nach oben

Pediatric Radiology

Erschienen in:

01.09.2010 | Original Article

Assessment of retromesenteric position of the third portion of the duodenum: an US feasibility study in 33 newborns

verfasst von: David K. Yousefzadeh, Lisa Kang, Laura Tessicini

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

US can be used to assess bowel and does not require ionizing radiation or the administration of contrast material. Prior studies of the duodenum with US are limited.

Objective

This study assesses the success rate of US demonstration of the third portion of the duodenum (D3) between the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the aorta in newborns to exclude malrotation based on embryologic and anatomic principles.

Material and methods

Thirty-three newborns underwent US studies. The structures between the SMA and the aorta, including D3, were evaluated in axial and longitudinal planes. The length of time to acquire diagnostic images was recorded.

Results

In both the axial and longitudinal planes, D3 was seen between the SMA and the aorta in all 33 infants, including some with abundant bowel gas. The mean length of time to acquire diagnostic images was 34 s.

Conclusion

Bedside US successfully illustrated the retromesenteric position of D3 in all 33 infants. Overlying gas-filled bowel was effectively effaced by graded compression. The short study duration indicates the practicality of the method. Further studies in broader patient populations and in correlation with other imaging and/or surgical findings is required to validate our technique.

Rescorla FJ, Shedd FJ, Grosfeld JL et al (1990) Anomalies of intestinal rotation in childhood: analysis of 447 cases. Surgery 108:710–715PubMed

Dilley AV, Pereira J, Shi EC et al (2000) The radiologist says malrotation: does the surgeon operate? Pediatr Surg Int 16:45–49CrossRefPubMed

Berdon WE, Baker DH, Bull S et al (1970) Midgut malrotation and volvulus. Radiology 96:375–383PubMed

Applegate KE, Anderson JM, Klatte EC (2006) Intestinal malrotation in children: a problem-solving approach to the upper gastrointestinal series. Radiographics 26:1485–1500CrossRefPubMed

Long FR, Kramer SS, Markowitz RI et al (1996) Intestinal malrotation in children: tutorial on radiographic diagnosis in difficult cases. Radiology 198:775–780PubMed

Strouse PJ (2004) Disorders of intestinal rotation and fixation (‘malrotation’). Pediatr Radiol 34:837–851CrossRefPubMed

Blachar A, Federle MP, Brancatelli G et al (2001) Radiologist performance in the diagnosis of internal hernia by using specific CT findings with emphasis on transmesenteric hernia. Radiology 221:422CrossRefPubMed

Benya EC, Ben-Ami TE, Whitington PF et al (1998) Duodenum and duodenal-jejunal junction in children: position and appearance after liver transplantation. Radiology 207:233–236PubMed

Katz ME, Siegel MJ, Shackelford GD et al (1987) The position and mobility of the duodenum in children. AJR 148:947–951PubMed

10.

Yousefzadeh DK, Soper RT, Jackson JH (1980) Diagnostic advantages of manual compression fluoroscopy in the radiologic work-up of vomiting neonates. J Pediatr Surg 15:270–278CrossRefPubMed

11.

Lim-Dunham JE, Ben-Ami TE, Yousefzadeh DK (1999) Manual epigastric compression during upper gastrointestinal examination of neonates: value in diagnosis of intestinal malrotation and volvulus. AJR 173:979–983PubMed

12.

Millar AJ, Rode H, Brown RA et al (1987) The deadly vomit: malrotation and midget volvulus. A review of 137 cases. Pediatr Surg Int 2:172–174CrossRef

13.

Loyer E, Eggli KD (1989) Sonographic evaluation of superior mesenteric vascular relationship in malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 19:173–175CrossRefPubMed

14.

Dufour D, Delaet MH, Dassonville M et al (1992) Midgut malrotation, the reliability of sonographic diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 22:21–23CrossRefPubMed

15.

Orzech N, Navarro OM, Langer JC (2006) Is ultrasonography a good screening test for intestinal malrotation. J Pediatr Surg 41:1005–1009CrossRefPubMed

16.

Sze RW, Guillerman P, Krauter D et al (2002) Case reports. A possible new ancillary sign for diagnosing midgut volvulus: the truncated superior mesenteric artery. J Ultrasound Med 21:477–480PubMed

17.

Patino MO, Munden MM (2004) Utility of the sonographic whirlpool sign in diagnosing midgut volvulus in patients with atypical clinical presentations. J Ultrasound Med 23:397–401PubMed

18.

Shimanuki Y, Aihara T, Takano H et al (1996) Clockwise whirlpool sign at color Doppler US: an objective and definite sign of midgut volvulus. Radiology 199:261–264PubMed

19.

Pracros JP, Sann L, Genin G et al (1992) Ultrasound diagnosis of midgut volvulus: the “whirlpool” sign. Pediatr Radiol 22:18–20CrossRefPubMed

20.

Yeh WC, Wang HP, Chen C et al (1999) Preoperative sonographic diagnosis of midgut malrotation with volvulus in adults: the “whirlpool” sign. J Clinical US 27:279–283

21.

Hsu CY, Chiba Y, Fukui O et al (2004) Counterclockwise barber-pole sign on prenatal three-dimensional power Doppler sonography in a case of duodenal obstruction without intestinal malrotation. J Clinical US 32:86–90

22.

Paul C, Lynne R (2005) Counterclockwise barber-pole sign on CT: SMA/SMV variance without midgut malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 35:1125–1127CrossRef

23.

Ashley LM, Allen S, Teele RL (2001) A normal sonogram does not exclude malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 31:354–356CrossRefPubMed

24.

Aidlen J, Anupindi SA, Jaramillo D et al (2005) Malrotation with midgut volvulus: CT findings of bowel infarction. Pediatr Radiol 35:529–531CrossRefPubMed

25.

Zissin R, Osadchy A, Gayer G et al (2002) Pictorial review CT of duodenal pathology. Br J Radiol 75:78–84PubMed

26.

Zissin R, Rathaus V, Oscadchy A et al (1999) Intestinal malrotation as an incidental finding on CT in adults. Abdom Imaging 24:550–555CrossRefPubMed

27.

Boudiaf M, Soyer P, Terem C et al (2001) CT evaluation of small bowel obstruction. RadioGraphics 21:613–624PubMed

28.

Jayaraman MV, Mayo-Smith WW, Movson S et al (2001) CT of the duodenum: an overlooked segment gets its due. Radiographics 21:S147–S160PubMed

29.

Applegate KE (2009) Evidence-based diagnosis of malrotation and volvulus. Pediatr Radiol 39(Suppl 2):S161–S163CrossRefPubMed

30.

Daneman A (2009) Malrotation: the balance of evidence. Pediatr Radiol 39(Suppl 2):S164–S166CrossRefPubMed

31.

Slovis TL, Strouse PJ (2009) Malrotation: some answers but more questions. Pediatr Radiol 39:315–316CrossRefPubMed

32.

Han MC, Kim CW (1989) Sectional human anatomy: transverse, sagittal and coronal sections correlated with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, 2nd edn. Igaku-Shoin Medical Pub, Seoul, p 120

33.

Netter FH (1989) Abdominal wall in visceral midsagittal section. In: Colacino S (ed) Atlas of human anatomy. CIBA-GEIGY Corp, New Jersey, plate 333

34.

Floch MN (2005) Congenital abnormalities of the small intestine. In: Floch MH, Floch NR, Kowdley KV (eds) Netter’s gastroenterology. ICON Learning Systems, Carlstadt

35.

Yousefzadeh DK (2009) The position of the duodenojejunal junction: the wrong horse to bet on in diagnosing or excluding malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 39(Suppl 2):S172–S177CrossRefPubMed

36.

Santer R, Young C, Rossi T et al (1991) Computed tomography in superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 21:154–155CrossRefPubMed

37.

Hines JR, Gore RM, Ballantyne GH (1984) Superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Diagnostic criteria and therapeutic approaches. Am J Surg 148:630–632CrossRefPubMed

38.

Burrington JD (1976) Superior mesenteric artery syndrome in children. Am J Dis Child 130:1367–1370PubMed

39.

Burrington JD, Wayne ER (1974) Obstruction of the duodenum by the superior mesenteric artery—does it exist in children? J Pediatr Surg 9:733–741CrossRefPubMed

40.

Lampl B, Levin TL, Berdon W et al (2009) Malrotation and midgut volvulus: a historical review and current controversies in diagnosis and management. Pediatr Radiol 39:359–366CrossRefPubMed

41.

Borley NR, Healy JC (2008) Abdomen and pelvis. Section 8. In: Stranding S (ed) Gray’s anatomy, 40th edn. Elsevier, London, p 1127

42.

Inoue Y, Nakamura H (1997) Aplasia or hypoplasia of the pancreatic uncinate process: comparison in patients with and patients without intestinal nonrotation. Radiology 205:531–533PubMed

Titel: Assessment of retromesenteric position of the third portion of the duodenum: an US feasibility study in 33 newborns
verfasst von: David K. Yousefzadeh
Lisa Kang
Laura Tessicini
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2010
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1709-4

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Assessment of retromesenteric position of the third portion of the duodenum: an US feasibility study in 33 newborns

Abstract

Background

Objective

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Objective

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2010

Hermes

Congenital megacalyces presenting as neonatal hydronephrosis

Herbert J. Kaufmann (10 June 1924 – 15 April 2010)

MRI in isolated dextrogastria with eventration of the right hemidiaphragm with associated mesentero-axial volvulus

Safety coaches in radiology: decreasing human error and minimizing patient harm

Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome: diagnosis using hand radiograph performed for bone age

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Update Radiologie