sammeln Sie 2 CME-Punkte. Jetzt gleich anmelden!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Sports Medicine
Erschienen in: Sports Medicine 11/2014

01.11.2014 | Review Article

Conventional and Genetic Talent Identification in Sports: Will Recent Developments Trace Talent?

verfasst von: Sarah Breitbach, Suzan Tug, Perikles Simon

Erschienen in: Sports Medicine | Ausgabe 11/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of talent identification (TI) is the earliest possible selection of auspicious athletes with the goal of systematically maximizing their potential. The literature proposes excellent reviews on various facets of talent research on different scientific issues such as sports sciences or genetics. However, the approaches of conventional and genetic testing have only been discussed separately by and for the respective groups of interest. In this article, we combine the discoveries of these disciplines into a single review to provide a comprehensive overview and elucidate the prevailing limitations. Fundamental problems in TI reside in the difficulties of defining the construct ‘talent’ or groups of different performance levels that represent the target variable of testing. Conventional and genetic testing reveal a number of methodological and technical limitations, and parallels are summarised in terms of the test designs, the point in time of testing, psychological skills or traits and unknown interactions between different variables. In conclusion, many deficiencies in the current talent research have gained attention. Alternative solutions include the talent development approach, while genetic testing is re-emphasised as a tool for risk stratification in sport participation. Future research needs to clearly define the group of interest and comprehensively implement all methodological improvement suggestions.
Literatur
1.
2.
Güllich A, Emrich E, Schwank B. Evaluation of the support of young athletes in the elite sport system. Eur J Sport Sci EJSS. 2006;3(2):85–108.
3.
Hohmann A. Leistungsdiagnostische Kriterien sportlichen Talents. Dargestellt am Beispiel des leichtathletischen Sprints (Performance diagnostic criteria for talent in exercise. Illustrated by the example of the athletic sprint). Leistungssport 2001; 31(4):14–22.
4.
Vaeyens R, Lenoir M, Williams AM, et al. Talent identification and development programmes in sport. Current models and future directions. Sports Med. 2008;38(9):703–14.PubMed
5.
Davids K, Araújo D, Vilar L, et al. An ecological dynamics approach to skill acquisition: implications for development of talent in sport. Talent Dev. 2013;5(1):21–34.
6.
Hohmann A, Seidel I. Talententwicklung im Leistungssport. Die Magdeburger Talent-und Schnelligkeitsstudie MATASS1 (Talent development in competitive sport. The Magdeburger Talent and Speed Study MATASS). BISp-Jahrbuch; 2004;185–96.
7.
Heller KA, Ziegler A. Experience is no improvement over talent. Behav Brain Sci. 1998;21(3):417–8.
8.
Davids K, Baker J. Genes, environment and sport performance. Sports Med. 2007;37(11):961–80.PubMed
9.
Phillips E, Davids K, Renshaw I, et al. Expert performance in sport and the dynamics of talent development. Sports Med. 2010;40(4):271–83.PubMed
10.
Morelock MJ. On the nature of giftedness and talent: imposing order on chaos. Roeper Rev. 1996;19(1):4–12.
11.
Gagné F. A biased survey and interpretation of the nature–nurture literature. Behav Brain Sci. 1998;21(3):415–6.
12.
Eysenck HJ. Genius: the natural history of creativity. Vol. 12. Cambridge: University Press; 1995.
13.
Winner E. Talent: don’t confuse necessity with sufficiency, or science with policy. Behav Brain Sci. 1998;21(3):430–1.
14.
Singer RN, Janelle CM. Determining sport expertise: from genes to supremes. Int J Sport Psychol. 1999;30(2):117–50.
15.
Howe MJ, Davidson JW, Sloboda JA. Innate talents: reality or myth? Behav Brain Sci. 1998;21(3):399–407.PubMed
16.
Gagné F. Giftedness and talent: reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gift Child Q. 1985;29(3):103–12.
17.
Gagné F. From giftedness to talent: a developmental model and its impact on the language of the field. Roeper Rev. 1995;18(2):103–11.
18.
Gagné F. Critique of Morelock’s (1996) definitions of giftedness and talent. Roeper Rev. 1997;20(2):76–85.
19.
Bloom BS, Sosniak LA. Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books; 1995.
20.
Hatano G. Might we adopt the learning-related account instead of the talent account? Behav Brain Sci. 1998;21(3):416–7.
21.
Côté J, Lidor R, Hackfort D. ISSP position stand: to sample or to specialize? Seven postulates about youth sport activities that lead to continued participation and elite performance. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009;7(1):7–17.
22.
Baker J, Horton S, Robertson-Wilson J, et al. Nurturing sport expertise: factors influencing the development of elite athlete. J Sports Sci Med. 2003;2(1):1–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Williams AM, Reilly T. Talent identification and development in soccer. J Sports Sci. 2000;18(9):657–67.PubMed
24.
Abbott A, Button C, Pepping GJ, et al. Unnatural selection: talent identification and development in sport. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2005;9(1):61–88.PubMed
25.
Pearson DT, Naughton GA, Torode M. Predictability of physiological testing and the role of maturation in talent identification for adolescent team sports. J Sci Med Sport. 2006;9(4):277–87.PubMed
26.
Anshel MH, Lidor R. Talent detection programs in sport: the questionable use of psychological measures. J Sport Behav. 2012;35(3):239–66.
27.
Roth SM. Critical overview of applications of genetic testing in sport talent identification. Recent Pat DNA Gene Seq. 2012;6(3):247–55.PubMed
28.
Lidor R, Côté J, Hackfort D. ISSP position stand: to test or not to test? The use of physical skill tests in talent detection and in early phases of sport development. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009;7(2):131–46.
29.
30.
31.
Mikulić P, Ruzic L. Predicting the 1000 m rowing ergometer performance in 12–13-year-old rowers: the basis for selection process? J Sci Med Sport. 2008;11(2):218–26.PubMed
32.
Hirose N. Prediction of talent in youth soccer players: prospective study over 4–6 years. Footb Sci. 2011;8:1–7.
33.
Matthys SPJ, Vaeyens R, Coelho-e-Silva MJ, et al. The contribution of growth and maturation in the functional capacity and skill performance of male adolescent handball players. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33(07):543–9.PubMed
34.
Matthys SP, Vaeyens R, Fransen J, et al. A longitudinal study of multidimensional performance characteristics related to physical capacities in youth handball. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(3):325–34.PubMed
35.
Vandorpe B, Vandendriessche J, Vaeyens R, et al. Factors discriminating gymnasts by competitive level. Int J Sports Med. 2011;32(8):591–7.PubMed
36.
Hoare DG. Predicting success in junior elite basketball players—the contribution of anthropometic and physiological attributes. J Sci Med Sport. 2000;3(4):391–405.PubMed
37.
Douda HT, Toubekis AG, Avloniti AA, et al. Physiological and anthropometric determinants of rhythmic gymnastics performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2008;3(1):41.PubMed
38.
39.
40.
Carling C, Le Gall F, Reilly T, et al. Do anthropometric and fitness characteristics vary according to birth date distribution in elite youth academy soccer players? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;19(1):3–9.PubMed
41.
Burgess DJ, Naughton GA. Talent development in adolescent team sports: a review. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(1):103–16.PubMed
42.
Christensen MK, Sørensen JK. Sport or school? Dreams and dilemmas for talented young Danish football players. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2009;15(1):115–33.
43.
Nieuwenhuis CF, Spamer EJ, van Rossum JHA. Prediction function for identifying talent in 14-to 15-year-old female field hockey players. High Abil Stud. 2002;13(1):21–33.
44.
Falk B, Lidor R, Lander Y, et al. Talent identification and early development of elite water-polo players: a 2-year follow-up study. J Sports Sci. 2004;22(4):347–55.PubMed
45.
Ward P, Williams AM. Perceptual and cognitive skill development in soccer: the multidimensional nature of expert performance. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2003;25:93–111.
46.
Williams AM, Davids K. Declarative knowledge in sport: a by-product of experience or a characteristic of expertise? J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1995;17(3):259–75.
47.
Gould D, Dieffenbach K, Moffett A. Psychological characteristics and their development in Olympic champions. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2002;14(3):172–204. doi:10.​1080/​1041320029010348​2.
48.
Durand-Bush N, Salmela JH. The development and maintenance of expert athletic performance: perceptions of world and Olympic champions. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2002;14(3):154–71. doi:10.​1080/​1041320029010347​3.
49.
50.
Balish SM, Eys MA, Schulte-Hostedde AI. Evolutionary sport and exercise psychology: integrating proximate and ultimate explanations. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2013;14(3):413–22.
51.
Hancock DJ, Adler AL, Côté J. A proposed theoretical model to explain relative age effects in sport. Eur J Sport Sci. 2013;13:630–7.PubMed
52.
Pienaar AE, Spamer MJ, Steyn HS Jr. Identifying and developing rugby talent among 10-year-old boys: a practical model. J Sports Sci. 1998;16(8):691–9.PubMed
53.
Mohamed H, Vaeyens R, Matthys S, et al. Anthropometric and performance measures for the development of a talent detection and identification model in youth handball. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(3):257–66. doi:10.​1080/​0264041080248241​7.PubMed
54.
Ericsson KA. The road to excellence: the acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 1996.
55.
Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100:363–406.
56.
Côté J, Baker J, Abernethy B. Practice and play in the development of sport expertise. New York: Wiley; 2007.
57.
Fransen J, Pion J, Vandendriessche J, et al. Differences in physical fitness and gross motor coordination in boys aged 6–12 years specializing in one versus sampling more than one sport. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(4):379–86.PubMed
58.
Baker J. Early specialization in youth sport: a requirement for adult expertise? High Abil Stud. 2003;14(1):85–94.
59.
Ford PR, Carling C, Garces M, et al. The developmental activities of elite soccer players aged under-16 years from Brazil, England, France, Ghana, Mexico, Portugal and Sweden. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(15):1653–63.PubMed
60.
Ericsson KA. Peak performance and age: an examination of peak performance in sports. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM, editors. Successful aging: perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 164–95.
61.
62.
Ackland TR, Bloomfield J. Stability of human proportions through adolescent growth. Aust J Sci Med Sport. 1996;28(2):57.PubMed
63.
Helsen WF, Baker J, Michiels S, et al. The relative age effect in European professional soccer: did ten years of research make any difference? J Sports Sci. 2012;30(15):1665–71.PubMed
64.
Votteler A, Höner O. The relative age effect in the German Football TID Programme: biases in motor performance diagnostics and effects on single motor abilities and skills in groups of selected players. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(5):433-42.
65.
66.
Malina RM. Physical growth and biological maturation of young athletes. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1994;22:389–433.PubMed
67.
Höner O, Roth K. Erläuterungen zu den individuellen Spielerauswertungen im Rahmen der technisch-motorischen Leistungsdiagnostik an den DFB-Stützpunkten (Explanation report on individual evaluations of soccer players as part of the technical and motor performance diagnostics at the bases of the German Football Federation). 2009. http://​www.​dfb.​de/​uploads/​media/​Homepage-Manual_​2009.​pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2013.
68.
Tromp EJY, Pepping GJ, Lyons J, et al. “Let’s pick him!”: ratings of skill level on the basis of in-game playing behaviour in Bantam League junior ice hockey. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2013;8(4):641–60.
69.
Volek JS, Duncan ND, Mazzetti SA, et al. Performance and muscle fiber adaptations to creatine supplementation and heavy resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31:1147–56.PubMed
70.
Abernethy P, Wilson G, Logan P. Strength and power assessment. Issues, controversies and challenges. Sports Med. 1995;19(6):401–17.PubMed
71.
72.
Morris T. Psychological characteristics and talent identification in soccer. J Sports Sci. 2000;18(9):715–26.PubMed
73.
Gabbett T, Georgieff B, Domrow N. The use of physiological, anthropometric, and skill data to predict selection in a talent-identified junior volleyball squad. J Sports Sci. 2007;25(12):1337–44.PubMed
74.
Peeters MW, Thomis MAI, Beunen GP, et al. Genetics and sports: an overview of the pre-molecular biology era. In: Collins M (ed). Genetics and sports. Vol 54. Basel: Karger; 2009: p 28–42. doi:10.​1159/​000235695.
75.
Ehlert T, Moser D, Simon P. Epigenetics in sports. A potent confounder in genetic association studies. Sports Med. 2012;43(2):93–110.
76.
Falconer DS. The inheritance of liability to certain diseases, estimated from the incidence among relatives. Ann Hum Genet. 1965;29(1):51–76.
77.
Bouchard C. Genetics of fitness and physical performance. Hum Kinetics 1;1997.
78.
Bouchard C, Malina RM. Genetics of physiological fitness and motor performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1983;11(1):306.PubMed
79.
Hirschhorn JN, Daly MJ. Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6(2):95–108.PubMed
80.
Wang K, Dickson SP, Stolle CA, et al. Interpretation of association signals and identification of causal variants from genome-wide association studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86(5):730–42.PubMedPubMedCentral
81.
Frazer KA, Murray SS, Schork NJ, et al. Human genetic variation and its contribution to complex traits. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(4):241–51.PubMed
82.
Dewey FE, Pan S, Wheeler MT, et al. DNA sequencing clinical applications of new DNA sequencing technologies. Circulation. 2012;125(7):931–44.PubMedPubMedCentral
83.
Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, et al. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88(1):76–82.PubMedPubMedCentral
84.
Dickson SP, Wang K, Krantz I, et al. Rare variants create synthetic genome-wide associations. PloS Biol. 2010;8(1):e1000294.PubMedPubMedCentral
85.
Xavier RJ, Rioux JD. Genome-wide association studies: a new window into immune-mediated diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(8):631–43.PubMedPubMedCentral
86.
Eichler EE, Nickerson DA, Altshuler D, et al. Completing the map of human genetic variation. Nature. 2007;447(7141):161–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
87.
88.
Spurway N. Top-down studies of genetic contribution to differences in physical capacity. In: Spurway H, Wackerhage H, editors. Genetics and molecular biology of muscle adaptation. London: Elsevier; 2004. p. 25–9.
89.
90.
91.
Döring FE, Onur S, Geisen U, et al. ATCN3 R577X and other polymorphisms are not associated with elite endurance athlete status in the Genathlete study. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(12):1355–9.PubMed
92.
Lippi G, Longo UG, Maffulli N. Genetics and sports. Br Med Bull. 2010;93(1):27–47.PubMed
93.
Di Cagno A, Sapere N, Piazza M, et al. ACE and AGTR1 polymorphisms in elite rhythmic gymnastics. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013;17(2):99–103.PubMed
94.
Ahmetov II, Druzhevskaya AM, Astratenkova IV, et al. The ACTN3 R577X polymorphism in Russian endurance athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(9):649–52.PubMed
95.
Pimenta EM, Coelho DB, Barros Coelho EJ, et al. Effect of gene ACTN3 on strength and endurance in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(12):3286–92.PubMed
96.
Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001;409(6822):860–921.PubMed
97.
Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 2001;291(5507):1304–51.PubMed
98.
Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies: the next generation. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;11(1):31–46.PubMed
99.
100.
Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA. Variation is the spice of life. Nat Genet. 2001;27(3):234–5.PubMed
101.
Jimenez-Sanchez G, Childs B, Valle D. Human disease genes. Nature. 2001;409(6822):853–5.PubMed
102.
Bouchard C, Sarzynski MA, Rice TK, et al. Genomic predictors of the maximal O2 uptake response to standardized exercise training programs. J Appl Physiol. 2011;110(5):1160–70.PubMedPubMedCentral
103.
An P, Teran-Garcia M, Rice T, et al. Genome-wide linkage scans for prediabetes phenotypes in response to 20 weeks of endurance exercise training in non-diabetic whites and blacks: the HERITAGE Family Study. Diabetologia. 2005;48(6):1142–9.PubMed
104.
Wu R, Lin M. Functional mapping: how to map and study the genetic architecture of dynamic complex traits. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7(3):229–37.PubMed
105.
Maller J, George S, Purcell S, et al. Common variation in three genes, including a noncoding variant in CFH, strongly influences risk of age-related macular degeneration. Nat Genet. 2006;38(9):1055–9.PubMed
106.
Camporesi S. Bend it like Beckham! The ethics of genetically testing children for athletic potential. Sport Ethic Philos. 2013;7(2):175–85.
107.
Eynon N, Alves AJ, Yamin C, et al. Is there an ACE ID-ACTN3 R577X polymorphisms interaction that influences sprint performance? Int J Sports Med. 2009;30(12):888–91. doi:10.​1055/​s-0029-1238291.PubMed
108.
Miah A, Rich E. Genetic tests for ability? Talent identification and the value of an open future. Sport Educ Soc. 2006;11(3):259–73.
109.
McNamee MJ, Müller A, van Hilvoorde I, et al. Genetic testing and sports medicine ethics. Sports Med. 2009;39(5):339–44.PubMed
110.
Williams AG, Wackerhage H. Genetic testing of athletes. In: Collins M (ed). Genetics and sports. Vol 54, Basel: Karger;2009. p 176–86. doi:10.​1159/​000235704.
111.
Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003;33:245–54.PubMed
112.
Schutz RW, Gessaroli ME. Use, misuse, and disuse of psychometrics in sport psychology research. In: Singer RN, Murphey M, Tennant LK, editors. Handbook of research on sport psychology. New York: MacMillan; 1993. p. 901–17.
113.
McGowan PO, Sasaki A, D’Alessio AC, et al. Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(3):342–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
114.
Raleigh SM. Epigenetic regulation of the ACE gene might be more relevant to endurance physiology than the I/D polymorphism. J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(6):1082–3.PubMed
115.
Beunen G, Thomis M. Genetic determinants of sports participation and daily physical activity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23:55–63.
116.
Ford PR, Ward P, Hodges NJ, et al. The role of deliberate practice and play in career progression in sport: the early engagement hypothesis. High Abil Stud. 2009;20(1):65–75.
117.
Kannekens R, Elferink-Gemser MT, Visscher C. Positioning and deciding: key factors for talent development in soccer. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(6):846–52.PubMed
118.
Abbott A, Collins D, Sowerby K, et al. Developing the potential of young people in sport. Edinburgh: Sportscotland; 2007.
119.
Jordan BD. Genetic susceptibility to brain injury in sports: a role for genetic testing in athletes? Phys Sportsmed. 1998;26(2):25–6.PubMed
120.
Schwellnus MP. Genetic biomarkers and exercise-related injuries: current clinical applications? Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(9):530–2.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Conventional and Genetic Talent Identification in Sports: Will Recent Developments Trace Talent?
verfasst von
Sarah Breitbach
Suzan Tug
Perikles Simon
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2014
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Sports Medicine / Ausgabe 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0221-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2014

Sports Medicine 11/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Review Article

The Effects of Statin Medications on Aerobic Exercise Capacity and Training Adaptations

Systematic Review

Association between Physical Activity Advice Only or Structured Exercise Training with Blood Pressure Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Systematic Review

Personal and Psychosocial Predictors of Doping Use in Physical Activity Settings: A Meta-Analysis

Review Article

McArdle Disease: A Unique Study Model in Sports Medicine

Systematic Review

Physical Activity and Physical Self-Concept in Youth: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Review Article

Physical Activity, Air Pollution and the Brain

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise