nach oben

European Radiology

Erschienen in:

01.09.2008 | Musculoskeletal

Differences in perfusion parameters between upper and lower lumbar vertebral segments with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE MRI)

verfasst von: Vasiliki Savvopoulou, Thomas G. Maris, Lampros Vlahos, Lia Angela Moulopoulos

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

To investigate the influence of age, sex and spinal level on perfusion parameters of normal lumbar bone marrow with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE MRI). Sixty-seven subjects referred for evaluation of low back pain or sciatica underwent DCE MRI of the lumbar spine. After subtraction of dynamic images, a region of interest (ROI) was placed on each lumbar vertebral body of all subjects, and time intensity curves were generated. Consequently, perfusion parameters were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed to search for perfusion differences among lumbar vertebrae and in relation to age and sex. Upper (L1, L2) and lower (L3, L4, L5) vertebrae showed significant differences in perfusion parameters (p<0.05). Vertebrae of subjects younger than 50 years showed significantly higher perfusion compared to vertebrae of older ones (p<0.05). Vertebrae of females demonstrated significantly increased perfusion compared to those of males of corresponding age (p<0.05). All perfusion parameters, except for washout (WOUT), showed a mild linear correlation with age. Time to maximum slope (TMSP) and time to peak (TTPK) showed the same correlation with sex (0.22<r<0.32, p<0.05). Our results indicate increased perfusion of the upper compared to the lower lumbar spine, of younger compared to older subjects and of females compared to males.

Weinreb JC (1990) MR imaging of bone marrow: a map could help. Radiology 177:23–24PubMed

Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, Maldague B (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of normal bone marrow. Eur Radiol 8:1327–1334PubMedCrossRef

Ricci C, Cova M, Kang YS et al (1990) Normal age-related patterns of cellular and fatty bone marrow distribution in the axial skeleton: MR imaging study. Radiology 177:83–88PubMed

Duda SH, Laniado M, Schick F et al (1995) Normal bone marrow in the sacrum of young adults: differences between the sexes seen on chemical shift imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:935–940PubMed

Dooms GC, Fisher MR, Hricak H, Richardson M, Crooks LE, Genant HK (1985) Bone marrow imaging: magnetic resonance studies related to age and sex. Radiology 155:429–432PubMed

Vogler JB, Murphy WA (1988) Bone marrow imaging. Radiology 168:679–693PubMed

Vande Berg BC, Lecouvet FE, Michaux L, Ferrant A, Maldague B, Malghem J (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of the bone marrow in hematologic malignancies. Eur Radiol 8:1335–1344PubMedCrossRef

Moulopoulos LA, Varma DGK, Dimopoulos MA et al (1992) Multiple myeloma: spinal MR imaging in patients with untreated newly diagnosed disease. Radiology 185:833–840PubMed

Rahmouni A, Divine M, Mathieu D et al (1993) Detection of multiple myeloma involving the spine: efficacy of fat-suppression and contrast enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:1049–1052PubMed

10.

Baur A, Stäbler A, Bartl R, Lamerz R, Scheidler J, Reiser M (1997) MRI gadolinium enhancement of bone marrow: age related changes in normals and in diffuse neoplastic infiltration. Skeletal Radiology 26:414–418PubMedCrossRef

11.

Ishijima H, Ishizaka H, Horikoshi H, Sakurai M (1996) Water fraction of lumbar vertebral bone marrow estimated from chemical shift misregistration on MR imaging: normal variations with age and sex. AJR 167:355–358PubMed

12.

Chen WT, Shih TTF, Chen RC et al (2001) Vertebral bone marrow perfusion evaluated with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging; significance of aging and sex. Radiology 220:213–218PubMed

13.

Montazel JL, Divine M, Lepage E, Kobeiter H, Breil S, Rahmouni A (2003) Normal spinal bone marrow in adults: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 229:703–709PubMedCrossRef

14.

Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least squares estimation of non-linear parameters. J Soc Indust Appl Math 11:431–441CrossRef

15.

Moulopoulos LA, Maris TG, Papanikolaou N, Panagi G, Vlahos L, Dimopoulos MA (2003) Detection of malignant bone marrow involvement with dynamic contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Oncology 14:152–158PubMedCrossRef

16.

Fleckenstein JL (2005) What’s new about osteoporosis. Radiology 236(3):745–746PubMedCrossRef

17.

Rahmouni AL, Montazel JL, Divine M et al (2003) Bone marrow with diffuse tumor infiltration in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 229:710–717PubMedCrossRef

18.

Bollow M, Knauf W, Korfel A et al (1996) Initial experience with dynamic MR imaging in evaluation of normal bone marrow versus malignant bone marrow infiltrations in humans. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:241–250CrossRef

19.

Hawighorst H, Libicher M, Knopp MV et al (1999) Evaluation of angiogenesis and perfusion of bone marrow lesions: role of semiquantitative and quantitative dynamic MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:286–294PubMedCrossRef

20.

Taylor JS, Tofts PS, Phil D et al (1999) MR imaging of tumor microcirculation: promise for the new millenium. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:903–904PubMedCrossRef

21.

van der Woude HJ, Verstraete KL, Hogendoorn P, Taminiau A, Hermans J, Bloem J (1998) Musculoskeletal tumors: does fast dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging contribute to the characterization. Radiology 208:821–828PubMed

22.

Verstraete KL, De Deene Y, Roels H, Dierick A, Uyttendale D, Kunnen M (1994) Benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions: Dynamic contrast-enhancedMR imaging-Parametric “first pass” images depict tissue vascularization and perfusion. Radiology 192:835–843PubMed

23.

Wiekes CH, Visicher MB (1975) Some physiological aspects of bone marrow pressure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 7:49–57

24.

Zamboni L, Pease DC (1961) The vascular bed of red bone marrow. Ultrastr Res 5:65–73CrossRef

25.

Laroche M (1996) Arteriosclerosis and osteoporosis (editorial). Presse Med 25:52–54PubMed

26.

Justesen J, Stenderup K, Ebbesen EN, Mosekilde L, Steniche T, Kassem M (2001) Adipocyte tissue volume in bone marrow is increased with aging and in patients with osteoporosis. Biogerontology 2(3):165–171PubMedCrossRef

27.

Griffith JF, Yeung DKW, Antonio GE et al (2005) Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in healthy men and men with osteoporosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR spectroscopy. Radiology 236:945–951PubMedCrossRef

28.

Griffith JF, Yeung DKW, Antonio GE et al (2006) Vertebral marrow fat content and diffusion and perfusion indexes in women with varying bone density: MR evaluation. Radiology 241:831–838PubMedCrossRef

29.

Gardner-Morse MG, Stokes IA (2004) Structural behavior of human lumbar spinal motion segments. J Biomech 37(2):205–212PubMedCrossRef

30.

Shih TTF, Liu HC, Chang CJ, Wei SY, Shen LC, Yang PC (2004) Correlation of MR lumbar spine bone marrow perfusion with bone mineral density in female subjects. Radiology 233:121–128PubMedCrossRef

31.

Demler K, Otte P, Bartl R et al (1983) Osteopenia, marrow atrophy and capillary circulation. Comparative studies of the human iliac crest and 1st lumbar vertebra. Z Orthop 121:223–227CrossRef

32.

Burkhardt R, Kettner G, Bohm W et al (1987) Changes in trabecular bone, hematoppoiesis and bone marrow vessels in aplastic anemia, primary osteoporosis, and old age: a comparative histomorphometric study. Bone 8:157–164PubMedCrossRef

33.

Kannel WB, Hjortland MC, McNamara PM, Gordon T (1976) Menopause and the risk of cardiovascular disease: the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med 85:447–452PubMed

34.

Colditz GA, Willert WC, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH (1987) Menopause and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med 316:1105–1110PubMed

35.

Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd (1986) Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 314:1676–1686PubMed

36.

Mazess RB, Barden HS, Ettinger M et al (1987) Spine and femur density using dual photon absorptiometry in US white women. Bone Miner 2:211–219PubMedCrossRef

37.

Jensen GF, Boesen J, Transbal I (1986) Spinal osteoporosis: a local vascular disease? (abstr). Calcif Tissue Int 39:A62

38.

Frye MA, Melton JL 3rd, Bryant SC et al (1992) Osteoporosis and calcification of the aorta. Bone Miner 19:185–194PubMedCrossRef

39.

Banks LM, Lees B, Mac Sweeney JE, Stevenson JC (1994) Effect of degenerative spinal and aortic calcification on bone density measurements in post- menopausal women: links between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Eur J Clin Invest 24:813–817PubMedCrossRef

40.

Kiel DP, Kaupilla LI, Cupples LA, Hannan MT, O’Donnel CJ, Wilson PW (2001) Bone loss and the progression of abdominal aortic calcification over a 25-year period; The Framingham Heart Study. Calcif Tissue Int 68:271–276PubMedCrossRef

41.

Tsai KS, Pan WH, Hsu SHJ et al (1996) Sexual differences in bone markers and bone mineral density of normal Chinese. Calcif Tissue Int 59:454–460PubMed

42.

Dunnil MS, Anderson JA, Whitehead R (1967) Quantitative histological studies on age changes in bone. J Pathol Bacteriol 94:275–291CrossRef

43.

Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Carter JR (1988) Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radiology 168:177–186PubMed

44.

Kuisma M, Karppinen J, Niinimäki J et al (2006) A three-year follow-up of lumbar spine endplate (Modic) changes. Spine 31(15):1714–1718PubMedCrossRef

45.

Kuisma M, Karppinen J, Niinimäki J et al (2007) Modic changes in endplates of lumbar vertebral bodies: prevalence and association with low back and sciatic pain among middle-aged male workers. Spine 32(10):1116–1122PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Differences in perfusion parameters between upper and lower lumbar vertebral segments with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE MRI)
verfasst von: Vasiliki Savvopoulou
Thomas G. Maris
Lampros Vlahos
Lia Angela Moulopoulos
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2008
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2008
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0943-8

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Differences in perfusion parameters between upper and lower lumbar vertebral segments with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE MRI)

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2008

Iodine contrast media doses equal-attenuating with gadolinium chelates at CT-aortography may have less risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and no risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in azotaemic patients!

Detection of hypervascular malignant foci in borderline lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of dynamic multi-detector row CT, dynamic MR imaging and superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging

Bone marrow MR imaging as predictors of outcome in hemopoietic stem cell transplantation

Pelvic floor muscle lesions at endoanal MR imaging in female patients with faecal incontinence

Carotid artery wall thickness and ischemic symptoms: evaluation using multi-detector-row CT angiography

Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update Radiologie