Background
Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, with an estimated 43,470 new cases diagnosed in 2010 [
1]. In Japan, endometrial cancer is currently the fourth most common gynecologic malignancy in women, with an estimated incidence of 6,665 new cases in 2010 [
2]. Clinical parameters such as the disease stage, nuclear grade, histologic subtypes and tumor size are correlated with the outcome of the disease. Therefore, it is hoped that a better understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying the progression of endometrial cancer will lead to new insights for novel therapeutic targets.
Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (Emmprin) is a highly glycosylated transmembrane protein that belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily and is encoded by a gene localized to 19p13.3. [
3,
4]. Most cell types show constitutive expression of low levels of emmprin owing to its involvement in many physiologic processes, while high levels of emmprin expression are observed during remodeling processes such as inflammation, embryonic development, wound healing and tumor progression [
5‐
9]. Emmprin has recently been recognized as an important modulator of tumor-stromal communication and mediates a wide range of tumor-promoting molecular events, including the acquisition of anchorage-independent growth and invasive phenotype by tumor cells and tumor cell-induced angiogenesis [
10]. To date, several studies on emmprin expression in tumor tissues have been published. Emmprin is overexpressed in a variety of human cancers, and its overexpression is correlated with clinically aggressive behavior and poor patient survival [
11‐
19].
The function of emmprin in malignant tumors has been investigated in many different experimental systems. Emmprin on tumor cells stimulates peritumoral fibroblasts or cancer cells to secrete increased amounts of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which are responsible for degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM), and therefore facilitate tumor invasion and metastasis [
4,
15]. Emmprin can promote tumor cell invasion via activation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and stimulate tumor angiogenesis via vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF), and is thus implicated in other aspects of tumor progression, such as tumor survival and angiogenesis [
20,
21].
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is an essential morphologic conversion that occurs during embryonic development. Increasing evidence suggests that a similar process occurs during cancer progression when tumor cells acquire the capacity to migrate, invade and metastasize [
22]. Loss of cell-cell adhesion is a prerequisite for EMT and involves functional loss of E-cadherin. The activation of E-cadherin repressors may be induced by signaling mediated by growth factors, including transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, insulin-like growth factor (IGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, via their specific receptors [
23‐
25]. The transcriptional repressors of E-cadherin are zinc finger transcription factors, including Snail, Slug, Smad-interacting protein 1 (SIP1) and Twist, which is also implicated in this process [
26‐
29]. However, it remains unclear how the mechanisms of action of emmprin are involved in endometrial cancer and how its roles are intertwined.
In the present study, we examined whether emmprin expression is correlated with clinicopathological characteristics in patients suffering from endometrial cancer. The main aim of this study was to determine whether emmprin could represent a potential therapeutic target for endometrial cancer.
Methods
Patients and tissue specimens
Patients with normal endometrium (n = 20), endometrial hyperplasia (n = 10) (simple, n = 1; complex, n = 2; atypical complex, n = 7), adenocarcinoma and carcinosarcoma (n = 134) were treated at Okayama University Hospital between January 2000 and November 2009. All of the patients underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and partial omentectomy with or without pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Pelvic lymph node dissection included the right and left common iliac, external iliac, suprainguinal, internal iliac, obturator, sacral and parametrial nodal chains. Para-aortic lymph node dissection included the nodes located from the bifurcation of the aorta to the level of the renal vein (n = 36). Adjuvant chemotherapy was used depending the FIGO stage, grade, patient preference and physician discretion. Our standard chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 infused over 3 h) and carboplatin (dosed for an area under the curve of 5) for 3–6 cycles (n = 52). Patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded from this study. Tumor specimens were obtained at the time of surgery, immediately fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. The histological cell types were diagnosed according to the WHO classification, and all 134 cancer specimens were classified as endometrioid adenocarcinomas and carcinosarcoma. The histological grades were assigned according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging classification as follows: grade 1, n = 51; grade 2, n = 55; grade 3, n = 22; and carcinosarcoma, n = 6) The surgical stages were reviewed based on the FIGO staging system as follows: stage I, n = 74; stage II, n = 11; stage III, n = 39; stage IV, n = 10. The median age at the time of surgery was 57.7 years (range, 28–85). The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were defined as the interval between the initial operation and clinically or radiologically proven recurrence or death, respectively. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Okayama University Hospital.
Immunohistochemistry and staining evaluation
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections (4-μm thickness) were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated in ethanol. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by treatment with methanol containing 0.3% hydrogen peroxidase for 15 min. The sections were then incubated with an anti-emmprin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) at room temperature, followed by staining with a streptavidin-biotin -peroxidase kit (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan). The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. The levels of emmprin staining in epithelial cells were classified into three groups by scoring the percentages of positive cells: 2, strong, >50% of cells stained; 1, moderate, 10–50% of cells stained; 0, weak, <10% of cells stained. Microscopic analyses were independently conducted by two independent examiners with no prior knowledge of the clinical data. Final decisions in controversial cases were made using a conference microscope.
The HEC-50B (Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources (JCRB) number: JCRB1145) and KLE (ATCC number: CRL-1622) cell lines evaluated were derived from human endometrial cancers. The HEC-50B cell line was maintained in Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The KLE cell line was maintained in DMEM/F12 medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% FBS. HEC-50B and KLE cells were trypsinized and plated in culture dishes. At ~50% confluency, the cells were transfected with an annealed emmprin siRNA (sc-35298) or scramble siRNA as an empty vector for gene silencing (final concentration, 100 nmol/L) using a siRNA transfection reagent (sc-29528; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The cells were cultured with each siRNA for 24, 48 and 72 h.
Western blotting analysis
Cell lysates were collected and estimated using a Protein Assay system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Proteins from each cell line were subjected to SDS-PAGE, and then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies used for immunoblotting were as follows: anti-emmprin, anti-NF-κB p65 and anti-NF-κB phospho-p65 (p-p65) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA); and anti-β-actin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). The working dilution of all the primary antibodies was 1:1000. The membranes were then incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies. The resulting antigen-antibody complexes were detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ).
MTS assay and cell viability assay
To evaluate the effects of emmprin on cell proliferation, MTS and cell viability assays were performed. For the MTS assay, cells were seeded into 96-well plates and transfected when the cell density reached 5 × 104 cells/well. After transfection of the cells with the emmprin siRNA for 24, 48 and 72 h, MTS (Promega, Madison, WI) was added for 2 h. The absorbances were measured at 490 nm using an ELISA plate-reader (Bio-Rad Systems, Hercules, CA). The cell viability was analyzed using SYTO 10 green fluorescent nucleic acid stain and dead red (ethidium homodimer-2) nucleic acid stain (Live/Dead® reduced biohazard viability/cytotoxicity kit; Invitrogen, Eugene, OR). Briefly, cells were transfected with the emmprin siRNA for 72 h and then incubated with SYTO 10 green fluorescent nucleic acid stain and dead red nucleic acid stain for 15 min. The cell fluorescence was observed using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Motility and invasion assay
To investigate the effects of the emmprin siRNA on cell motility and invasion, we used monolayer wounding (scratch) and chemotaxicells (polycarbonate filter, pore size 8 μm; Kurabo, Osaka, Japan) coated with type IV collagen. For the monolayer wounding assay, cells were allowed to form a monolayer on a culture dish, and a wound was made by scratching the monolayer with a pipette tip. After removal of the scratched cells and transfection with the emmprin siRNA, the cells were cultured for 24 h. For the chemotaxicells coated with type IV collagen, cells (1 × 105) in 100 μL of DMEM/F12 medium or DMEM supplemented with 0.1% bovine serum albumin were placed in the upper compartment, transfected with the emmprin siRNA and then incubated for 72 h. After the incubation, the cells on the upper surface of the filter were wiped off with a cotton swab. The cells on the lower surface were stained with hematoxylin and counted in 10 randomly selected fields.
Matrigel invasion assay
To investigate the differences in the Matrigel invasion abilities among cells expressing emmprin, we used BD BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Bioscience, Bedford, MA). HEC-50B and KLE cells transfected with the emmprin siRNA were added in situ with 10 μg/mL of DiI (Invitrogen) in DMEM/F12 or DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS for 1 h. Cells (5 × 104) of each genotype were added to the inserts, and 0.75 mL of medium was added to the bottom of each well. After 72 h of incubation, the membranes were removed from the insert and mounted on slides, and the numbers of invading cells were counted under a microscope. The Matrigel assays were performed in triplicate.
Real-time and quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from the cell lines using an acid guanidinium –phenol -chloroform method (ISOGEN; Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Real-time RT-PCR was performed using a LightCycler rapid thermal cycler instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) under the conditions recommended by the manufacturer. The real-time RT-PCR used primers for emmprin, EGF and TGF-β as previously described [
30,
31]. The PCR products were checked by melting point analyses and their electrophoretic mobilities. Standard curves for calculation of the numbers of transcripts were created using plasmids containing the respective amplified fragments as inserts, and were adjusted to use glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as a reference gene. In addition, the PCR products were analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. As an internal control, GAPDH mRNA was also measured by quantitative RT-PCR. The quantitative RT-PCR used primers for MMP-2, MMP-9, VEGF, E-cadherin, Vimentin, Snail and GAPDH as described previously [
32].
Transient transfection assay
pNF-κB-responsive and pAP-1-responsive elements were used for NF-κB and AP-1 signaling reporter assays, respectively. pNF-κB-Luc and pAP-1-Luc were purchased from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA). Transient transfections were performed using Lipofectamine™ 2000 reagent (Life Technologies). For the luciferase reporter assays, cells were transfected with 0.5 μg of NF-κB-responsive plasmid, AP-1-responsive plasmid, estrogen-responsive plasmid or progesterone-responsive plasmid in combination with 0.05 μg of pTK-RLUC (Promega) as an internal control. Their proteins were extracted using a Dual-Luciferase reporter assay system (Promega). The firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured concurrently for 12 sec using a luminometer (LUMAT LB9507; Berthold, Wildbad, Germany). The assays were carried out for quadruplicate transfection experiments, and at least three independent values were analyzed to confirm reproducibility.
Cell growth in monolayers
For evaluation of cell growth in monolayers, cells were plated at a density of 3 × 104 cells/well in 6-well plates containing DMEM or DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS. The cell numbers were counted in triplicate after 1, 3, 5 and 7 days using a hemocytometer to assess cell proliferation.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test for comparisons with controls and one-factor ANOVA followed by Fisher's protected least significance difference test for all pairwise comparisons. The survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and the differences between the survival curves were examined by using the log-rank test. The analyses were performed with the software package StatView version 5.0 (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.
Discussion
Proteins on the cell surface play important roles during cancer progression and metastasis via their ability to mediate cell-cell interactions and navigate the communication between cells and the microenvironment. Emmprin is a transmembrane glycoprotein belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily of molecules expressed on the cell surface of most tumor cells. Several lines of data have clearly shown key roles for emmprin in tumor progression and metastasis. Indeed, high levels of emmprin have been reported in many cancers [
11‐
19]. Accordingly, emmprin expression has been found to be associated with known risk factors for breast cancer and with a poor prognosis of breast cancer patients [
19]. In endometrial cancer, Ueda et al. reported that high levels of emmprin expression had a significant association with recurrence [
33]. However, the correlation between emmprin expression and survival has not been studied in endometrial cancer. In the present study, we examined whether the emmprin expression levels were associated with uterine normal endometrium, endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer specimens. The levels of emmprin expression were significantly increased in the endometrial cancer specimens relative to the normal endometrium and endometrial hyperplasia specimens. Immunohistochemistry of endometrial cancer specimens from chemosensitivity patients revealed increased emmprin expression with clinicopathological parameters such as FIGO stage, histology, depth of myometrial invasion, cervical involvement, lymph node metastasis, LVS involvement and peritoneal cytology. Moreover, high levels of emmprin expression were significantly associated with the DFS and OS rates in endometrial cancer. Interestingly, these findings indicate that low emmprin expression might be a predictor of favorable prognosis in endometrial cancer patients.
Glycosylated transmembrane proteins are likely to have important roles in cellular homeostasis and their dysregulated activities and expression have been implicated in tumor development and progression. Emmprin plays a role in a variety of physiological processes as is evident by the diverse deficiencies detectable in emmprin knockout mice. Knockout mice deficient in the emmprin gene are sterile and show various neurological abnormalities. emmprin-deficient embryos are also difficult to implant. Emmprin has been found to participate in the cell-surface orientation of monocarboxylic acid transporters (MCTs) to the plasma membrane. Dysfunction of the retina in emmprin-deficient mice is ascribed to the failure of plasma membrane integration of MCTs in the tissue [
5]. To date, several studies have suggested possible roles for emmprin in the invasion of carcinoma cells. Emmprin in tumor cells triggers the production or release of matrix metalloproteinases in the surrounding mesenchymal cells and tumor cells, thereby contributing to tumor invasion. Furthermore, the association of emmprin with integrins might be important in signaling through emmprin. Engineered overexpression of emmprin in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells stimulated cell invasion but not cell proliferation [
34]. Emmprin regulates cell adhesion, invasion, and cytoskeleton reorganization in prostate cancer cells [
35]. Bladder, prostate and gastic cancer, after transfection with emmprin siRNA, showed a significant inhibitory effect of cell proliferation and invasion [
36‐
38]. In the present study, we found the inhibition of cell proliferation, migration and invasion in endometrial cancer cells after transfection of the emmprin siRNA.
The activation of emmprin may be promoted by multiple mechanisms. Emmprin can also interact with key adhesion proteins such as integrins, implying roles in cancer cell migration and invasion. Emmprin is an upstream inducer of several MMPs and is suggested to be the master regulator of MMP production in disease states such as cancer metastasis. In prostate cancer, Emmprin knockdown by the siRNA led to migration and invasion through MMP-2, and MMP-9 expression [
38]. The inhibition by emmprin siRNA mediated migration and proliferation, which led to apoptosis by VEGF receptor-2/VEGF system and the matrix degrading protease to block tumor cell growth and invasion in malignant melanoma [
39].
EMT, which has been recognized for several decades as being critical for embryogenesis, has also recently been shown to be relevant to cancer progression. Hence, MMP activities have been implicated in EMT by activating growth factors and their receptors and cleaving cell-cell and cell-ECM adhesion molecules. Loss of cell-cell adhesion is a prerequisite for EMT and involves functional loss of E-cadherin. Activation of E-cadherin repressors may be induced by signaling mediated by growth factors, such as TGF-β, EGF, IGF and TNF-α, via their specific receptors. The resultant signaling cascade induces E-cadherin transcription repressors such as Snail, Slug, SIP1 and Twist, eventually resulting in a loss of epithelial morphology [
22‐
29]. Emmprin/CD147 promotes EMT through TGF-β signaling and is transcriptionally regulated by Slug on hepatocellular carcinoma [
40]. In this study, we used RT-PCR assays to examine whether transcriptional repressors of growth factors and EMT family were affected in endometrial cancer cells after transfection of the emmprin siRNA. The transfection of the emmprin siRNA caused significant increases in the expression of E-cadherin. The activation of E-cadherin repressors may be induced by emmprin signaling mediated through TGF-β and EGF. Moreover, the expression of E-cadherin was also increased, accompanied by enhanced expression of Vimentin and Snail after transfection of the emmprin siRNA. However, IGF-1, TNF-α, Slug, SIP1 and Twist were unaffected by transfection of the emmprin siRNA (data not shown).
Emmprin can promote tumor cell invasion via activation of NF-κB, JNK, MMPs and VEGF and is thus implicated in other aspects of tumor progression, such as tumor survival and angiogenesis [
20,
21]. Venkatesan et al. reported that emmprin promoted NF-κB- and AP-1-dependent response gene activation [
41]. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of action by the emmprin siRNA in endometrial cancer cell lines. The NF-κB transcriptional activities were decreased after transfection of the emmprin siRNA. Furthermore, NF-κB p-p65 was significantly decreased after transfection of the emmprin siRNA into endometrial cancer cells. However, AP-1 was not affected by transfection of the emmprin siRNA into endometrial cancer cells.
The functions of NF-κB in the transcription of the mesenchymal genes encoding VEGF, Vimentin, MMP-2 and MMP-9 are critical for promoting and maintaining a mesenchymal phenotype in cancers.
Emmprin is involved in cancer development through its ability to stimulate MMP and VEGF production and consequently control extracellular remodeling and anchor-independent growth. MMP-9 and VEGF were induced via the NF-κB pathway in an emmprin-dependent manner in osteotropic breast cancer cells [
42]. Emmprin induces osteolysis as a direct emmprin activity as well as the induction of release of downstream effectors, including VEGF and MMP-9 [
38]. In this study, we used RT-PCR assays to examine whether VEGF, MMP-2 and MMP-9 were affected in endometrial cancer cells after transfection of the emmprin siRNA. The transfection of the emmprin siRNA caused significant decreases in the expression of VEGF, MMP-2 and MMP-9 in endometrial cancer cells. Overall, the inhibition caused by the emmprin siRNA affected cell proliferation, migration and invasion through TGF-β, EGF, NF-κB, VEGF, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression, which in turn resulted in increased levels of E-cadherin and reduced levels of Vimentin and Snail in endometrial cancer.
In summary, this study has revealed a critical role for emmprin in endometrial cancer. The present findings suggest that low emmprin expression might be a predictor of favorable prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer, and that emmprin may represent a potential therapeutic target for endometrial cancer.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
KN contributed to study design, laboratory work, data collection, data management, statistical analysis, data interpretation, and manuscript writing. JK, AH and YH participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.