Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2016

13.07.2016 | Evidence-Based Current Surgical Practice

Development of Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery: an Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Approaches

verfasst von: G. Paul Wright, Amer H. Zureikat

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic and robotic surgery of the pancreas has only recently emerged as viable treatment options for benign and malignant disease. This review seeks to evaluate the current body of evidence on these approaches to pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy.

Methods

A systematic review of large published series was performed utilizing the PubMed search engine.

Results

Based on these reports, both the laparoscopic and robotic techniques for these complex procedures appear to be safe and effective, if performed by high volume experienced pancreatic surgeons. The advantages of each approach are highlighted, emphasizing the data available on the learning curve and potential dissemination.

Conclusions

Both minimally invasive approaches to pancreatic resection are safe and feasible.
Literatur
1.
Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Antoniou AI, Granderath FA. Past, present, and future of minimally invasive abdominal surgery. JSLS 2015;19:e2015.00052.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Reyonlds Jr W. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 2001;5:89-94.
3.
Litynski GS. Mouret, Dubois, and Perissat: The laparoscopic breakthrough in Europe (1987–1988). JSLS 1999;3:163-167.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 1994;8:408-410.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1994;39:178-184.PubMed
6.
Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Ellison EC. Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2003;13:33-36.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G. Robotics in general surgery: Personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003;138:777-784.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG for the PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535.PubMed
9.
Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: Overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215:810-819.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Kim SC, Song KB, Jung YS, Kim YH, Park DH, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Kwang MP, Lee YJ. Short-term clinical outcomes for 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: Improvement with surgical experience. Surg Endosc 2013;27:95-103.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Gumbs AA, Croner R, Rodriguez A, Zuker N, Perrakis A, Gayet B. 200 consecutive laparoscopic pancreatic resections performed with a robotically controlled laparoscope holder. Surg Endosc 2013;27:3781-3791.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectmoy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 2014;260:633-640.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Senthilnathan P, Gurumurthy SS, Gul SI, Sabnis S, Ntesan AV, Palanisamy NV, Raj PP, Subbiah R, Ramakrishnan P, Palanivelu C. Long-term results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary cancer – Experience of 130 cases from a tertiary-care center in South India. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2015;25:295-300.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Sharpe SM, Talamonti MS, Wang CE, Prinz RA, Roggin KK, Bentrem DJ, Winchester DJ, Marsh RDW, Stocker SJ, Baker MS. Early national experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: A comparison of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg 2015;221:175-184.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Shah G, Addeo P, Caravaglios G, Coratti A. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: Single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1646-1657.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH. Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 2015;150:416-422.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, Barbarello L, Belluomini M, Signori S, Mosca F. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic literature review. Surg Endosc 2015;29:9-23.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Correa-Gallego C, Dinkelspiel HE, Sulimanoff I, Fisher S, Vineula EF, Kingham TP, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, D’Angelica MI, Jarnagin WR, Allen PJ. Minimally-invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2014;218:129-139.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Nigri G, Petrucciani N, La Torre M, Magistri P, Valabrega S, Aurello P, Ramacciato G. Duodenopancreatectomy: Open or minimally invasive approach? Surgeon 2014;12:227-234.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Adam MA, Choudhury K, Dinan MA, Reed SD, Scheri RP, Blazer III DG, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: Practice patterns and short-term outcomes among 7061 patients. Ann Surg 2015;262:372-377.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Nussbaum DP, Adam MA, Youngwirth LM, Ganapathi AM, Roman SA, Tyler DS, Sosa JA, Blazer III DG. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy does not improve use or time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. 2015 Nov 5;Epub ahead of print.
22.
Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L, Azagra JS, Bassi C, Delvaux G, Weerts J, Fabre JM, Boulez J, Baulieux J, Peix JL, Gigot JF. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 2005;137:597-605.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Fernandez-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L, Levi S, Lopez-Boado MA, Navarro S. Curative laparoscopic resection for pancreatic neoplasms: A critical analysis from a single institution. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11:1607-1622.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, Nakeeb A, Schmidt MC, Merchant NB, Parikh AA, Martin II RCG, Scoggins CR, Ahmad S, Kim HJ, Park J, Johnson F, Strouch MJ, Menze A, Rymer J, McClaine R, Strasberg SM, Talamonti MS, Staley CA, McMasters KM, Lowy AM, Byrd-Sellers J, Wood WC, Hawkins WG. Left-sided pancreatectomy: Multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg 2008;248:438-446.PubMed
25.
Røsok BI, Marangos IP, Kazaryan AM, Rosseland AR, Buanes T, Mathisen Ø, Edwin B. Single-centre experience of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 2010;97:902-909.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Vijan SS, Ahmed KA, Harmsen WS, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Nagorney DM, Donohue JH, Farnell MB, Kendrick ML. Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy: A single-institution comparative study. Arch Surg 2010;145:616-621.CrossRefPubMed
27.
DiNorcia J, Schrope BA, Lee MK, Reavey PL, Rosen SJ, Lee JA, Chabot JA, Allendorf JD. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy offers shorter hospital stays with fewer complications. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:1804-1812.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Song KB, Kim SC, Park JB, Kim YH, Jung YS, Kim MH, Lee SK, Seo DW, Lee SS, Park DH, Han DJ. Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: Changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 2011;25:3364-3372.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Kneuertz PJ, Patel SH, Chu CK, Fisher SB, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Weber SM, Staley CA, Kooby DA. Laparoscopic distal pacnreatectomy: Trends and lessons learned through an 11-year experience. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215:167-176.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Stauffer JA, Rosales-Velderrain A, Goldberg RF, Bowers SP, Asbun HJ. Comparison of open with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: A single institution’s transition over a 7-year period. HPB 2013;15:149-155.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Adam JP, Jacquin A, Laurent C, Collet D, Masson B, Fernandez-Cruz L, Sa-Cunha A. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: Splenic vessel preservation compared with the Warshaw technique. JAMA Surg 2013;148:246-252.CrossRef
32.
Braga M, Pecorelli N, Ferrari D, Balzano G, Zuliani W, Castoldi R. Results of 100 conseutive laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: Postoperative outcome, cost-benefit analysis, and quality of life assessment. Surg Endosc 2015;29:1871-1878.CrossRefPubMed
33.
de Rooij T, Jilesen AP, Boerma D, Bonsing BA, Bosscha K, van Dam RM, van Dieren S, Dijkgraaf MG, van Eijck CH, Gerhards MF, van Goor H, van der Harst E, de Hingh IH, Kazemier G, Klaase JM, Molenaar IQ, van Dijkum EJN, Patijn GA, van Santvoort HC, Scheepers JJ, van der Schelling GP, Sieders E, Vogel JA, Busch OR, Besselink MG, for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. A nationwide comparison of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant disease. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:263-270.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Sharpe SM, Talamonti MS, Wang E, Bentrem DJ, Roggin KK, Prinz RA, Marsh RDW, Stocker SJ, Winchester DJ, Baker MS. The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma results in shorter lengths of stay without compromising oncologic outcomes. Am J Surg 2015;209:557-563.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Sahakyan MA, Kazaryan AM, Rawashdeh M, Fuks D, Shmavonyan M, Haugvik SP, Labori KJ, Buanes T, Røsok BI, Ignjatovic D, Hilal MA, Gayet B, Kim SC, Edwin B. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results of a multicenter cohort study on 196 patients. Surg Endosc 2015 Oct 30;Epub ahead of print.
36.
Sulpice L, Farges O, Goutte N, Bendersky N, Dokmak S, Sauvanet A, Delpero JR, on behalf of the ACHBT French Pancreatectomy Study Group. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Time for a randomized controlled trial? Results of an all-inclusive national observational study. Ann Surg 2015;262:868-874.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Perrone VG, Miccoli M, Brozzetti S, Boggi U. The learning curve in robotic distal pancreatectomy. Updates Surg 2015;67:257-264.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Shakir M, Boone BA, Polanco PM, Zenati MS, Hogg ME, Tsung A, Choudry HA, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH. The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: An analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre. HPB 2015;17:580-586.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, Dumas RP, Beane JD, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Ball CG, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Schmidt CM. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: Cost effective? Surgery 2010;148:814-823.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS. Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages? Surg Endosc 2011;25:2004-2009.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, Bartlett DL, Hughes SJ, Lee KK, Moser AJ, Zeh HJ. Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 2013;257:128-132.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Butturini G, Damoli I, Crepax L, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Daskalaki D, Esposito A, Cingarlini S, Salvia R, Bassi C. A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 2015;29:3163-3170.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Chen S, Zhan Q, Chen JZ, Jin JB, Deng XX, Chen H, Shen BY, Peng CH, Li HW. Robotic approach improves spleen-preserving rate and shortens postoperative hospital stay of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: A matched cohort study. Surg Endosc 2015;29:3507-3518.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Lee SY, Allen PJ, Sadot E, D’Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, Kingham TP. Distal pancreatectomy: A single institution’s experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. 2015;220:18-27.
45.
Adam MA, Choudhury K, Goffredo P, Reed SD, Blazer III D, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for cancer: Short-term oncologic outcomes in 1733 patients. World J Surg 2015;39:2564-2572.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Song KB, Kim SC, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Lee DJ, Lee JW, Jun ES, Sin SH, Kim HE, Park KM, Lee YJ. Enucleation for benign or low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas: Single-center experience with 65 consecutive patients. Surgery 2015;158:1203-1210.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Sa Cunha A, Rault A, Beau C, Collet D, Masson B. Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy: Single institution experience of 6 patients. Surgery 2007;142:405-409.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh III HJ. 250 Robotic pancreatic resections: Safety and feasibility. Ann Surg 2013;258:554-562.PubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Khaled YS, Malde DJ, Packer J, Fox T, Laftsidis P, Ajala-Agbo T, De Ligurori Carino N, Deshpande R, O’Reilly DA, Sherlock DJ, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic versus open cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst: a case-matched comparative study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2014;21:818-823.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Wright JD, Ananth CV, Tergas AI, Herzog TJ, Burke WM, Lewin SN, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Hershman DL. An economic analysis of robotically assisted hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1038-1048.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Geller EJ, Matthews CA. Impact of robotic operative efficiency on profitability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:20.e1-5.CrossRef
52.
Tran TB, Dua MM, Worhunsky DJ, Poultsides GA, Norton JA, Visser BC. The first decade of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States: Costs and outcomes using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc 2015 Aug 15;Epub ahead of print.
Metadaten
Titel
Development of Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery: an Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Approaches
verfasst von
G. Paul Wright
Amer H. Zureikat
Publikationsdatum
13.07.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2016
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3204-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2016

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Morbidity and Mortality After Gastrectomy: Identification of Modifiable Risk Factors

Original Article

Routine Cyst Fluid Cytology Is Not Indicated in the Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions

OriginalPaper

Tipping the Scales: Liver Transplant Outcomes of the Super Obese

GI Image

Gastric Schwannoma

Original Article

Is total pancreatectomy as feasible, safe, efficacious, and cost-effective as pancreaticoduodenectomy? A single center, prospective, observational study

OriginalPaper

Managing Malignant Colorectal Obstruction with Self-Expanding Stents. A Closer Look at Bowel Perforations and Failed Procedures

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.