Introduction
Besides being a common colonizer of human skin and mucosa,
Staphylococcus aureus also acts as a major human pathogen. The species can cause a broad range of infections, most frequently skin and soft tissue infections, such as wound infections, furuncles, carbuncles and abscesses, but also life-threatening systemic infections, such as pneumonia and sepsis [
1‐
3]. Furunculosis is a common staphylococcal skin disease characterised by painful, deep infections of the hair follicle. Even mild lesions are painful and unsightly and often leave a scar after they heal [
4]. Antibiotic treatment is frequently not effective, and many furunculosis patients suffer from recurrent episodes or develop chronic symptoms [
4].
The alarming global spread of antibiotic resistant strains has spurred efforts to develop active and passive anti-staphylococcal vaccines [
5,
6]. However, vaccine development is a challenging task, because both the species
S. aureus and the host response that it induces are highly variable. Two
S. aureus strains can differ drastically in their virulence gene content [
7]. The variable genome consists of mobile genetic elements such as pathogenicity islands and phages that encode numerous virulence factors, including toxins, exoenzymes and immune modulators [
7‐
10]. In concert with conserved virulence factors, these variable bacterial compounds could determine differential pathogenesis [
11]. We observed a strong and strain-specific antibody response against these variable antigens in
S. aureus carriers and during the natural course of
S. aureus bacteremia [
12].
Active vaccination can be based on mono- or multivalent subunit vaccines or on whole cell vaccines, which include autologous vaccines (short: autovaccines) [
6]. Autovaccines are individually prepared from the autologous infecting bacterial strain [
13,
14]. Following subculture, the bacteria and their secreted proteins are usually inactivated by fixation, heat or cell lysis, and then repeatedly applied orally or subcutaneously [
13,
15]. In contrast to subunit vaccines, autovaccines contain poorly characterized variegated cocktails of surface proteins and secreted virulence factors produced by the infecting strain.
Before the antibiotic era, chronic staphylococcal infections such as chronic furunculosis and osteomyelitis were frequently treated by therapeutic vaccination with autologous formalin-killed
S. aureus cells [
14,
16‐
18]. Today, autovaccination is still regularly performed in some Eastern European countries, including Poland and the Czech Republic [
13,
19]. It is offered as a therapeutic alternative to patients with chronic
S. aureus infections that are refractory to standard therapy. Moreover, bacterial whole cell vaccines are commonly used in veterinary medicine to treat chronic infectious diseases [
20‐
22]. The major argument against the use of autovaccines in human medicine is that safety and efficacy have not been determined in controlled clinical trials. Moreover, the mode of action is largely unknown.
In this prospective pilot study we analyzed if autovaccination influences the serum antibody response to a broad spectrum of secreted and surface-bound S. aureus antigens.
Materials and methods
Autovaccination patients
The Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology at the Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland has long-standing experience with autovaccination for therapy of chronic
S. aureus furunculosis and osteomyelitis [
13]. This prospective pilot study included four patients (3 female and 1 male) from the Szczecin area. They suffered from chronic or recurrent furunculosis and asked for autovaccination, one of the treatment options in Poland. In all four patients previous antibiotic treatment and surgical intervention had been unsuccessful. Patient data and anatomic location of the furuncles are shown in Table
1. The patients showed no signs of immune suppression. All four patients provided their written informed consent and the study was approved by the Ethics Board of the University of Szczecin.
Table 1
Clinical outcome of autovaccination
Age (y) | 23 | 35 | 50 | 41 |
Gender | Female | Female | Male | Female |
Risk factorsa
| Atopic dermatitis | – | – | Atopic dermatitis |
Onset of furuncles | 02/06 | 07/06 | 2002 | 07/06 |
AV treatment | 08/07–12/08 | 10/06–08/07 | 10/06–10/07 | 12/06–10/07 |
|
Location of furuncles | Face, neck, axilla | Axilla, abdomen, back | Face, neck | Axilla, buttocks |
Mean number of episodes per month | Before AV | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3.5 |
During AV | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.2 |
After AV | 1 | 0 | 0.6 | 0 |
Chronicity | Before AV | Intermittently | Permanently | Permanently | Permanently |
During AV | Symptom free | Intermittently | Intermittently | Intermittently |
After AV | Intermittently | Symptom free | Intermittently | Symptom free |
Single/multiple sites | Before AV | Multiple | Multiple | Multiple | Multiple |
During AV | – | Multiple (1 episode) | Single | Single |
After AV | Single | – | Single | – |
Severity scoreb
| Before AV | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
During AV | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
After AV | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Clinical improvementc
| Strong | Strong | Moderate | Strong |
S. aureus strains and sera
The S. aureus vaccine strains were isolated from infected lesions (pus) during episodes of furunculosis. Moreover, nasal swabs were taken repeatedly to determine the nasal colonization status. S. aureus was identified on the basis of generally accepted criteria: the presence of clumping factor (slide test) and extracellular coagulase (tube test), and biochemical identification (ID 32 Staph, BioMerieux). The infecting and colonizing S. aureus isolates were stored as glycerol stocks.
Antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates was estimated by the disc diffusion method according to current recommendations by the NCCLS/CLSI. Resistance to oxacillin/cephoxitin was confirmed by detection of PBP 2′ (Slidex MRSA detection, BioMerieux) and mecA PCR (see below).
Sera were obtained directly before and during autovaccination treatment and stored at −80°C. We obtained four consecutive serum samples from patient 6466 (day 0, 86, 273 and 332), three samples from patients 7293 (day 0, 42, and 187) and 9105 (day 0, 85, and 166), and two samples from patient 7510 (day 0, and 63). Additionally, control sera from 11 healthy lab workers from the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin (age 37.6 ± 10.7 years; 36% male) were analyzed.
Preparation of autologous vaccines
Autovaccines were individually prepared from the causative S. aureus strain, which was isolated from furunculosis lesions. Autologous strains were cultivated for a maximum of 24 h on oblique test tubes containing PPLO agar (Becton Dickinson) supplemented with 10% (w/v) glucose and 0.1% (v/v) Tween 80. Bacteria were resuspended in 0.9% NaCl solution and fixed with 0.4% formalin solution for 48 h. The bacterial suspension was adjusted to 5 × 108 bacteria/ml (suspension I), 1 × 109 bacteria/ml (suspension II), and 2.5 × 109 bacteria/ml (suspension III) based on McFarland quantification. Afterwards, 0.1 mg/ml thiomersal was added to these suspensions as preservative. Finally, sterility of autovaccine preparation was tested by cultivation in thioglycollate medium (Becton Dickinson) for 7 days.
Administration of autovaccines
Autovaccines were prepared by the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, and administered by the patients’ general practitioners. Before the beginning of treatment, a skin test was performed to exclude hypersensitivity of the patient to any of the vaccine components. Intradermally, 0.5 ml of a 1:10 dilution of suspension I in Aqua ad injectionem was injected. Skin reaction was checked after 15 min and 24 hours. Autovaccines were then applied subcutaneously in 3–5 day intervals over 3 months. With each injection the dose was increased based on the following application scheme. Suspension I (5 × 108 bacteria/ml) was applied in volumes of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 ml, followed by suspension II (1 × 109 bacteria/ml; 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0 ml) and suspension III (2.5 × 109 bacteria/ml; 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0 ml). This immunization procedure was followed by several recall injections (suspension III, 1 ml) every 1–3 weeks for up to 5–12 months. After each injection the patients were closely monitored for 30 minutes (swelling, pain or rash on injection side, blood pressure, breathing). After every vaccination, presumptive systemic symptoms (fever, headache, general malaise, sore throat, etc.) were also analyzed by a physician to exclude any side effects associated with autovaccination. Moreover, laboratory tests were performed before autovaccination and after completion of the basic application scheme (blood count, CRP; urine: proteinuria).
Clinical evaluation
The impact of autovaccination on the severity and frequency of furunculosis was retrospectively analyzed by reviewing the clinical records. Additionally, a telephone interview using a questionnaire was performed by a physician, which included questions about the chronicity, duration, location and severity of furuncles, as well as a patient’s rating of the clinical improvement after autovaccination.
Detection of S. aureus virulence factors by PCR
PCR was used to screen for a total of 26 virulence genes. Single and multiplex-PCR were applied for the detection of gyrase (
gyr), methicillin resistance (
mecA), Panton-Valentine-leukocidin (
pvl), staphylococcal enterotoxins (
sea-seu), toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (
tst), exfoliative toxins (
eta, etb, etd), and
agr groups 1–4 as previously reported [
8].
spa genotyping
PCR for amplification of the
S. aureus protein A (
spa) repeat region was performed according to the published protocol [
23,
24]. PCR products were sequenced by a commercial supplier using both amplification primers (Agowa, Berlin, Germany). The forward and reverse sequence chromatograms were analyzed with the Ridom StaphType software (Ridom GmbH, Würzburg, Germany).
Spa types were clustered into different clonal clusters using the Based Upon Repeat Pattern (BURP) algorithm. Since s
pa typing and multilocus-sequence typing (MLST) are highly concordant,
spa typing data could be mapped on MLST types by using the SpaServer database (
www.spaserver.ridom.de).
2D-Immunoblots
Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2-DE) with mini 2D gels and 2D immunoblots (2D-IBs) were performed as described [
25]. Briefly, for antigen preparation, bacteria were inoculated in tryptic soy broth (TSB) to an optical density at 540 nm of 0.05 and cultivated in 100 ml cultures at 37°C and 180 rpm. Cultures were harvested 3.5 h after the bacterial culture entered the stationary phase, extracellular proteins were collected, and protein concentration was determined as previously described [
11,
25].
Afterwards, isoelectric focusing was performed with 7 cm Immobiline Dry Strips of pI ranges 4–7 and 6–11 (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany). Following separation according to molecular mass in the second dimension, the resolved staphylococcal proteins were blotted onto a PVDF membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore) and incubated with the corresponding human sera at 1:10,000 dilution. IgG binding was detected by peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG and visualized with an ECL substrate (SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate, Pierce). Consecutive serum samples from one patient were always analyzed simultaneously; at least three technical replicates were performed for each patient.
Analysis of the 2D-IB images was performed with the Delta-2D software package version 4.0 (Decodon GmbH, Greifswald, Germany) as described [
11,
25]. A fused image of all IBs from one patient was obtained in a two-step procedure. First, all IB images from one time course experiment were matched with the most complex IB and a fusion image was obtained using the union fuse option. Second, the fusion images from the three technical replicates were matched and fused. Spots on the fusion image were automatically detected and manually validated by comparing the original blot images with the fusion image. Subsequently, the spot map and the corresponding labels from the fusion image were transferred to all blot images from one patient. For spot detection on IBs the signal intensity threshold was set to 0.2 arbitrary units (AU).
Flamingo® protein staining
To correlate IB binding with protein abundance, representative IB images were matched with Flamingo®-stained 2D gels. Gels were stained with the Flamingo® Fluorescent Gel Stain (BioRad, Munich, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Bead-based flow cytometry (Luminex®)
Serum IgG, IgA and IgM directed against a panel of 40 recombinant staphylococcal antigens was quantified using the bead based flow cytometry technique (xMap®, Luminex Corporation, Austin, Texas, USA). Antigens comprised surface proteins, such as clumping factor A and B (ClfA, ClfB), and serine-aspartate dipeptide repeat proteins (SdrD and SdrE), and secreted proteins, including toxins (superantigens, leukotoxins) and immune modulatory proteins (CHIPS, SCIN, SSL proteins).
Methods were as described previously [
26,
27]. Tests were performed in independent duplicates and the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) values, reflecting antibody concentrations, were averaged. In each experiment, control beads (no protein coupled) were included to determine non-specific antibody binding. In case of non-specific binding, this background was subtracted from the MFI values. Human pooled serum was used as a standard.
Statistics
Differences in antibody binding (Luminex®) between furunculosis patients and healthy controls were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test in conjunction with the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) multiple testing correction (FDR < 0.05).
Discussion
Autovaccines have been applied in chronic staphylococcal infections for decades, but their mechanism of action is still unknown. In this pilot study, we demonstrate that autovaccination only slightly boosts the antibody response to extracellular bacterial antigens and surface proteins.
This pilot study was not designed to test the efficacy of autovaccination, but rather to characterize the kinetics of the antibody responses. Therefore, we analyzed only a small cohort and did not include placebo controls. Moreover, some clinical outcome criteria (severity score, rating of clinical improvement) are subjective, which limits the evaluation of the clinical outcome. Nevertheless, it is interesting to note that based on the applied criteria all four patients, two of whom were chronically infected with CA-MRSA, clinically improved during treatment. In the 1970s, Ring et al. reported that oral autovaccination treatment improved the clinical state in 11/18 patients with chronic posttraumatic osteomyelitis [
15]. Similarly, a controlled study of 292 children with paranasal sinusitis demonstrated that antibiotic therapy plus autovaccine was superior to antibiotic therapy alone [
29]. Overall, little is published in English on the efficacy and safety of autovaccination. In particular, prospective, controlled, randomized, and, if possible, (double)-blind clinical studies are lacking.
Already before autovaccination, the study patients had serum antibodies that bound to a broad antigen spectrum of their infecting
S. aureus strain. There was no obvious defect in their anti-staphylococcal antibody response. Furunculosis patients suffer from chronic or recurrent infection for many months or even years and, therefore, the immune system is frequently and intensively exposed to the invasive strain and establishes a memory response. Moreover, most furunculosis patients are
S. aureus carriers and the nasal and infecting strains are usually identical [
28]. In this study, three out of four patients were colonized with the infecting strain in the nose. Thus, the nose appears to be a potential source for repeated endogenous infections. In agreement with our findings of a robust baseline anti-
S. aureus antibody response in the furunculosis patients, we previously reported that healthy human carriers are pre-immunized with their colonizing strain [
12,
25].
By applying 2D-IB and Luminex assays we found that autovaccination only slightly boosted the pre-existing antibody response to secreted bacterial antigens and surface proteins. Notably, autovaccination did not induce a profound de novo generation of antibody specificities. These findings suggest that repeated subcutaneous immunization does not strongly trigger the humoral immune response in these well pre-immunized patients. In line with this, Szkaradkiewicz et al. analyzed the IgG response in patients treated with autovaccines using 1D-immunoblots and also observed no changes in IgG binding patterns to
S. aureus polypeptides [
30]. In contrast to autovaccination of furunculosis patients, systemic
S. aureus infection strongly enhances the anti-staphylococcal antibody response in patients [
10].
We previously reported a high degree of strain-specificity in the anti-
S. aureus antibody response [
12]. However, it is also possible that some antibody specificities are cross-reactive. For example, patient 6466 mounted an antibody response against SEC, but the strain used for autovaccination lacked the
sec gene. SEC belongs to a family of 21 staphylococcal superantigens with up to 90% sequence homology, which could explain the observed cross-reactivity [
31,
32].
The pore-forming toxin PVL is epidemiologically strongly linked to
S. aureus furunculosis [
3,
28]. In this study, three out of four patients were infected with
pvl-positive strains. All patients had high levels of IgG antibodies against both subunits of the toxin, LukF and LukS, which did not increase during autovaccination.
Little is known about the mechanisms by which autovaccines might influence the disease course or impact on the immune response. Halasa et al. reported that autovaccination increases the concentration of
S. aureus strain-specific agglutinating antibodies and enhances the phagocytosis of bacteria by peripheral blood granulocytes [
13]. Similarly, clinical improvement of acne after autovaccination with killed
Propionibacterium acnes was accompanied by the generation of specific antibodies against bacterial structures [
33]. Still, it is difficult to imagine that the observed moderate changes of antibody titers should fully explain the clinical effects of the treatment. Other groups have reported that autovaccination down-regulates Th1 cell function and reduces delayed type hypersensitivity reactions [
15,
21,
34]. In conjunction with the observation that T cells can influence the recruitment and anti-bacterial action of granulocytes [
35,
36], this opens an interesting perspective for research. Moreover, the humoral immune response to non-protein staphylococcal antigens, such as lipoteichoic acid, wall teichoic acid and capsular polysaccharides, might be clinically important and will be addressed in future analyses [
11,
37]. Finally, we cannot rule out that formalin-fixation of the vaccine preparation influences the three-dimensional antigen structure, which might influence the antibody response, especially to surface antigens.
The rapid spread of multiresistant S. aureus strains enforces the development of new strategies to combat staphylococcal infections. In view of the pronounced variability of the bacterial species, personalized approaches could hold promise for patients with recurrent or chronic S. aureus infection. Autovaccination could serve as a model that merits further investigation.