Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2013

01.01.2013

Wait only to resuscitate: early surgery for acutely presenting paraesophageal hernias yields better outcomes

verfasst von: N. H. Bhayani, A. A. Kurian, A. M. Sharata, K. M. Reavis, C. M. Dunst, L. L. Swanstrom

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Incarceration and obstruction of an intrathoracic stomach are potentially devastating complications of paraesophageal hernias (PEH). Gastric decompression and resuscitation are important elements of preoperative management of acutely presenting PEH. The optimal time for surgical repair after decompression is unknown. We hypothesized that in obstructed PEH, early surgery may improve outcomes.

Methods

From the 2005–2010 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database, we selected PEH repairs with a diagnosis of obstruction. Patients were divided by time to surgery: ≤1 day of admission (early) or >1 day (interval). Outcomes were mortality and morbidity. Multivariable regression controlled for age and cardiopulmonary comorbidities.

Results

Of 224 patients, 149 (67 %) were early and 75 (33 %) were interval, with mean 3.6 days. Repairs were 89 % transabdominal, 9 % included fundoplication, and 18 % gastrostomy. Early and interval groups experienced similar morbidity 23 versus 31 % (p = 0.2) and mortality 5.4 versus 4 % (p = 0.7). Pulmonary, wound, or VTE complications were equivalent. Sepsis was less (2.7 vs. 13 %, p = 0.002) and length of stay was shorter (5 vs. 11 days, p < 0.001) for early vs. interval patients. On adjusted analysis, the early group had an 80 % reduction in sepsis (95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.05–0.6, p = 0.005). Odds of overall or other morbidity or mortality were statistically similar between groups.

Conclusions

Patients who required emergency surgery for PEH have disease complicated by strangulation, perforation, bleeding, or sepsis. Emergency surgery for PEH repair is inherently high-risk and preoperative resuscitation and decompression is critical. In our analysis, patients with an obstructed PEH had less postoperative sepsis and fewer days in the hospital if surgery was performed within the first hospital day. However, there was no difference in mortality between early and delayed treatment. Deferring surgery for resuscitation permits optimization, but prolonged delay may worsen patient outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Larusson HJ, Zingg U, Hahnloser D, Delport K, Seifert B, Oertli D (2009) Predictive factors for morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: age, ASA score and operation type influence morbidity. World J Surg 33(5):980–985PubMedCrossRef Larusson HJ, Zingg U, Hahnloser D, Delport K, Seifert B, Oertli D (2009) Predictive factors for morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: age, ASA score and operation type influence morbidity. World J Surg 33(5):980–985PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Skinner DB, Belsey RH (1967) Surgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus hernia. Long-term results with 1,030 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53(1):33–54PubMed Skinner DB, Belsey RH (1967) Surgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus hernia. Long-term results with 1,030 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53(1):33–54PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sihvo EI, Salo JA, Räsänen JV, Rantanen TK (2009) Fatal complications of adult paraesophageal hernia: a population-based study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137(2):419–424PubMedCrossRef Sihvo EI, Salo JA, Räsänen JV, Rantanen TK (2009) Fatal complications of adult paraesophageal hernia: a population-based study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137(2):419–424PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Velanovich V, Karmy-Jones R (2001) Surgical management of paraesophageal hernias: outcome and quality of life analysis. Dig Surg 18(6):432–437PubMedCrossRef Velanovich V, Karmy-Jones R (2001) Surgical management of paraesophageal hernias: outcome and quality of life analysis. Dig Surg 18(6):432–437PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, McLaughlin RH, Graham TO, Slivka A, Lee KK, Schraut WH, Luketich JD (1998) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia. Am J Surg 176(6):659–665PubMedCrossRef Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, McLaughlin RH, Graham TO, Slivka A, Lee KK, Schraut WH, Luketich JD (1998) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia. Am J Surg 176(6):659–665PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gangopadhyay N, Perrone JM, Soper NJ, Matthews BD, Eagon JC, Klingensmith ME, Frisella MM, Brunt LM (2006) Outcomes of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair in elderly and high-risk patients. Surgery 140(4):491–498PubMedCrossRef Gangopadhyay N, Perrone JM, Soper NJ, Matthews BD, Eagon JC, Klingensmith ME, Frisella MM, Brunt LM (2006) Outcomes of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair in elderly and high-risk patients. Surgery 140(4):491–498PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW (2002) Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg 236(4):492–500PubMedCrossRef Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW (2002) Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg 236(4):492–500PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Poulose BK, Gosen C, Marks JM, Khaitan L, Rosen MJ, Onders RP, Trunzo JA, Ponsky JL (2008) Inpatient mortality analysis of paraesophageal hernia repair in octogenarians. J Gastrointest Surg 12(11):1888–1892PubMedCrossRef Poulose BK, Gosen C, Marks JM, Khaitan L, Rosen MJ, Onders RP, Trunzo JA, Ponsky JL (2008) Inpatient mortality analysis of paraesophageal hernia repair in octogenarians. J Gastrointest Surg 12(11):1888–1892PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Polomsky M, Hu R, Sepesi B, O’Connor M, Qui X, Raymond DP, Litle VR, Jones CE, Watson TJ, Peters JH (2010) A population-based analysis of emergent versus elective hospital admissions for an intrathoracic stomach. Surg Endosc 24(6):1250–1255PubMedCrossRef Polomsky M, Hu R, Sepesi B, O’Connor M, Qui X, Raymond DP, Litle VR, Jones CE, Watson TJ, Peters JH (2010) A population-based analysis of emergent versus elective hospital admissions for an intrathoracic stomach. Surg Endosc 24(6):1250–1255PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehta S, Boddy A, Rhodes M (2006) Review of outcome after laparoscopic paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16(5):301–306PubMedCrossRef Mehta S, Boddy A, Rhodes M (2006) Review of outcome after laparoscopic paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16(5):301–306PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore AJ, Stulberg JJ, Byrnes J, Delaney CP (2009) A national comparison of laparoscopic versus open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data. Dis Colon Rectum 52(2):183–186PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Stulberg JJ, Byrnes J, Delaney CP (2009) A national comparison of laparoscopic versus open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data. Dis Colon Rectum 52(2):183–186PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Steele SR, Brown TA, Rush RM, Martin MJ (2008) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12(3):583–591PubMedCrossRef Steele SR, Brown TA, Rush RM, Martin MJ (2008) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12(3):583–591PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Wait only to resuscitate: early surgery for acutely presenting paraesophageal hernias yields better outcomes
verfasst von
N. H. Bhayani
A. A. Kurian
A. M. Sharata
K. M. Reavis
C. M. Dunst
L. L. Swanstrom
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2436-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.