Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Radiology
Erschienen in: European Radiology 6/2014

01.06.2014 | Breast

MRI-only lesions: application of diffusion-weighted imaging obviates unnecessary MR-guided breast biopsies

verfasst von: Claudio Spick, Katja Pinker-Domenig, Margaretha Rudas, Thomas H. Helbich, Pascal A. Baltzer

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To assess if the application of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) obviates unnecessary MR-guided biopsies in suspicious breast lesions visible only on contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI).

Methods

This institutional review board (IRB)-approved, retrospective, single-centre study included 101 patients (mean age, 49.5; SD 13.9 years) who underwent additional DWI at 1.5 T prior to MRI-guided biopsy of 104 lesions classified as suspicious for malignancy and visible on CE-MRI only. An experienced radiologist, blinded to histopathologic and follow-up results, measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained from DWI. Diagnostic accuracy was investigated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.

Results

Histopathology revealed 20 malignant and 84 benign lesions. Lesions were masses in 61 (15 malignant, 24.6 %) and non-masses in 43 cases (five malignant, 11.6 %). Mean ADC values were 1.53 ± 0.38 × 10−3 mm2/s in benign lesions and 1.06 ± 0.27 × 10−3 mm2/s in malignant lesions. ROC analysis revealed exclusively benign lesions if ADC values were greater than 1.58 × 10−3 mm2/s. As a consequence, 29 false-positive biopsies (34.5 %) could have been avoided without any false-negative findings. Both in mass and in non-mass lesions, rule-in and rule-out criteria were identified using flexible ADC thresholds based on ROC analysis.

Conclusion

Additional application of DWI in breast lesions visible only on MRI can avoid false-positive, MR-guided biopsies. Thus, DWI should be an integral part of breast MRI protocols.

Key Points

• DWI measurements are a fast and helpful technique for improved breast lesion diagnosis
• DWI application in breast lesions visible only on MRI obviates false-positive, MR-guided biopsies
• Flexible ADC thresholds provide rule-in and rule-out criteria for breast lesion malignancy
Literatur
1.
Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D (2008) Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 148:671–679PubMedCrossRef
2.
Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316PubMedCrossRef
5.
Floery D, Helbich TH (2006) MRI-guided percutaneous biopsy of breast lesions: materials, techniques, success rates, and management in patients with suspected radiologic-pathologic mismatch. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14:411–425, viiiPubMedCrossRef
6.
Schrading S, Simon B, Braun M, Wardelmann E, Schild HH, Kuhl CK (2010) MRI-guided breast biopsy: influence of choice of vacuum biopsy system on the mode of biopsy of MRI-only suspicious breast lesions. Am J Roentgenol 194:1650–1657CrossRef
7.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A, Schaumlöffel U et al (1999) MR-guided percutaneous excisional and incisional biopsy of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 9:1656–1665PubMedCrossRef
8.
Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A et al (2006) Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 106:982–990PubMedCrossRef
9.
Guo Y, Cai Y-Q, Cai Z-L et al (2002) Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:172–178PubMedCrossRef
10.
Kinoshita T, Yashiro N, Ihara N, Funatu H, Fukuma E, Narita M (2002) Diffusion-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging in breast tumors: differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma from fibroadenoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:1042–1046PubMedCrossRef
11.
Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, DeBruhl N, Bassett LW (2002) In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:693–704PubMedCrossRef
12.
Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K et al (2005) Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:644–649PubMedCrossRef
13.
Rubesova E, Grell A-S, De Maertelaer V, Metens T, Chao S-L, Lemort M (2006) Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:319–324PubMedCrossRef
14.
Wenkel E, Geppert C, Schulz-Wendtland R et al (2007) Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. Acad Radiol 14:1077–1083PubMedCrossRef
15.
Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Cilotti A, Moretti M, Bartolozzi C (2007) Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 17:2646–2655PubMedCrossRef
16.
Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2007) Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 244:94–103PubMedCrossRef
17.
Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T et al (2008) Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:1157–1165PubMedCrossRef
18.
Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H et al (2008) Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. Magn Reson Med Sci 7:23–29PubMedCrossRef
19.
Tozaki M, Fukuma E (2009) 1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy? Am J Roentgenol 193:840–849CrossRef
20.
Baltzer PAT, Renz DM, Herrmann K-H et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques. Eur Radiol 19:1612–1620PubMedCrossRef
21.
Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. Am J Roentgenol 193:1716–1722CrossRef
22.
El-Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 256:64–73CrossRef
23.
Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD (2010) Differential diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:562–570PubMedCrossRef
24.
Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, Dinc H, Gunes G, Reis A (2011) Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. Am J Roentgenol 196:210–217CrossRef
25.
26.
Kuroki Y, Nasu K (2008) Advances in breast MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast. Breast Cancer (Tokyo, Japan) 15:212–217CrossRef
27.
28.
American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS® ). American College of Radiology, Reston
29.
Satake H, Nishio A, Ikeda M et al (2011) Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging. Am J Roentgenol 196:202–209CrossRef
30.
Parsian S, Rahbar H, Allison KH et al (2012) Nonmalignant breast lesions: ADCs of benign and high-risk subtypes assessed as false-positive at dynamic enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 265:696–706PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
31.
Baltzer PAT, Dietzel M, Vag T, Mieczyslaw G, Camara O, Kaiser WA (2009) Diffusion weighted imaging—useful in all kinds of lesions? A systematic review. Eur Radiol 19:S765–S974CrossRef
32.
Chen X, Li WL, Zhang YL, Wu Q, Guo YM, Bai ZL (2010) Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions. BMC Cancer 10:693PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
33.
34.
Pinker K, Bickel H, Helbich TH et al (2013) Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the "Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System" for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 23:1791–1802PubMedCrossRef
35.
Bogner W, Pinker-Domenig K, Bickel H et al (2012) Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T. Radiology 263:64–76PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
MRI-only lesions: application of diffusion-weighted imaging obviates unnecessary MR-guided breast biopsies
verfasst von
Claudio Spick
Katja Pinker-Domenig
Margaretha Rudas
Thomas H. Helbich
Pascal A. Baltzer
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3153-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

European Radiology 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Magnetic Resonance

Radial volumetric imaging breath-hold examination (VIBE) with k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) for dynamic gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI of the liver: advantages over Cartesian VIBE in the arterial phase

Gastrointestinal

Gastrointestinal tract perforation: evaluation of MDCT according to perforation site and elapsed time

Cardiac

Magnetic resonance-derived circumferential strain provides a superior and incremental assessment of improvement in contractile function in patients early after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Breast

Short interval follow-up after a benign concordant MR-guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy – is it worthwhile?

Magnetic Resonance

MR diffusion imaging for preoperative staging of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Magnetic Resonance

Influence of Calcium on Choline Measurements by 1H MR Spectroscopy of Thigh Muscles

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

23.04.2024 | Pankreaskarzinom | Nachrichten

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

13.04.2024 | Klinik aktuell | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

08.04.2024 | Andrologie | Nachrichten

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet
weitere anzeigen

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen