nach oben

Erschienen in:

27.02.2018 | Original Article

Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced increase in external jugular venous pressure does not predict fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic prostatectomy

verfasst von: Min Hur, Seokha Yoo, Jung-Yoon Choi, Sun-Kyung Park, Dhong Eun Jung, Won Ho Kim, Jin-Tae Kim, Jae-Hyon Bahk

Erschienen in: Journal of Anesthesia | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Dynamic change in central venous pressure (CVP) was associated with fluid responsiveness. External jugular venous pressure (EJVP) may reliably estimate CVP and have the advantages of being less invasive. We investigated whether increase in EJVP induced by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) could be a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).

Methods

Fifty patients who underwent RALP with steep Trendelenburg position were enrolled. PEEP of 10 cmH₂O was applied for 5 min and then 300 ml of colloid was administered. EJVP, stroke volume variation (SVV), and cardiac index calculated by pulse contour method were measured before and after the PEEP challenge and colloid administration. Increase in cardiac index > 10% was used to define the fluid responsiveness.

Results

Twenty-six patients were fluid responders. Neither the increase in EJVP after the initial PEEP nor SVV was significantly different between responders and non-responders. They were not significantly correlated with an increase in cardiac index. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of these two variables were not significantly greater than 0.5. However, a post hoc analysis revealed that AUC of a decrease in EJVP after removal of PEEP was significantly greater than 0.50.

Conclusion

Our study results suggested that SVV and increase in EJVP after applying PEEP were not accurate predictors of fluid responsiveness during RALP. Further studies are required to find an adequate preload index in robot-assisted urologic surgery with steep Trendelenburg position.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Monk TG, Saini V, Weldon BC, Sigl JC. Anesthetic management and one-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:4–10.CrossRefPubMed

Walsh M, Devereaux PJ, Garg AX, Kurz A, Turan A, Rodseth RN, Cywinski J, Thabane L, Sessler DI. Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery: toward an empirical definition of hypotension. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:507–15.CrossRefPubMed

Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, Boucau C, Simon R, Henaine R, Lehot JJ. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:513–7.CrossRefPubMed

Biais M, Bernard O, Ha JC, Degryse C, Sztark F. Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:407–13.CrossRefPubMed

Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S, Huneke R, Schalte G, Autschbach R, Rossaint R, Buhre W. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93:782–8.CrossRefPubMed

Lestar M, Gunnarsson L, Lagerstrand L, Wiklund P, Odeberg-Wernerman S. Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45 degrees Trendelenburg position. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:1069–75.CrossRefPubMed

Meininger D, Westphal K, Bremerich DH, Runkel H, Probst M, Zwissler B, Byhahn C. Effects of posture and prolonged pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamic parameters during laparoscopy. World J Surg. 2008;32:1400–5.CrossRefPubMed

Kalmar AF, Dewaele F, Foubert L, Hendrickx JF, Heeremans EH, Struys MM, Absalom A. Cerebral haemodynamic physiology during steep Trendelenburg position and CO(2) pneumoperitoneum. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:478–84.CrossRefPubMed

Schramm P, Treiber AH, Berres M, Pestel G, Engelhard K, Werner C, Closhen D. Time course of cerebrovascular autoregulation during extreme Trendelenburg position for robotic-assisted prostatic surgery. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:58–63.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Chin JH, Lee EH, Hwang GS, Choi WJ. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using dynamic preload indices in patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery with pneumoperitoneum in the Trendelenburg position. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013;41:515–22.PubMed

11.

Wajima Z, Shiga T, Imanaga K. Pneumoperitoneum affects stroke volume variation in humans. J Anesth. 2015;29:508–14.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Chin JH, Kim WJ, Choi JH, Han YA, Kim SO, Choi WJ. Unreliable tracking ability of the third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system for changes in stroke volume after fluid administration in patients with high systemic vascular resistance during laparoscopic surgery. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142125.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

De Backer D, Taccone FS, Holsten R, Ibrahimi F, Vincent JL. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:1092–7.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS, Weis FC, Kilger E, Lamm P, Goetz AE. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:476–80.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Kawazoe Y, Nakashima T, Iseri T, Yonetani C, Ueda K, Fujimoto Y, Kato S. The impact of inspiratory pressure on stroke volume variation and the evaluation of indexing stroke volume variation to inspiratory pressure under various preload conditions in experimental animals. J Anesth. 2015;29:515–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134:172–8.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Cherpanath TG, Geerts BF, Maas JJ, de Wilde RB, Groeneveld AB, Jansen JR. Ventilator-induced central venous pressure variation can predict fluid responsiveness in post-operative cardiac surgery patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60:1395–403.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Geerts BF, Aarts LP, Groeneveld AB, Jansen JR. Predicting cardiac output responses to passive leg raising by a PEEP-induced increase in central venous pressure, in cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:150–6.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Magder S, Lagonidis D, Erice F. The use of respiratory variations in right atrial pressure to predict the cardiac output response to PEEP. J Crit Care. 2001;16:108–14.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Parker JL, Flucker CJ, Harvey N, Maguire AM, Russell WC, Thompson JP. Comparison of external jugular and central venous pressures in mechanically ventilated patient. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:596–600.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Leonard AD, Allsager CM, Parker JL, Swami A, Thompson JP. Comparison of central venous and external jugular venous pressures during repair of proximal femoral fracture. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:166–70.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kim N, Shim JK, Choi HG, Kim MK, Kim JY, Kwak YL. Comparison of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced increase in central venous pressure and passive leg raising to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with atrial fibrillation. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116:350–6.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A. What is a fluid challenge? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011;17:290–5.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2642–7.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Hoiseth LO, Hoff IE, Myre K, Landsverk SA, Kirkeboen KA. Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:777–86.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Seo H, Kong YG, Jin SJ, Chin JH, Kim HY, Lee YK, Hwang JH, Kim YK. Dynamic arterial elastance in predicting arterial pressure increase after fluid challenge during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e1794.CrossRef

27.

Phong SV, Koh LK. Anaesthesia for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: considerations for laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg position. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:281–5.PubMed

28.

Rosendal C, Markin S, Hien MD, Motsch J, Roggenbach J. Cardiac and hemodynamic consequences during capnoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning: lessons learned from robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26:383–9.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Mesquida J, Kim HK, Pinsky MR. Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure, and cardiac contractility on variations in pulse pressure, stroke volume, and intrathoracic blood volume. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1672–9.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Duperret S, Lhuillier F, Piriou V, Vivier E, Metton O, Branche P, Annat G, Bendjelid K, Viale JP. Increased intra-abdominal pressure affects respiratory variations in arterial pressure in normovolaemic and hypovolaemic mechanically ventilated healthy pigs. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:163–71.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Valenza F, Chevallard G, Porro GA, Gattinoni L. Static and dynamic components of esophageal and central venous pressure during intra-abdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1575–81.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Jacques D, Bendjelid K, Duperret S, Colling J, Piriou V, Viale JP. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during increased intra-abdominal pressure: an experimental study. Crit Care. 2011;15:R33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Atkinson TM, Giraud GD, Togioka BM, Jones DB, Cigarroa JE. Cardiovascular and ventilatory consequences of laparoscopic surgery. Circulation. 2017;135:700–10.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Nanas S, Magder S. Adaptations of the peripheral circulation to PEEP. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146:688–93.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Magder S. Bench-to-bedside review: an approach to hemodynamic monitoring–Guyton at the bedside. Crit Care. 2012;16:236.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Shojaee M, Sabzghabaei A, Alimohammadi H, Derakhshanfar H, Amini A, Esmailzadeh B. Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on central venous pressure in patients under mechanical ventilation. Emerg (Tehran). 2017;5:e1.

37.

McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1123–33.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Metzelder S, Coburn M, Fries M, Reinges M, Reich S, Rossaint R, Marx G, Rex S. Performance of cardiac output measurement derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:776–84.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Slagt C, Malagon I, Groeneveld AB. Systematic review of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to determine cardiac output and stroke volume variation. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:626–37.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Maddali MM, Waje ND, Sathiya PM. Authentication of radial versus femoral arterial pressure waveform-derived cardiac output with transesophageal echocardiography-derived cardiac output measurements in patients undergoing on-pump coronary bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31:1183–9.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Lamia B, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Cross-comparisons of trending accuracies of continuous cardiac-output measurements: pulse contour analysis, bioreactance, and pulmonary-artery catheter. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018;32:33–43.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Ueyama H, Kiyonaka S. Predicting the need for fluid therapy-does fluid responsiveness work? J Intensive Care. 2017;5:34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced increase in external jugular venous pressure does not predict fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic prostatectomy
verfasst von: Min Hur
Seokha Yoo
Jung-Yoon Choi
Sun-Kyung Park
Dhong Eun Jung
Won Ho Kim
Jin-Tae Kim
Jae-Hyon Bahk
Publikationsdatum: 27.02.2018
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Journal of Anesthesia / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2475-y

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Springer Medizin

Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced increase in external jugular venous pressure does not predict fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic prostatectomy