Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2017

17.06.2016

Is the benefit of laparoscopy maintained in elderly patients undergoing rectal cancer resection? An analysis of 446 consecutive patients

verfasst von: Gilles Manceau, Elisabeth Hain, Léon Maggiori, Cécile Mongin, Justine Prost à la Denise, Yves Panis

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Several studies showed that age is significantly associated with impaired outcomes after open colorectal surgery. However, very few data exist on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to assess operative results of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery according to age.

Methods

From 2005 to 2014, 446 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer resection were identified from a prospective database. Five groups were defined: age <45 (n = 44), 45–54 (n = 80), 55–64 (n = 166), 65–74 (n = 95) and ≥75 years (n = 61).

Results

Elderly patients presented significantly higher ASA score (p = 0.004), higher Charlson comorbidity index (p < 0.0001) and more frequent cardiovascular, pulmonary (p < 0.0001) and neurological (p = 0.03) comorbidities. Overall postoperative morbidity rate was similar between groups (34–35–37–43–43 %, p = 0.70). Medical morbidity slightly increased with age (14–9–14–19–26 %, p = 0.06), but there was no significant difference regarding clinical anastomotic leakage, surgical morbidity, major morbidity (Dindo ≥3), cardiopulmonary complications and length of hospital stay. In multivariate analysis, age was not an independent factor for postoperative morbidity, unlike ASA score ≥3 (p = 0.039), neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.034) and operative time ≥240 min (p = 0.013).

Conclusions

This study showed that laparoscopic rectal cancer resection might safely be performed irrespective of age.
Literatur
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, Chang GJ, Rafferty JF, Buie WD, Rafferty J, Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of C, Rectal S (2013) Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 56(5):535–550. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828cb66c CrossRefPubMed Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, Chang GJ, Rafferty JF, Buie WD, Rafferty J, Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of C, Rectal S (2013) Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 56(5):535–550. doi:10.​1097/​DCR.​0b013e31828cb66c​ CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat van de Velde CJ, Boelens PG, Borras JM, Coebergh JW, Cervantes A, Blomqvist L, Beets-Tan RG, van den Broek CB, Brown G, Van Cutsem E, Espin E, Haustermans K, Glimelius B, Iversen LH, van Krieken JH, Marijnen CA, Henning G, Gore-Booth J, Meldolesi E, Mroczkowski P, Nagtegaal I, Naredi P, Ortiz H, Pahlman L, Quirke P, Rodel C, Roth A, Rutten H, Schmoll HJ, Smith JJ, Tanis PJ, Taylor C, Wibe A, Wiggers T, Gambacorta MA, Aristei C, Valentini V (2014) EURECCA colorectal: multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum. Eur J Cancer 50(1):1 e1–1 e34 van de Velde CJ, Boelens PG, Borras JM, Coebergh JW, Cervantes A, Blomqvist L, Beets-Tan RG, van den Broek CB, Brown G, Van Cutsem E, Espin E, Haustermans K, Glimelius B, Iversen LH, van Krieken JH, Marijnen CA, Henning G, Gore-Booth J, Meldolesi E, Mroczkowski P, Nagtegaal I, Naredi P, Ortiz H, Pahlman L, Quirke P, Rodel C, Roth A, Rutten H, Schmoll HJ, Smith JJ, Tanis PJ, Taylor C, Wibe A, Wiggers T, Gambacorta MA, Aristei C, Valentini V (2014) EURECCA colorectal: multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum. Eur J Cancer 50(1):1 e1–1 e34
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96(9):982–989. doi:10.1002/bjs.6662 CrossRefPubMed Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96(9):982–989. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​6662 CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Hon SS, Mak TW, Ngo DK, Leung WW, Leung KL (2014) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for mid and low rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc 28(1):297–306. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3187-x CrossRefPubMed Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Hon SS, Mak TW, Ngo DK, Leung WW, Leung KL (2014) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for mid and low rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc 28(1):297–306. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-013-3187-x CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70131-5 CrossRefPubMed Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(10)70131-5 CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, Group COcLoORIS (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0 CrossRefPubMed van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, Group COcLoORIS (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(13)70016-0 CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, Group CIS (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414882 CrossRefPubMed Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, Group CIS (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa1414882 CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim TY, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kim JH, Oh JH (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0 CrossRefPubMed Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim TY, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kim JH, Oh JH (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(14)70205-0 CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Hon SS (2009) Long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: ten-year results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 52(4):558–566. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819ec20c CrossRefPubMed Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Hon SS (2009) Long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: ten-year results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 52(4):558–566. doi:10.​1007/​DCR.​0b013e31819ec20c​ CrossRefPubMed
17.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, Ueno M, Yamaguchi T (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13(9):1614–1618. doi:10.1007/s11605-009-0961-0 CrossRefPubMed Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, Ueno M, Yamaguchi T (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13(9):1614–1618. doi:10.​1007/​s11605-009-0961-0 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujii S, Ishibe A, Ota M, Yamagishi S, Watanabe K, Watanabe J, Kanazawa A, Ichikawa Y, Oba M, Morita S, Hashiguchi Y, Kunisaki C, Endo I (2014) Short-term results of a randomized study between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Surg Endosc 28(2):466–476. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3223-x CrossRefPubMed Fujii S, Ishibe A, Ota M, Yamagishi S, Watanabe K, Watanabe J, Kanazawa A, Ichikawa Y, Oba M, Morita S, Hashiguchi Y, Kunisaki C, Endo I (2014) Short-term results of a randomized study between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Surg Endosc 28(2):466–476. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-013-3223-x CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hinoi T, Kawaguchi Y, Hattori M, Okajima M, Ohdan H, Yamamoto S, Hasegawa H, Horie H, Murata K, Yamaguchi S, Sugihara K, Watanabe M, Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal S (2015) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a multicenter matched case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol 22(6):2040–2050. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-4172-x CrossRefPubMed Hinoi T, Kawaguchi Y, Hattori M, Okajima M, Ohdan H, Yamamoto S, Hasegawa H, Horie H, Murata K, Yamaguchi S, Sugihara K, Watanabe M, Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal S (2015) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a multicenter matched case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol 22(6):2040–2050. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-014-4172-x CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurian AA, Wang L, Grunkemeier G, Bhayani NH, Swanstrom LL (2013) Defining “the elderly” undergoing major gastrointestinal resections: receiver operating characteristic analysis of a large ACS-NSQIP cohort. Ann Surg 258(3):483–489. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a196d8 CrossRefPubMed Kurian AA, Wang L, Grunkemeier G, Bhayani NH, Swanstrom LL (2013) Defining “the elderly” undergoing major gastrointestinal resections: receiver operating characteristic analysis of a large ACS-NSQIP cohort. Ann Surg 258(3):483–489. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3182a196d8​ CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mongin C, Maggiori L, Agostini J, Ferron M, Panis Y (2014) Does anastomotic leakage impair functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A case-matched study. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(4):459–467. doi:10.1007/s00384-014-1833-y CrossRefPubMed Mongin C, Maggiori L, Agostini J, Ferron M, Panis Y (2014) Does anastomotic leakage impair functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A case-matched study. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(4):459–467. doi:10.​1007/​s00384-014-1833-y CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chau A, Maggiori L, Debove C, Kanso F, Hennequin C, Panis Y (2014) Toward the end of abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer? An 8-year experience in 189 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer. Ann Surg 260(5):801–805; discussion 805–806. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000979 Chau A, Maggiori L, Debove C, Kanso F, Hennequin C, Panis Y (2014) Toward the end of abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer? An 8-year experience in 189 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer. Ann Surg 260(5):801–805; discussion 805–806. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000000979​
27.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Bretagnol F, Panis Y, Rullier E, Rouanet P, Berdah S, Dousset B, Portier G, Benoist S, Chipponi J, Vicaut E, French Research Group of Rectal Cancer S (2010) Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: The French GRECCAR III multicenter single-blinded randomized trial. Ann Surg 252(5):863–868. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fd8ea9 CrossRefPubMed Bretagnol F, Panis Y, Rullier E, Rouanet P, Berdah S, Dousset B, Portier G, Benoist S, Chipponi J, Vicaut E, French Research Group of Rectal Cancer S (2010) Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: The French GRECCAR III multicenter single-blinded randomized trial. Ann Surg 252(5):863–868. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3181fd8ea9​ CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Mantion G, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K, Association Francaise de C (2005) Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Arch Surg 140(3):278–283, discussion 284. doi:10.1001/archsurg.140.3.278 Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Mantion G, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K, Association Francaise de C (2005) Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Arch Surg 140(3):278–283, discussion 284. doi:10.​1001/​archsurg.​140.​3.​278
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Alves A, Panis Y, Mantion G, Slim K, Kwiatkowski F, Vicaut E (2007) The AFC score: validation of a 4-item predicting score of postoperative mortality after colorectal resection for cancer or diverticulitis: results of a prospective multicenter study in 1049 patients. Ann Surg 246(1):91–96. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180602ff5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alves A, Panis Y, Mantion G, Slim K, Kwiatkowski F, Vicaut E (2007) The AFC score: validation of a 4-item predicting score of postoperative mortality after colorectal resection for cancer or diverticulitis: results of a prospective multicenter study in 1049 patients. Ann Surg 246(1):91–96. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3180602ff5​ CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Smith JJ, Cohen CR, Montgomery A, Audisio RA, Thompson MR, Stamatakis JD (2006) Prediction of postoperative mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49(6):816–824. doi:10.1007/s10350-006-0523-4 CrossRefPubMed Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Smith JJ, Cohen CR, Montgomery A, Audisio RA, Thompson MR, Stamatakis JD (2006) Prediction of postoperative mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49(6):816–824. doi:10.​1007/​s10350-006-0523-4 CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78(3):355–360CrossRefPubMed Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78(3):355–360CrossRefPubMed
38.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM, Senapati A, Poloniecki JD, Stamatakis JD, Windsor AC (2004) Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM). Br J Surg 91(9):1174–1182. doi:10.1002/bjs.4430 CrossRefPubMed Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM, Senapati A, Poloniecki JD, Stamatakis JD, Windsor AC (2004) Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM). Br J Surg 91(9):1174–1182. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​4430 CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran Ba Loc P, du Montcel ST, Duron JJ, Levard H, Suc B, Descottes B, Desrousseaux B, Hay JM (2010) Elderly POSSUM, a dedicated score for prediction of mortality and morbidity after major colorectal surgery in older patients. Br J Surg 97(3):396–403. doi:10.1002/bjs.6903 CrossRefPubMed Tran Ba Loc P, du Montcel ST, Duron JJ, Levard H, Suc B, Descottes B, Desrousseaux B, Hay JM (2010) Elderly POSSUM, a dedicated score for prediction of mortality and morbidity after major colorectal surgery in older patients. Br J Surg 97(3):396–403. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​6903 CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Haglind E, Group CIS (2015) A er. N Engl J randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancMed 373(2):194. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1505367 Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Haglind E, Group CIS (2015) A er. N Engl J randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancMed 373(2):194. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMc1505367
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Panis Y, Maggiori L, Caranhac G, Bretagnol F, Vicaut E (2011) Mortality after colorectal cancer surgery: a French survey of more than 84,000 patients. Ann Surg 254(5):738–743; discussion 743–734. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823604ac Panis Y, Maggiori L, Caranhac G, Bretagnol F, Vicaut E (2011) Mortality after colorectal cancer surgery: a French survey of more than 84,000 patients. Ann Surg 254(5):738–743; discussion 743–734. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e31823604ac​
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwenk W, Bohm B, Witt C, Junghans T, Grundel K, Muller JM (1999) Pulmonary function following laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resection: a randomized controlled evaluation. Arch Surg 134 (1):6–12; discussion 13 Schwenk W, Bohm B, Witt C, Junghans T, Grundel K, Muller JM (1999) Pulmonary function following laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resection: a randomized controlled evaluation. Arch Surg 134 (1):6–12; discussion 13
45.
46.
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahbari NN, Elbers H, Askoxylakis V, Motschall E, Bork U, Buchler MW, Weitz J, Koch M (2013) Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg Oncol 20(13):4169–4182. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3198-9 CrossRefPubMed Rahbari NN, Elbers H, Askoxylakis V, Motschall E, Bork U, Buchler MW, Weitz J, Koch M (2013) Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg Oncol 20(13):4169–4182. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-013-3198-9 CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat van Gestel YR, Lemmens VE, de Hingh IH, Steevens J, Rutten HJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, van Dam RM, Siersema PD (2013) Influence of comorbidity and age on 1-, 2-, and 3-month postoperative mortality rates in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 20(2):371–380. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2663-1 CrossRefPubMed van Gestel YR, Lemmens VE, de Hingh IH, Steevens J, Rutten HJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, van Dam RM, Siersema PD (2013) Influence of comorbidity and age on 1-, 2-, and 3-month postoperative mortality rates in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 20(2):371–380. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-012-2663-1 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Is the benefit of laparoscopy maintained in elderly patients undergoing rectal cancer resection? An analysis of 446 consecutive patients
verfasst von
Gilles Manceau
Elisabeth Hain
Léon Maggiori
Cécile Mongin
Justine Prost à la Denise
Yves Panis
Publikationsdatum
17.06.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5009-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Wie sieht der OP der Zukunft aus?

04.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Der OP in der Zukunft wird mit weniger Personal auskommen – nicht, weil die Technik das medizinische Fachpersonal verdrängt, sondern weil der Personalmangel es nötig macht.

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO2-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.