Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 9/2004

01.09.2004 | Breast

The significance of circumscribed malignant mammographic masses in the surveillance of BRCA 1/2 gene mutation carriers

verfasst von: R. Kaas, R. Kroger, J. H. C. L. Hendriks, A. P. E. Besnard, W. Koops, F. A. Pameijer, W. Prevoo, C. E. Loo, S. H. Muller

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2004

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Breast cancers in gene mutation carriers may escape mammographic detection because of rapid growth and tumor expansion. Therefore, they may mimic benign lesions on the mammogram. Twenty-nine BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers under surveillance developed 31 breast cancers between 1994 and 2001 at a mean age of 44.2 years. Controls were 63 women with 67 breast cancers in the same period at a mean age of 53.8 years, also under surveillance because of a life time risk of at least 15%. In 26% of the carriers vs. 48% of the controls, mammography was the method that first suspected a malignancy. Seven radiologists performed a retrospective review of the original mammograms to establish technical assessment, with special attention for circumscribed lesions and estimated probability of malignancy. In the mutation carriers seven (23%) circumscribed non-calcified mammographic masses were found and three in the controls (4.5%) P=0.01. These masses were proven to be malignant. In both groups around 70% of these fast-growing circumscribed lesions were detected by the patients. The masses were situated in breasts with a good interpretable breast pattern. BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers had a significantly higher percentage of circumscribed non-calcified mammographic masses that proved to be malignant. These mammographic lesions in women at high risk should be described as at least Birads 0 and worked-up with ultrasound and needle biopsy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabar L, Vitak B, Tony HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA (2001) Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724–1731PubMed Tabar L, Vitak B, Tony HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA (2001) Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724–1731PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Duffy SW, Tabar L, Chen HH, Holmqvist M, Yen M-F, Abdsalah S et al (2002) The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer 95:458–469CrossRefPubMed Duffy SW, Tabar L, Chen HH, Holmqvist M, Yen M-F, Abdsalah S et al (2002) The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer 95:458–469CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Looman CWN, Broeders MJM, Boer R, Hendriks JHCL et al (2003) Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast cancer mortality: a systematic review. Lancet 361:1411–1417CrossRef Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Looman CWN, Broeders MJM, Boer R, Hendriks JHCL et al (2003) Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast cancer mortality: a systematic review. Lancet 361:1411–1417CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium (1997) Pathology of familial breast cancer: differences between breast cancers in carriers of BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations and sporadic cases. Lancet 349:1505–1510CrossRefPubMed Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium (1997) Pathology of familial breast cancer: differences between breast cancers in carriers of BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations and sporadic cases. Lancet 349:1505–1510CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke W, Daly M, Garber J, Botkin J, Kahn MJE, Lynch P et al (1997) Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA 1 and BRCA 2. J Am Med Assoc 277:997–1003CrossRef Burke W, Daly M, Garber J, Botkin J, Kahn MJE, Lynch P et al (1997) Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA 1 and BRCA 2. J Am Med Assoc 277:997–1003CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Feig SA, D’Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Jackson VP, Kopans DB, Monsees B (1998) American college of radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. Am J Roentgenol 171:29–33 Feig SA, D’Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Jackson VP, Kopans DB, Monsees B (1998) American college of radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. Am J Roentgenol 171:29–33
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lakhani SR, Jaquemier J, Sloane JP, Gusterson BA, Anderson TJ, van de Vijver MJ et al (1998) Multifactorial analysis of differences between sporadic breast cancers and cancers involving BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1138–1145PubMed Lakhani SR, Jaquemier J, Sloane JP, Gusterson BA, Anderson TJ, van de Vijver MJ et al (1998) Multifactorial analysis of differences between sporadic breast cancers and cancers involving BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1138–1145PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lakhani SR, Gusterson BA, Jacquemier J, Sloane JP, Anderson TJ, van de Vijver MJ et al (2000) The pathology of familial breast cancer: histological features of cancers in families not attributable to mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Clin Cancer Res 6:782–789PubMed Lakhani SR, Gusterson BA, Jacquemier J, Sloane JP, Anderson TJ, van de Vijver MJ et al (2000) The pathology of familial breast cancer: histological features of cancers in families not attributable to mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Clin Cancer Res 6:782–789PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Brekelmans CTM, Seynave C, Bartels CCM, Tilanus-Linthorst MMA, Meijers-Heijboer EJ, Crelin CMG et al (2001) Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk. J Clin Oncol 19:924–930PubMed Brekelmans CTM, Seynave C, Bartels CCM, Tilanus-Linthorst MMA, Meijers-Heijboer EJ, Crelin CMG et al (2001) Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk. J Clin Oncol 19:924–930PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaas R, Hart AAM, Besmard APE, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJT (2001) Impact of mammographic interval on stage and survival after the diagnosis of contra lateral breast cancer. Br J Surg 88:123–127CrossRefPubMed Kaas R, Hart AAM, Besmard APE, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJT (2001) Impact of mammographic interval on stage and survival after the diagnosis of contra lateral breast cancer. Br J Surg 88:123–127CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sickles EA (1994) Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. Radiology 192:439–442PubMed Sickles EA (1994) Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. Radiology 192:439–442PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamb PM, Perry NM, Vinnicombe SJ, Wells CA (2000) Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Clin Radiol 55:40–44CrossRefPubMed Lamb PM, Perry NM, Vinnicombe SJ, Wells CA (2000) Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Clin Radiol 55:40–44CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tilanus-Linthorst M, Verhoog L, Obdeyn I-M, Bartels K, Menke-Pluymers M, Eggermont A, Klijn J, Meijers-Heyboer H, Kwast Th vd, Brekelmans C (2002) A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false-negative mammography. Int J Cancer 102:91–95CrossRefPubMed Tilanus-Linthorst M, Verhoog L, Obdeyn I-M, Bartels K, Menke-Pluymers M, Eggermont A, Klijn J, Meijers-Heyboer H, Kwast Th vd, Brekelmans C (2002) A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false-negative mammography. Int J Cancer 102:91–95CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, Kempe A, Wardelmann E, Hocke A et al (2000) Breast MR Imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 215:267–279PubMed Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, Kempe A, Wardelmann E, Hocke A et al (2000) Breast MR Imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 215:267–279PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, White E (2000) Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1081–1087CrossRefPubMed Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, White E (2000) Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1081–1087CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ, Beex L, Bult P, Hendriks JHCL (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1095–1102CrossRefPubMed Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ, Beex L, Bult P, Hendriks JHCL (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1095–1102CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ntziachristos V, Bremer C, Weissleder R (2003) Fluorescence imaging with near-infrared light: new technological advances that enable in vivo molecular imaging. Eur Radiol 13:195–208PubMed Ntziachristos V, Bremer C, Weissleder R (2003) Fluorescence imaging with near-infrared light: new technological advances that enable in vivo molecular imaging. Eur Radiol 13:195–208PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The significance of circumscribed malignant mammographic masses in the surveillance of BRCA 1/2 gene mutation carriers
verfasst von
R. Kaas
R. Kroger
J. H. C. L. Hendriks
A. P. E. Besnard
W. Koops
F. A. Pameijer
W. Prevoo
C. E. Loo
S. H. Muller
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2004
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2004
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2307-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2004

European Radiology 9/2004 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.