nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.09.2013 | Magnetic Resonance

Diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced, contrast-enhanced perfusion and angiographic MRI sequences for pulmonary embolism diagnosis: results of independent sequence readings

verfasst von: Marie Pierre Revel, Olivier Sanchez, Catherine Lefort, Guy Meyer, Sophie Couchon, Anne Hernigou, Ralph Niarra, Gilles Chatellier, Guy Frija

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To independently evaluate unenhanced, contrast-enhanced perfusion and angiographic MR sequences for pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis.

Methods

Prospective investigation, including 274 patients who underwent perfusion, unenhanced 2D steady-state-free-precession (SSFP) and contrast-enhanced 3D angiographic MR sequences on a 1.5-T unit, in addition to CTA (CT angiography). Two independent readers evaluated each sequence independently in random order. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and inter-reader agreement were calculated for each sequence, excluding sequences judged inconclusive. Sensitivity was also calculated according to PE location.

Results

Contrast-enhanced angiographic sequences showed the highest sensitivity (82.9 and 89.7 %, reader 1 and reader 2, respectively), specificity (98.5 and 100 %) and agreement (kappa value 0.77). Unenhanced angiographic sequences, although less sensitive overall (68.7 and 76.4 %), were sensitive for the detection of proximal PE (92.7 and 100 %) and showed high specificity (96.1 and 99.1 %) and good agreement (kappa value 0.62). Perfusion sequences showed lower sensitivity (75.0 and 79.3 %), specificity (84.8 and 89.7 %) and agreement (kappa value 0.51), and a negative predictive value of 84.8 % at best.

Conclusions

Compared with contrast-enhanced angiographic sequences, unenhanced sequences demonstrate lower sensitivity, except for proximal PE, but high specificity and agreement. The negative predictive value of perfusion sequences was insufficient to safely rule out PE.

Key Points

• Unenhanced angiographic MR sequences are very specific and can identify proximal PE.

• Contrast-enhanced MR angiographic sequences show high sensitivity for PE diagnosis.

• A normal MR perfusion result does not exclude PE.

• Inter-reader agreement is better for angiographic than perfusion MR sequences.

Davidson BL, Lacrampe MJ (2010) Why can't magnetic resonance imaging reliably diagnose pulmonary embolism? Ann Intern Med 152:467–468PubMedCrossRef

Stein PD, Chenevert TL, Fowler SE et al (2010) Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann Intern Med 152:434–443PubMedCrossRef

Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Sostman HD et al (2008) Methods of prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis III (PIOPED III). Semin Nucl Med 38:462–470PubMedCrossRef

Gosselin MV, Rassner UA, Thieszen SL, Phillips J, Oki A (2004) Contrast dynamics during CT pulmonary angiogram: analysis of an inspiration associated artifact. J Thorac Imaging 19:1–7PubMedCrossRef

Kluge A, Muller C, Hansel J, Gerriets T, Bachmann G (2004) Real-time MR with TrueFISP for the detection of acute pulmonary embolism: initial clinical experience. Eur Radiol 14:709–718PubMedCrossRef

Kluge A, Gerriets T, Stolz E et al (2006) Pulmonary perfusion in acute pulmonary embolism: agreement of MRI and SPECT for lobar, segmental and subsegmental perfusion defects. Acta Radiol 47:933–940PubMedCrossRef

Kluge A, Luboldt W, Bachmann G (2006) Acute pulmonary embolism to the subsegmental level: diagnostic accuracy of three MRI techniques compared with 16-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W7–W14PubMedCrossRef

Revel MP, Sanchez O, Couchon S et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for an acute pulmonary embolism: results of the 'IRM-EP' study. J Thromb Haemost 10:743–750PubMedCrossRef

Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef

10.

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2003) Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med 138:40–44PubMedCrossRef

11.

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2003) The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 138:W1–W12PubMedCrossRef

12.

Bhave G, Lewis JB, Chang SS (2008) Association of gadolinium based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. J Urol 180:830–835PubMedCrossRef

13.

Marckmann P (2008) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: epidemiology update. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 17:315–319PubMedCrossRef

14.

Othersen JB, Maize JC, Woolson RF, Budisavljevic MN (2007) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after exposure to gadolinium in patients with renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22:3179–3185PubMedCrossRef

15.

Perazella MA (2008) Gadolinium-contrast toxicity in patients with kidney disease: nephrotoxicity and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Curr Drug Saf 3:67–75PubMedCrossRef

16.

Rajaram S, Swift AJ, Capener D et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and unenhanced proton MR imaging compared with CT pulmonary angiography in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Radiol 22:310–317PubMedCrossRef

17.

Suga K, Yasuhiko K, Iwanaga H, Tokuda O, Matsunaga N (2008) Relation between lung perfusion defects and intravascular clots in acute pulmonary thromboembolism: assessment with breath-hold SPECT-CT pulmonary angiography fusion images. Eur J Radiol 67:472–480PubMedCrossRef

18.

Thieme SF, Johnson TR, Lee C et al (2009) Dual-energy CT for the assessment of contrast material distribution in the pulmonary parenchyma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:144–149PubMedCrossRef

19.

Kalb B, Sharma P, Tigges S et al (2012) MR imaging of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced 3D MR pulmonary angiography, contrast-enhanced low-flip angle 3D GRE, and nonenhanced free-induction FISP sequences. Radiology 263:271–278PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced, contrast-enhanced perfusion and angiographic MRI sequences for pulmonary embolism diagnosis: results of independent sequence readings
verfasst von: Marie Pierre Revel
Olivier Sanchez
Catherine Lefort
Guy Meyer
Sophie Couchon
Anne Hernigou
Ralph Niarra
Gilles Chatellier
Guy Frija
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2013
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2852-8

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced, contrast-enhanced perfusion and angiographic MRI sequences for pulmonary embolism diagnosis: results of independent sequence readings