Background
In 2014, the World Health Organization issued a statement on prevention and elimination of disrespectful behavior and ill-treatment of women in medical facilities. This document calls for action and research to ensure women’s freedom from abuse and violence within perinatal care [
1]. The current guidelines, published in February 2018, underline the importance of respectful care for mothers and children, recognizing the positive experience of women as a priority [
2].
Several terms and expressions are found in the literature to describe negative experiences during labor and birth: disrespect, misconduct, disrespectful or arrogant care, offensive behavior, abuse or neglect [
3‐
5]. In addition, he concept of disrespectful and abusive obstetric care is now being used (DACF - disrespectful/abusive care during childbirth in facilities) [
6,
7]. In recent years, inappropriate behavior towards women in childbirth began to be described and classified as violence, abuse and discrimination [
8,
9]. Moreover, human rights are believed to be violated - when there is a maternal perinatal death associated with the possibility of avoiding complications [
10].
Bowser and Hill described seven categories of inappropriate behaviors - physical abuse, non-consented clinical care, non-confidential care, non-dignified care, discrimination, abandonment, and detention in health facilities [
6]. However, Bowser and Hill’s work has been critiqued. Freedmann et al. point to the fact that the 7-categories described by Bowser and Hill approach has certain limitations, due to the fact that it concentrates on describing the types of abuse that take place in maternity facilities, but does not take into account the wider context [
11]. Freedmann et al. propose a definition that considers both the individual experience of degrading or violent behavior towards women and the importance of structural determinants. This approach reflects the complexity of violence in maternity care. It enables opening to perspectives of very different, often antagonized, groups of stakeholders - women, service providers, politicians and a joint debate on how to improve the quality of care.
A systematic review in the area of negligence and violations of childbirth led by Bohren et al. allowed a widening to the typology of these abuses [
8]. The review presented a detailed typology that was evidence based and comprehensively illustrated how women in perinatal care facilities can be mistreated on multiple levels: interactions between women and healthcare providers as well as system and organizational failures. The literature describes respectful maternity care (RMC), which is opposed to abusive care during childbirth in facilities. A recent qualitative evidence synthesis performed by Shakibazadeh et al. elaborates further and mentions how respectful care is concerned with being free from harm and mistreatment [
12].
There are many studies of violence and abuse in obstetrics in parts of Africa (Tanzania, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria) [
13‐
16], Latin America and the Caribbean [
17], Pakistan [
18]. Yet, there is a paucity of studies related to violence and abuse within European perinatal care. Data from several studies, that included 25% European women, inferred that the occurrence of certain forms of violence during labor may be associated with traumatic deliveries [
19].
The scale and type of abuse and violence varies depending on the region of the world, culture or social position [
20]. Abuses against birthing women start with subtle forms of discrimination and can turn into overt violence [
21]. Research shows that minors, unmarried women, migrants or women from minority groups, as well as those with low socio-economic status, are the most exposed to degrading and inappropriate treatment, and women with HIV are particularly vulnerable to unequal treatment [
22]. These abuses and acts of violence towards women during perinatal care have consequences. For example, abusive perinatal care is associated with the risk of complications in the mother and child such as uterine rapture, perineal laceration, neonatal mortality [
7,
23].
In Poland, there are legal acts pertaining to a woman’s rights when receiving perinatal care provided by gynecological and obstetric hospitals, for example, The Patient Rights and Patient Rights Law [
24] and the Regulation of the Minister of Health of August 16, 2018 on the standard of perinatal care [
25] - in short called Perinatal Care Standards (PCS). These legal documents focus on protection of human rights and are evidence based, but they do not define instruments for monitoring the degree of compliance with these principles by specific institutions. These standards refer to patient’s rights [in this case women’s rights receiving perinatal care] and actions that guarantee care consistent with these rights. However, they do not refer to the issue of violence and abuse or the definition of these phenomena in the context of perinatal care exercised in Polish healthcare institutions. Unfortunately, Poland neither employs scientific research nor social activities to lessen and mitigate perinatal abuse and violence within its institutions and that this issue be addressed directly as soon as possible. Using the definitions described in the cited literature this study sought to uncover what is the disrespectful and abusive practices in Polish perinatal care through the experiences of women.
Aim
The aim of the study was to analyze perinatal care related experiences of women, especially focusing on those that have characteristics that indicate disrespectful/abusive care during childbirth in health facilities.
Results
Analyzing the results according to the typology proposed by Bohren et al. 81% of patients on at least one occasion experienced violence or abuse by staff during hospital stay [
8]. For example, 55% of women reported experiencing at least one medical procedure being carried out on them during hospitalization without their informed consent.
Respondents were asked about staff behavior during their hospital stay (specifically during labor and birth in the in the obstetric department). Not all types of abuse listed in Bohren et al’s typology of mistreatment of women during childbirth were observed in our study [
8]. Responses regarding abuse were grouped according to the following themes: verbal and physical, performing procedures without informed consent, other abuse during delivery (including discrimination, stigmatization, defying the right to secrecy/confidentiality, lack of access to professional care, inappropriate relationships between staff and women). 25% of the respondents reported that during hospital stay hospital staff made inappropriate personal comments related their situation and 20% experienced nonchalant treatment by medical personnel. An important aspect of assessing quality of perinatal care is the way informed consent is given by the woman. The data in this study highlighted that Polish women were not provided adequate informed consent for medical and obstetric procedures.
Table
2 presents the percentage of respondents who experienced some form of physical and/or verbal abuse. Table
3 presents the percentage of respondents who were not asked to give informed consent before medical procedures.
Table 2Physical and verbal violence among the respondents (N = 8378)
Verbal violence |
Inappropriate comments | 2048 | 24.4 |
Nonchalant treatment | 1697 | 20.3 |
Not answering questions/ignoring | 1433 | 17.1 |
Raising your voice, shouting, disrespectful expressions | 1307 | 15.6 |
Mocking | 843 | 10.1 |
Insulting | 565 | 6.8 |
Blackmailing with child’s health / woman’s health | 411 | 4.9 |
Physical violence |
The staff would force their legs apart when pushing | 233 | 2,8 |
The staff tied their legs to the delivery bed | 66 | 0.8 |
The staff poked her | 38 | 0.5 |
Table 3Abuse doing things without asking women for permission (N = 4616)
Enema | n = 1715 | 4.3 |
Newborn vaccination | n = 8345 | 12.4 |
Shaving of pubic hair | n = 1370 | 17.4 |
Newborn examination | n = 8346 | 27.3 |
Induction of delivery | n = 2969 | 27.1 |
Administration of an oxytocin drip | n = 4143 | 29.1 |
Episiotomy | n = 3309 | 30.5 |
Vaginal examination | n = 5710 | 32.9 |
Newborn drug administration | n = 4278 | 36.6 |
Insertion of intravenous cannula | n = 6213 | 40.8 |
Feeding a newborn baby with modified milk | n = 5709 | 43.2 |
Presence of students during delivery | n = 1118 | 46.1 |
Newborn bath | n = 6718 | 48.1 |
Level of education was the variable that differentiated responses regarding giving informed consent. Respondents with higher education significantly reported more concerns in regard to informed consent than those with secondary or lower education. Table
4. Shows the relationship between educational level and informed consent.
Table 4Performing activities without asking women for informed consent depending on the education of the respondents (N = 4616)
Enema | 49 | 7.6 | 61 | 3.2 | p < 0.05 |
Shaving pubic hair | 86 | 22.5 | 153 | 15.4 | p < 0.05 |
Presence of students during delivery | 147 | 9.3 | 369 | 7.0 | p < 0.05 |
Oxytocin drip during delivery | 340 | 35.5 | 864 | 27.1 | p < 0.05 |
Newborn bath | 866 | 44.8 | 2365 | 36.7 | p < 0.05 |
Newborn vaccination | 282 | 14.6 | 751 | 11.7 | p < 0.05 |
There were other abuses and forms of violence reported in the study. Table
5. presents the remaining behaviors that were classified as abuses. Almost 30% of respondents declared that during hospital stay the staff performed medical procedures that were rough lacking sensitivity. Among them, 71.8% stated that vaginal examinations were not performed gently, 27.4% mentioned episiotomy repairs being uncomfortable, 19.9% reported that latching the child to the breast was not done sensitively, 14.5% complained that intravenous cannula placement was painful.
Table 5Other abuses excluding violence and excluding the lack of consent for medical procedures (N = 4569)
No access to professional care | Undelicate treatment (internal examination, episiotomy repair) | 2597 | 8378 | 31.0 |
No access to lactation consultant | 1871 | 5740 | 32.6 |
No support in breastfeeding | 2410 | 8378 | 28.8 |
No support in dealing with depressed mood | 1395 | 8378 | 16.6 |
No access to epidural anesthesia | 878 | 6744 | 13.0 |
Care that violates the right to privacy/confidentiality | Some activities were done without respect for intimacy | 1617 | 8378 | 19.3 |
Improper relations between staff and women | Providing information in an incomprehensible way | 1432 | 8378 | 17.1 |
Not showing respect | 1368 | 8378 | 16.3 |
Conversation in a rude and uncultured manner | 1190 | 8378 | 14.2 |
Not giving all the information needed | 2954 | 8378 | 35.3 |
Discrimination and stigmatization | The feeling of being discriminated or stigmatized | 739 | 8378 | 8.8 |
19.3% of respondents reported that their privacy and intimacy was not properly taken care of during their hospital stay. Such situations included interviewing or performing tests in the presence of third parties (67.8%), leaving the door open (61.2%), too many people, including staff, during examinations or interviews (56.6%), too many students present during examinations (18.7%) and conversations in the presence of other women or their family members (12%).
Some respondents had negative experience related to communication. Most reported that they did not get all the information they needed from the staff. Yet paradoxically, only a small number recognized that the staff did not show them respect or talked in a rude manner.
Women in the study felt discriminated against in some way, the most common reason being the way staff spoke to them (45%), specifically if women were under 18 years old or above 40 years old (25%), state of health, e.g. chronic disease (18%), body weight (14%). It is also worth noting that 1.7% of respondents reported that the reason for inappropriate treatment was the feeling of anonymity during their hospitalization was due to not having a prior professional relationship with staff caring for them, having prenatal care from a doctor hired by the hospital, and no private midwifery services or care after delivery.
Statistically significant relationships were found between abuse and age, place of residence, education, manner of delivery, use of parenting classes, and birth with an accompanying known person (Table
6).
Table 6The dependence of variables on occurrence / experience of abuse (excluding violence) in childbirth (N = 6777)
Age (years) | < 25 | 779 (84.95%) | 138 (15.05%) | X2(3) = 28.22 p < 0.001 |
26–30 | 2995 (81.83%) | 665 (18.17%) |
31–35 | 2399 (79.91%) | 603 (20.09%) |
> 36 | 604 (75.59%) | 195 (24.41%) |
Mode of delivery | Vaginal delivery | 4082 (79.45%) | 1056 (20.55%) | X2(2) = 21.81 p < 0.001 |
Instrumental vaginal delivery | 183 (88.41%) | 24 (11.59%) |
Cesarean section | 2512 (82.82%) | 521 (17.18%) |
Place of residence | City above 500,000 inhabitants | 1978 (77.66%) | 569 (22.34%) | X2(4) = 29.11 p < 0.001 |
City 100,000–500,000 inhabitants | 1452 (82.59%) | 306 (17.41%) |
City between 50,000–100,000 inhabitants | 929 (84.00%) | 177 (16.00%) |
City below 50,000 inhabitants | 1234 (82.21%) | 267 (17.79%) |
Village | 1184 (80.76%) | 282 (19.24%) |
Education | Elementary/Middle School | 66 (88.00%) | 9 (12.00%) | X2(3) = 8.05 P < 0.05 |
Trade School | 87 (79.09%) | 23 (20.91%) |
High School | 1314 (82.90%) | 271 (17.10%) |
Higher School | 5310 (80.36%) | 1298 (19.64%) |
Parenting school | Yes | 3651 (83.47%) | 723 (16.53%) | X2(1) = 39.41 p < 0.001 |
No | 3126 (78.07%) | 878 (21.93%) |
Childbirth with an accompanying person | Yes | 4915 (81.60%) | 1108 (18.40%) | X2(1) = 7.06 P < 0.01 |
No | 1862 (79.07%) | 493 (20.93%) |
Despite the extent of abuse and violence experienced by women in this study it is concerning that only 15.5% of the respondents recognized that during hospitalization their rights had been violated, moreover, only 3.0% complained that their rights were violated according to the law.
It cannot be ruled out that study participants had strong experiences related to childbirth (both positive and negative) or those who were convinced that participation in this type of research could make a real difference in the care system. At the same time, it should be noted that the majority described their experience of labor as intermediate (neither definitely negative nor definitely positive).
Discussion
In the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region, the results of prenatal and neonatal care often reach satisfactory levels [
28]. In Poland the perinatal mortality of children is 4.9‰, and perinatal mortality rate of women (pregnancy, labor, puerperium) is 0.23‰ (9 cases) [
29]. Research analyzing subjective assessment of perinatal care by laboring women, highlights that 30–60% of women find care to be satisfactory [
30,
31]. However, it is believed that obstetrical violence globally remains for the most part invisible, due to being part of a cultural context and societal acceptance that forms of violence against women does not necessarily constitute a serious breach of human rights [
32]. This may explain the discrepancy between the subjective assessment of care by women, and the incidence of documented violent behavior [
11].
In Poland, many changes in perinatal care occurred in the 1990s, after the beginning of social action for dignity in childbirth. In 1994, the “Childbirth with Dignity” campaign was carried out for the first time. It was met with great enthusiasm from women eager to talk about childbirth experiences. Until today, non-governmental organizations play a significant role in assessing the quality of perinatal care in Poland. They conduct numerous educational activities for medical staff and women and periodically monitor perinatal care. Public administration institutions do not maintain a register of data on the quality of care for woman in labor. Institutions are only required to record data on perinatal mortality, financial status of medical services, and the percentage of cesarean sections.
It is difficult to compare the overall level of violations from this study with other studies due to different research criteria and study instruments Although in Poland there has been reports of situations described by Bowser, such as sexual violence, delivery without attendant or dirty beds on the obstetrics ward [
6], our study found that the majority of reported abuse was associated with lack of informed consent for medical and obstetric examinations or treatment. An Hungarian study examined consent for performing an episiotomy and found that 62% of Hungarian were not asked for informed consent prior to receiving an episiotomy [
33,
34], in our Polish study this percentage was 30.5%.
It is difficult to compare the overall level of violations from this study with other studies due to different research criteria.
Payment for care processes vary across studies. Research in Serbia, Ukraine and Hungary indicate an informal system of fees for the choice of a doctor during labor, helping to facilitate more dignified care [
34‐
36]. In our study 9.8% respondents declared that they had to pay during the stay in a hospital. Respondents stated that lack of additional services (one on one care service) was the reason for abusive treatment. 32.1% of women therefore paid for the presence of a midwife of their choice during delivery.
Freedman describes violent behavior resulting from systemic conditions. According to the regulations in Poland, every woman should have access to this type of epidural anesthesia. However, our study highlighted that was not occurring for all women, for example, no access to epidural anesthesia on demand was reported. It is not known if the lack of access to anesthesia was a result of organizational problem within the medical facility or because of medical contraindications to epidural that were not adequately explained to the woman. Moreover women in our study reported laboring and delivering in shared hospital rooms lacking respect for their privacy [
11].
In our study, 16% of women report that the staff are rude to them. This is reflected in other studies. A qualitative review found that women expect a safe, supporting, respectful and responsive care during childbirth [
37]. Fear of staff being distant, insensitive or rude has been the subject of many publications [
38,
39]. Incorrect communication with staff has also been observed in research in Serbia [
35].
It is concerning that insensitive and disrespectful behaviors are reported widely in the literature. Violence and abuse during childbirth are a breach of certain human rights [
40]. From this perspective, most of the abuse in our study is associated primarily with violation of the right to privacy, the right to information, the right to equal treatment and the right to freedom from violence. Low awareness of the experienced abuse and the complaints reported in the study may result from the ignorance of women regarding the relevant laws and regulations. A finding in a recent study on Polish women using Scottish maternity services highlights how a social model of care based on relationships and communication was more evident in the UK than in Poland [
41]. Women in the Scottish study perceived maternity care to be more medically dominated and the provision of choice considerably less in the Polish system. Women in the Scottish study were surprised at the approach adopted in the UK and expressed surprise at not being told what to do and anticipated more medical procedures. A reason for these perspectives may be due to the intergenerational views about childbirth in Polish hospitals. The experiences of the mothers and grandmothers of women today would not have questioned the rights of the patient and the quality of perinatal care. Some contemporary women may therefore be convinced that, compared to the stories they heard, the care they received was of a high standard. This intergenerational discourse warrants further research and a national campaign to raise awareness across Polish society about the rights of women to receive care that is delivered with sensitivity, tact and gentleness.
Strengths and limitations
The strength of the study is the size of the studied population. Another strength is the division of answers based on stages of care during hospitalisation. The inclusion of qualitative assessment of violations reported by women was also an important asset. The online data collection approach was helpful because mothers with young children are usually active on the Internet, and an online survey gave them the opportunity to take part in the study at a convenient time, and to interrupt it even when the child was crying and then continue later. Limitations include the tested sample was very large, but not random, so it is not representative. Also, women who participated in the study self-selected and thus wanted to share their experiences and this may have introduced bias. This was also reflected in the over-representation of people with higher education, perhaps caused by the online data collection method. In addition those women who have no access to computers and internet services were silent in this study. The purpose of this work was to show the women’s view of perinatal healthcare, but examining the perspective of medical staff and including observational data could verify the obtained data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.