Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 9/2020

29.04.2020 | Breast

Diffusion-weighted imaging or dynamic contrast-enhanced curve: a retrospective analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging–based differential diagnoses of benign and malignant breast lesions

verfasst von: Xiaoping Yang, Mengshi Dong, Shu Li, Ruimei Chai, Zheng Zhang, Nan Li, Lina Zhang

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To compare the diagnostic performance of models based on a combination of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or time-intensity curves (TIC) in diagnosing malignancies of breast lesions.

Methods

A double-blind retrospective study was conducted in 328 patients (254 for training and the following 74 for validation) who underwent dynamic contrast–enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the breast with pathological results. Two score models, the DWI model (apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) + morphology + enhanced information) and the TIC model (TIC + morphology + enhanced information), were established with binary logistic regression for mass and non-mass enhancements (NMEs) in the training set. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared between the two models (DWI model vs. TIC model); p < 0.05 was considered as statistically different. External validation was used.

Results

In the training set, the sensitivities, specificities, and AUCs of the DWI/TIC model were 95.2%/95.8%, 70.8%/47.9%, and 0.932/0.891 for masses, and 94.2%/90.4%, 47.4%/47.4%, and 0.798 (95% CI, 0.686–0.884)/0.802 (95% CI, 0.691–0.887) for NMEs, respectively. The AUC of the DWI model was significantly higher than that of the TIC model (p < 0.05) for masses. In the validation set, the AUCs of the DWI/TIC model were 0.896/0.861 for masses (p < 0.05) and 0.936/0.836 for NMEs (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Combined with CE MRI, the DWI model was superior or equal to the TIC model in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

Key Points

• Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging played an important role in the diagnosis of breast neoplasms.
• On the basis of contrast-enhanced MRI, the DWI model had significantly higher diagnostic ability than the TIC model in distinguishing benign and malignant masses.
• It would be reasonable to replace the time-consuming TIC with DWI for less scan time and similar diagnostic efficiency.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Medeiros LR, Duarte CS, Rosa DD et al (2011) Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(2):273–285PubMed Medeiros LR, Duarte CS, Rosa DD et al (2011) Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(2):273–285PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220(1):13–30PubMed Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220(1):13–30PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl C (2007) The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 244(2):356–378PubMed Kuhl C (2007) The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 244(2):356–378PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 30(5):501–507PubMed Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 30(5):501–507PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Abe H, Mori N, Tsuchiya K et al (2016) Kinetic analysis of benign and malignant breast lesions with ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with standard kinetic assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207(5):1159–1166PubMedPubMedCentral Abe H, Mori N, Tsuchiya K et al (2016) Kinetic analysis of benign and malignant breast lesions with ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with standard kinetic assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207(5):1159–1166PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Vreemann S, Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Nickel D et al (2017) Compressed sensing for breast MRI: resolving the trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Invest Radiol 52(10):574–582PubMed Vreemann S, Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Nickel D et al (2017) Compressed sensing for breast MRI: resolving the trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Invest Radiol 52(10):574–582PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Heacock L, Gao Y, Heller SL et al (2017) Comparison of conventional DCE-MRI and a novel golden-angle radial multicoil compressed sensing method for the evaluation of breast lesion conspicuity. J Magn Reson Imaging 45(6):1746–1752PubMed Heacock L, Gao Y, Heller SL et al (2017) Comparison of conventional DCE-MRI and a novel golden-angle radial multicoil compressed sensing method for the evaluation of breast lesion conspicuity. J Magn Reson Imaging 45(6):1746–1752PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mus RD, Borelli C, Bult P et al (2017) Time to enhancement derived from ultrafast breast MRI as a novel parameter to discriminate benign from malignant breast lesions. Eur J Radiol 89:90–96PubMed Mus RD, Borelli C, Bult P et al (2017) Time to enhancement derived from ultrafast breast MRI as a novel parameter to discriminate benign from malignant breast lesions. Eur J Radiol 89:90–96PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mann RM, Cho N, Moy L (2019) Breast MRI: state of the art. Radiology 292(3):520–536PubMed Mann RM, Cho N, Moy L (2019) Breast MRI: state of the art. Radiology 292(3):520–536PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Clauser P, Mann R, Athanasiou A et al (2018) A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 28(5):1909–1918PubMed Clauser P, Mann R, Athanasiou A et al (2018) A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 28(5):1909–1918PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nogueira L, Brandao S, Matos E et al (2014) Diffusion-weighted breast imaging at 3 T: preliminary experience. Clin Radiol 69(4):378–384PubMed Nogueira L, Brandao S, Matos E et al (2014) Diffusion-weighted breast imaging at 3 T: preliminary experience. Clin Radiol 69(4):378–384PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinker K, Bickel H, Helbich TH et al (2013) Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the “Breast imaging reporting and data system” for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 23(7):1791–1802PubMed Pinker K, Bickel H, Helbich TH et al (2013) Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the “Breast imaging reporting and data system” for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 23(7):1791–1802PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Baltzer A, Dietzel M, Kaiser CG, Baltzer PA (2016) Combined reading of contrast enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging by using a simple sum score. Eur Radiol 26(3):884–891PubMed Baltzer A, Dietzel M, Kaiser CG, Baltzer PA (2016) Combined reading of contrast enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging by using a simple sum score. Eur Radiol 26(3):884–891PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Partridge SC, Nissan N, Rahbar H, Kitsch AE, Sigmund EE (2017) Diffusion-weighted breast MRI: clinical applications and emerging techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 45(2):337–355PubMed Partridge SC, Nissan N, Rahbar H, Kitsch AE, Sigmund EE (2017) Diffusion-weighted breast MRI: clinical applications and emerging techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 45(2):337–355PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Baxter GC, Graves MJ, Gilbert FJ, Patterson AJ (2019) A meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of diffusion MRI for breast lesion characterization. Radiology 291(3):632–641PubMed Baxter GC, Graves MJ, Gilbert FJ, Patterson AJ (2019) A meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of diffusion MRI for breast lesion characterization. Radiology 291(3):632–641PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu D, Ba Z, Ni X, Wang L, Yu D, Ma X (2018) Apparent diffusion coefficient to subdivide Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System magnetic resonance imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) category 4 lesions. Med Sci Monit 24:2180–2188PubMedPubMedCentral Liu D, Ba Z, Ni X, Wang L, Yu D, Ma X (2018) Apparent diffusion coefficient to subdivide Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System magnetic resonance imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) category 4 lesions. Med Sci Monit 24:2180–2188PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietzel M, Ellmann S, Schulz-Wendtland R et al (2020) Breast MRI in the era of diffusion weighted imaging: do we still need signal-intensity time curves? Eur Radiol 30(1):47–56PubMed Dietzel M, Ellmann S, Schulz-Wendtland R et al (2020) Breast MRI in the era of diffusion weighted imaging: do we still need signal-intensity time curves? Eur Radiol 30(1):47–56PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System— breast MRI, 5th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, pp 23–144 D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System— breast MRI, 5th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, pp 23–144
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213(3):881–888PubMed Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213(3):881–888PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Maltez de Almeida JR, Gomes AB, Barros TP, Fahel PE, de Seixas RM (2015) Subcategorization of suspicious breast lesions (BI-RADS category 4) according to MRI criteria: role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205(1):222–231PubMed Maltez de Almeida JR, Gomes AB, Barros TP, Fahel PE, de Seixas RM (2015) Subcategorization of suspicious breast lesions (BI-RADS category 4) according to MRI criteria: role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205(1):222–231PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Kaiser WA (2013) A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography. Eur Radiol 23(8):2051–2060PubMed Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Kaiser WA (2013) A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography. Eur Radiol 23(8):2051–2060PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietzel M, Baltzer PAT (2018) How to use the Kaiser score as a clinical decision rule for diagnosis in multiparametric breast MRI: a pictorial essay. Insights Imaging 9(3):325–335PubMedPubMedCentral Dietzel M, Baltzer PAT (2018) How to use the Kaiser score as a clinical decision rule for diagnosis in multiparametric breast MRI: a pictorial essay. Insights Imaging 9(3):325–335PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wengert GJ, Pipan F, Almohanna J et al (2020) Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decisionmaking in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI. Eur Radiol 30(3):1451–1459 Wengert GJ, Pipan F, Almohanna J et al (2020) Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decisionmaking in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI. Eur Radiol 30(3):1451–1459
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Woodhams R, Ramadan S, Stanwell P et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: principles and clinical applications. Radiographics 31(4):1059–1084PubMed Woodhams R, Ramadan S, Stanwell P et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: principles and clinical applications. Radiographics 31(4):1059–1084PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pereira FP, Martins G, Figueiredo E et al (2009) Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(4):1030–1035PubMed Pereira FP, Martins G, Figueiredo E et al (2009) Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(4):1030–1035PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tozaki M, Maruyama K (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging for characterizing breast lesions prior to biopsy. Magnetom Flash 2:67–70 Tozaki M, Maruyama K (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging for characterizing breast lesions prior to biopsy. Magnetom Flash 2:67–70
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V, Metens T, Chao SL, Lemort M (2006) Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 24(2):319–324PubMed Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V, Metens T, Chao SL, Lemort M (2006) Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 24(2):319–324PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, Dinc H, Gunes G, Reis A (2011) Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(1):210–217PubMed Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, Dinc H, Gunes G, Reis A (2011) Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(1):210–217PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S et al (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211(1):101–110PubMed Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S et al (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211(1):101–110PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnall MD, Rosten S, Englander S, Orel SG, Nunes LW (2001) A combined architectural and kinetic interpretation model for breast MR images. Acad Radiol 8(7):591–597PubMed Schnall MD, Rosten S, Englander S, Orel SG, Nunes LW (2001) A combined architectural and kinetic interpretation model for breast MR images. Acad Radiol 8(7):591–597PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA et al (2006) Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 238(1):42–53PubMed Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA et al (2006) Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 238(1):42–53PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma D, Lu F, Zou X et al (2017) Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to improve accuracy of the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 36:175–179PubMed Ma D, Lu F, Zou X et al (2017) Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to improve accuracy of the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 36:175–179PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292(22):2735–2742PubMed Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292(22):2735–2742PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ et al (2000) Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(1):35–43PubMed Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ et al (2000) Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(1):35–43PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA (2010) False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(6):1658–1663PubMed Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA (2010) False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(6):1658–1663PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat El Khouli RH, Macura KJ, Jacobs MA et al (2009) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: quantitative method for kinetic curve type assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(4):W295–W300PubMedPubMedCentral El Khouli RH, Macura KJ, Jacobs MA et al (2009) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: quantitative method for kinetic curve type assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(4):W295–W300PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Menezes GL, Knuttel FM, Stehouwer BL, Pijnappel RM, van den Bosch MA (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: a literature review and future perspectives. World J Clin Oncol 5(2):61–70PubMedPubMedCentral Menezes GL, Knuttel FM, Stehouwer BL, Pijnappel RM, van den Bosch MA (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: a literature review and future perspectives. World J Clin Oncol 5(2):61–70PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Leithner D, Wengert GJ, Helbich TH et al (2018) Clinical role of breast MRI now and going forward. Clin Radiol 73(8):700–714PubMed Leithner D, Wengert GJ, Helbich TH et al (2018) Clinical role of breast MRI now and going forward. Clin Radiol 73(8):700–714PubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Thakran S, Gupta PK, Kabra V et al (2018) Characterization of breast lesion using T1-perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: qualitative vs. quantitative analysis. Diagn Interv Imaging 99(10):633–642PubMed Thakran S, Gupta PK, Kabra V et al (2018) Characterization of breast lesion using T1-perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: qualitative vs. quantitative analysis. Diagn Interv Imaging 99(10):633–642PubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Choudhery S, Lynch B, Sahoo S, Seiler SJ (2015) Features of non-mass enhancing lesions detected on 1.5 T breast MRI: a radiologic and pathologic analysis. Breast Dis 35(1):13–17PubMed Choudhery S, Lynch B, Sahoo S, Seiler SJ (2015) Features of non-mass enhancing lesions detected on 1.5 T breast MRI: a radiologic and pathologic analysis. Breast Dis 35(1):13–17PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat de Almeida JR, Gomes AB, Barros TP, Fahel PE, Rocha Mde S (2016) Predictive performance of BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging descriptors in the context of suspicious (category 4) findings. Radiol Bras 49(3):137–143PubMedPubMedCentral de Almeida JR, Gomes AB, Barros TP, Fahel PE, Rocha Mde S (2016) Predictive performance of BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging descriptors in the context of suspicious (category 4) findings. Radiol Bras 49(3):137–143PubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen SA, Fan X, Karczmar GS et al (2008) DCEMRI of breast lesions: is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement? Med Phys 35(7):3102–3109PubMedPubMedCentral Jansen SA, Fan X, Karczmar GS et al (2008) DCEMRI of breast lesions: is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement? Med Phys 35(7):3102–3109PubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Wenkel E, Uder M, Janka R (2014) Diffusion-weighted breast imaging. Clinical implementation procedure. Radiologe 54(3):224–232PubMed Wenkel E, Uder M, Janka R (2014) Diffusion-weighted breast imaging. Clinical implementation procedure. Radiologe 54(3):224–232PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Kul S, Eyuboglu I, Cansu A, Alhan E (2014) Diagnostic efficacy of the diffusion weighted imaging in the characterization of different types of breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 40(5):1158–1164PubMed Kul S, Eyuboglu I, Cansu A, Alhan E (2014) Diagnostic efficacy of the diffusion weighted imaging in the characterization of different types of breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 40(5):1158–1164PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Diffusion-weighted imaging or dynamic contrast-enhanced curve: a retrospective analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging–based differential diagnoses of benign and malignant breast lesions
verfasst von
Xiaoping Yang
Mengshi Dong
Shu Li
Ruimei Chai
Zheng Zhang
Nan Li
Lina Zhang
Publikationsdatum
29.04.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06883-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

European Radiology 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.