nach oben

Erschienen in:

11.03.2016 | Review

Off-site training of laparoscopic skills, a scoping review using a thematic analysis

verfasst von: Ebbe Thinggaard, Jakob Kleif, Flemming Bjerrum, Jeanett Strandbygaard, Ismail Gögenur, E. Matthew Ritter, Lars Konge

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The focus of research in simulation-based laparoscopic training has changed from examining whether simulation training works to examining how best to implement it. In laparoscopic skills training, portable and affordable box trainers allow for off-site training. Training outside simulation centers and hospitals can increase access to training, but also poses new challenges to implementation. This review aims to guide implementation of off-site training of laparoscopic skills by critically reviewing the existing literature.

Methods

An iterative systematic search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, Scopus, and PsychINFO, following a scoping review methodology. The included literature was analyzed iteratively using a thematic analysis approach. The study was reported in accordance with the STructured apprOach to the Reporting In healthcare education of Evidence Synthesis statement.

Results

From the search, 22 records were identified and included for analysis. A thematic analysis revealed the themes: access to training, protected training time, distribution of training, goal setting and testing, task design, and unsupervised training. The identified themes were based on learning theories including proficiency-based learning, deliberate practice, and self-regulated learning.

Conclusions

Methods of instructional design vary widely in off-site training of laparoscopic skills. Implementation can be facilitated by organizing courses and training curricula following sound education theories such as proficiency-based learning and deliberate practice. Directed self-regulated learning has the potential to improve off-site laparoscopic skills training; however, further studies are needed to demonstrate the effect of this type of instructional design.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Soper NJ, Fried GM (2008) The fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery: its time has come. Bull Am Coll Surg 93(9):30–32PubMed

Zendejas B, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Cook DA (2013) State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 257(4):586–593PubMedCrossRef

Nagendran M, Toon C, Davidson B, Gurusamy K (2014) Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010479.pub2

Gurusamy KS, Nagendran M, Toon CD, Davidson BR (2014) Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010478.pub2

Thinggaard E, Bjerrum F, Strandbygaard J, Gogenur I, Konge L (2015) Validity of a cross-specialty test in basic laparoscopic techniques (TABLT). Br J Surg 102(9):1106–1113PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Gordon M, Gibbs T (2014) STORIES statement: publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis. doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0143-0

Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol Theory Pract 8(1):19–32CrossRef

Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK (2010) Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 PubMedPubMedCentral

Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A (2005) Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 10(1):45–53PubMedCrossRef

10.

Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Bello F, Darzi A (2003) Motion analysis in the training and assessment of minimally invasive surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 12(3):137–142PubMedCrossRef

11.

Partridge R, Hughes M, Brennan P, Hennessey I (2015) There is a worldwide shortfall of simulation platforms for minimally invasive surgery. J Surg Simul. doi:10.1102/2051-7726.2015.0003

12.

Benjamin AS, Tullis J (2010) What makes distributed practice effective? Cogn Psychol 61(3):228–247PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

13.

Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, Smith CD, Satava RM (2005) Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241(2):364–372PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

14.

Gue S (1995) Home-made videoscopic trainer for operative laparoscopic surgery. Aust N Z J Surg 65:820–821PubMedCrossRef

15.

Russo MA, Tsuda S (2010) Portable, self-practice laparoscopic box trainers underutilized by surgical trainees. In Paper presented at the 2010 scientific session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, SAGES 2010, National Harbor, MD United States, 14 April 2010

16.

Russo M, Tsuda S (2011) Assessment of a mandatory curriculum for laparoscopic skills using a portable, self-practice box trainer outside of duty hours. In Paper presented at the 2011 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, SAGES San Antonio, TX United States, 30 March 2011

17.

Harvey LFB, King L, Hur HC (2013) Challenges associated with a self-contained simulation curriculum using a home laparoscopic skills trainer. In Paper presented at the 42nd Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology AAGL 2013, Washington, DC United States, 10 November 2013

18.

Zapf M, Ujiki M (2013) Surgical resident evaluations of portable laparoscopic box trainers. Surg Innov. doi:10.1177/1553350614535858

19.

Griffin S, Kumar A, Burgess N, Donaldson P (2006) Development of laparoscopic suturing skills: a prospective trial. J Endourol 20(2):144–148PubMedCrossRef

20.

Korndorffer JR Jr, Bellows CF, Tekian A, Harris IB, Downing SM (2012) Effective home laparoscopic simulation training: a preliminary evaluation of an improved training paradigm. Am J Surg 203(1):1–7PubMedCrossRef

21.

De Win G, Van Bruwaene S, De Ridder D, Miserez M (2013) The optimal frequency of endoscopic skill labs for training and skill retention on suturing: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Educ 70(3):384–393PubMedCrossRef

22.

Stefanidis D, Walters KC, Mostafavi A, Heniford BT (2009) What is the ideal interval between training sessions during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training? Am J Surg 197(1):126–129PubMedCrossRef

23.

van Empel PJ, Verdam MG, Strypet M, van Rijssen LB, Huirne JA, Scheele F, Bonjer HJ, Meijerink WJ (2012) Voluntary autonomous simulator based training in minimally invasive surgery, residents’ compliance and reflection. J Surg Educ 69(4):564–570PubMedCrossRef

24.

Kromann CB, Jensen ML, Ringsted C (2009) The effect of testing on skills learning. Med Educ 43(1):21–27PubMedCrossRef

25.

Downing SM (2003) Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 37(9):830–837PubMedCrossRef

26.

Norcini JJ, Shea JA (1997) The credibility and comparability of standards. Appl Meas Educ 10(1):39–59CrossRef

27.

Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236(4):458–463 (discussion 463–454) PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

28.

Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199(1):115–120PubMedCrossRef

29.

Strandbygaard J, Bjerrum F, Maagaard M, Rifbjerg Larsen C, Ottesen B, Sorensen JL (2014) A structured four-step curriculum in basic laparoscopy: development and validation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93(4):359–366PubMedCrossRef

30.

Ericsson KA (2004) Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 79(10 Suppl):S70–S81PubMedCrossRef

31.

Nakamura LY, Martin GL, Fox JC, Andrews PE, Humphreys M, Castle EP (2012) Comparing the portable laparoscopic trainer with a standardized trainer in surgically naïve subjects. J Endourol 26(1):67–72PubMedCrossRef

32.

Morgan D, O’Sullivan R, Prendiville W (2010) A study of a novel ‘take-home’ Laparoscopic simulator and program. In Paper presented at the 39th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, AAGL 2010, Las Vegas, NV United States, 11 August 2010

33.

Morgan D, Prendiville W, O’Sullivan R (2010) A laparoscopic surgical skills program utilising a ‘take-home’ laparoscopic simulator. In Paper presented at the 39th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, AAGL 2010, Las Vegas, NV United States, 08 November 2010

34.

Chummun K, Burke JP, O’Sullivan R, Prendiville W (2012) The influence of a ‘take home’ box trainer on laparoscopic performance for gynaecological surgeons. Gynecol Surg 9:303–308CrossRef

35.

Okrainec A, Henao O, Azzie G (2010) Telesimulation: an effective method for teaching the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery in resource-restricted countries. Surg Endosc 24(2):417–422PubMedCrossRef

36.

Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, Brown M (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84(2):273–278PubMedCrossRef

37.

Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondre K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2005) A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 190(1):107–113PubMedCrossRef

38.

Butler R (1987) Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. J Educ Psychol 79(4):474–482CrossRef

39.

Manzone J, Tremblay L, You-Ten KE, Desai D, Brydges R (2014) Task- versus ego-oriented feedback delivered as numbers or comments during intubation training. Med Educ 48(4):430–440PubMedCrossRef

40.

Strandbygaard J, Bjerrum F, Maagaard M, Winkel P, Larsen CR, Ringsted C, Gluud C, Grantcharov T, Ottesen B, Sorensen JL (2013) Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 257(5):839–844PubMedCrossRef

41.

Snyder CW, Vandromme MJ, Tyra SL, Hawn MT (2009) Proficiency-based laparoscopic and endoscopic training with virtual reality simulators: a comparison of proctored and independent approaches. J Surg Educ 66(4):201–207PubMedCrossRef

42.

Ritter EM, Scott DJ (2007) Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 14(2):107–112PubMedCrossRef

43.

Scott DJ, Ritter EM, Tesfay ST, Pimentel EA, Nagji A, Fried GM (2008) Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training. Surg Endosc 22(8):1887–1893PubMedCrossRef

44.

Brydges R, Manzone J, Shanks D, Hatala R, Hamstra SJ, Zendejas B, Cook DA (2015) Self-regulated learning in simulation-based training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ 49(4):368–378PubMedCrossRef

45.

Brydges R, Nair P, Ma I, Shanks D, Hatala R (2012) Directed self-regulated learning versus instructor-regulated learning in simulation training. Med Educ 46(7):648–656PubMedCrossRef

46.

Robinson JK, Kushner DM (2006) Development and validation of a home-based, mirrored, gynecologic laparoscopy trainer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(2):102–107PubMedCrossRef

47.

Arden D, Hacker MR, Jones DB, Awtrey CS (2008) Description and validation of the Pelv-Sim: a training model designed to improve gynecologic minimally invasive suturing skills. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:707–711PubMedCrossRef

48.

Stovall DW, Redick DL, Prettyman ST (2010) The usefulness of a personal laparoscopic trainer in resident education. In Paper presented at the 39th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, AAGL 2010, Las Vegas, NV United States, 08 November 2010

49.

Rabie ME (2010) Acquiring laparoscopic suturing skills using a homemade trainer. 42 (Rabie) Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia, pp 149–151

50.

Kobayashi SA, Jamshidi R, O’Sullivan P, Palmer B, Hirose S, Stewart L, Kim EH (2011) Bringing the skills laboratory home: an affordable webcam-based personal trainer for developing laparoscopic skills. J Surg Educ 68:105–109PubMedCrossRef

51.

Harrity C, Prendiville W, Ahmed S, Reus E, O’Sullivan R (2011) The benefits of a take-home trainer on the development of laparoscopic surgical skills. In Paper presented at the 20th Annual Congress ESGE, London, United Kingdom, 21 September 2011

52.

Harrity C, O’Sullivan R, Prendiville W (2012) Effects of a home-based simulation programme. In Paper presented at the 21st Annual Congress ESGE, Paris France, 14 September 2012

53.

Arthur LM, Moug SJ, Gough V, Vella M, Renwick A (2012) Laparoscopic training at home: a pilot study. In Paper presented at the 19th international congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, EAES 2011, Torino, Italy, 15 June 2011

54.

Caban AM, Guido C, Silver M, Rossidis G, Sarosi G, Ben-David K (2013) Use of collapsible box trainer as a module for Resident Education. J Soc Laparoendo 17:440–444CrossRef

Titel: Off-site training of laparoscopic skills, a scoping review using a thematic analysis
verfasst von: Ebbe Thinggaard
Jakob Kleif
Flemming Bjerrum
Jeanett Strandbygaard
Ismail Gögenur
E. Matthew Ritter
Lars Konge
Publikationsdatum: 11.03.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4834-9

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Internistische Arzneimitteltherapie Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Off-site training of laparoscopic skills, a scoping review using a thematic analysis