Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2020

27.09.2019 | Original Article

Variation in the utilization of robotic surgical operations

verfasst von: Jennifer H. Fieber, Lindsay E. Kuo, Chris Wirtalla, Rachel R. Kelz

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The appropriate use of the robot in surgery continues to evolve. Robotic operations (RO) are particularly advantageous for deep pelvic and retroperitoneal procedures, but the implementation of RO is unknown. We aimed to examine regional variation for the most commonly performed RO in general, gynecologic, and urologic surgery. A three-state inpatient database from 2008 to 2011 was used. Nine common robotic inpatient general, gynecologic and urologic surgery procedures were analyzed. States were divided into hospital service areas (HSAs). The percentage of RO was calculated for each operation. Hospital service areas that had < 50% or > 150% of the RO average were outliers. Hospital service areas were compared based on demographics, patterns of adoption, variation in usage, and association with population, physician and hospital density. Hysterectomies were the procedure that was performed most often robotically. Over 50% of radical prostatectomies were performed robotically. Procedures with the highest rate of RO performance were performed with the least variation. Characteristics that were significantly correlated with RO included provider and hospital density. Variation in the utilization of RO is common and differs by operation. Physician density impacts access to care and is associated with the variation in use of RO depending on procedure type. Further research is needed to understand the causes of variation and adoption of RO.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah J, Vyas A, Vyas D (2014) The history of robotics in surgical specialties. Am J Robot Surg 1:12–20CrossRef Shah J, Vyas A, Vyas D (2014) The history of robotics in surgical specialties. Am J Robot Surg 1:12–20CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239:14–21CrossRef Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239:14–21CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mack MJ (2001) Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA 285:568–572CrossRef Mack MJ (2001) Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA 285:568–572CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D (2018) Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32:1636–1655CrossRef Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D (2018) Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32:1636–1655CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat California State Inpatient Database (SID). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) [homepage on the Internet]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research. HCUP State Inpatient Databases (SID); Nov 2014 [cited 2014 Dec 30]. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/sidoverview.jsp. Accessed 20 Apr 2019 California State Inpatient Database (SID). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) [homepage on the Internet]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research. HCUP State Inpatient Databases (SID); Nov 2014 [cited 2014 Dec 30]. http://​www.​hcup-us.​ahrq.​gov/​sidoverview.​jsp. Accessed 20 Apr 2019
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Straney LD, Lim SS, Murray CJ (2012) Disentangling the effects of risk factors and clinical care on subnational variation in early neonatal mortality in the United States. PLoS One 7:e49399CrossRef Straney LD, Lim SS, Murray CJ (2012) Disentangling the effects of risk factors and clinical care on subnational variation in early neonatal mortality in the United States. PLoS One 7:e49399CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Area Health Resources Files (AHRF). National, state and county health resources information database. Secondary area health resources files (AHRF). National, state and county health resources information database. http://ahrf.hrsa.gov. Accessed 15 Feb 2015 Area Health Resources Files (AHRF). National, state and county health resources information database. Secondary area health resources files (AHRF). National, state and county health resources information database. http://​ahrf.​hrsa.​gov. Accessed 15 Feb 2015
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Curtin LR, Klein RJ (1995) Direct standardization (age-adjusted death rates). Healthy People 2000 Stat Notes:1–10, PMID: 11762384 Curtin LR, Klein RJ (1995) Direct standardization (age-adjusted death rates). Healthy People 2000 Stat Notes:1–10, PMID: 11762384
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuo LE, Murayama K, Simmons KD, Kelz RR (2017) Variation in the utilization of minimally invasive surgical operations. Ann Surg 265:514–520CrossRef Kuo LE, Murayama K, Simmons KD, Kelz RR (2017) Variation in the utilization of minimally invasive surgical operations. Ann Surg 265:514–520CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Sharp SM, Finlayson SR, Fisher ES, Wennberg JE (1998) Variation profiles of common surgical procedures. Surgery 124:917–923CrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Sharp SM, Finlayson SR, Fisher ES, Wennberg JE (1998) Variation profiles of common surgical procedures. Surgery 124:917–923CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu JC, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Lipsitz SR, Keating NL (2008) Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 26:2278–2284CrossRef Hu JC, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Lipsitz SR, Keating NL (2008) Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 26:2278–2284CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting–the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 174:269–272CrossRef Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting–the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 174:269–272CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Berryhill R Jr, Jhaveri J, Yadav R, Leung R, Rao S, El-Hakim A, Tewari A (2008) Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology 72:15–23CrossRef Berryhill R Jr, Jhaveri J, Yadav R, Leung R, Rao S, El-Hakim A, Tewari A (2008) Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology 72:15–23CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, Orvieto MA, Chauhan S, Ficarra V, Melegari S, Palmer KJ, Patel VR (2010) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 24:2003–2015CrossRef Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, Orvieto MA, Chauhan S, Ficarra V, Melegari S, Palmer KJ, Patel VR (2010) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 24:2003–2015CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S, Nutter B, Nosseir M, Falcone T (2011) Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 117:256–265CrossRef Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S, Nutter B, Nosseir M, Falcone T (2011) Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 117:256–265CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, Scales CD Jr, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ (2010) Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 116:685–693CrossRef Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, Scales CD Jr, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ (2010) Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 116:685–693CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Walters MD, Ridgeway BM (2017) Increasing utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 60:273–285CrossRef Walters MD, Ridgeway BM (2017) Increasing utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 60:273–285CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Morgan DM, Kamdar NS, Swenson CW, Kobernik EK, Sammarco AG, Nallamothu B (2018) Nationwide trends in the utilization of and payments for hysterectomy in the United States among commercially insured women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218:425 (e421–425 e418) PubMed Morgan DM, Kamdar NS, Swenson CW, Kobernik EK, Sammarco AG, Nallamothu B (2018) Nationwide trends in the utilization of and payments for hysterectomy in the United States among commercially insured women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218:425 (e421–425 e418) PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcus HJ, Hughes-Hallett A, Payne CJ, Cundy TP, Nandi D, Yang GZ, Darzi A (2017) Trends in the diffusion of robotic surgery: a retrospective observational study. Int J Med Robot 13(4):p.e1870CrossRef Marcus HJ, Hughes-Hallett A, Payne CJ, Cundy TP, Nandi D, Yang GZ, Darzi A (2017) Trends in the diffusion of robotic surgery: a retrospective observational study. Int J Med Robot 13(4):p.e1870CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB (2015) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD003677. Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB (2015) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD003677.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, Buda A, Yan X, Shuzhong Y, Chetty N, Isla D, Tamura M, Zhu T, Robledo KP, Gebski V, Asher R, Behan V, Nicklin JL, Coleman RL, Obermair A (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379:1895–1904CrossRef Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, Buda A, Yan X, Shuzhong Y, Chetty N, Isla D, Tamura M, Zhu T, Robledo KP, Gebski V, Asher R, Behan V, Nicklin JL, Coleman RL, Obermair A (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379:1895–1904CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Armijo PR, Pagkratis S, Boilesen E, Tanner T, Oleynikov D (2018) Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons’ conversion: a study of trends and costs. Surg Endosc 32:2106–2113CrossRef Armijo PR, Pagkratis S, Boilesen E, Tanner T, Oleynikov D (2018) Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons’ conversion: a study of trends and costs. Surg Endosc 32:2106–2113CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Wormer BA, Dacey KT, Williams KB, Bradley JF 3rd, Walters AL, Augenstein VA, Stefanidis D, Heniford BT (2014) The first nationwide evaluation of robotic general surgery: a regionalized, small but safe start. Surg Endosc 28:767–776CrossRef Wormer BA, Dacey KT, Williams KB, Bradley JF 3rd, Walters AL, Augenstein VA, Stefanidis D, Heniford BT (2014) The first nationwide evaluation of robotic general surgery: a regionalized, small but safe start. Surg Endosc 28:767–776CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Jung M, Morel P, Buehler L, Buchs NC, Hagen ME (2015) Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:283–292CrossRef Jung M, Morel P, Buehler L, Buchs NC, Hagen ME (2015) Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:283–292CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Tam MS, Kaoutzanis C, Mullard AJ, Regenbogen SE, Franz MG, Hendren S, Krapohl G, Vandewarker JF, Lampman RM, Cleary RK (2016) A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30:455–463CrossRef Tam MS, Kaoutzanis C, Mullard AJ, Regenbogen SE, Franz MG, Hendren S, Krapohl G, Vandewarker JF, Lampman RM, Cleary RK (2016) A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30:455–463CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 37:2782–2790CrossRef Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 37:2782–2790CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Thiele RH, Rea KM, Turrentine FE, Friel CM, Hassinger TE, McMurry TL, Goudreau BJ, Umapathi BA, Kron IL, Sawyer RG, Hedrick TL (2015) Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 220:430–443CrossRef Thiele RH, Rea KM, Turrentine FE, Friel CM, Hassinger TE, McMurry TL, Goudreau BJ, Umapathi BA, Kron IL, Sawyer RG, Hedrick TL (2015) Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 220:430–443CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Coffey JC, Dockery P (2016) Colorectal cancer: surgery for colorectal cancer—standardization required. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:256–257CrossRef Coffey JC, Dockery P (2016) Colorectal cancer: surgery for colorectal cancer—standardization required. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:256–257CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Daes J (2015) Standardization of hernia surgery. Hernia 19:1039–1040CrossRef Daes J (2015) Standardization of hernia surgery. Hernia 19:1039–1040CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Eto K, Urashima M, Kosuge M, Ohkuma M, Noaki R, Neki K, Ito D, Takeda Y, Sugano H, Yanaga K (2018) Standardization of surgical procedures to reduce risk of anastomotic leakage, reoperation, and surgical site infection in colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study of 1189 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:755–762CrossRef Eto K, Urashima M, Kosuge M, Ohkuma M, Noaki R, Neki K, Ito D, Takeda Y, Sugano H, Yanaga K (2018) Standardization of surgical procedures to reduce risk of anastomotic leakage, reoperation, and surgical site infection in colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study of 1189 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:755–762CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper RA (2009) States with more physicians have better-quality health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 28:w91–102 Cooper RA (2009) States with more physicians have better-quality health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 28:w91–102
Metadaten
Titel
Variation in the utilization of robotic surgical operations
verfasst von
Jennifer H. Fieber
Lindsay E. Kuo
Chris Wirtalla
Rachel R. Kelz
Publikationsdatum
27.09.2019
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-01003-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.