Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Im April diskutierten die Herz-Kreislauf-Spezialisten aus der ganzen Welt auf dem  Kongress des American College of Cardiology (ACC) u.a. neue Therapieansätze bei akutem Myokardinfarkt, koronarer Herzerkrankung, kardiogenem Schock oder Aortenklappenstenose. In unserem Kongress-Dossier haben wir für Sie Berichte über die „Late-Breaking Trials“ und andere wichtige Studien zusammengestellt. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Oncology Reports
Erschienen in: Current Oncology Reports 11/2019

01.11.2019 | Head and Neck Cancers (EY Hanna, Section Editor)

Contemporary Approach to Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

verfasst von: Christopher M. K. L. Yao, Edward I. Chang, Stephen Y. Lai

Erschienen in: Current Oncology Reports | Ausgabe 11/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Surgical management of locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas (OCSCC) has long been recognized as a primary treatment modality. Technological advances have led to significant improvements in our surgical approach, from improvement in the visualization of tumors to more efficient and precise reconstruction. Here, we review the latest technological advances in surgical extirpation and reconstruction of locally advanced OCSCCs.

Recent Findings

The focus of technological innovation in surgical extirpation has been on improving visualization, with the use of intraoperative ultrasound for margin delineation, intraoperative navigation, narrow-band imaging, and the use of fluorescence. Though early, these are promising steps to ensuring complete resection of the cancer. Advances in reconstruction have been centered on the incorporation of computer assisted design, manufacturing, and virtual surgical planning, allowing for more complex three-dimensional defects to be expeditiously reconstructed.

Summary

As these technologies are still under development, their impact on oncologic outcomes are not yet robustly defined; however, as technology continues to advance and become more widely available, new technologies will undoubtedly become integrated into enhancing surgical precision and planning.
Literatur
1.
Ow TJ, Myes JN. Current management of advanced resectable oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;4:1–10.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Liao CT, Ng SH, Chang JT, Wang HM, Hsueh C, Lee LY, et al. T4b oral cavity cancer below the mandibular notch is resectable with a favorable outcome. Oral Oncol. 2007;43(6):570–9.PubMed
3.
Liao CT, Lee LY, Hsueh C, Lin CY, Fan KH, Wang HM, et al. Comparative outcomes in oral cavity cancer with resected pT4a and pT4b. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(3):230–6.PubMed
4.
Cheraghlou S, Schettino A, Zogg CK, Judson BL. Changing prognosis of oral cancer: an analysis of survival and treatment between 1973 and 2014. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(12):2762–9.PubMed
5.
Huang SH, O’Sullivan B. Oral cancer: current role of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18(2):e233–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Kraeima J, Schepers RH, van Ooijen PMA, Steenbakkers RJHM, Roodenburg JLN, Witjes MJH. Integration of oncologic margins in three-dimensional virtual planning for head and neck surgery, including a validation of the software pathway. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(8):1374–9.PubMed
7.
Orosco RK, Tapia VJ, Califano JA, Clary B, Cohen EEW, Kane C, et al. Positive surgical margins in the 10 most common solid cancers. Sci Rep. 2018;8:5686.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Luryi AL, Chen MM, Mehra S, Roman SA, Sosa JA, Judson BL. Positive surgical margins in early stage oral cavity cancer: an analysis of 20, 602 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151:984–90.PubMed
9.
Binahmed A, Nason RW, Abdoh AA. The clinical significance of the positive surgical margin in oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2007;43:780–4.PubMed
10.
Chen TY, Emrich LJ, Driscoll DL. The clinical significance of pathological findings in surgically resected margins of the primary tumor in head and neck carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987;13:833–7.PubMed
11.
Jacobs JT, Ahmad K, Casiano R, Schuller DE, Scott C, Laramore GE, et al. Implications of positive surgical margins. Laryngoscope. 1993;103:64–8.PubMed
12.
Jones AS. Prognosis in mouth cancer: tumor factors. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol. 1994; 30B;30:8–15.
13.
Sutton DN, Brown JS, Rogers SN, Vaughan ED, Woolgar JA. The prognostic implications of the surgical margin in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:30–4.PubMed
14.
Genden E, Ferlito A, Silver CE, et al. Contemporary management of cancer of the oral cavity. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267:1001–17.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Curran AJ, Toner M, Quinn A, et al. Mandibular invasion diagnosed by SPECT. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1996;21:542–5.PubMed
16.
Mukherji SK, Isaacs DL, Creager A, Shockley W, Weissler M, Armao D. Ct detection of mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:237–43.PubMed
17.
Li C, Men Y, Yang W, Pan J, Sun J, Li L. Computed tomography for the diagnosis of mandibular invasion caused by head and neck cancer: a systematic review comparing contrast-enhanced and plain computed tomography. J Oral Maxillo Fac Surg. 2014;72(8):1601–15.
18.
Li C, Yang W, Men Y, Wu F, Pan J, Li L. Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of mandibular involvement from head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112267.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Arya S, Rane P, Sable N, Juvekar S, Bal M, Chaukar D. Retromolar trigone squamous cell cancers: a reappraisal of 16 section MDCT for assessing mandibular invasion. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:e680–8.PubMed
20.
Nemzek WR, Hecht S, Gandour-Edwards R, Donald P, McKennan K. Perineural spread of head and neck tumors: how accurate is MR imaging? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:701–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Ong CK, Chong VF. Imaging of perineural spread in head and neck tumors. Cancer Imaging. 2010;10(Spec no A):S92–8.
22.
Le G. Perineural tumor spread associated with head and neck malignancies. In: Som PM, Curtin HD, editors. Head and neck imaging. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2011. p. 1021–39.
23.
Imaizumi A, Yoshino N, Yamada I, Nagumo K, Amagasa T, Omura K, et al. A potential pitfall of MR imaging for assessing mandibular invasion of squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:114–22.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Lam P, Au Yeung KM, Cheng PW, et al. Correlating MRI and histologic tumor thickness in the assessment of oral tongue cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:803–8.PubMed
25.
Arya S, Rane P, Deshmukh A. Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: role of pretreatment imaging and its influence on management. Clin Radiol. 2014;69:916–30.PubMed
26.
Johnson RE, Signman JD, Funk GF. Quantification of surgical margin shrinkage in the oral cavity. Head Neck. 1997;19:281–6.PubMed
27.
Mistry RC, Qureshi SS, Kumaran C. Post-resection mucosal margin shrinkage in oral cancer: quantification and significance. J Surg Oncol. 2005;91:131–3.PubMed
28.
Priya SR, D’Cruz AK, Pai PS. Cut margins and disease control in oral cancers. J Cancer Res Ther. 2012;8:74–9.PubMed
29.
McMahon JD, Devine JC, Hetherington J, Bryson G, McLellan D, MacIver C, et al. Involved surgical margins in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma-an anatomical problem? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;49:172–5.PubMed
30.
Iseli TA, Lin MJ, Tsui A, Guiney A, Wiesenfeld D, Iseli CE. Are wider surgical margins needed for early oral tongue cancer? J Laryngol Otol. 2012;126:289–94.PubMed
31.
Nason RW, Sako K, Beecroft WA, Razack MS, Bakamjian VY, Shedd DP. Surgical Management of Squamous cell carcinoma of the floor of mouth. Am J Surg. 1989;158:292–6.PubMed
32.
Ota Y, Aoki T, Karakida K, Otsuru M, Kurabayashi H, Sasaki M, et al. Determination of deep surgical margin based on anatomical architecture for local control of squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:605–9.PubMed
33.
Liao CT, Huang SF, Chen IH, Chang JT, Wang HM, Ng SH, et al. When does skin excision allow the achievement of an adequate local control rate in patients with squamous cell carcinoma involving the buccal mucosa? Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2187–94.PubMed
34.
Mahmood S, Conway DI, Ramesar K. Use of intra-operative cytological assessment of mandibular marrow scrapings to predict resection margin status in patients with squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59:1138–41.PubMed
35.
Oxford LE, Ducic Y. Intraoperative evaluation of cortical bony margins with frozen-section analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;134:138–41.PubMed
36.
Wysluch A, Stricker I, Holzle F, Wolff K-D, Maurer P. Intraoperative evaluation of bony margins with frozen-section analysis and trephine drill extraction technique: a preliminary study. Head Neck. 2010;32:1473–8.PubMed
37.
Weisberger EC, Hilburn M, Johnson B, Nguyen C. Intraoperative microwave processing of bone margins during resection of head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:790–3.PubMed
38.
NCCN Principles of surgery - Magin SURG-A page 3 of 9 v1.2015, National Comprehensive Cancer Network Inc. Head and Neck Cancer.
39.
Williams MD. Determining adequate margins in head and neck cancers: practice and continued challenges. Curr Oncol Rep. 2016;18:54.PubMed
40.
• Tarabichi O, Kanumuri V, Juliano AF, Faquin WC, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound in oral tongue cancer resection: Feasibility Study and Early Outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;58(4): 645–8. A preliminary report on the use of ultrasound to confirm clearance of the deep margin as an adjunct to palpation for oral tongue cancers. PubMed
41.
Baek CH, Seon YI, Jeong HS, et al. Intraoral sonography assisted resection of T1-2 tongue cancer for adequate deep resection. Otolaryngol head Neck Surg. 2008;139:805–10.PubMed
42.
Kodama M, Khanal A, Habu M, Iwanaga K, Yoshioka I, Tanaka T, et al. Ultrasonography for intraoperative determination of tumor thickness and resection margin in tongue carcinomas. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:1746–52.PubMed
43.
Cantazaro S, Copelli C, Manfuso A, Tewfik K, Pederneschi N, Cocchi CLR. Intraoperative navigation in complex head and neck resections: indications and limits. Int J CARS. 2017;12:881–7.
44.
Bitterman G, Scheifele C, Prokic V, Chatt V, Henke M, Grosu AL, et al. Description of a method: computer generated virtual model for accurate localization of tumor margins, standardized resection, and planning of radiation treatment in head and neck cancer surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41(4):279–81.
45.
Ma AK, Daly M, Quin J, Chan HHL, Goldstein DP, Irish JC, et al. Intraoperative image guidance in transoral robotic surgery: a pilot study. Head Neck. 2017;39(10):1976–83.PubMed
46.
King E, Daly MJ, Chan H, Bachar G, Dixon BJ, Siewerdsen JH, et al. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for head and neck surgery: feasibility of clinical implementation using a prototype mobile C-arm. Head Neck. 2013;35(7):959–67.PubMed
47.
Yang SW, Lee YS, Chang LC, Hwang CC, Chen TA. Diagnostic significance of narrow-band imaging for detecting high-grade dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, and carcinoma in oral leukoplakia. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(12):2754–61.PubMed
48.
Tirelli G, Piovesana M, Gatto A, Tofanelli M, Biasotto M, Boscolo Nata F. Narrow band imaging in the intra-operative definition of resection margins in oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2015;51(10):908–13.PubMed
49.
Rosenthal EL, Warram JM, de Boer E, Chung TK, Korb ML, Brandwein-Gensler M, et al. Safety and tumor specificity of cetuximab-IRDye800 for surgical navigation in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:3658–66.PubMedPubMedCentral
50.
•• Rosenthal EL, Moore LS, Tipirneni K, de Boer E, Stevens TM, Hartman YE, Carroll WR, Zinn KR, Warram JM. Sensitivity and specificity of cetuximab-IRDye800CW to identify regional metastatic disease in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4744–52. This group’s efforts in developing a cancer-targeting agent to more specifically identify cancer cells intra-operatively is cumulated into this study whereby the cancer-targeting agent was able to localize regional metastatic disease. PubMedPubMedCentral
51.
James ML, Gambhir SS. A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications. Physiol Rev. 2012;92:897–965.PubMed
52.
Koch M, Ntziachristos V. Advancing surgical vision with fluorescence imaging. Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:153–64.PubMed
53.
Harmsen S, Teraphongphom N, Tweedle MF, Basilion JP, Rosenthal EL. Optical surgical navigation for precision in tumor resections. Mol Imaging Biol. 2017;19:357–62.PubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Barth CW, Gibbs SL. Direct administration of nerve-specific contrast to improve nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. Thernostics. 2017;7:573–93.
55.
KleinJan GH, Buckle T, van Willigen DM, Oosterom M, Spa S, Kloosterboer H, et al. Fluorescent lectins for local in vivo visualization of peripheral nerves. Molecules. 2014;19:9876–92.PubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Kang S, Wang Y, Reder NP, Liu JT. Multiplexed molecular imaging of biomarker-targeted SERS nanoparticles on fresh tissue specimens with channel-compressed spectrometry. PLoS One. 2016;11:e163473.
57.
Harmsen S, Huang R, Wall MA, Karabeber H, Samii JM, Spaliviero M, et al. Surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering nanostars for high-precision cancer imaging. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(271):271ra7.PubMedPubMedCentral
58.
•• Aubreville M, Knipfer C, Oetter N, Jaremenko C, et al. Automatic classification of cancerous tissue in Laser endomicroscopy images of the oral cavity using deep learning. Sci Rep. 2017;7:11979. A novel method using artificial intelligence and deep learning for the accurate and automated detection of confocal laser endomicroscopy images of oral cavity squamous cell cancer.
59.
Garvey PB, Chang EI, Selber JC, et al. A prospective study of preoperative computer tomographic angiographic mapping of free fibula osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconst Surg. 2012;130:541e–50e.PubMed
60.
• Rommel N, Kesting MR, Rohleder NH, et al. Mandible reconstruction with free fibula flaps: outcome of a cost-effective individual planning concept compared with virtual surgical planning. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45:1246–50. This group describes a cost-effective, and simple planning concept with stereolithographic models for free fibula mandibular reconstruction with similar operative time and post-operative outcomes to virtual surgical planning. PubMed
61.
Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ. Computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling in microvascular mandible reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:597–604.PubMed
62.
Gangopadhyay N, Villa MT, Chang EI, Selber JC, Liu J, Garvey PB. Combining preoperative CTA mapping of the peroneal artery and its perforators with virtual planning for free fibular flap reconstruction of mandibulectomy defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(Suppl):8–9.
63.
Largo RD, Garvey PB. Updates in head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:271e–85e.PubMed
64.
•• Chang EI, Jenkins MP, Patel SA, Topham NS. Long-term operative outcomes of preoperative computer tomography-guided virtual surgical planning for osteocutaneous free flap mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:619–23. This is one of the largest and longest single institution retrospective reviews comparing virtual surgical planning against prefabricated stereolithic models in fibular free flap reconstruction of mandibular defects and found significant decreased operative time, and fewer rates of bony nonunion with virtual surgical planning. PubMed
65.
Ramella V, Franchi A, Bottoso S, et al. Triple cut computer-aided design-computer-aided modeling: more oncologic safety added to precise mandible modeling. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75:1567e1–6.
66.
Nakao M, Aso S, Imai Y, Ueda N, Hatanaka T, Shiba M, et al. Automated planning with multivariate shape descriptors for fibular transfer in mandibular reconstruction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017;64:1772–85.PubMed
67.
Riediger D. Restoration of masticatory function by microsurgically revascularized iliac crest bone grafts using endosseous implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;81:861–77.PubMed
68.
Sozzi D, Novelli G, Silva R, Connelly ST, Tartaglia GM. Implant rehabilitation in fibula-free flap reconstruction: a retrospective study of cases at 1-18 years following surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45:1655–61.PubMed
69.
Barber AJ, Butterworth CJ, Rogers SN. Systematic review of primary osseointegrated dental implants in head and neck oncology. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;49:29–36.PubMed
70.
Ch’ng S, Skoracki RJ, Selber JC, et al. Osseointegrated implant-based dental rehabilitation in head and neck reconstruction patients. Head Neck. 2016;38(Suppl):E321–7.PubMed
71.
Barber BR, Dziegelewski PT, Chuka R, et al. Bone-impacted fibular free flap: long-term dental implant success and complications compared to traditional fibular free tissue transfer. Head Neck. 2016;28:E1783–7.
72.
Dziegielewski PT, Mlynarek AM, Harris JR, Hrdlicka A, Barber B, al-Qahtani K, et al. Bone impacted fibular free flap: a novel technique to increase bone density for dental implantation in osseous reconstruction. Head Neck. 2014;36:1648–53.PubMed
73.
Levine JP, Bae JS, Soares M, Brecht LE, Saadeh PB, Ceradini DJ, et al. Jaw in a day: Total maxillofacial reconstruction using digital technology. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1386–91.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Contemporary Approach to Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
verfasst von
Christopher M. K. L. Yao
Edward I. Chang
Stephen Y. Lai
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Oncology Reports / Ausgabe 11/2019
Print ISSN: 1523-3790
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6269
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-019-0845-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2019

Current Oncology Reports 11/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Melanoma (RJ Sullivan, Section Editor)

Surgery for Metastatic Melanoma: an Evolving Concept

Head and Neck Cancers (EY Hanna, Section Editor)

Treatment Strategy for Distant Synchronous Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Head and Neck Cancers (EY Hanna, Section Editor)

Contemporary Management of Parapharyngeal Tumors

Melanoma (RJ Sullivan, Section Editor)

Novel Immunotherapy Combinations

Palliative Medicine (A Jatoi, Section Editor)

Managing Pain in the Older Cancer Patient

Leukemia (A Aguayo, Section Editor)

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: Insights into Biology, Prognostic Factors, and Treatment

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Alphablocker schützt vor Miktionsproblemen nach der Biopsie

16.05.2024 alpha-1-Rezeptorantagonisten Nachrichten

Nach einer Prostatabiopsie treten häufig Probleme beim Wasserlassen auf. Ob sich das durch den periinterventionellen Einsatz von Alphablockern verhindern lässt, haben australische Mediziner im Zuge einer Metaanalyse untersucht.

Antikörper-Wirkstoff-Konjugat hält solide Tumoren in Schach

16.05.2024 Zielgerichtete Therapie Nachrichten

Trastuzumab deruxtecan scheint auch jenseits von Lungenkrebs gut gegen solide Tumoren mit HER2-Mutationen zu wirken. Dafür sprechen die Daten einer offenen Pan-Tumor-Studie.

Mammakarzinom: Senken Statine das krebsbedingte Sterberisiko?

15.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen mit lokalem oder metastasiertem Brustkrebs, die Statine einnehmen, haben eine niedrigere krebsspezifische Mortalität als Patientinnen, die dies nicht tun, legen neue Daten aus den USA nahe.

Labor, CT-Anthropometrie zeigen Risiko für Pankreaskrebs

13.05.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Gerade bei aggressiven Malignomen wie dem duktalen Adenokarzinom des Pankreas könnte Früherkennung die Therapiechancen verbessern. Noch jedoch klafft hier eine Lücke. Ein Studienteam hat einen Weg gesucht, sie zu schließen.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise