Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2013

01.06.2013

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: experience of 22 cases

verfasst von: Francesco Corcione, Felice Pirozzi, Diego Cuccurullo, Domenico Piccolboni, Valerio Caracino, Francesco Galante, Daniele Cusano, Antonio Sciuto

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery has gradually expanded its applications to include pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, the benefits of the laparoscopic approach are still debated. This article aims to present data regarding the efficacy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in a single center.

Methods

From March 2003 to June 2010, a total of 22 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with a totally laparoscopic approach, using a five-trocar technique. Reconstruction of the digestive tract was adapted to the aspect of the pancreatic stump, with 6 patients having Wirsung duct occlusion and 16 patients pancreaticodigestive anastomosis. Patient selection, short-term outcomes, oncologic results, and technical issues were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Mean operative time was 392 (range, 327–570) min. Conversion was required in 2 patients (9.1 %) as a result of bleeding and difficult dissection. Major intraoperative complications included an injury to the right hepatic artery (4.5 %). Postoperative mortality was 4.5 %. Surgery-related morbidity occurred in 14 patients (63.6 %) and included bleeding (n = 5), pancreatic fistula (n = 6), biliary fistula (n = 2), and dumping syndrome (n = 1). Pancreatic fistulas occurred in 4 patients with duct occlusion and in 2 patients with pancreaticojejunostomy, and they all healed with conservative treatment. Mean hospital stay was 23 (range, 12–35) days. Pathologic diagnoses were pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 11), ampullary adenocarcinoma (n = 8), and duodenal adenocarcinoma (n = 3). The resection margins were all free from disease; the mean number of collected lymph nodes was 15 (range, 14–20).

Conclusions

The complexity of pancreaticoduodenectomy entails some issues, including patient selection and management of the pancreatic stump, that are not related to the approach used. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is feasible, safe, and oncologically adequate, but only if performed in selected cases by highly skilled laparoscopic surgeons. Laparoscopy does not provide any significant advantage over traditional surgery, but it may improve postoperative outcomes in the so-called excellence centers, once the learning curve has been overcome. Multicenter randomized trials are needed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Palermo M (2009) Laparoscopic Wipple procedure: review of the literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:726–730PubMedCrossRef Gagner M, Palermo M (2009) Laparoscopic Wipple procedure: review of the literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:726–730PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Vaithiswaran V, Senthilnathlan P, Parthasarathi R, Praveen Raj P (2009) Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiery center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:731–740PubMedCrossRef Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Vaithiswaran V, Senthilnathlan P, Parthasarathi R, Praveen Raj P (2009) Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiery center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:731–740PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura Y, Uchida E, Nomura T, Aimoto T, Matsumoto S, Tajiri T (2009) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: some benefits of evolving surgical techniques. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:741–748PubMedCrossRef Nakamura Y, Uchida E, Nomura T, Aimoto T, Matsumoto S, Tajiri T (2009) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: some benefits of evolving surgical techniques. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:741–748PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Backlund DC, Berlin JD, Parikh AA (2010) Update on adjuvant trials for pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 19:391–409PubMedCrossRef Backlund DC, Berlin JD, Parikh AA (2010) Update on adjuvant trials for pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 19:391–409PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Doucas H, Sutton CD, Zimmerman A, Dennison AR, Berry DP (2007) Assessment of pancreatic malignancy with laparoscopy and intraoperative ultrasound. Surg Endosc 21:1147–1152PubMedCrossRef Doucas H, Sutton CD, Zimmerman A, Dennison AR, Berry DP (2007) Assessment of pancreatic malignancy with laparoscopy and intraoperative ultrasound. Surg Endosc 21:1147–1152PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, Buchler MW, Seiler CM (2005) Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 92:539–546PubMedCrossRef Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, Buchler MW, Seiler CM (2005) Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 92:539–546PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Suc B, Msika S, Piccinini M (2004) Octreotide in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications following elective pancreatic resection: a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 139:288–295PubMedCrossRef Suc B, Msika S, Piccinini M (2004) Octreotide in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications following elective pancreatic resection: a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 139:288–295PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Corcione F, Miranda L, Settembre A, Capasso P, Piccolboni D, Cusano D, Bakhtri M, Manzi F (2007) Open Veress assisted technique. Results in 2700 cases. Minerva Chir 62:443–446PubMed Corcione F, Miranda L, Settembre A, Capasso P, Piccolboni D, Cusano D, Bakhtri M, Manzi F (2007) Open Veress assisted technique. Results in 2700 cases. Minerva Chir 62:443–446PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Piccolboni D, Ciccone F, Settembre A, Corcione F (2008) The role of echo-laparoscopy in abdominal surgery: five years’ experience in a dedicated center. Surg Endosc 22:112–117PubMedCrossRef Piccolboni D, Ciccone F, Settembre A, Corcione F (2008) The role of echo-laparoscopy in abdominal surgery: five years’ experience in a dedicated center. Surg Endosc 22:112–117PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Glanemann M, Shi B, Liang F, Gang-Sun X, Bahara M, Jacob D, Neumann U, Neuhaus P (2008) Surgical strategies of treatment of malignant pancreatic tumors: extended, standard or local surgery? World J Surg Oncol 6:123PubMedCrossRef Glanemann M, Shi B, Liang F, Gang-Sun X, Bahara M, Jacob D, Neumann U, Neuhaus P (2008) Surgical strategies of treatment of malignant pancreatic tumors: extended, standard or local surgery? World J Surg Oncol 6:123PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Takaori K, Tanigawa N (2007) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: the past, present, and the future. Surg Today 37:535–545PubMedCrossRef Takaori K, Tanigawa N (2007) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: the past, present, and the future. Surg Today 37:535–545PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fortner JG (1973) Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach. Surgery 73:307–320PubMed Fortner JG (1973) Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach. Surgery 73:307–320PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Reddy SK, Tyler DS, Pappas TN, Clary BM (2007) Extended resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Oncologist 12:654–663PubMedCrossRef Reddy SK, Tyler DS, Pappas TN, Clary BM (2007) Extended resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Oncologist 12:654–663PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fortner JG, Kim DK, Cubilla A, Turnbull A, Pahnke LD, Shils ME (1977) Regional pancreatectomy: en bloc pancreatic, portal vein and lymph node resection. Ann Surg 186:43–50 Fortner JG, Kim DK, Cubilla A, Turnbull A, Pahnke LD, Shils ME (1977) Regional pancreatectomy: en bloc pancreatic, portal vein and lymph node resection. Ann Surg 186:43–50
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedrazzoli S, Di Carlo V, Dionigi R, Mosca F, Pederzoli P, Pasquali C, Kloppel G, Dhaene K, Michelassi F (1998) Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy study group. Ann Surg 228:508–517PubMedCrossRef Pedrazzoli S, Di Carlo V, Dionigi R, Mosca F, Pederzoli P, Pasquali C, Kloppel G, Dhaene K, Michelassi F (1998) Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy study group. Ann Surg 228:508–517PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chu CK, Kooby DA (2010) Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic tumors. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 19:311–333PubMedCrossRef Chu CK, Kooby DA (2010) Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic tumors. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 19:311–333PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez-Cruz L (2006) Distal pancreatic resection: technical differences between open and laparoscopic approaches. HPB 8:49–56PubMedCrossRef Fernandez-Cruz L (2006) Distal pancreatic resection: technical differences between open and laparoscopic approaches. HPB 8:49–56PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ammori BJ, Ayiomamitis GD (2011) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a UK experience and a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc 25:2084–2099PubMedCrossRef Ammori BJ, Ayiomamitis GD (2011) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a UK experience and a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc 25:2084–2099PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahaina A (2006) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg Endosc 20:1045–1050PubMedCrossRef Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahaina A (2006) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg Endosc 20:1045–1050PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Paye F (2010) The pancreatic stump after pancreatoduodenectomy: the “Achilles’ heel” revisited. J Vasc Surg 147:e13–e20 Paye F (2010) The pancreatic stump after pancreatoduodenectomy: the “Achilles’ heel” revisited. J Vasc Surg 147:e13–e20
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F, Seeliger H, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ (2008) The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:459–471PubMedCrossRef Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F, Seeliger H, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ (2008) The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:459–471PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP, Sauter PK, Bower-Cherry M, Dutkevitch S, Hyslop T, Schmidt CM, Rosato EL, Lavu H, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:738–747PubMedCrossRef Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP, Sauter PK, Bower-Cherry M, Dutkevitch S, Hyslop T, Schmidt CM, Rosato EL, Lavu H, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:738–747PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang YM, Tian XD, Zhuang Y, Wang WM, Wan YL, Huang YT (2005) Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 11:2456–2461PubMed Yang YM, Tian XD, Zhuang Y, Wang WM, Wan YL, Huang YT (2005) Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 11:2456–2461PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Benzoni E, Zompicchiatti A, Saccomano E, Lorenzin D, Baccarani U, Adani G, Noce L, Uzzau A, Cedolini C, Bresadola F, Intini S (2008) Postoperative complications linked to pancreaticoduodenectomy. An analysis of pancreatic stump management. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 17:43–47PubMed Benzoni E, Zompicchiatti A, Saccomano E, Lorenzin D, Baccarani U, Adani G, Noce L, Uzzau A, Cedolini C, Bresadola F, Intini S (2008) Postoperative complications linked to pancreaticoduodenectomy. An analysis of pancreatic stump management. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 17:43–47PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran K, Van Eijck C, Di Carlo V, Hop WC, Zerbi A, Balzano G, Jeekel H (2002) Occlusion of the pancreatic duct versus pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 236:422–428PubMedCrossRef Tran K, Van Eijck C, Di Carlo V, Hop WC, Zerbi A, Balzano G, Jeekel H (2002) Occlusion of the pancreatic duct versus pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 236:422–428PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Farsi M, Boffi B, Cantafio S, Miranda E, Bencini L, Moretti R (2007) Treatment of the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Wirsung duct occlusion versus pancreaticojejunostomy. Minerva Chir 62:225–233PubMed Farsi M, Boffi B, Cantafio S, Miranda E, Bencini L, Moretti R (2007) Treatment of the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Wirsung duct occlusion versus pancreaticojejunostomy. Minerva Chir 62:225–233PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y, Kosuge T (2005) Safe management of the pancreatic remnant with prolamine duct occlusion after extended pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1874–1877PubMed Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y, Kosuge T (2005) Safe management of the pancreatic remnant with prolamine duct occlusion after extended pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1874–1877PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakao A, Takeda S, Inoue S, Nomoto S, Kanazumi N, Sugimoto H, Fujii T (2006) Indications and techniques of extended resection for pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 30:976–982PubMedCrossRef Nakao A, Takeda S, Inoue S, Nomoto S, Kanazumi N, Sugimoto H, Fujii T (2006) Indications and techniques of extended resection for pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 30:976–982PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SC, Park KT, Hwang JW, Shin HC, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Han DJ (2008) Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution. Surg Endosc 22:2261–2268PubMedCrossRef Kim SC, Park KT, Hwang JW, Shin HC, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Han DJ (2008) Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution. Surg Endosc 22:2261–2268PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Pugliese R, Scandroglio I, Sansonna F, Maggioni D, Costanzi A, Citterio D, Ferrari GC, Di Lernia S, Magistro C (2008) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective review of 19 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:13–18PubMedCrossRef Pugliese R, Scandroglio I, Sansonna F, Maggioni D, Costanzi A, Citterio D, Ferrari GC, Di Lernia S, Magistro C (2008) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective review of 19 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:13–18PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Merchant NB, Parikh AA, Kooby DA (2009) Should all distal pancreatectomies performed laparoscopically? Adv Surg 43:283–300PubMedCrossRef Merchant NB, Parikh AA, Kooby DA (2009) Should all distal pancreatectomies performed laparoscopically? Adv Surg 43:283–300PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Corcione F, Cuccurullo D, Pirozzi F, Marzano E, Caracino V (2005) Duodenopancreatectomie cephalique: experience laparoscopique preliminaire relative a quatre cas consecutifs. JCC 56:13–17 Corcione F, Cuccurullo D, Pirozzi F, Marzano E, Caracino V (2005) Duodenopancreatectomie cephalique: experience laparoscopique preliminaire relative a quatre cas consecutifs. JCC 56:13–17
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee G, Park AC (2008) Development of a more robust tool for postural stability analysis of laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:1087–1092PubMedCrossRef Lee G, Park AC (2008) Development of a more robust tool for postural stability analysis of laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:1087–1092PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston WK 3rd, Hollenback BK, Wolf JS Jr (2005) Comparison of neuromuscular injuries to the surgeon during hand-assisted and standard laparoscopic urologic surgery. J Endourol 19:377–381PubMedCrossRef Johnston WK 3rd, Hollenback BK, Wolf JS Jr (2005) Comparison of neuromuscular injuries to the surgeon during hand-assisted and standard laparoscopic urologic surgery. J Endourol 19:377–381PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: experience of 22 cases
verfasst von
Francesco Corcione
Felice Pirozzi
Diego Cuccurullo
Domenico Piccolboni
Valerio Caracino
Francesco Galante
Daniele Cusano
Antonio Sciuto
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2728-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.