Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 2/2016

01.02.2016 | Radiological Education

Information about radiation dose and risks in connection with radiological examinations: what patients would like to know

verfasst von: Leila Ukkola, Heljä Oikarinen, Anja Henner, Hilkka Honkanen, Marianne Haapea, Osmo Tervonen

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To find out patients’ wishes for the content and sources of the information concerning radiological procedures.

Methods

A questionnaire providing quantitative and qualitative data was prepared. It comprised general information, dose and risks of radiation, and source of information. Two tables demonstrating different options to indicate the dose or risks were also provided. Patients could give one or many votes. Altogether, 147 patients (18–85 years) were interviewed after different radiological examinations using these devices.

Results

95 % (139/147) of the patients wished for dose and risk information. Symbols (78/182 votes) and verbal scale (56/182) were preferred to reveal the dose, while verbal (83/164) and numerical scale (55/164) on the risk of fatal cancer were preferred to indicate the risks. Wishes concerning the course, options and purpose of the examination were also expressed. Prescriber (3.9 on a scale 1–5), information letter (3.8) and radiographer (3.3) were the preferred sources. Patients aged 66–85 years were reluctant to choose electronic channels.

Conclusions

Apart from general information, patients wish for dose and risk information in connection with radiological examinations. The majority preferred symbols to indicate dose and verbal scales to indicate risks, and the preferred source of information was the prescriber or information letter.

Key points

95 % of patients expect information on the dose and risks of radiation.
Symbols and verbal scale are preferred to indicate the dose.
Verbal and numerical scales are preferred to indicate fatal cancer risk.
Patients expect information on course, options and purpose of examination.
Prescriber, information letter and radiographer are popular sources of the overall information.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Davies HE, Wathen CG, Gleeson FV (2011) The risks of radiation exposure related to diagnostic imaging and how to minimise them. BMJ 342:d947PubMedCrossRef Davies HE, Wathen CG, Gleeson FV (2011) The risks of radiation exposure related to diagnostic imaging and how to minimise them. BMJ 342:d947PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner DJ (2010) Should we be concerned about the rapid increase in CT usage? Rev Environ Health 25:63–68PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ (2010) Should we be concerned about the rapid increase in CT usage? Rev Environ Health 25:63–68PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner DJ (2010) Medical imaging in the 21st century–getting the best bang for the rad. N Engl J Med 362:943–945PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ (2010) Medical imaging in the 21st century–getting the best bang for the rad. N Engl J Med 362:943–945PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE et al (2007) American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 4:272–284PubMedCrossRef Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE et al (2007) American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 4:272–284PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Malone J, Guleria R, Craven C et al (2012) Justification of diagnostic medical exposures, some practical issues: report of an International Atomic Energy Agency Consultation. Br J Radiol 85:523–538PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Malone J, Guleria R, Craven C et al (2012) Justification of diagnostic medical exposures, some practical issues: report of an International Atomic Energy Agency Consultation. Br J Radiol 85:523–538PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Oikarinen H, Meriläinen S, Pääkkö E, Karttunen A, Nieminen MT, Tervonen O (2009) Unjustified CT examinations in young patients. Eur Radiol 19:1161–1165PubMedCrossRef Oikarinen H, Meriläinen S, Pääkkö E, Karttunen A, Nieminen MT, Tervonen O (2009) Unjustified CT examinations in young patients. Eur Radiol 19:1161–1165PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the ICRP. Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37 (2–4) International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the ICRP. Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37 (2–4)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nievelstein RAJ, Frush DP (2012) Should we obtain informed consent for examinations that expose patients to radiation? Am J Roentgenol 199:664–669CrossRef Nievelstein RAJ, Frush DP (2012) Should we obtain informed consent for examinations that expose patients to radiation? Am J Roentgenol 199:664–669CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 2:393–398CrossRef Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 2:393–398CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas KE, Parnell-Parmley JE, Haidar S et al (2006) Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. Pediatr Radiol 36:823–832PubMedCrossRef Thomas KE, Parnell-Parmley JE, Haidar S et al (2006) Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. Pediatr Radiol 36:823–832PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Koutalonis M, Horrocks J (2012) Justification in clinical radiological practice. A survey among staff of five London hospitals. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 149:124–137PubMedCrossRef Koutalonis M, Horrocks J (2012) Justification in clinical radiological practice. A survey among staff of five London hospitals. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 149:124–137PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat International Atomic Energy Agency (2009) Report of a consultation on justification of patient exposures in medical imaging. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 135:137–144CrossRef International Atomic Energy Agency (2009) Report of a consultation on justification of patient exposures in medical imaging. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 135:137–144CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Royal College of Radiologists (2012) Making the best use of clinical radiology, 7th edn. RCR, London Royal College of Radiologists (2012) Making the best use of clinical radiology, 7th edn. RCR, London
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J for Qual Health Care 15:261–266CrossRef Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J for Qual Health Care 15:261–266CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2013) ESR statement on radiation protection: globalisation, personalised medicine and safety (the GPS approach). Insights Imaging 4:737–739CrossRef European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2013) ESR statement on radiation protection: globalisation, personalised medicine and safety (the GPS approach). Insights Imaging 4:737–739CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardinal JS, Gunderman RB, Tarver RD (2011) Informing patients about risks and benefits of radiology examinations: a review article. J Am Coll Radiol 8:402–408PubMedCrossRef Cardinal JS, Gunderman RB, Tarver RD (2011) Informing patients about risks and benefits of radiology examinations: a review article. J Am Coll Radiol 8:402–408PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Pringle MB, Natesh BG, Konieczny KM (2013) Patient information leaflet on mastoid surgery risks: assessment of readability and patient understanding. J Laryngol Otol 127:1078–1083PubMedCrossRef Pringle MB, Natesh BG, Konieczny KM (2013) Patient information leaflet on mastoid surgery risks: assessment of readability and patient understanding. J Laryngol Otol 127:1078–1083PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen NB, Oort FJ, Fockens P, Willems DL, de Haes HC, Smets EM (2009) Under what conditions do patients want to be informed about their risk of a complication? A vignette study. J Med Ethics 35:276–282PubMedCrossRef Janssen NB, Oort FJ, Fockens P, Willems DL, de Haes HC, Smets EM (2009) Under what conditions do patients want to be informed about their risk of a complication? A vignette study. J Med Ethics 35:276–282PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Boutis K, Cogollo W, Fischer J, Freedman SB, David GB, Thomas KE (2013) Parental knowledge of potential cancer risks from exposure to computed tomography. Pediatrics 132:305–311PubMedCrossRef Boutis K, Cogollo W, Fischer J, Freedman SB, David GB, Thomas KE (2013) Parental knowledge of potential cancer risks from exposure to computed tomography. Pediatrics 132:305–311PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson DB, Rader SB, Forman HP, Fenton LZ (2007) Informing parents about CT radiation exposure: It’s OK to tell them. Am J Roentgenol 189:271–275CrossRef Larson DB, Rader SB, Forman HP, Fenton LZ (2007) Informing parents about CT radiation exposure: It’s OK to tell them. Am J Roentgenol 189:271–275CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Baerlocher MO, Detsky AS (2010) Discussing radiation risks associated with CT scans with patients. JAMA 304:2170–2171PubMedCrossRef Baerlocher MO, Detsky AS (2010) Discussing radiation risks associated with CT scans with patients. JAMA 304:2170–2171PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Dauer LT, Thornton RH, Hay JL, Balter R, Williamson MJ, St. Germain J (2011) Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients. Am J Roentgenol 196:756–761CrossRef Dauer LT, Thornton RH, Hay JL, Balter R, Williamson MJ, St. Germain J (2011) Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients. Am J Roentgenol 196:756–761CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Brink JA, Goske MJ, Patti JA (2012) Informed decision making trumps informed consent for medical imaging with ionizing radiation. Radiology 262:11–14PubMedCrossRef Brink JA, Goske MJ, Patti JA (2012) Informed decision making trumps informed consent for medical imaging with ionizing radiation. Radiology 262:11–14PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Semelka RC, Armao DM, Elias J Jr, Picano E (2012) The information imperative: is it time for an informed consent process explaining the risks of medical radiation? Radiology 262:15–18PubMedCrossRef Semelka RC, Armao DM, Elias J Jr, Picano E (2012) The information imperative: is it time for an informed consent process explaining the risks of medical radiation? Radiology 262:15–18PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Information about radiation dose and risks in connection with radiological examinations: what patients would like to know
verfasst von
Leila Ukkola
Heljä Oikarinen
Anja Henner
Hilkka Honkanen
Marianne Haapea
Osmo Tervonen
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3838-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

European Radiology 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.