Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 5/2009

01.05.2009 | Cardiac

Italian multicenter, prospective study to evaluate the negative predictive value of 16- and 64-slice MDCT imaging in patients scheduled for coronary angiography (NIMISCAD-Non Invasive Multicenter Italian Study for Coronary Artery Disease)

verfasst von: Riccardo Marano, Francesco De Cobelli, Irene Floriani, Christoph Becker, Christopher Herzog, Maurizio Centonze, Giovanni Morana, Gian Franco Gualdi, Guido Ligabue, Gianluca Pontone, Carlo Catalano, Dante Chiappino, Massimo Midiri, Giovanni Simonetti, Filippo Marchisio, Lucio Olivetti, Rossella Fattori, Lorenzo Bonomo, Alessandro Del Maschio, NIMISCAD Study Group

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This was a prospective, multicenter study designed to evaluate the utility of MDCT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients scheduled for elective coronary angiography (CA) using different MDCT systems from different manufacturers. Twenty national sites prospectively enrolled 367 patients between July 2004 and June 2006. Computed tomography (CT) was performed using a standardized/optimized scan protocol for each type of MDCT system (≥16 slices) and compared with quantitative CA performed within 2 weeks of MDCT. A total of 284 patients (81%) were studied by 16-slice MDCT systems, while 66 patients (19%) by 64-slice MDCT scanners. The primary analysis was on-site/off-site evaluation of the negative predictive value (NPV) on a per-patient basis. Secondary analyses included on-site evaluation on a per-artery and per-segment basis. On-site evaluation included 327 patients (CAD prevalence 58%). NPV, positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy (DA) were 0.91 (95% CI 0.85–0.95), 0.91 (95% CI 0.86–0.95), 0.94 (95% CI 0.89–0.97), 0.88 (95% CI 0.81–0.93), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88–0.94), respectively. Off-site analysis included 295 patients (CAD prevalence 56%). NPV, PPV, sensitivity, specificity, and DA were 0.73 (95% CI 0.65–0.79), 0.93 (95% CI 0.87–0.97), 0.73 (95% CI 0.65–0.79), 0.93 (95% CI 0.87–0.97), and 0.82 (95% CI 0.77–0.86), respectively. The results of this study demonstrate the utility of MDCT in excluding significant CAD even when conducted by centers with varying degrees of expertise and using different MDCT machines.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Topol EJ, Nissen SE (1995) Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 92:2333–2342PubMed Topol EJ, Nissen SE (1995) Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 92:2333–2342PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Davidson CJ, Fishman RF, Bonow RO (1997) Cardiac catheterization. In: Braunwald E (ed) Heart disease: A textbook of cardiovascular medicine. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, pp 177–203 Davidson CJ, Fishman RF, Bonow RO (1997) Cardiac catheterization. In: Braunwald E (ed) Heart disease: A textbook of cardiovascular medicine. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, pp 177–203
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Haberl R, Becker A, Leber A et al (2001) Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of 1.764 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:451–457PubMedCrossRef Haberl R, Becker A, Leber A et al (2001) Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of 1.764 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:451–457PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W et al (2006) American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. AHA Statistical Update. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2006 Update. A Report From the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 113(6):e85–151PubMedCrossRef Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W et al (2006) American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. AHA Statistical Update. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2006 Update. A Report From the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 113(6):e85–151PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad-Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery. Circulation 51:5–40PubMed Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad-Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery. Circulation 51:5–40PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult treatment Panel III (2001) JAMA 285:2846–2897 Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult treatment Panel III (2001) JAMA 285:2846–2897
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U et al (2000) Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation 102:2823–2828PubMed Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U et al (2000) Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation 102:2823–2828PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al (2001) Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 357:599–603PubMedCrossRef Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al (2001) Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 357:599–603PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al (2001) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103:2535–2538PubMed Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al (2001) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103:2535–2538PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogl TJ, Abolmaali ND, Diebold T et al (2002) Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiology 223:212–220PubMedCrossRef Vogl TJ, Abolmaali ND, Diebold T et al (2002) Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiology 223:212–220PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A et al (2002) Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients. Eur Heart J 23:1714–1725PubMed Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A et al (2002) Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients. Eur Heart J 23:1714–1725PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA et al (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106:2051–2054PubMedCrossRef Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA et al (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106:2051–2054PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107:664–666PubMedCrossRef Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107:664–666PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC et al (2004) Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease. Patient- versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 110:2638–2643PubMedCrossRef Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC et al (2004) Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease. Patient- versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 110:2638–2643PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuettner A, Kopp AF, Schroeder S et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:831–839PubMedCrossRef Kuettner A, Kopp AF, Schroeder S et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:831–839PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K et al (2004) Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:2265–2270PubMedCrossRef Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K et al (2004) Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:2265–2270PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:123–127PubMedCrossRef Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:123–127PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP et al (2005) Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:128–132PubMedCrossRef Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP et al (2005) Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:128–132PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaiser C, Bremerich J, Haller S et al (2005) Limited diagnostic yield of non-invasive coronary angiography by 16-slice multi-detector spiral computed tomography in routine patients referred for evaluation of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 26:1987–1992PubMedCrossRef Kaiser C, Bremerich J, Haller S et al (2005) Limited diagnostic yield of non-invasive coronary angiography by 16-slice multi-detector spiral computed tomography in routine patients referred for evaluation of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 26:1987–1992PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL et al (2005) Non invasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 293:2471–2478CrossRef Hoffman MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL et al (2005) Non invasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 293:2471–2478CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26:1482–1487PubMedCrossRef Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26:1482–1487PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557PubMedCrossRef Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323PubMedCrossRef Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography. A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147–154PubMedCrossRef Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography. A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147–154PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 16:575–582PubMedCrossRef Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 16:575–582PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C et al (2006) Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Am J Roentgenol 187:111–117CrossRef Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C et al (2006) Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Am J Roentgenol 187:111–117CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: Comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 70:564–571PubMedCrossRef Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: Comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 70:564–571PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K et al (2006) Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64-×0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 97:343–348PubMedCrossRef Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K et al (2006) Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64-×0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 97:343–348PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R (2007) New technology for non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Circulation 115:1464–1480PubMedCrossRef Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R (2007) New technology for non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Circulation 115:1464–1480PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamon M, Morello R, Riddell JW et al (2007) Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography — Meta-Analysis. Radiology 245:720–731PubMedCrossRef Hamon M, Morello R, Riddell JW et al (2007) Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography — Meta-Analysis. Radiology 245:720–731PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffman MH (2006) Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 296:403–411PubMedCrossRef Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffman MH (2006) Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 296:403–411PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256–268PubMedCrossRef Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256–268PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography—Initial experience. Eur J Radiol 57:331–335PubMedCrossRef Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography—Initial experience. Eur J Radiol 57:331–335PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson TRC, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ et al (2006) Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 16:1409–1415PubMedCrossRef Johnson TRC, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ et al (2006) Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 16:1409–1415PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16:2739–2747PubMedCrossRef Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16:2739–2747PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Sampson UK, Dorbala S, Limaye A et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1052–1058PubMedCrossRef Sampson UK, Dorbala S, Limaye A et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1052–1058PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Kalff V et al (2007) Validation of a new cardiac image fusion software for three-dimensional integration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and stand-alone 64-slice CT angiography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:1097–1106PubMedCrossRef Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Kalff V et al (2007) Validation of a new cardiac image fusion software for three-dimensional integration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and stand-alone 64-slice CT angiography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:1097–1106PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S (2007) Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298(3):317–323PubMedCrossRef Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S (2007) Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298(3):317–323PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Flohr T, Kuttner A, Bruder H et al (2003) Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system with 16-slice detector and increased gantry rotation speed for isotropic submillimeter imaging of the heart. Herz 28(1):7–19PubMedCrossRef Flohr T, Kuttner A, Bruder H et al (2003) Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system with 16-slice detector and increased gantry rotation speed for isotropic submillimeter imaging of the heart. Herz 28(1):7–19PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: Impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305–1310PubMedCrossRef Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: Impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305–1310PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CAG, Mollet NR et al (2007) Sixty-four-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1469–1475PubMedCrossRef Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CAG, Mollet NR et al (2007) Sixty-four-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1469–1475PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Fox K, Alonso Garcia MA, Ardissino D et al (2006) Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Eur Heart J 27:1341–1381PubMedCrossRef Fox K, Alonso Garcia MA, Ardissino D et al (2006) Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Eur Heart J 27:1341–1381PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Italian multicenter, prospective study to evaluate the negative predictive value of 16- and 64-slice MDCT imaging in patients scheduled for coronary angiography (NIMISCAD-Non Invasive Multicenter Italian Study for Coronary Artery Disease)
verfasst von
Riccardo Marano
Francesco De Cobelli
Irene Floriani
Christoph Becker
Christopher Herzog
Maurizio Centonze
Giovanni Morana
Gian Franco Gualdi
Guido Ligabue
Gianluca Pontone
Carlo Catalano
Dante Chiappino
Massimo Midiri
Giovanni Simonetti
Filippo Marchisio
Lucio Olivetti
Rossella Fattori
Lorenzo Bonomo
Alessandro Del Maschio
NIMISCAD Study Group
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1239-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2009

European Radiology 5/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.