nach oben

Erschienen in:

23.03.2019 | Original Article

Accuracy of the ClearSight™ system in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

verfasst von: Miho Sumiyoshi, Takuma Maeda, Erika Miyazaki, Naoshi Hotta, Hitoshi Sato, Eisuke Hamaguchi, Hiroko Kanazawa, Yoshihiko Ohnishi, Masataka Kamei

Erschienen in: Journal of Anesthesia | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The ClearSight™ device monitors continuous pressure and cardiac output via pulse contour analysis. ClearSight™, however, may not be reliable in patients with reduced peripheral perfusion caused by high peripheral resistance. This study aimed to elucidate the accuracy and trending ability of ClearSight™ in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery by comparing the ClearSight^TM-derived cardiac index (CI_CS) with that measured using three-dimensional echocardiography (CI_3D).

Methods

The study included 20 patients who underwent elective AAA surgery. CI_CS and CI_3D were measured simultaneously at eight time points during the surgery. Trending ability was investigated after aortic clamping and unclamping. We used CI_3D as the reference method.

Results

Bland–Altman analysis showed a wide limit of agreement between CI_CS and CI_3D (percentage error 41.3%). Subgroup analysis showed a lower percentage error (33.2%) in patients with CI ≥ 2.5 L/min/m². The cubic splines related to the CI_3D and CI discrepancy were negatively sloped, indicating that CI_3D had significant influence on the CI discrepancy (p < 0.001). Four-quadrant plot analysis showed that the tracking ability of ClearSight™ after aortic clamping and declamping were clinically unacceptable (81.3% and 78.6%, respectively). Also, the polar plot analysis showed that the concordance rate of ClearSight™ after aortic clamping and declamping were clinically unacceptable (58.3% and 66.7%, respectively).

Conclusions

ClearSight™ was not sufficiently accurate in patients undergoing AAA surgery. The tracking ability of ClearSight™ after aortic clamping was below the acceptable limit.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Mor-Avi V, Jenkins C, Kuhl HP, Nesser HJ, Marwick T, Franke A, Ebner C, Freed BH, Steringer-Mascherbauer R, Pollard H, Weinert L, Niel J, Sugeng L, Lang RM. Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes: multicenter study for validation with magnetic resonance imaging and investigation of sources of error. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:413–23.CrossRefPubMed

Mor-Avi V, Sugeng L, Lang RM. Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: an integral component of the routine echocardiographic examination in adult patients? Circulation. 2009;119:314–29.CrossRefPubMed

Shimada YJ, Ishikawa K, Kawase Y, Ladage D, Tilemann L, Shiota T, Hajjar RJ. Comparison of left ventricular stroke volume assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography in a swine model of acute myocardial infarction validated by thermodilution method. Echocardiography. 2012;29:1091–5.CrossRefPubMed

Jenkins C, Bricknell K, Hanekom L, Marwick TH. Reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular parameters using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:878–86.CrossRefPubMed

Balluz R, Liu L, Zhou X, Ge S. Real time three-dimensional echocardiography for quantification of ventricular volumes, mass, and function in children with congenital and acquired heart diseases. Echocardiography. 2013;30:472–82.CrossRefPubMed

Jakubovic BD, Wald R, Goldstein MB, Leong-Poi H, Yuen DA, Perl J, Lima JA, Liu JJ, Kirpalani A, Dacouris N, Wald R, Connelly KA, Yan AT. Comparative assessment of 2-dimensional echocardiography vs cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in measuring left ventricular mass in patients with and without end-stage renal disease. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:384–90.CrossRefPubMed

Maeda T, Yoshitani K, Inatomi Y, Ohnishi Y. Inaccuracy of the FloTrac/Vigileo system in patients with low cardiac index. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;28:1521–6.CrossRefPubMed

McNamara H, Barclay P, Sharma V. Accuracy and precision of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM 1A) in pregnancy: comparison with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:669–76.CrossRefPubMed

Maeda T, Sakurai R, Nakagawa K, Morishima K, Maekawa M, Furumoto K, Kono T, Egawa A, Kubota Y, Kato S, Okamura H, Yoshitani K, Ohnishi Y. Cardiac resynchronization therapy-induced cardiac index increase measured by three-dimensional echocardiography can predict decreases in brain natriuretic peptide. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:599–605.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Ameloot K, Palmers PJ, Malbrain ML. The accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output and pressure measurements with finger cuff: a concise review. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21:232–9.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Ameloot K, Van De Vijver K, Broch O, Van Regenmortel N, De Laet I, Schoonheydt K, Dits H, Bein B, Malbrain ML. Nexfin noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring: validation against continuous pulse contour and intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution derived cardiac output in critically ill patients. Sci World J. 2013;2013:519080.CrossRef

12.

Ameloot K, Van De Vijver K, Van Regenmortel N, De Laet I, Schoonheydt K, Dits H, Broch O, Bein B, Malbrain ML. Validation study of Nexfin(R) continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in critically ill adult patients. Miner Anestesiol. 2014;80:1294–301.

13.

Maeda T, Hattori K, Sumiyoshi M, Kanazawa H, Ohnishi Y. Accuracy and trending ability of the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo System in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J Anesth. 2018;32:387–93.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Kusaka Y, Yoshitani K, Irie T, Inatomi Y, Shinzawa M, Ohnishi Y. Clinical comparison of an echocardiograph-derived versus pulse counter-derived cardiac output measurement in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26:223–6.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Hattori K, Maeda T, Masubuchi T, Yoshikawa A, Ebuchi K, Morishima K, Kamei M, Yoshitani K, Ohnishi Y. Accuracy and trending ability of the fourth-generation Flotrac/Vigileo system in patients with low cardiac index. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31:99–104.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Wesseling KH, Jansen JR, Settels JJ, Schreuder JJ. Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 1985 1993;74:2566–73.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.CrossRef

18.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Givertz MM, Colucci WS, LeJemtel TH, Gottlieb SS, Hare JM, Slawsky MT, Leier CV, Loh E, Nicklas JM, Lewis BE. Acute endothelin A receptor blockade causes selective pulmonary vasodilation in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2000;101:2922–7.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Pica S, Ghio S, Tonti G, Camporotondo R, Turco A, Pazzano AS, Scelsi L, Raineri C, Oltrona Visconti L. Analyses of longitudinal and of transverse right ventricular function provide different clinical information in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40:1096–103.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1180–92.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Suehiro K, Tanaka K, Funao T, Matsuura T, Mori T, Nishikawa K. Systemic vascular resistance has an impact on the reliability of the Vigileo-FloTrac system in measuring cardiac output and tracking cardiac output changes. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:170–7.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A. Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:536–46.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Bubenek-Turconi SI, Craciun M, Miclea I, Perel A. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:366–72.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Chen G, Meng L, Alexander B, Tran NP, Kain ZN, Cannesson M. Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output measurements using the Nexfin monitoring device and the esophageal Doppler. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24:275–83.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Monnet X, Picard F, Lidzborski E, Mesnil M, Duranteau J, Richard C, Teboul JL. The estimation of cardiac output by the Nexfin device is of poor reliability for tracking the effects of a fluid challenge. Crit Care. 2012;16:R212.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Fischer MO, Coucoravas J, Truong J, Zhu L, Gerard JL, Hanouz JL, Fellahi JL. Assessment of changes in cardiac index and fluid responsiveness: a comparison of Nexfin and transpulmonary thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:704–12.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, Grayburn PA, Kraft CD, Levine RA, Nihoyannopoulos P, Otto CM, Quinones MA, Rakowski H, Stewart WJ, Waggoner A, Weissman NJ, American Society of E. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:777–802.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Accuracy of the ClearSight™ system in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery
verfasst von: Miho Sumiyoshi
Takuma Maeda
Erika Miyazaki
Naoshi Hotta
Hitoshi Sato
Eisuke Hamaguchi
Hiroko Kanazawa
Yoshihiko Ohnishi
Masataka Kamei
Publikationsdatum: 23.03.2019
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Journal of Anesthesia / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-019-02632-6

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Springer Medizin

Accuracy of the ClearSight™ system in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery