nach oben

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Erschienen in:

22.08.2017 | Original Article

Prognostic impact of hospital volume on familial adenomatous polyposis: a nationwide multicenter study

verfasst von: Masahiro Tanaka, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Hideki Ueno, Hirotoshi Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Fumio Ishida, Tatsuro Yamaguchi, Takao Hinoi, Yasuhiro Inoue, Naohiro Tomita, Hideyuki Ishida, Kenichi Sugihara

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 10/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Many studies have shown that hospital volume is significantly associated with short- and long-term outcomes in various diseases, including cancer. However, there have been no reports discussing the relationship between hospital volume and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This study aimed to clarify whether hospital volume affects short- and long-term outcomes in FAP patients.

Methods

We established a retrospectively collected database of FAP patients who underwent initial surgical treatment at 23 Japanese institutions during 2000–2012. Factors associated with short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed.

Results

The study cohort included 303 FAP patients. These patients were classified into tertile categories according to hospital volume: low (n = 31), middle (n = 72), and high volume (n = 200). The proportion of only adenoma/stage 0 was comparable among tertile categories. The adoption of operative procedure significantly differed among tertile categories; specifically, high-volume institutions preferred handsewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy (P < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Nevertheless, the frequency of complications with Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ 3 was not significantly different among tertile categories. Functional results were acceptable in every category. Wexner scores were significantly lower in high-volume compared to low-volume institutions (P = 0.02). Multivariate analyses showed that UICC stage and hospital volume were significantly associated with overall survival (P = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively).

Conclusions

Hospital volume was significantly associated with short- and long-term outcomes in FAP patients.

Cunningham D, Atkin W, Lenz H-J, Lynch HT, Minsky B, Nordlinger B, Starling N (2010) Colorectal cancer. Lancet 375(9719):1030–1047. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60353-4 CrossRefPubMed

Bülow S, Nielsen TF, Bülow C, Bisgaard ML, Karlsen L, Moesgaard F (1996) The incidence rate of familial adenomatous polyposis. Int J Color Dis 11(2):88–91. doi:10.1007/bf00342466 CrossRef

Campos FG (2014) Surgical treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis: dilemmas and current recommendations. World J Gastroenterol 20(44):16620–16629. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16620 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Nishisho I, Nakamura Y, Miyoshi Y, Miki Y, Ando H, Horii A, Koyama K, Utsunomiya J, Baba S, Hedge P, Markham A, Krush AJ, Petersen G, Hamilton SR, Nilbert MC, Levy DB, Bryan TM, Preisinger AC, Smith KJ, Su L-K, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (1991) Mutations of chromosome 5q21 genes in FAP and colorectal cancer patients. Science 253(5020):665–669CrossRefPubMed

Groden J, Thliveris A, Samowitz W, Carlson M, Gelbert L, Albertsen H, Joslyn G, Stevens J, Spirio L, Robertson M, Sargeant L, Krapcho K, Wolff E, Burt R, Hughes JP, Warrington J, McPherson J, Wasmuth J, Le Paslier D, Abderrahim H, Cohen D, Leppert M, White R (1991) Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Cell 66(3):589–600. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(81)90021-0 CrossRefPubMed

Vasen HFA, Möslein G, Alonso A, Aretz S, Bernstein I, Bertario L, Blanco I, Bülow S, Burn J, Capella G, Colas C, Engel C, Frayling I, Friedl W, Hes FJ, Hodgson S, Järvinen H, Mecklin J-P, Møller P, Myrhøi T, Nagengast FM, Parc Y, Phillips R, Clark SK, de Leon MP, Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Sampson JR, Stormorken A, Tejpar S, Thomas HJW, Wijnen J (2008) Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Gut 57(5):704–713. doi:10.1136/gut.2007.136127 CrossRefPubMed

Hueting WE, Buskens E, van der Tweel I, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2005) Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9,317 patients. Dig Surg 22(1–2):69–79. doi:10.1159/000085356 CrossRefPubMed

Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Fazio VW, Nicholls RJ, Darzi AW, Church J, Phillips RK, Tekkis PP (2006) Meta-analysis of observational studies of ileorectal versus ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 93(4):407–417. doi:10.1002/bjs.5276 CrossRefPubMed

Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346(15):1128–1137. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa012337 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Tol JA, van Gulik TM, Busch OR, Gouma DJ (2012) Centralization of highly complex low-volume procedures in upper gastrointestinal surgery. A summary of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Dig Surg 29(5):374–383. doi:10.1159/000343929 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA (2007) Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg 245(5):777–783. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000252402.33814.dd CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

12.

Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, Radzyner M, Brennan MF (2005) Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 242(4):540–544 discussion 544-547 PubMedCentralPubMed

13.

van Gijn W, Gooiker GA, Wouters MWJM, Post PN, Tollenaar RAEM, van de Velde CJH (2010) Volume and outcome in colorectal cancer surgery. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO) 36(supplement 1):S55–S63. doi:10.1016/j.Ejso.2010.06.027 CrossRef

14.

Khani MH, Smedh K (2010) Centralization of rectal cancer surgery improves long-term survival. Color Dis 12(9):874–879. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02098.x CrossRef

15.

Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E, Cramer LD, Guillem JG, Bach PB, Begg CB (2002) Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg 236(5):583–592. doi:10.1097/01.SLA.0000033036.14533.BC CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

16.

Yamaguchi T, Ishida H, Ueno H, Kobayashi H, Hinoi T, Inoue Y, Ishida F, Kanemitsu Y, Konishi T, Tomita N, Matsubara N, Watanabe T, Sugihara K (2016) Upper gastrointestinal tumours in Japanese familial adenomatous polyposis patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 46(4):310–315. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyv210 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

17.

American Society of Anesthesiologists (2014) ASA Physical Classification System. http://www.asahq.org/~/media/modules/digital briefcase apps/asa practice management/standards guidelines statements/administration/asa-physical-status-classification-system.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2017

18.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

19.

Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC (1979) Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 301(25):1364–1369. doi:10.1056/nejm197912203012503 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Kulkarni GS, Urbach DR, Austin PC, Fleshner NE, Laupacis A (2013) Higher surgeon and hospital volume improves long-term survival after radical cystectomy. Cancer 119(19):3546–3554. doi:10.1002/cncr.28235 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Aquina CT, Probst CP, Becerra AZ, Iannuzzi JC, Kelly KN, Hensley BJ, Rickles AS, Noyes K, Fleming FJ, Monson JR (2016) High volume improves outcomes: the argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery. Surgery 159(3):736–748. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.021 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Mokdad AA, Zhu H, Marrero JA, Mansour JC, Singal AG, Yopp AC (2016) Hospital volume and survival after hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. Am J Gastroenterol 111(7):967–975. doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.181 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Hodgson DC, Zhang W, Zaslavsky AM, Fuchs CS, Wright WE, Ayanian JZ (2003) Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(10):708–716. doi:10.1093/jnci/95.10.708 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Kumpulainen S, Grenman S, Kyyronen P, Pukkala E, Sankila R (2002) Evidence of benefit from centralised treatment of ovarian cancer: a nationwide population-based survival analysis in Finland. Int J Cancer 102(5):541–544. doi:10.1002/ijc.10754 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Delitto D, Black BS, Cunningham HB, Sliesoraitis S, Lu X, Liu C, Sarosi GA, Thomas RM, Trevino JG, Hughes SJ, George TJ Jr, Behrns KE (2016) Standardization of surgical care in a high-volume center improves survival in resected pancreatic head cancer. Am J Surg. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.03.001

26.

Coupland VH, Lagergren J, Luchtenborg M, Jack RH, Allum W, Holmberg L, Hanna GB, Pearce N, Moller H (2013) Hospital volume, proportion resected and mortality from oesophageal and gastric cancer: a population-based study in England, 2004-2008. Gut 62(7):961–966. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303008 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC (1987) The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res 22(2):157–182PubMedCentralPubMed

28.

Arvanitis ML, Jagelman DG, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, McGannon E (1990) Mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 33(8):639–642. doi:10.1007/bf02150736 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Groen EJ, Roos A, Muntinghe FL, Enting RH, de Vries J, Kleibeuker JH, Witjes MJ, Links TP, van Beek AP (2008) Extra-intestinal manifestations of familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg Oncol 15(9):2439–2450. doi:10.1245/s10434-008-9981-3 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

30.

Garbay D, Le Cesne A, Penel N, Chevreau C, Marec-Berard P, Blay JY, Debled M, Isambert N, Thyss A, Bompas E, Collard O, Salas S, Coindre JM, Bui B, Italiano A (2012) Chemotherapy in patients with desmoid tumors: a study from the French Sarcoma Group (FSG). Ann Oncol 23(1):182–186. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr051 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Bülow S (2003) Results of national registration of familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut 52(5):742–746. doi:10.1136/gut.52.5.742 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

32.

Koskenvuo L, Pitkaniemi J, Rantanen M, Lepisto A (2016) Impact of screening on survival in familial adenomatous polyposis. J Clin Gastroenterol 50(1):40–44. doi:10.1097/mcg.0000000000000426 CrossRefPubMed

33.

von Roon AC, Will OC, Man RF, Neale KF, Phillips RK, Nicholls RJ, Clark SK, Tekkis PP (2011) Mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis reduces the risk of adenoma formation in the anorectal segment after restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 253(2):314–317. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318f3f498 CrossRef

34.

Tekkis PP, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Remzi FH, Senagore AJ, Wu JS, Strong SA, Poloneicki JD, Hull TL, Church JM (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. Ann Surg 241(2):262–268CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

35.

Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Remzi FH, Nicholls RJ, Fazio VW, Tekkis PP (2006) A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann Surg 244(1):18–26. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000225031.15405.a3 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

36.

Becker JM, McGrath KM, Meagher MP, Parodi JE, Dunnegan DA, Soper NJ (1991) Late functional adaptation after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Surgery 110(4):718–724 discussion 725 PubMed

37.

Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, Oakley JR, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Schroeder TK (1995) Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 222 (2):120–127

38.

Sugerman HJ, Sugerman EL, Meador JG, Newsome HH Jr, Kellum JM Jr, DeMaria EJ (2000) Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion. Ann Surg 232(4):530–541CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

39.

Hor T, Zalinski S, Lefevre JH, Shields C, Attal E, Tiret E, Parc Y (2012) Feasibility of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy without diverting stoma. Dig Liver Dis 44(2):118–122. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2011.09.007 CrossRefPubMed

40.

Nugent KP, Spigelman AD, Phillips RK (1993) Life expectancy after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 36(11):1059–1062CrossRefPubMed

41.

Belchetz LA, Berk T, Bapat BV, Cohen Z, Gallinger S (1996) Changing causes of mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 39(4):384–387CrossRefPubMed

42.

Iwama T, Tamura K, Morita T, Hirai T, Hasegawa H, Koizumi K, Shirouzu K, Sugihara K, Yamamura T, Muto T, Utsunomiya J, Japanese Society for Cancer of the C, Rectum (2004) A clinical overview of familial adenomatous polyposis derived from the database of the Polyposis Registry of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 9(4):308–316. doi:10.1007/s10147-004-0414-4 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Latchford AR, Neale KF, Spigelman AD, Phillips RK, Clark SK (2009) Features of duodenal cancer in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(6):659–663. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.02.028 CrossRefPubMed

44.

Bulow S, Christensen IJ, Hojen H, Bjork J, Elmberg M, Jarvinen H, Lepisto A, Nieuwenhuis M, Vasen H (2012) Duodenal surveillance improves the prognosis after duodenal cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis. Color Dis 14(8):947–952. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02844.x CrossRef

45.

Moriya Y, Sugihara K, Akasu T, Fujita S (1997) Importance of extended lymphadenectomy with lateral node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. World J Surg 21(7):728–732CrossRefPubMed

46.

Kusters M, Beets GL, van de Velde CJ, Beets-Tan RG, Marijnen CA, Rutten HJ, Putter H, Moriya Y (2009) A comparison between the treatment of low rectal cancer in Japan and the Netherlands, focusing on the patterns of local recurrence. Ann Surg 249(2):229–235. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318190a664 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Prognostic impact of hospital volume on familial adenomatous polyposis: a nationwide multicenter study
verfasst von: Masahiro Tanaka
Yukihide Kanemitsu
Hideki Ueno
Hirotoshi Kobayashi
Tsuyoshi Konishi
Fumio Ishida
Tatsuro Yamaguchi
Takao Hinoi
Yasuhiro Inoue
Naohiro Tomita
Hideyuki Ishida
Kenichi Sugihara
Publikationsdatum: 22.08.2017
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2885-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2017

The DGAV risk calculator: development and validation of statistical models for a web-based instrument predicting complications of colorectal cancer surgery

Postoperative course of laparoscopic subtotal colectomy is affected by prolonged preoperative anti-TNF therapy in patients with acute colitis complicating inflammatory bowel disease

Multicentre, controlled, randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of ambulatory treatment of mild acute diverticulitis without antibiotics with the standard treatment with antibiotics

Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs

Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after middle and low rectal cancer resection without diverting stoma: a retrospective study of 319 consecutive patients

The robotic approach significantly reduces length of stay after colectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

Update Chirurgie