Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2014

01.01.2014

Cholecystectomy for the elderly: no hesitation for otherwise healthy patients

verfasst von: Liv Bjerre Juul Nielsen, Kirstine Moll Harboe, Linda Bardram

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The number of Danish inhabitants older than 65 years is increasing, and cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed for this age group. This study aimed to analyze the role of age as an independent predictor of outcome for elderly cholecystectomy patients.

Methods

Data from the Danish Cholecystectomy Database (2006–2010) were used. The outcomes of interest were conversion rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, outpatient rate, postoperative hospital length of stay, readmission rate, and frequency of additional procedures and death within 30 days postoperatively.

Results

In this study, 697 patients 80 years of age or older and 4,915 patients ages 65–70 years were compared with 8,805 patients ages 50–64 years. Significantly more patients age 80 years or older underwent surgery for acute cholecystitis, and the conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery was significantly higher in the oldest group. The older patients had longer postoperative hospital stays, but nearly 30 % of the patients age 80 years or older were admitted for only 0–1 day and not readmitted, and nearly half of the patients were admitted for only 0–3 days without readmission. Also, the mortality rate and the number of patients who underwent additional procedures within 30 days were higher in the oldest group (6 vs 0.1 and 28 vs 15 %, respectively). A subanalysis of the patients age 80 years or older classified as American Society of Anesthesiology 1 and 2 without acute cholecystitis showed that 44 % left the hospital within 1 day and 63 % within 3 days without readmission and that the 30-day mortality rate was only 2 %.

Conclusions

Age is an independent predictor for worse outcome after cholecystectomy. However, among otherwise healthy patients age 80 years or older who underwent surgery before acute inflammatory complications occurred, 63 % had a fast and uncomplicated course. Thus, it seems fair to recommend elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy when repeated gallstone symptoms have occurred also for the older patient, particularly before the patient experiences acute cholecystitis.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunt LM, Quasebarth MA, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ (2001) Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. Surg Endosc 15:700–705PubMedCrossRef Brunt LM, Quasebarth MA, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ (2001) Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. Surg Endosc 15:700–705PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiss R, Deutsch AA (1985) Emergency abdominal procedures in patients above 70. J Gerontol 40:154–158PubMedCrossRef Reiss R, Deutsch AA (1985) Emergency abdominal procedures in patients above 70. J Gerontol 40:154–158PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuy S, Sosa JA, Roman SA, Desai R, Rosenthal RA (2011) Age matters: a study of clinical and economic outcomes following cholecystectomy in elderly Americans. Am J Surg 201:789–796PubMedCrossRef Kuy S, Sosa JA, Roman SA, Desai R, Rosenthal RA (2011) Age matters: a study of clinical and economic outcomes following cholecystectomy in elderly Americans. Am J Surg 201:789–796PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber D (2003) Laparoscopic surgery, an excellent approach in elderly patients. Arch Surg 138:1083–1088PubMedCrossRef Weber D (2003) Laparoscopic surgery, an excellent approach in elderly patients. Arch Surg 138:1083–1088PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Maxwell JG, Tyler BA, Rutledge R, Brinker CC, Maxwell BG (1998) Cholecystectomy in patients aged 80 and older. Am J Surg 176:627–631PubMedCrossRef Maxwell JG, Tyler BA, Rutledge R, Brinker CC, Maxwell BG (1998) Cholecystectomy in patients aged 80 and older. Am J Surg 176:627–631PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Maxwell JG, Tyler BA, Maxwell BG, Brinker CC, Covington DL (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in octogenarians. Am Surg 54:826–831 Maxwell JG, Tyler BA, Maxwell BG, Brinker CC, Covington DL (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in octogenarians. Am Surg 54:826–831
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Uecker J, Adams M, Skipper K, Dunn E (2001) Cholecystitis in the octogenarian: is laparoscopic cholecystectomy the best approach? Am Surg 67:637–640PubMed Uecker J, Adams M, Skipper K, Dunn E (2001) Cholecystitis in the octogenarian: is laparoscopic cholecystectomy the best approach? Am Surg 67:637–640PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pessaux P, Tuech J-J, Derouet N, Rouge C, Regenet N, Arnaud J-P (2000) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly. Surg Endosc 14:1067–1069PubMed Pessaux P, Tuech J-J, Derouet N, Rouge C, Regenet N, Arnaud J-P (2000) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly. Surg Endosc 14:1067–1069PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Huber FD, Martin EW, Cooperman M (1983) Cholecystectomy in elderly patients. Am J Surg 146:719–722PubMedCrossRef Huber FD, Martin EW, Cooperman M (1983) Cholecystectomy in elderly patients. Am J Surg 146:719–722PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Harboe KM, Anthonsen K, Bardram L (2009) Validation of data and indicators in the Danish Cholecystectomy Database. Int J Qual Health Care 21:160–168PubMedCrossRef Harboe KM, Anthonsen K, Bardram L (2009) Validation of data and indicators in the Danish Cholecystectomy Database. Int J Qual Health Care 21:160–168PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database. Surg Endosc 25:1630–1641PubMedCrossRef Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database. Surg Endosc 25:1630–1641PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) Nationwide quality improvement of cholecystectomy: results from a national database. Int J Qual Health Care 23:565–573PubMedCrossRef Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) Nationwide quality improvement of cholecystectomy: results from a national database. Int J Qual Health Care 23:565–573PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tucker JJ, Yanagawa F, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V (2011) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe but underused in the elderly. Am Surg 77:1014–1020PubMed Tucker JJ, Yanagawa F, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V (2011) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe but underused in the elderly. Am Surg 77:1014–1020PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Magnuson TH, Ratner LE, Zenilman ME, Bender JS (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: applicability in the geriatric population. Am Surg 63:91–96PubMed Magnuson TH, Ratner LE, Zenilman ME, Bender JS (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: applicability in the geriatric population. Am Surg 63:91–96PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Ishukawa KB, Horiguchi H, Fujimori K (2011) Relationships of age, cholecystectomy approach, and timing with the surgical and functional outcomes of elderly patients with cholecystitis. Int J Surg 9:392–399PubMedCrossRef Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Ishukawa KB, Horiguchi H, Fujimori K (2011) Relationships of age, cholecystectomy approach, and timing with the surgical and functional outcomes of elderly patients with cholecystitis. Int J Surg 9:392–399PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergman S, Sourial N, Vedel I, Hanna WC, Fraser SA, Newman D, Bilek AJ, Galatas C, Marek JE, Monette J (2011) Gallstone disease in the elderly: are older patients managed differently? Surg Endosc 25:55–61PubMedCrossRef Bergman S, Sourial N, Vedel I, Hanna WC, Fraser SA, Newman D, Bilek AJ, Galatas C, Marek JE, Monette J (2011) Gallstone disease in the elderly: are older patients managed differently? Surg Endosc 25:55–61PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cholecystectomy for the elderly: no hesitation for otherwise healthy patients
verfasst von
Liv Bjerre Juul Nielsen
Kirstine Moll Harboe
Linda Bardram
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3144-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.