Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Acta Neurochirurgica 6/2020

06.03.2020 | Original Article - Pituitaries

Enhanced recovery and accelerated discharge after endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: safety, patient feedback, and cost implications

verfasst von: Mark A. Hughes, Elizabeth Culpin, Roisin Darley, Justin McKinlay, Paul Nix, Alex Smedley, Atul Tyagi, Asim Sheikh, Nick Phillips

Erschienen in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a constant motivation. There is growing evidence that an endoscopic (rather than microscopic) transsphenoidal approach to pituitary tumours can play a role, facilitating faster recovery and a commensurate reduction in length of stay (LOS). Reducing LOS is beneficial to both patients and healthcare systems. We sought to assess the safety, patient feedback, and resource implications of adopting an enhanced recovery and accelerated discharge policy for elective pituitary surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed two consecutive cohorts of patients undergoing elective surgery for pituitary adenoma in a single UK centre between July 2016 and November 2019. The pre-ERAS cohort included 52 sequential patients operated prior to protocol change. The ERAS cohort included 55 sequential patients operated after a protocol change. Patient demographic data, tumour characteristics, intra- and post-operative CSF leak, the rate and cause of readmission (within 30 days), and the mean and median LOS were recorded. Patient feedback was collected from a subset of patients (n = 23) in the ERAS group.

Results

The two cohorts were well-matched with respect to their demographic, pathological, and operative characteristics. The rates of readmission within 30 days of discharge were similar between the two groups (8% pre-ERAS cohort, 9% ERAS cohort, p = 0.75). In the pre-ERAS cohort, the mean LOS was 4.5 days and median LOS was 3 days. This compares with significant reduction in LOS for the ERAS group: mean of 1.7 days and median of 1 day (p < 0.05). Thirty-nine of 55 patients in the ERAS group were discharged on post-operative day 1. Patient feedback was very positive in the ERAS group (mean patient satisfaction score of 9.7/10 using a Likert scale).

Conclusions

An enhanced recovery protocol after elective endoscopic pituitary surgery is safe, reduces length of stay, and is associated with high patient satisfaction.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617CrossRef Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Koupparis A, Dunn J, Gillatt D et al (2010) Improvement of an enhanced recovery protocol for radical cystecomy. British Journal of Medical and Surgical Urology 3:237–240CrossRef Koupparis A, Dunn J, Gillatt D et al (2010) Improvement of an enhanced recovery protocol for radical cystecomy. British Journal of Medical and Surgical Urology 3:237–240CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969CrossRef Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Podore PC, Throop EB (1999) Infrarenal aortic surgery with a 3-day hospital stay: a report on success with a clinical pathway. J Vasc Surg 29:787–792CrossRef Podore PC, Throop EB (1999) Infrarenal aortic surgery with a 3-day hospital stay: a report on success with a clinical pathway. J Vasc Surg 29:787–792CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tovar EA, Roethe RA, Weissig MD et al (1998) One-day admission for lung lobectomy: an incidental result of a clinical pathway. Ann Thorac Surg 65:803–806CrossRef Tovar EA, Roethe RA, Weissig MD et al (1998) One-day admission for lung lobectomy: an incidental result of a clinical pathway. Ann Thorac Surg 65:803–806CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins TS, Courtemanche C, Karakla D et al (2008) Analysis of transnasal endoscopic versus transseptal microscopic approach for excision of pituitary tumors. Am J Rhinol 22(6):649–652CrossRef Higgins TS, Courtemanche C, Karakla D et al (2008) Analysis of transnasal endoscopic versus transseptal microscopic approach for excision of pituitary tumors. Am J Rhinol 22(6):649–652CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Barker FG II, Klibanski A, Swearingen B (2003) Transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors in the United States, 1996–2000: mortality, morbidity, and the effects of hospital and surgeon volume. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88(10):4709–4719CrossRef Barker FG II, Klibanski A, Swearingen B (2003) Transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors in the United States, 1996–2000: mortality, morbidity, and the effects of hospital and surgeon volume. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88(10):4709–4719CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cappabianca P, Alfieri A, Colao A et al (1999) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach: an additional reason in support of surgery in the management of pituitary lesions. Skull Base Surg 9(2):109–117CrossRef Cappabianca P, Alfieri A, Colao A et al (1999) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach: an additional reason in support of surgery in the management of pituitary lesions. Skull Base Surg 9(2):109–117CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Casler JD (2005) Doolittle AM, Mair EA. Endoscopic surgery of the anterior skull base. Laryngoscope 115(1):16–24CrossRef Casler JD (2005) Doolittle AM, Mair EA. Endoscopic surgery of the anterior skull base. Laryngoscope 115(1):16–24CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Neal JG, Patel SJ, Kulbersh JS et al (2007) Comparison of techniques for transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Am J Rhinol 21(2):203–206CrossRef Neal JG, Patel SJ, Kulbersh JS et al (2007) Comparison of techniques for transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Am J Rhinol 21(2):203–206CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rotenberg B, Tam S, Ryu WH et al (2010) Microscopic versus endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 120(7):1292–1297CrossRef Rotenberg B, Tam S, Ryu WH et al (2010) Microscopic versus endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 120(7):1292–1297CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarkiss CA, Lee J, Papin JA et al (2015) Pilot study on early postoperative discharge in pituitary adenoma patients: effect of socioeconomic factors and benefit of specialized pituitary centers. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 76(4):323–330CrossRef Sarkiss CA, Lee J, Papin JA et al (2015) Pilot study on early postoperative discharge in pituitary adenoma patients: effect of socioeconomic factors and benefit of specialized pituitary centers. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 76(4):323–330CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas JG, Gadgil N, Samson SL et al (2014) Prospective trial of a short hospital stay protocol after endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma surgery. World Neurosurg 81(3–4):576–583CrossRef Thomas JG, Gadgil N, Samson SL et al (2014) Prospective trial of a short hospital stay protocol after endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma surgery. World Neurosurg 81(3–4):576–583CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith I, Krankes P, Murat I et al (2011) Perioperative fasting in adults and children: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 28(8):556–569CrossRef Smith I, Krankes P, Murat I et al (2011) Perioperative fasting in adults and children: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 28(8):556–569CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Schraag S, Pradelli L, Alsaleh AJO et al (2018) Propofol vs. inhalational agents to maintain general anaesthesia in ambulatory and in-patient surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthiol 18(1):162CrossRef Schraag S, Pradelli L, Alsaleh AJO et al (2018) Propofol vs. inhalational agents to maintain general anaesthesia in ambulatory and in-patient surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthiol 18(1):162CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kranke P, Jokinen J, Pace NL, et al. (2015) Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 16;(7) Kranke P, Jokinen J, Pace NL, et al. (2015) Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 16;(7)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cornesse D, Senard M, Hans GA et al (2010) Comparison between two intraoperative intravenous loading doses of paracetamol on pain after minor hand surgery: two grams versus one gram. Acta Chir Belg 110(5):529–532CrossRef Cornesse D, Senard M, Hans GA et al (2010) Comparison between two intraoperative intravenous loading doses of paracetamol on pain after minor hand surgery: two grams versus one gram. Acta Chir Belg 110(5):529–532CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Milton Raff M, Belbachir A, El-Tallawy S et al (2018) Intravenous oxycodone versus other intravenous strong opioids for acute postoperative pain control: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain and Therapy 1:19–39 Milton Raff M, Belbachir A, El-Tallawy S et al (2018) Intravenous oxycodone versus other intravenous strong opioids for acute postoperative pain control: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain and Therapy 1:19–39
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gan TJ, Diemunsch P, Habib AS et al (2014) Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 118(1):85–113CrossRef Gan TJ, Diemunsch P, Habib AS et al (2014) Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 118(1):85–113CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Spitzer M, Wildenhain J, Rappsilber J et al (2014) BoxPlotR: a web tool for generation of box plots. Nat Methods 11:121–122CrossRef Spitzer M, Wildenhain J, Rappsilber J et al (2014) BoxPlotR: a web tool for generation of box plots. Nat Methods 11:121–122CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Alzhrani G, Sivakumar W, Park MS, Taussky P, Couldwell WT (2018) Delayed complications after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas. World Neurosurg 109:233–241CrossRef Alzhrani G, Sivakumar W, Park MS, Taussky P, Couldwell WT (2018) Delayed complications after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas. World Neurosurg 109:233–241CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmer LA, Andaluz N (2018) Incidence of epistaxis after endoscopic pituitary surgery: proposed treatment algorithm. Ear Nose Throat J 97(3):E44–E48CrossRef Zimmer LA, Andaluz N (2018) Incidence of epistaxis after endoscopic pituitary surgery: proposed treatment algorithm. Ear Nose Throat J 97(3):E44–E48CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Zwagerman NT, Wang EW, Shin SS et al (2019) Does lumbar drainage reduce postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery? A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Neurosurg 131:1172–1178CrossRef Zwagerman NT, Wang EW, Shin SS et al (2019) Does lumbar drainage reduce postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery? A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Neurosurg 131:1172–1178CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Strickland BA, Lucas J, Harris B et al (2018) Identification and repair of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks in endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: surgical experience in a series of 1002 patients. J Neurosurg 129(2):425–429CrossRef Strickland BA, Lucas J, Harris B et al (2018) Identification and repair of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks in endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: surgical experience in a series of 1002 patients. J Neurosurg 129(2):425–429CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Enhanced recovery and accelerated discharge after endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: safety, patient feedback, and cost implications
verfasst von
Mark A. Hughes
Elizabeth Culpin
Roisin Darley
Justin McKinlay
Paul Nix
Alex Smedley
Atul Tyagi
Asim Sheikh
Nick Phillips
Publikationsdatum
06.03.2020
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Elektronische ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04282-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

Acta Neurochirurgica 6/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Frühe Alzheimertherapie lohnt sich

25.04.2024 AAN-Jahrestagung 2024 Nachrichten

Ist die Tau-Last noch gering, scheint der Vorteil von Lecanemab besonders groß zu sein. Und beginnen Erkrankte verzögert mit der Behandlung, erreichen sie nicht mehr die kognitive Leistung wie bei einem früheren Start. Darauf deuten neue Analysen der Phase-3-Studie Clarity AD.

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

25.04.2024 Parkinson-Krankheit Nachrichten

Neue arznei- und zellbasierte Ansätze, Frühdiagnose mit Bewegungssensoren, Rückenmarkstimulation gegen Gehblockaden – in der Parkinsonforschung tut sich einiges. Auf dem Deutschen Parkinsonkongress ging es auch viel um technische Innovationen.

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

23.04.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Wenn Demenzkranke aufgrund von Symptomen wie Agitation oder Aggressivität mit Antipsychotika behandelt werden, sind damit offenbar noch mehr Risiken verbunden als bislang angenommen.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.