Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2017

29.12.2016 | Shoulder

Clinical outcome and prognostic factors of revision arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair

verfasst von: Maria Valencia Mora, Diana Morcillo Barrenechea, Maria Dolores Martín Ríos, Antonio M. Foruria, Emilio Calvo

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff revision surgery in a cohort of patients and to identify prognostic factors for this procedure.

Methods

Fifty-one consecutive patients undergoing revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were prospectively followed over a minimum period of one year. Radiologic findings and clinical data regarding primary and revision surgery were collected. Clinical evaluation was performed pre- and post-operatively by means of Constant Score and Simple Shoulder Test.

Results

Median age at the time of revision surgery was 60 years (range 36–77 years). Median follow-up was 25 months (range 12–58 months). There were 17 men (33.3%) and 34 women (66.7%). The majority of the tears affected the supraspinatus tendon alone (51%) or both the supra- and infraspinatus tendons (35.3%). Significant improvements were seen in terms of active forward elevation, active external rotation, pain, Simple Shoulder Test score, Constant Score, and post-operative satisfaction—age, gender, and time to revision surgery did not show significant predictive value. A smaller tear size and pre-operative elevation greater than 90° were demonstrated to be independent prognostic factors for better outcome. However, the mean increase in Constant Score was not related to the size of the tear, range of motion, or age.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair results in reliable improvement in shoulder function, pain, and satisfaction. Pre-operative active range of motion and tear size seem to determine final outcome. A similar increase in mean Constant Score can be achieved even in large tears in patients aged over 65 years.

Level of evidence

IV.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abrams JS (2010) Management of the failed rotator cuff surgery: causation and management. Sports Med Arthrosc 18(3):188–197CrossRefPubMed Abrams JS (2010) Management of the failed rotator cuff surgery: causation and management. Sports Med Arthrosc 18(3):188–197CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson K, Boothby M, Aschenbrener D, van Holsbeeck M (2016) Outcome and structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 rows of fixation: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34(12):1899–1905CrossRef Anderson K, Boothby M, Aschenbrener D, van Holsbeeck M (2016) Outcome and structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 rows of fixation: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34(12):1899–1905CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Burkhart SS, Barth JR, Richards DP, Zlatkin MB, Larsen M (2007) Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with stage 3 and 4 fatty degeneration. Arthroscopy 23(4):347–354CrossRefPubMed Burkhart SS, Barth JR, Richards DP, Zlatkin MB, Larsen M (2007) Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with stage 3 and 4 fatty degeneration. Arthroscopy 23(4):347–354CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chuang MJ, Jancosko J, Nottage WM (2014) Clinical outcomes of single-row arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Orthopedics 37:e692–e698CrossRefPubMed Chuang MJ, Jancosko J, Nottage WM (2014) Clinical outcomes of single-row arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Orthopedics 37:e692–e698CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cole BJ, McCarty LP, Kang RW, Alford W, Lewis PB, Hayden JK (2007) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective functional outcome and repair integrity at minimum 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(5):579–585CrossRefPubMed Cole BJ, McCarty LP, Kang RW, Alford W, Lewis PB, Hayden JK (2007) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective functional outcome and repair integrity at minimum 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(5):579–585CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164 Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Denard PJ, Burkhart SS (2011) Arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19(11):657–666CrossRefPubMed Denard PJ, Burkhart SS (2011) Arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19(11):657–666CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat DeOrio JK, Cofield RH (1984) Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(4):563–567CrossRefPubMed DeOrio JK, Cofield RH (1984) Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(4):563–567CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Djurasovic M, Marra G, Arroyo JS, Pollock RG, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU (2001) Revision rotator cuff repair: factors influencing results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(12):1849–1855CrossRefPubMed Djurasovic M, Marra G, Arroyo JS, Pollock RG, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU (2001) Revision rotator cuff repair: factors influencing results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(12):1849–1855CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dwyer R, Razmjou H, Holtby R (2015) Full thickness rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 55 years: clinical outcome of arthroscopic repair in comparison with older patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(2):508–513CrossRefPubMed Dwyer R, Razmjou H, Holtby R (2015) Full thickness rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 55 years: clinical outcome of arthroscopic repair in comparison with older patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(2):508–513CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C (1999) Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(6):599–605CrossRefPubMed Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C (1999) Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(6):599–605CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartzler RU, Sperling JW, Schleck CD, Cofield RH (2013) Clinical and radiographic factors influencing the results of revision rotator cuff repair. Int J Shoulder Surg 7(2):41–45CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hartzler RU, Sperling JW, Schleck CD, Cofield RH (2013) Clinical and radiographic factors influencing the results of revision rotator cuff repair. Int J Shoulder Surg 7(2):41–45CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Katolik LI, Romeo AA, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Hayden JK, Bach BR (2005) Normalization of the constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(3):279–285CrossRefPubMed Katolik LI, Romeo AA, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Hayden JK, Bach BR (2005) Normalization of the constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(3):279–285CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Keener JD, Wei AS, Kim HM, Paxton ES, Teefey SA, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K (2010) Revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: repair integrity and clinical outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(3):590–598CrossRefPubMed Keener JD, Wei AS, Kim HM, Paxton ES, Teefey SA, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K (2010) Revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: repair integrity and clinical outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(3):590–598CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kowalsky MS, Keener JD (2011) Revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: repair integrity and clinical outcome: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(Suppl 1):62–74CrossRefPubMed Kowalsky MS, Keener JD (2011) Revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: repair integrity and clinical outcome: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(Suppl 1):62–74CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kukkonen J, Kauko T, Virolainen P, Äärimaa V (2015) The effect of tear size on the treatment outcome of operatively treated rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(2):567–572CrossRefPubMed Kukkonen J, Kauko T, Virolainen P, Äärimaa V (2015) The effect of tear size on the treatment outcome of operatively treated rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(2):567–572CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lädermann A, Denard PJ, Burkhart SS (2011) Midterm outcome of arthroscopic revision repair of massive and nonmassive rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 27(12):1620–1627CrossRefPubMed Lädermann A, Denard PJ, Burkhart SS (2011) Midterm outcome of arthroscopic revision repair of massive and nonmassive rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 27(12):1620–1627CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lo IK, Burkhart SS (2004) Arthroscopic revision of failed rotator cuff repairs: technique and results. Arthroscopy 20(3):250–267CrossRefPubMed Lo IK, Burkhart SS (2004) Arthroscopic revision of failed rotator cuff repairs: technique and results. Arthroscopy 20(3):250–267CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Oh JH, Kim SH, Ji HM, Jo KH, Bin SW, Gong HS (2009) Prognostic factors affecting anatomic outcome of rotator cuff repair and correlation with functional outcome. Arthroscopy 25(1):30–39CrossRefPubMed Oh JH, Kim SH, Ji HM, Jo KH, Bin SW, Gong HS (2009) Prognostic factors affecting anatomic outcome of rotator cuff repair and correlation with functional outcome. Arthroscopy 25(1):30–39CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Oh JH, Kim SH, Shin SH, Chung SW, Kim JY, Kim SH, Kim SJ (2011) Outcome of rotator cuff repair in large-to-massive tear with pseudoparalysis: a comparative study with propensity score matching. Am J Sports Med 39(7):1413–1420CrossRefPubMed Oh JH, Kim SH, Shin SH, Chung SW, Kim JY, Kim SH, Kim SJ (2011) Outcome of rotator cuff repair in large-to-massive tear with pseudoparalysis: a comparative study with propensity score matching. Am J Sports Med 39(7):1413–1420CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Parnes N, DeFranco M, Wells JH, Higgins LD, Warner JJ (2013) Complications after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 29(9):1479–1486CrossRefPubMed Parnes N, DeFranco M, Wells JH, Higgins LD, Warner JJ (2013) Complications after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 29(9):1479–1486CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Piasecki DP, Verma NN, Nho SJ, Bhatia S, Boniquit N, Cole BJ et al (2010) Outcomes after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 38(1):40–46CrossRefPubMed Piasecki DP, Verma NN, Nho SJ, Bhatia S, Boniquit N, Cole BJ et al (2010) Outcomes after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 38(1):40–46CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Shamsudin A, Lam PH, Peters K, Rubenis I, Hackett L, Murrell G (2015) Revision versus primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a 2-year analysis of outcomes in 360 patients. Am J Sports Med 43(3):557–564CrossRefPubMed Shamsudin A, Lam PH, Peters K, Rubenis I, Hackett L, Murrell G (2015) Revision versus primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a 2-year analysis of outcomes in 360 patients. Am J Sports Med 43(3):557–564CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss EJ, McCormack RA, Onyekwelu I, Rokito AS (2012) Management of failed arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(5):301–309PubMed Strauss EJ, McCormack RA, Onyekwelu I, Rokito AS (2012) Management of failed arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(5):301–309PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Visotsky JL, Basamania C, Seebauer L, Rockwood CA, Jensen KL (2004) Cuff tear arthropathy: pathogenesis, classification, and algorithm for treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2):35–40CrossRef Visotsky JL, Basamania C, Seebauer L, Rockwood CA, Jensen KL (2004) Cuff tear arthropathy: pathogenesis, classification, and algorithm for treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2):35–40CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical outcome and prognostic factors of revision arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair
verfasst von
Maria Valencia Mora
Diana Morcillo Barrenechea
Maria Dolores Martín Ríos
Antonio M. Foruria
Emilio Calvo
Publikationsdatum
29.12.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4392-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

TEP mit Roboterhilfe führt nicht zu größerer Zufriedenheit

15.05.2024 Knie-TEP Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Operationsrobotern für den Einbau von Totalendoprothesen des Kniegelenks hat die Präzision der Eingriffe erhöht. Für die postoperative Zufriedenheit der Patienten scheint das aber unerheblich zu sein, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Lever-Sign-Test hilft beim Verdacht auf Kreuzbandriss

15.05.2024 Vordere Kreuzbandruptur Nachrichten

Mit dem Hebelzeichen-Test lässt sich offenbar recht zuverlässig feststellen, ob ein vorderes Kreuzband gerissen ist. In einer Metaanalyse war die Vorhersagekraft vor allem bei positivem Testergebnis hoch.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

03.05.2024 Fibromyalgiesyndrom Nachrichten

Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.