nach oben

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie

Erschienen in:

01.07.2012 | Reports of Original Investigations

The LMA Supreme™ in 700 parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery: an observational study

verfasst von: Wei Yu Yao, MBBS, Shi Yang Li, MBBS, Ban Leong Sng, MBBS, Yvonne Lim, MBBS, Alex Tiong Heng Sia, MBBS

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 7/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The LMA Supreme™ (SLMA) is a single-use supraglottic device that provides a good seal for positive pressure ventilation. It has a double aperture design that facilitates the introduction of an orogastric tube to aspirate gastric contents. This observational study evaluated the role of the SLMA in parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery under general anesthesia.

Methods

Non-obese parturients with at least four hours of fasting and antacid prophylaxis scheduled for uncomplicated Cesarean delivery were recruited from June 2009 through May 2010 at the Quanzhou Women’s and Children’s Hospital, China. We recorded the number of SLMA insertion attempts, the time to effective ventilation, the incidence of aspiration, and other anesthetic and obstetric outcomes. Postoperatively, we noted the presence of blood on the SLMA, postoperative sore throat, and patient satisfaction. Analysis included comparison of results between parturients having elective and urgent Cesarean delivery.

Results

We recruited 700 parturients (576 elective, 124 urgent). Mean (standard deviation) body mass index was 25.6 (2.5) kg·m⁻². All SLMA insertions were successful, with 686 (98%) inserted on first attempt and a time to effective airway of 19.5 (3.9) sec. We maintained ventilation and oxygenation in all parturients with a good seal and there was no evidence of aspiration. Eighteen parturients (2.6%) had blood on the SLMA upon removal, 24 (3.4%) had sore throat, and patient satisfaction was 85 (7)%. These results were similar in elective and urgent cases.

Conclusions

In a carefully selected group of parturients, the SLMA is a useful alternative to tracheal intubation for Cesarean delivery, providing effective ventilation and a low incidence of side effects or complications.

Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-Supreme–a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 405-10.PubMedCrossRef

Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 602-7.PubMedCrossRef

Lee AK, Tey JB, Lim Y, Sia AT. Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37: 815-9.PubMed

Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, Tekin M, Toker K, Solak M. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 852-7.PubMedCrossRef

Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme–a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 79-83.PubMedCrossRef

Cook TM, Gatward JJ, Handel J, et al. Evaluation of the LMA Supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 555-62.PubMedCrossRef

Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, et al. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2009; 111: 55-62.PubMedCrossRef

Abdi W, Amathieu R, Adhoum A, et al. Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme and the ETT. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 141-6.PubMedCrossRef

Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert DJ, Fick GH. LMA-Classic and LMA-ProSeal are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 71-7.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Abdi W, Dhonneur G, Amathieu R, et al. LMA supreme versus facemask ventilation performed by novices: a comparative study in morbidly obese patients showing difficult ventilation predictors. Obes Surg 2009; 19: 1624-30.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Lopez AM, Valero R, Brimacombe J. Insertion and use of the LMA Supreme in the prone position. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 154-7.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Sharma V, Verghese C, McKenna PJ. Prospective audit on the use of the LMA-Supreme for airway management of adult patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery in prone position. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 228-32.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Braude D, Southard A, Bajema T, Sims E, Martinez J. Rapid sequence airway using the LMA-Supreme as a primary airway for 9 h in a multi-system trauma patient. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 1217.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Sharma B, Sahai C, Sood J, Kumra VP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in two failed obstetric tracheal intubation scenarios. Int J Obstet Anesth 2006; 15: 338-9.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Cook TM, Brooks TS, Van der Westhuizen J, Clarke M. The Proseal LMA is a useful rescue device during failed rapid sequence intubation: two additional cases. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 630-3.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Vaida SJ, Gaitini LA. Another case of use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in a difficult obstetric airway. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 905; author reply 905.

17.

Bullingham A. Use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for airway maintenance during emergency caesarean section after failed intubation. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 903; author reply 904.

18.

Awan R, Nolan JP, Cook TM. Use of a ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for airway maintenance during emergency caesarean section after failed tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 144-6.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Evans NR, Skowno JJ, Bennett PJ, James MF, Dyer RA. A prospective observational study of the use of the Proseal laryngeal mask airway for postpartum tubal ligation. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005; 14: 90-5.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Ali A, Canturk S, Turkmen A, Turgut N, Altan A. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Classic in adults. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26: 1010-4.PubMedCrossRef

21.

de Caestecker JS, Blackwell JN, Pryde A, Heading RC. Daytime gastro-oesophageal reflux is important in oesophagitis. Gut 1987; 28: 519-26.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Loeckinger A. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1017-20.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Lim Y, Goel S, Brimacombe JR. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is an effective alternative to laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007; 35: 52-6.PubMed

24.

Bercker S, Schmidbauer W, Volk T, et al. A comparison of seal in seven supraglottic airway devices using a cadaver model of elevated esophageal pressure. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 445-8.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Schmidbauer W, Bercker S, Volk T, Bogusch G, Mager G, Kerner T. Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic and ProSeal using a cadaver model. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 135-9.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF. ProSeal laryngeal mask protects against aspiration of fluid in the pharynx. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 584-7.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Vaida SJ, Pott LM, Budde AO, Gaitini LA. Suggested algorithm for management of the unexpected difficult airway in obstetric anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21: 385-6.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Mendelson CL. The aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs during obstetric anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1946; 52: 191-205.PubMed

29.

Han TH, Brimacombe J, Lee EJ, Yang HS. The laryngeal mask airway is effective (and probably safe) in selected healthy parturients for elective cesarean section: a prospective study of 1067 cases. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 1117-21.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Halaseh BK, Sukkar ZF, Hassan LH, Sia AT, Bushnaq WA, Adarbeh H. The use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in caesarean section–experience in 3000 cases. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 1023-8.PubMed

31.

Lyons G. Failed intubation. Six years’ experience in a teaching maternity unit. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 759-62.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Samsoon GL, Young JR. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 487-90.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Barnardo PD, Jenkins JG. Failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics: a 6-year review in a UK region. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 690-4.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Elkington KW. At the water’s edge: where obstetrics and anesthesia meet. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 304-8.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Hunter AR, Moir DD. Confidential enquiry into maternal deaths. Br J Anaesth 1983; 55: 367-9.PubMedCrossRef

36.

May WJ, Greiss FC Jr. Maternal mortality in North Carolina: a forty-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 555-60. discussion 560-1.PubMed

37.

Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 1105-11.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: The LMA Supreme™ in 700 parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery: an observational study
verfasst von: Wei Yu Yao, MBBS
Shi Yang Li, MBBS
Ban Leong Sng, MBBS
Yvonne Lim, MBBS
Alex Tiong Heng Sia, MBBS
Publikationsdatum: 01.07.2012
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-012-9718-4

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Springer Medizin

The LMA Supreme™ in 700 parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery: an observational study