Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 5/2012

01.05.2012 | Original Article

Deep sedation in pediatric imaging: efficacy and safety of intravenous chlorpromazine

verfasst von: C. Heng Vong, A. Bajard, P. Thiesse, E. Bouffet, H. Seban, P. Marec Bérard

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The quality of MRI and CT depends largely on immobility of the patient during the procedure, which is often difficult to achieve without sedation in children below the age of 6 years.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous chlorpromazine sedation for repeated imaging in young children treated for cancer.

Materials and methods

From July 2003 to January 2007, information on children younger than 6 years of age having MRI or CT was prospectively collected. Forty-five minutes before the scan, a 10-min infusion of chlorpromazine 0.5 mg/kg was administered and managed by non-anesthetic staff. Patient monitoring included continuous measurement of pulse, respiration, oxygen saturation and arterial blood pressure. Procedure-related parameters and adverse events were documented. Sedation was considered successful when the procedure was completed and at least 95% of images were usable.

Results

One-hundred-one procedures (82 MRI, 19 CT) were evaluated in 62 children, 3–74 months old. Adequate sedation was achieved in 96% of cases, with mean induction time, 22 min; mean duration of sleep, 72 min, and mean duration of procedure, 33 min. Mean time spent in the radiology unit was 104 min. Ninety-six percent of imaging procedures were successfully completed. No cardiac, respiratory, neurological or allergic complication occurred.

Conclusion

Intravenous chlorpromazine is safe and effective for procedural sedation in young children with cancer undergoing MRI and CT.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubbard AM, Markowitz RI et al (1992) Sedation for pediatric patients undergoing CT and MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16:3–6PubMedCrossRef Hubbard AM, Markowitz RI et al (1992) Sedation for pediatric patients undergoing CT and MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16:3–6PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pereira JK, Burrows PE et al (1993) Comparison of sedation regimens for pediatric outpatient CT. Pediatr Radiol 23:341–344PubMedCrossRef Pereira JK, Burrows PE et al (1993) Comparison of sedation regimens for pediatric outpatient CT. Pediatr Radiol 23:341–344PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Dosseur P, Dacher JN et al (2003) [Medical and organizational aspects of sedation in imaging]. Arch Pediatr 10(Suppl 1):227s–230sPubMedCrossRef Le Dosseur P, Dacher JN et al (2003) [Medical and organizational aspects of sedation in imaging]. Arch Pediatr 10(Suppl 1):227s–230sPubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dalal PG, Murray D et al (2006) Sedation and anesthesia protocols used for magnetic resonance imaging studies in infants: provider and pharmacologic considerations. Anesth Analg 103:863–868PubMedCrossRef Dalal PG, Murray D et al (2006) Sedation and anesthesia protocols used for magnetic resonance imaging studies in infants: provider and pharmacologic considerations. Anesth Analg 103:863–868PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung T, Hoffer FA, Connor L et al (2000) The use of oral pentobarbital sodium (Nembutal) versus oral chloral hydrate in infants undergoing CT and MR imaging—a pilot study. Pediatr Radiol 30:332–335PubMedCrossRef Chung T, Hoffer FA, Connor L et al (2000) The use of oral pentobarbital sodium (Nembutal) versus oral chloral hydrate in infants undergoing CT and MR imaging—a pilot study. Pediatr Radiol 30:332–335PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T et al (2000) Sedation/Analgesia for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in children. J Perianesth Nurs 15:415–422PubMedCrossRef Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T et al (2000) Sedation/Analgesia for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in children. J Perianesth Nurs 15:415–422PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mason KP, Sanborn P et al (2004) Superiority of pentobarbital versus chloral hydrate for sedation in infants during imaging. Radiology 230:537–542PubMedCrossRef Mason KP, Sanborn P et al (2004) Superiority of pentobarbital versus chloral hydrate for sedation in infants during imaging. Radiology 230:537–542PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dacher JN, Neuenschwander S et al (1996) Sedation with oral hydroxyzine and rectal chloral hydrate in pediatric MRI and CT. J Radiol 77:1189–1192, discussion 1193–4PubMed Dacher JN, Neuenschwander S et al (1996) Sedation with oral hydroxyzine and rectal chloral hydrate in pediatric MRI and CT. J Radiol 77:1189–1192, discussion 1193–4PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Dosseur P et al (2000) Principle of precaution and pediatric imaging: the good side and the less good one. J Radiol 81:935–936PubMed Le Dosseur P et al (2000) Principle of precaution and pediatric imaging: the good side and the less good one. J Radiol 81:935–936PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat American Academy of Pediatrics Comittee on drugs. Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients During and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures. Pediatrics 110:836–838 American Academy of Pediatrics Comittee on drugs. Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients During and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures. Pediatrics 110:836–838
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanborn PA, Michna E et al (2005) Adverse cardiovascular and respiratory events during sedation of pediatric patients for imaging examinations. Radiology 237:288–294PubMedCrossRef Sanborn PA, Michna E et al (2005) Adverse cardiovascular and respiratory events during sedation of pediatric patients for imaging examinations. Radiology 237:288–294PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Trotti A, Byhardt R et al (2000) Common toxicity criteria: version 2.0. An improved reference for grading the acute effects of cancer treatment: impact on radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:13–47PubMedCrossRef Trotti A, Byhardt R et al (2000) Common toxicity criteria: version 2.0. An improved reference for grading the acute effects of cancer treatment: impact on radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:13–47PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramsay MA, Savege TM et al (1974) Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J 2:656–659PubMedCrossRef Ramsay MA, Savege TM et al (1974) Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J 2:656–659PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutherland P, Platt M (2000) Sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI and CT. Br J Anaesth 85:803–804PubMedCrossRef Sutherland P, Platt M (2000) Sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI and CT. Br J Anaesth 85:803–804PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Moro-Sutherland DM, Algren JT et al (2000) Comparison of intravenous midazolam with pentobarbital for sedation for head computed tomography imaging. Acad Emerg Med 7:1370–1375PubMedCrossRef Moro-Sutherland DM, Algren JT et al (2000) Comparison of intravenous midazolam with pentobarbital for sedation for head computed tomography imaging. Acad Emerg Med 7:1370–1375PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Acworth JP, Purdie D et al (2001) Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam is superior to intranasal midazolam for emergency paediatric procedural sedation. Emerg Med J 18:39–45PubMedCrossRef Acworth JP, Purdie D et al (2001) Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam is superior to intranasal midazolam for emergency paediatric procedural sedation. Emerg Med J 18:39–45PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Masue T, Shimonaka H et al (2003) Oral high-dose midazolam premedication for infants and children undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 13:662–667PubMedCrossRef Masue T, Shimonaka H et al (2003) Oral high-dose midazolam premedication for infants and children undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 13:662–667PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T et al (2004) Pentobarbital vs chloral hydrate for sedation of children undergoing MRI: efficacy and recovery characteristics. Paediatr Anaesth 14:589–595PubMedCrossRef Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T et al (2004) Pentobarbital vs chloral hydrate for sedation of children undergoing MRI: efficacy and recovery characteristics. Paediatr Anaesth 14:589–595PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Varner PD, Ebert JP et al (1985) Methohexital sedation of children undergoing CT scan. Anesth Analg 64:643–645PubMedCrossRef Varner PD, Ebert JP et al (1985) Methohexital sedation of children undergoing CT scan. Anesth Analg 64:643–645PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Audenaert SM, Montgomery CL et al (1995) A prospective study of rectal methohexital: efficacy and side effects in 648 cases. Anesth Analg 81:957–961PubMed Audenaert SM, Montgomery CL et al (1995) A prospective study of rectal methohexital: efficacy and side effects in 648 cases. Anesth Analg 81:957–961PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin T, Vilke GM et al (2003) Safety and effectiveness of methohexital for procedural sedation in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 24:315–318PubMedCrossRef Austin T, Vilke GM et al (2003) Safety and effectiveness of methohexital for procedural sedation in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 24:315–318PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien JF, Falk JL et al (1991) Rectal thiopental compared with intramuscular meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine for pediatric sedation. Ann Emerg Med 20:644–647PubMedCrossRef O’Brien JF, Falk JL et al (1991) Rectal thiopental compared with intramuscular meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine for pediatric sedation. Ann Emerg Med 20:644–647PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Glasier CM, Stark JE et al (1995) Rectal thiopental sodium for sedation of pediatric patients undergoing MR and other imaging studies. AJNR 16:111–114PubMed Glasier CM, Stark JE et al (1995) Rectal thiopental sodium for sedation of pediatric patients undergoing MR and other imaging studies. AJNR 16:111–114PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Alp H, Guler I et al (1999) Efficacy and safety of rectal thiopental: sedation for children undergoing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Int 41:538–541PubMedCrossRef Alp H, Guler I et al (1999) Efficacy and safety of rectal thiopental: sedation for children undergoing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Int 41:538–541PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenberg SB, Faerber EN et al (1993) High-dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging: safety and efficacy in relation to age. AJR 161:639–641PubMed Greenberg SB, Faerber EN et al (1993) High-dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging: safety and efficacy in relation to age. AJR 161:639–641PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Liddo L, D’Angelo A et al (2006) Etomidate versus midazolam for procedural sedation in pediatric outpatients: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 48:433–440, 440 e1PubMedCrossRef Di Liddo L, D’Angelo A et al (2006) Etomidate versus midazolam for procedural sedation in pediatric outpatients: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 48:433–440, 440 e1PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Merola C, Albarracin C et al (1995) An audit of adverse events in children sedated with chloral hydrate or propofol during imaging studies. Paediatr Anaesth 5:375–378PubMedCrossRef Merola C, Albarracin C et al (1995) An audit of adverse events in children sedated with chloral hydrate or propofol during imaging studies. Paediatr Anaesth 5:375–378PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hertzog JH, Dalton HJ et al (2000) Prospective evaluation of propofol anesthesia in the pediatric intensive care unit for elective oncology procedures in ambulatory and hospitalized children. Pediatrics 106:742–747PubMedCrossRef Hertzog JH, Dalton HJ et al (2000) Prospective evaluation of propofol anesthesia in the pediatric intensive care unit for elective oncology procedures in ambulatory and hospitalized children. Pediatrics 106:742–747PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Connors K, Terndrup TE (1994) Nasal versus oral midazolam for sedation of anxious children undergoing laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med 24:1074–1079PubMedCrossRef Connors K, Terndrup TE (1994) Nasal versus oral midazolam for sedation of anxious children undergoing laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med 24:1074–1079PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kogan A, Katz J et al (2002) Premedication with midazolam in young children: a comparison of four routes of administration. Paediatr Anaesth 12:685–689PubMedCrossRef Kogan A, Katz J et al (2002) Premedication with midazolam in young children: a comparison of four routes of administration. Paediatr Anaesth 12:685–689PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Coventry DM, Martin CS et al (1991) Sedation for paediatric computerized tomography—a double-blind assessment of rectal midazolam. Eur J Anaesthesiol 8:29–32PubMed Coventry DM, Martin CS et al (1991) Sedation for paediatric computerized tomography—a double-blind assessment of rectal midazolam. Eur J Anaesthesiol 8:29–32PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Karian VE, Burrows PE et al (1999) Sedation for pediatric radiological procedures: analysis of potential causes of sedation failure and paradoxical reactions. Pediatr Radiol 29:869–873PubMedCrossRef Karian VE, Burrows PE et al (1999) Sedation for pediatric radiological procedures: analysis of potential causes of sedation failure and paradoxical reactions. Pediatr Radiol 29:869–873PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodson JM, Moore PA (1983) Life-threatening reactions after pedodontic sedation: an assessment of narcotic, local anesthetic, and antiemetic drug interaction. J Am Dent Assoc 107:239–245PubMed Goodson JM, Moore PA (1983) Life-threatening reactions after pedodontic sedation: an assessment of narcotic, local anesthetic, and antiemetic drug interaction. J Am Dent Assoc 107:239–245PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Cote CJ, Notterman DA et al (2000) Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: a critical incident analysis of contributing factors. Pediatrics 105(4 Pt 1):805–814PubMedCrossRef Cote CJ, Notterman DA et al (2000) Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: a critical incident analysis of contributing factors. Pediatrics 105(4 Pt 1):805–814PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Cote CJ, Karl HW et al (2000) Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: analysis of medications used for sedation. Pediatrics 106:633–644PubMedCrossRef Cote CJ, Karl HW et al (2000) Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: analysis of medications used for sedation. Pediatrics 106:633–644PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs (1985) Guidelines for the elective use of conscious sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia in pediatric patients. Pediatrics 76:317–321 American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs (1985) Guidelines for the elective use of conscious sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia in pediatric patients. Pediatrics 76:317–321
37.
Zurück zum Zitat American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs (1992) Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics 89:1110–1115 American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs (1992) Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics 89:1110–1115
38.
Zurück zum Zitat American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs (2002) Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: addendum. Pediatrics 110:836–838CrossRef American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs (2002) Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: addendum. Pediatrics 110:836–838CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Bordes M, Semjen F et al (2007) [Which anaesthesia for children undergoing MRI? An Internet survey in the French university hospitals]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 26:287–291PubMedCrossRef Bordes M, Semjen F et al (2007) [Which anaesthesia for children undergoing MRI? An Internet survey in the French university hospitals]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 26:287–291PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Bryan YF, Hoke LK et al (2009) A randomized trial comparing sevoflurane and propofol in children undergoing MRI scans. Paediatr Anaesth 19:672–681PubMedCrossRef Bryan YF, Hoke LK et al (2009) A randomized trial comparing sevoflurane and propofol in children undergoing MRI scans. Paediatr Anaesth 19:672–681PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun L (2010) Early childhood general anaesthesia exposure and neurocognitive development. Br J Anaesth 105(Suppl 1):i61–i68 Sun L (2010) Early childhood general anaesthesia exposure and neurocognitive development. Br J Anaesth 105(Suppl 1):i61–i68
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Heistein LC, Ramaciotti C et al (2006) Chloral hydrate sedation for pediatric echocardiography: physiologic responses, adverse events, and risk factors. Pediatrics 117:e434–e441PubMedCrossRef Heistein LC, Ramaciotti C et al (2006) Chloral hydrate sedation for pediatric echocardiography: physiologic responses, adverse events, and risk factors. Pediatrics 117:e434–e441PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T et al (2000) Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation for diagnostic imaging studies in children. Pediatrics 105:E42PubMedCrossRef Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T et al (2000) Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation for diagnostic imaging studies in children. Pediatrics 105:E42PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman GM, Nowakowski R et al (2002) Risk reduction in pediatric procedural sedation by application of an American Academy of Pediatrics/American Society of Anesthesiologists process model. Pediatrics 109:236–243PubMedCrossRef Hoffman GM, Nowakowski R et al (2002) Risk reduction in pediatric procedural sedation by application of an American Academy of Pediatrics/American Society of Anesthesiologists process model. Pediatrics 109:236–243PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Krauss B, Green SM (2006) Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet 367:766–780PubMedCrossRef Krauss B, Green SM (2006) Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet 367:766–780PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanderson PM (1997) A survey of pentobarbital sedation for children undergoing abdominal CT scans after oral contrast medium. Paediatr Anaesth 7:309–315PubMed Sanderson PM (1997) A survey of pentobarbital sedation for children undergoing abdominal CT scans after oral contrast medium. Paediatr Anaesth 7:309–315PubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Cote CJ, Cohen IT et al (2002) A comparison of three doses of a commercially prepared oral midazolam syrup in children. Anesth Analg 94:37–43, table of contentsPubMedCrossRef Cote CJ, Cohen IT et al (2002) A comparison of three doses of a commercially prepared oral midazolam syrup in children. Anesth Analg 94:37–43, table of contentsPubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Golparvar M, Saghaei M et al (2004) Paradoxical reaction following intravenous midazolam premedication in pediatric patients—a randomized placebo controlled trial of ketamine for rapid tranquilization. Paediatr Anaesth 14:924–930PubMedCrossRef Golparvar M, Saghaei M et al (2004) Paradoxical reaction following intravenous midazolam premedication in pediatric patients—a randomized placebo controlled trial of ketamine for rapid tranquilization. Paediatr Anaesth 14:924–930PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Roback MG, Wathen JE et al (2005) Adverse events associated with procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: a comparison of common parenteral drugs. Acad Emerg Med 12:508–513PubMedCrossRef Roback MG, Wathen JE et al (2005) Adverse events associated with procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: a comparison of common parenteral drugs. Acad Emerg Med 12:508–513PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Younge PA, Kendall JM (2001) Sedation for children requiring wound repair: a randomised controlled double blind comparison of oral midazolam and oral ketamine. Emerg Med J 18:30–33PubMedCrossRef Younge PA, Kendall JM (2001) Sedation for children requiring wound repair: a randomised controlled double blind comparison of oral midazolam and oral ketamine. Emerg Med J 18:30–33PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Deep sedation in pediatric imaging: efficacy and safety of intravenous chlorpromazine
verfasst von
C. Heng Vong
A. Bajard
P. Thiesse
E. Bouffet
H. Seban
P. Marec Bérard
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2310-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2012

Pediatric Radiology 5/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.