Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 6/2016

01.04.2016 | Reports of Original Investigations

The relationship between study findings and publication outcome in anesthesia research: a retrospective observational study examining publication bias

verfasst von: Simon W. Chong, MBBS, Neil F. Collins, MBBS, Christine Y. Wu, MBBS, Grace M. Liskaser, Philip J. Peyton, MD, PhD, MBBS

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Many areas of medicine have shown bias towards the publication of studies with positive results. To estimate publication bias in the anesthesia literature, we reviewed all abstracts presented at the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) annual meetings over a four-year period and compared study results (positive vs negative) with publication outcomes.

Methods

This review included all abstracts from the 2001-2004 ASA annual meetings performed as randomized-controlled trials in humans. We scored their outcome results as positive or negative and assessed abstract quality using a 13-point scoring system. We then performed a systematic literature search to identify any subsequent publication of the studies and calculated the relative risk (RR) for journal publication by comparing positive vs negative studies.

Results

Of 5,918 abstracts reviewed, 1,052 met inclusion criteria, and 564 (53.6%) of the abstracts proceeded to publication. The RR for abstracts with positive results proceeding to journal publication was 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.22 to 1.66; P < 0.001). This result did not change significantly after adjusting for study size and abstract quality score during logistic regression modelling. There was no significant difference in the abstract quality score between positive vs negative studies or between abstracts proceeding vs not proceeding to publication.

Conclusions

Approximately half of the ASA annual meeting abstracts proceed to publication. After adjustment for study quality and size, abstracts with positive results were more likely to proceed to journal publication than those with negative results, suggesting publication bias in the anesthesia literature.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Dickersin K, Chan S, Chalmers TC, Sacks HS, Smith H Jr. Publication bias and clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1987; 8: 343-53.CrossRefPubMed Dickersin K, Chan S, Chalmers TC, Sacks HS, Smith H Jr. Publication bias and clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1987; 8: 343-53.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1994; 272: 158-62.PubMed Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1994; 272: 158-62.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ioannidis JP. Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials. JAMA 1998; 279: 281-6.CrossRefPubMed Ioannidis JP. Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials. JAMA 1998; 279: 281-6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall R, de Antueno C, Webber A; Canadian Research Ethics Board. Publication bias in the medical literature: a review by a Canadian Research Ethics Board. Can. J Anesth 2007; 54: 380-8.CrossRefPubMed Hall R, de Antueno C, Webber A; Canadian Research Ethics Board. Publication bias in the medical literature: a review by a Canadian Research Ethics Board. Can. J Anesth 2007; 54: 380-8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 252-60.CrossRefPubMed Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 252-60.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton AJ, Duval SJ, Tweedie RL, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. BMJ 2000; 320: 1574-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sutton AJ, Duval SJ, Tweedie RL, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. BMJ 2000; 320: 1574-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat De Oliveira GS, Jr Chang R, Kendall MC, Fitzgerald PC, McCarthy RJ. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature. Anesth Analg 2012; 114: 1042-8.CrossRefPubMed De Oliveira GS, Jr Chang R, Kendall MC, Fitzgerald PC, McCarthy RJ. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature. Anesth Analg 2012; 114: 1042-8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopewell S, Clarke M, Stewart L, Tierney J. Time to publication for results of clinical trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 18: Mr000011. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Stewart L, Tierney J. Time to publication for results of clinical trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 18: Mr000011.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J; Cochrane Information Retrieval Methods Group. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S (Eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; 2011. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J; Cochrane Information Retrieval Methods Group. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S (Eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; 2011.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopewell S, Clarke M, Askie L. Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 681-4.CrossRefPubMed Hopewell S, Clarke M, Askie L. Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 681-4.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191-4.CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191-4.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 18: MR000005. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 18: MR000005.
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat van Lent M, Overbeke J, Out HJ. Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals. PLoS One 2014; 9: e104846.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Lent M, Overbeke J, Out HJ. Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals. PLoS One 2014; 9: e104846.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Carvalho B, Drover DR, Ginosar Y, Cohen SE, Riley ET. Intrathecal fentanyl added to bupivacaine and morphine for cesarean delivery may induce a subtle acute opioid tolerance. Int J Obstet Anesth 2012; 21: 29-34.CrossRefPubMed Carvalho B, Drover DR, Ginosar Y, Cohen SE, Riley ET. Intrathecal fentanyl added to bupivacaine and morphine for cesarean delivery may induce a subtle acute opioid tolerance. Int J Obstet Anesth 2012; 21: 29-34.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pang W, Liu YC, Maboudou E, et al. Metoclopramide improves the quality of tramadol PCA indistinguishable to morphine PCA: a prospective, randomized, double blind clinical comparison. Pain Med 2013; 14: 1426-34.CrossRefPubMed Pang W, Liu YC, Maboudou E, et al. Metoclopramide improves the quality of tramadol PCA indistinguishable to morphine PCA: a prospective, randomized, double blind clinical comparison. Pain Med 2013; 14: 1426-34.CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Weibel S, Elia N, Kranke P. The transparent clinical trial: why we need complete and informative prospective trial registration. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016; 33: 72-4.CrossRefPubMed Weibel S, Elia N, Kranke P. The transparent clinical trial: why we need complete and informative prospective trial registration. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016; 33: 72-4.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 2004; 292: 1363-4.CrossRefPubMed DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 2004; 292: 1363-4.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wager E, Williams P, OPEN Project (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) Consortium. “Hardly worth the effort”? Medical journals’ policies and their editors’ and publishers’ views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study. BMJ 2013; 347: f5248.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wager E, Williams P, OPEN Project (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) Consortium. “Hardly worth the effort”? Medical journals’ policies and their editors’ and publishers’ views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study. BMJ 2013; 347: f5248.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Teoh DC, Schramm B. Changes in clinical research in anaesthesia and intensive care from 1974-2004. Anaesth Intensive Care 2006; 34: 753-7.PubMed Teoh DC, Schramm B. Changes in clinical research in anaesthesia and intensive care from 1974-2004. Anaesth Intensive Care 2006; 34: 753-7.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Langford RA, Huang GH, Leslie K. Quality and reporting of trial design in scientific papers in Anaesthesia over 25 years. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 60-4.CrossRefPubMed Langford RA, Huang GH, Leslie K. Quality and reporting of trial design in scientific papers in Anaesthesia over 25 years. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 60-4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The relationship between study findings and publication outcome in anesthesia research: a retrospective observational study examining publication bias
verfasst von
Simon W. Chong, MBBS
Neil F. Collins, MBBS
Christine Y. Wu, MBBS
Grace M. Liskaser
Philip J. Peyton, MD, PhD, MBBS
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-016-0631-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.