nach oben

European Radiology

Erschienen in:

01.05.2007 | Magnetic Resonance

Artifacts in body MR imaging: their appearance and how to eliminate them

verfasst von: Alfred Stadler, Wolfgang Schima, Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah, Joachim Kettenbach, Edith Eisenhuber

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

A wide variety of artifacts can be seen in clinical MR imaging. This review describes the most important and most prevalent of them, including magnetic susceptibility artifacts and motion artifacts, aliasing, chemical-shift, zipper, zebra, central point, and truncation artifacts. Although the elimination of some artifacts may require a service engineer, the radiologist and MR technologist have the responsibility to recognize MR imaging problems. This review shows the typical MR appearance of the described artifacts, explains their physical basis, and shows the way to solve them in daily practice.

Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principle and image design. Wiley-Liss, New York

Hashemi RH, Bradley WG (2003) MRI the basics. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ (2004) Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences. Elsevier, San Diego

Vlaardingerbroek MT, den Boer JA (1999) Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 111–112

Pusey E, Yoon C, Anselmo ML, Lufkin RB (1988) Aliasing artifacts in MR imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph 12:219–224PubMedCrossRef

Weseby G, Adamis MK, Edelman RE (1996) Artifact in MRI: description, causes, and solutions. In: Edelman RE, Zlatkin MB, Hesselink JR (eds) Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2nd ed. Volume 1, Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 88–142

Arena L, Morehouse HT, Safir J (1995) MR imaging artifacts that simulate disease: how to recognize and eliminate them. Radiographics 15:1373–1394PubMed

Goldfarb JW (2004) The SENSE ghost: field-of-view restrictions for SENSE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:1046–1051PubMedCrossRef

Taber KH, Herrick RC, Weathers SW, Kumar AJ, Schomer DF, Hayman LA (1998) Pitfalls and artifacts encountered in clinical MR imaging of the spine. Radiographics 18:1499–1521PubMed

10.

Shellock FG, Morisoli SM (1994) Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts produced by heart valve prostheses exposed to a 1.5-T MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 4:756–758PubMedCrossRef

11.

Shellock FG, Shellock VJ (1996) Vascular access ports and catheters: ex vivo testing of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts associated with MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 14:443–447PubMedCrossRef

12.

Elster AD (1993) Sellar susceptibility artifacts: theory and implications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 14:129–136PubMed

13.

Czervionke LF, Daniels DL, Wehrli FW, Mark LP, Hendrix LE, Strandt JA, Williams AL, Haughton VM (1988) Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in gradient-recalled echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 9:1149–1155PubMed

14.

Port JD, Pomper MG (2000) Quantification and minimization of magnetic susceptibility artifacts on GRE images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:958–964PubMedCrossRef

15.

Schiebler ML, Listerud J (1992) Common artifacts encountered in thoracic magnetic resonance imaging: recognition, derivation, and solutions. Top Magn Reson Imaging 4:1–17PubMedCrossRef

16.

Mirowitz SA (1998) Diagnostic pitfalls and artifacts in abdominal MR imaging: a review. Radiology 208:577–589PubMed

17.

Wood ML, Henkelman RM (1985) MR image artifacts from periodic motion. Med Phys 12:143–151PubMedCrossRef

18.

Barish MA, Jara H (1999) Motion artifact control in body MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 7:289–301PubMed

19.

Huber ME, Hengesbach D, Botnar RM, Kissinger KV, Boesiger P, Manning WJ, Stuber M (2001) Motion artifact reduction and vessel enhancement for free-breathing navigator-gated coronary MRA using 3D k-space reordering. Magn Reson Med 45:645–652PubMedCrossRef

20.

Gazelle GS, Saini S, Hahn PF, Goldberg MA, Halpern EF (1994) MR imaging of the liver at 1.5 T: value of signal averaging in suppressing motion artifacts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:335–337PubMed

21.

Larkman DJ, Atkinson D, Hajnal JV (2004) Artifact reduction using parallel imaging methods. Top Magn Reson Imaging 15:267–275PubMedCrossRef

22.

Mitchell DG (1992) Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging: optimization and artifact suppression. Top Magn Reson Imaging 4:18–34PubMed

23.

Peh WC, Chan JH (2001) Artifacts in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: identification and correction. Skeletal Radiol 30:179–191PubMedCrossRef

24.

Wehrli FW, Perkins TG, Shimakawa A, Roberts F (1987) Chemical shift-induced amplitude modulations in images obtained with gradient refocusing. Magn Reson Imaging 5:157–158PubMedCrossRef

25.

Hood MN, Ho VB, Smirniotopoulos JG, Szumowski J (1999) Chemical shift: the artifact and clinical tool revisited. Radiographics 19:357–371PubMed

26.

Boland GW, Lee MJ (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging of the adrenal gland. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 36:115–174PubMed

27.

Venkataraman S, Braga L, Semelka RC (2002) Imaging the fatty liver. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 10:93–103PubMedCrossRef

28.

Schwaighofer BW, Yu KK, Mattrey RF (1989) Diagnostic significance of interslice gap and imaging volume in body MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 153:629–632PubMed

29.

Kneeland JB, Shimakawa A, Wehrli FW (1986) Effect of intersection spacing on MR image contrast and study time. Radiology 158:819–822PubMed

30.

Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Wolf HD, Deimling M, Kosling S, Hofer H, Spielmann RP (1996) Misleading changes of the signal intensity on opposed-phase MRI after injection of contrast medium. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:173–178PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Artifacts in body MR imaging: their appearance and how to eliminate them
verfasst von: Alfred Stadler
Wolfgang Schima
Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Joachim Kettenbach
Edith Eisenhuber
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2007
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: European Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0470-4

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Artifacts in body MR imaging: their appearance and how to eliminate them

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2007

Imaging features of musculoskeletal involvement in systemic sclerosis

Asbestos Surveillance Program Aachen (ASPA): initial results from baseline screening for lung cancer in asbestos-exposed high-risk individuals using low-dose multidetector-row CT

Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with an elliptical centric view for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms

Energetic differences between viable and non-viable myocardium in patients with recent myocardial infarction are not an effect of differences in wall thinning— a multivoxel 31P-MR-spectroscopy and MRI study

In-vivo flow simulation in coronary arteries based on computed tomography datasets: feasibility and initial results

Quantitative prediction of contrast enhancement from test bolus data in cardiac MSCT

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update Radiologie