Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 2/2014

01.02.2014 | Breast

Potential role of shear-wave ultrasound elastography for the differential diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: preliminary report

verfasst von: Kyung Hee Ko, Hae Kyoung Jung, So Joong Kim, Hyerin Kim, Jung Hyun Yoon

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To report our preliminary experience with shear-wave elastography (SWE) for non-mass lesions (NMLs) in the breast and suggest a potential ancillary role of SWE for BI-RADS Category 4a NMLs in reducing the number of unnecessary benign biopsies.

Methods

A total of 310 breast lesions in 286 consecutive women who had been scheduled for US-guided automated gun biopsy or vacuum-assisted biopsy between June and December 2012 were initially included in this study. Finally, 33 women with 34 breast lesions classified as NMLs constituted our study population. Diagnostic performances of each quantitative SWE parameter were calculated. Histological diagnosis was used as a reference standard.

Results

Among the 34 breast NMLs, 22 (65 %) were benign and 12 (35 %) were malignant. Emean value with cut-off set at 41.6 kPa had the highest Az value 0.788 (95 % CI, 0.625–0.951), showing sensitivity of 83.3 % and specificity of 68.2 %. By applying an Emean value of 41.6 kPa or less as a criterion for downgrading soft BI-RADS category 4a NMLs to category 3 NMLs, 15 unnecessary biopsies could have been eliminated from the 19 BI-RADS category 4a lesions (79 %).

Conclusions

SWE features could increase positive predictive values and reduce unnecessary benign biopsies of category 4a NMLs.

Key points

• Ultrasound elastography is increasingly used to assess the stiffness of breast lesions
• Shear-wave elastography provides useful information about non-mass breast lesions
• Shear-wave elastography may render some biopsies of non-mass breast lesions unnecessary
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim EK, Ko KH, Oh KK et al (2008) Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1209–1215PubMedCrossRef Kim EK, Ko KH, Oh KK et al (2008) Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1209–1215PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA (2005) BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1260–1265PubMedCrossRef Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA (2005) BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1260–1265PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Uematsu T (2012) Non-mass-like lesions on breast ultrasonography: a systematic review. Breast Cancer 19:295–301PubMedCrossRef Uematsu T (2012) Non-mass-like lesions on breast ultrasonography: a systematic review. Breast Cancer 19:295–301PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin HJ, Kim HH, Kim SM, Kwon GY, Gong G, Cho OK (2008) Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the sonographic and pathologic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:516–525PubMedCrossRef Shin HJ, Kim HH, Kim SM, Kwon GY, Gong G, Cho OK (2008) Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the sonographic and pathologic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:516–525PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon WK, Myung JS, Lee YJ, Park IA, Noh DY, Im JG (2002) US of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics 22:269–280, discussion 280-261PubMedCrossRef Moon WK, Myung JS, Lee YJ, Park IA, Noh DY, Im JG (2002) US of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics 22:269–280, discussion 280-261PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang LC, Sullivan M, Du H, Feldman MI, Mendelson EB (2013) US appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics 33:213–228PubMedCrossRef Wang LC, Sullivan M, Du H, Feldman MI, Mendelson EB (2013) US appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics 33:213–228PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Khetani K, Abdullah N, Joseph L, Kao E (2009) Mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: sonographic features with pathological correlation in 35 patients. Clin Radiol 64:628–636PubMedCrossRef Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Khetani K, Abdullah N, Joseph L, Kao E (2009) Mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: sonographic features with pathological correlation in 35 patients. Clin Radiol 64:628–636PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sotome K, Yamamoto Y, Hirano A et al (2007) The role of contrast enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of non-mass image-forming lesions on breast ultrasonography. Breast Cancer 14:371–380PubMedCrossRef Sotome K, Yamamoto Y, Hirano A et al (2007) The role of contrast enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of non-mass image-forming lesions on breast ultrasonography. Breast Cancer 14:371–380PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gwak YJ, Kim HJ, Kwak JY et al (2011) Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation. Acta Radiol 52:364–371PubMedCrossRef Gwak YJ, Kim HJ, Kwak JY et al (2011) Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation. Acta Radiol 52:364–371PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Izumori A, Takebe K, Sato A (2010) Ultrasound findings and histological features of ductal carcinoma in situ detected by ultrasound examination alone. Breast Cancer 17:136–141PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Izumori A, Takebe K, Sato A (2010) Ultrasound findings and histological features of ductal carcinoma in situ detected by ultrasound examination alone. Breast Cancer 17:136–141PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al (2012) Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification. Br J Cancer 107:224–229PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al (2012) Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification. Br J Cancer 107:224–229PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ et al (2012) Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 262:435–449PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ et al (2012) Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 262:435–449PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M et al (2010) Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging—preliminary results. Radiology 256:297–303PubMedCrossRef Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M et al (2010) Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging—preliminary results. Radiology 256:297–303PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al (2010) Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res 12:R104PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al (2010) Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res 12:R104PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee EJ, Jung HK, Ko KH, Lee JT, Yoon JH (2013) Diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography: which parameter to use in differential diagnosis of solid breast masses? Eur Radiol 23:1803–1811PubMedCrossRef Lee EJ, Jung HK, Ko KH, Lee JT, Yoon JH (2013) Diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography: which parameter to use in differential diagnosis of solid breast masses? Eur Radiol 23:1803–1811PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SH, Chang JM, Kim WH et al (2013) Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography. Eur Radiol 23:1015–1026PubMedCrossRef Lee SH, Chang JM, Kim WH et al (2013) Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography. Eur Radiol 23:1015–1026PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al (2012) Invasive breast cancer: relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. Radiology 263:673–677PubMedCrossRef Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al (2012) Invasive breast cancer: relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. Radiology 263:673–677PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gweon HM, Youk JH, Son EJ, Kim JA (2013) Visually assessed colour overlay features in shear-wave elastography for breast masses: quantification and diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol 23:658–663PubMedCrossRef Gweon HM, Youk JH, Son EJ, Kim JA (2013) Visually assessed colour overlay features in shear-wave elastography for breast masses: quantification and diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol 23:658–663PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang JM, Park IA, Lee SH et al (2013) Stiffness of tumours measured by shear-wave elastography correlated with subtypes of breast cancer. Eur Radiol 23:2450–2458PubMedCrossRef Chang JM, Park IA, Lee SH et al (2013) Stiffness of tumours measured by shear-wave elastography correlated with subtypes of breast cancer. Eur Radiol 23:2450–2458PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Youk JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ, Han KH, Kim JA (2013) Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4. Eur Radiol 23:2695–2704PubMedCrossRef Youk JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ, Han KH, Kim JA (2013) Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4. Eur Radiol 23:2695–2704PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N et al (2011) Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129:89–97PubMedCrossRef Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N et al (2011) Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129:89–97PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Raza S, Odulate A, Ong EM, Chikarmane S, Harston CW (2010) Using real-time tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation: our initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 29:551–563PubMed Raza S, Odulate A, Ong EM, Chikarmane S, Harston CW (2010) Using real-time tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation: our initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 29:551–563PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C et al (2008) Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 18:2381–2389PubMedCrossRef Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C et al (2008) Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 18:2381–2389PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleury EF, Rinaldi JF, Piato S, Fleury JC, Roveda Junior D (2009) Appearance of breast masses on sonoelastography with special focus on the diagnosis of fibroadenomas. Eur Radiol 19:1337–1346PubMedCrossRef Fleury EF, Rinaldi JF, Piato S, Fleury JC, Roveda Junior D (2009) Appearance of breast masses on sonoelastography with special focus on the diagnosis of fibroadenomas. Eur Radiol 19:1337–1346PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon JH, Jung HK, Lee JT, Ko KH (2013) Shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis of solid breast masses: what leads to false-negative or false-positive results? Eur Radiol 23:2432–2440PubMedCrossRef Yoon JH, Jung HK, Lee JT, Ko KH (2013) Shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis of solid breast masses: what leads to false-negative or false-positive results? Eur Radiol 23:2432–2440PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Potential role of shear-wave ultrasound elastography for the differential diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: preliminary report
verfasst von
Kyung Hee Ko
Hae Kyoung Jung
So Joong Kim
Hyerin Kim
Jung Hyun Yoon
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-3034-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

European Radiology 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.