nach oben

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology

Erschienen in:

01.06.2015 | Original Article

Is Demirjian’s original method really useful for age estimation in a forensic context?

verfasst von: José Luís Carneiro, Inês Morais Caldas, Américo Afonso, Hugo Filipe Violante Cardoso

Erschienen in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The suitability of Demirjian’s method for forensic age estimation has been systematically questioned. The aim of this study is to further assess the reliability of Demirjian’s original method in forensic age estimation using a sample of Portuguese children.

Methods

564 panoramic radiographs of Portuguese boys and girls between 6 and 16 years of age were evaluated using Demirjian’s method. Dental age (DA) was determined using the 50th percentile for the maturity score obtained for each age group. The mean difference between chronological age (CA) and dental age (DA) and the mean absolute difference between CA and DA were calculated for each age group. Paired t tests were used to test the statistical significance of mean differences between CA and DA. For each individual, a 94 % confidence interval was calculated for estimated DA, using the 3rd and 97th percentiles in Demirjian’s conversion tables.

Results

Chronological age was overestimated in boys, in every age group; mean differences between CA and DA were statistically significant, expect for age 7. In girls, chronological age was overestimated in the 10–15 year-old age group. The difference between CA and DA was highest in the 12 years olds for both sexes. The 94 % confidence intervals did not include the true chronological age in all 6, 13, and 15 year-old girls, and all 14 and 15 year-old boys. Only a small portion of the individuals in the remaining age groups had their true chronological age falling within the probable age interval.

Conclusions

Results show a systematic bias and consistent inaccuracy in estimating age from dental development using Demirjian’s original method, making this methodology unsuitable for age estimation in the study sample. These results add to published evidence which suggests that Demirjian’s method is not suitable and should be abandoned altogether for forensic age estimation purposes.

Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973;45(2):211–27.PubMed

Krailassiri S, Anuwongnukroh N, Dechkunakorn S. Relationships between dental calcification stages and skeletal maturity indicators in Thai individuals. Angle Orthod. 2002;72(2):155–66.PubMed

Sahin Saglam AM, Gazilerli U. The relationship between dental and skeletal maturity. J Orofac Orthop. 2002;63(6):454–62.CrossRefPubMed

Bagherpour A, Imanimoghaddam M, Bagherpour MR, Einolghozati M. Dental age assessment among Iranian children aged 6–13 years using the Demirjian method. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;197(1–3):121 e1–4.

Celikoglu M, Cantekin K, Ceylan I. Dental age assessment: the applicability of Demirjian method in eastern Turkish children. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(Suppl 1):S220–2.CrossRefPubMed

Chaillet N, Willems G, Demirjian A. Dental maturity in Belgian children using Demirjian’s method and polynomial functions: new standard curves for forensic and clinical use. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2004;22(2):18–27.PubMed

Koshy S, Tandon S. Dental age assessment: the applicability of Demirjian’s method in south Indian children. Forensic Sci Int. 1998;94(1–2):73–85.CrossRefPubMed

Lee SS, Kim D, Lee S, Lee UY, Seo JS, Ahn YW, et al. Validity of Demirjian’s and modified Demirjian’s methods in age estimation for Korean juveniles and adolescents. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;211(1–3):41–6.CrossRefPubMed

Tunc ES, Koyuturk AE. Dental age assessment using Demirjian’s method on northern Turkish children. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;175(1):23–6.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Willems G, Van Olmen A, Spiessens B, Carels C. Dental age estimation in Belgian children: Demirjian’s technique revisited. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46(4):893–5.PubMed

11.

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Liversidge HM. The assessment and interpretation of Demirjian, Goldstein and Tanner’s dental maturity. Ann Hum Biol. 2012;39(5):412–31.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Flood SJ, Mitchell WJ, Oxnard CE, Turlach BA, McGeachie J. A comparison of Demirjian’s four dental development methods for forensic age assessment. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(6):1610–5.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Blenkin MR, Evans W. Age estimation from the teeth using a modified Demirjian system. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55(6):1504–8.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Goya HA, Satake H, Maeda T, Tanaka S, Akimoto Y. Dental age in Japanese children using a modified Demirjian method. Pediatr Dent J. 2009;19(1):82–8.CrossRef

16.

Willems G. A review of the most commonly used dental age estimation techniques. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2001;19(1):9–17.PubMed

17.

Chaillet N, Nystrom M, Kataja M, Demirjian A. Dental maturity curves in Finnish children: Demirjian’s method revisited and polynomial functions for age estimation. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49(6):1324–31.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Maber M, Liversidge HM, Hector MP. Accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods using developing teeth. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;159(Suppl 1):S68–73.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Foti B, Lalys L, Adalian P, Giustiniani J, Maczel M, Signoli M, et al. New forensic approach to age determination in children based on tooth eruption. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;132(1):49–56.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Gleiser I, Hunt EE Jr. The permanent mandibular first molar: its calcification, eruption and decay. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1955;13(2):253–83.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Gustafson G, Koch G. Age estimation up to 16 years of age based on dental development. Odontol Revy. 1974;25(3):297–306.PubMed

22.

Haavikko K. The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth. An orthopantomographic study. Suom Hammaslaak Toim. 1970;66(3):103–70.PubMed

23.

Hagg U, Matsson L. Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: the accuracy and precision of three methods. Eur J Orthod. 1985;7(1):25–34.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Harris MJP, Nortje CJ. The mesial root of the third mandibular molar. A possible indicator of age. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1985;2:39–43.

25.

Hunt EE Jr, Gleiser I. The estimation of age and sex of preadolescent children from bones and teeth. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1955;13(3):479–87.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Kullman L, Johanson G, Akesson L. Root development of the lower third molar and its relation to chronological age. Swed Dent J. 1992;16(4):161–7.PubMed

27.

Liliequist B, Lundberg M. Skeletal and tooth development. A methodologic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn. 1971;11(2):97–112.

28.

Moorrees CF, Fanning EA, Hunt EE Jr. Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 1963;42:1490–502.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Nolla CM. The development of the permanent teeth. J Dent Child. 1960;27:254–66.

30.

Frucht S, Schnegelsberg C, Schulte-Monting J, Rose E, Jonas I. Dental age in southwest Germany. A radiographic study. J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61(5):318–29.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Chen JW, Guo J, Zhou J, Liu RK, Chen TT, Zou SJ. Assessment of dental maturity of western Chinese children using Demirjian’s method. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;197(1–3):119 e1–4.

Titel: Is Demirjian’s original method really useful for age estimation in a forensic context?
verfasst von: José Luís Carneiro
Inês Morais Caldas
Américo Afonso
Hugo Filipe Violante Cardoso
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1547-769X
Elektronische ISSN: 1556-2891
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-015-9656-x

Springer Medizin

Is Demirjian’s original method really useful for age estimation in a forensic context?

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Pathologie

Molekularpathologische Untersuchungen im Wandel der Zeit

Vergleichende Pathologie in der onkologischen Forschung

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren

Personalisierte Medizin in der Onkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Sphacelus of the liver: an unexpected finding at autopsy

Seasonal variation of postmortem microbial communities

Preventive pathology: the interface of forensic medicine and trauma surgery for pre-hospital trauma management

Discriminating factors in fatal blunt trauma from low level falls and homicide

Systematic analysis of the radiologic findings of aortic dissections on unenhanced postmortem computed tomography

Residual soil DNA extraction increases the discriminatory power between samples

Neu im Fachgebiet Pathologie

Molekularpathologische Untersuchungen im Wandel der Zeit

Vergleichende Pathologie in der onkologischen Forschung

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren

Personalisierte Medizin in der Onkologie