PHI-101 is an orally available, selective checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) inhibitor. PHI-101 has shown anti-tumour activity in ovarian cancer cell lines and impaired DNA repair pathways in preclinical experiments. Furthermore, the in vivo study suggests the synergistic effect of PHI-101 through combination with PARP inhibitors for ovarian cancer treatment. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of PHI-101 in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.
Methods
Chk2 inhibitor for Recurrent EpitheliAl periToneal, fallopIan, or oVarian cancEr (CREATIVE) trial is a prospective, multi-centre, phase IA dose-escalation study. Six cohorts of dose levels are planned, and six to 36 patients are expected to be enrolled in this trial.
Major inclusion criteria include ≥ 19 years with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal cancer. Also, patients who showed disease progression during platinum-based chemotherapy or disease progression within 24 weeks from completion of platinum-based chemotherapy will be included, and prior chemotherapy lines of more than five will be excluded. The primary endpoint of this study is to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PHI-101.
Discussion
PHI-101 is the first orally available Chk2 inhibitor, expected to show effectiveness in treating recurrent ovarian cancer. Through this CREATIVE trial, DLT and MTD of this new targeted therapy can be confirmed to find the recommended dose for the phase II clinical trial. This study may contribute to developing a new combination regimen for the treatment of ovarian cancer.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
AR
Accumulation ratio
ATM
Ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase
ATR
Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase
Chk1 and 2
Checkpoint kinase 1 and 2
CTCAE
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
DDR
DNA damage repair
DLT
Dose-limiting toxicity
ECOG
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
e-CRF
Electronic case report form
EOT
End of treatment
HR
Homologous recombination
HRD
Homologous recombination deficiency
ICH-GCP
The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use-Good Clinical Practice
IP
Investigational product
KGCP
Korea Good Clinical Practice
MTD
Maximum tolerated dose
PARP inhibitor
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors
PFT
Peak-trough fluctuation
SRC
Safety review committee
Background
DNA damage repair (DDR) system impairment has been associated with ovarian cancer carcinogenesis [1]. Approximately 50% of high-grade serous ovarian cancer is associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and other DDR systems, including base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, mismatch repair, and non-homologous end-joining system, also attributed to ovarian cancer development [1, 2]. Especially, tumours harbouring HRD showed synthetic lethality leads to higher sensitivity in poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Recent clinical trials on advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer have shown efficacy with PARP inhibitors. Olaparib increased progression-free survival in BRCA1/2 mutated patients in primary ovarian cancer [3], and niraparib prolonged progression-free survival regardless of HRD status or BRCA mutations in primary ovarian cancer [4].
Checkpoint kinase 1 and 2 (Chk1 and 2) are activated by ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase (ATM) and ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase (ATR) pathways, which are mainstreams of the DDR system [5]. Chk1 and 2 are activated by DNA double-strand breakage and involved in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. ATR phosphorylates Chk1, and the function of ATR and Chk1 is essential in cell cycle regulation and the DDR system. Several Chk1 and 2 depleting agents were developed, and prexasertib, which showed higher affinity to Chk1, was one of the promising molecules [6, 7]. A phase II study of prexasertib on BRCA mutant-type recurrent ovarian cancer yielded only an 11.1% response rate and a 29% response rate in BRCA wild-type recurrent ovarian cancer [6, 8].
Anzeige
On the other hand, Chk2 is a serine/threonine kinase and functions as a barrier in tumorigenesis by maintaining genomic stability, and loss of Chk2 is known to be discovered in solid tumours, including ovarian cancer [9]. PHI-101 is the first oral Chk2 selective inhibitor, identified by artificial intelligence and a big data-based in-house drug discovery platform. Anti-tumour activity of PHI-101 is shown in various ovarian cancer cell lines, including CAOV3, OVCAR3, and SC-OV3. PHI-101 induced impairment of chk2 downstream DNA repair pathway and anti-proliferative activity in ovarian cancer cell lines. Patient-derived tumour spheroid culture also showed anti-cancer activity of PHI-101 regardless of BRCA1 status [10]. Thus, PHI-101, a new Chk2 inhibitor, is expected to suggest a different treatment strategy for ovarian cancer, either alone or as a combination therapy. Therefore, we designed a phase I dose-escalation trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of PHI-101 for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.
Methods/Design
Trial design
Chk2 inhibitor for Recurrent EpitheliAl periToneal, fallopIan, or oVarian cancEr (CREATIVE) trial is a prospective, multi-centre, phase I dose-escalation study to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PHI-101. This study was approved by each institutional review board of all participating institutions and funded by Pharos iBio Co., Ltd. (Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea). Four participating institutions are listed: Ajou University Hospital, Bundang Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University Hospital, and Seoul ST. Mary's Hospital.
The investigators will obtain the informed consent form from all participants before any screening examinations. As shown in Figure 1, study participants will be orally administered PHI-101 (2 to 12 tablets/day) at a predetermined dose cohort once daily each for one cycle (28 days), and DLT will be observed during the first cycle of each subject by the list depicted in Table 1. Participants will continue to take PHI-101 until the following termination criteria are met: radiologic progression or clinical progression; death; withdrawal of consent; unacceptable adverse event; dose interruption longer than four weeks. Dose adjustment is not allowed during the DLT observation period (cycle 1, 28 days). Although treatment-specific side effects are not known so far, we included possible side effects shown in preclinical study results depicted in Supplementary Table 2 to the DLT list. During the study period, concomitant medication to control symptoms other than tumours is permitted. However, any antineoplastic therapies other than the IP (surgery, radio(chemo)therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immuno-oncologic drug) and alternative treatments (nonprescription drug, herb, or homoeopathy) will be prohibited.
Fig. 1
Study design schema. (Abbreviations: DLT, dose-limiting toxicity; EOT, end of treatment; PK, pharmacokinetic sampling)
Table 1
Definition of dose limiting toxicity (DLT)
CTCAE Term
CTCAE version 5.0
Hematological toxicity
Febrile neutropenia
grade ≥ 3
Neutrophil count decreased
grade ≥ 3 for > 7 days
WBC decreased
grade ≥ 3
Platelet count decreased
grade ≥ 3
grade < 3 requiring blood transfusion
Anemia
grade ≥ 3
Non-hematological toxicity
ECG QT corrected interval prolonged
grade ≥ 3
Nausea
grade ≥ 3 for > 7 days despite the adequate and optimal therapy
Tumor pain
grade ≥ 3 for > 7 days despite the adequate and optimal therapy
Vomiting
grade 3 for > 7 days despite the adequate and optimal therapy, or grade ≥ 4
Diarrhea or associated electrolyte abnormalities
grade ≥ 3 for > 2 days despite the adequate and optimal therapy
Fatigue
grade ≥ 3 for > 7 days
Anorexia
grade ≥ 3 for > 7 days
Hypophosphatemia, hypomagnesemia, or hypocalcemia
grade ≥ 3 for > 2 days despite the adequate and optimal therapy
Asymptomatic AST, ALT, ALP, or GGT
grade ≥ 3 for > 7 days
Baseline AST or ALT ≥ 2.5 to 5 X ULN in patients with confirmed liver metastases
AST or ALT > 8 X ULN for > 7 days
Baseline ALP ≥ 2 to 5 X ULN in patients with confirmed liver metastases
ALP > 8 X ULN for > 7 days
All the other ADRs excluding above
grade ≥ 3
Other toxicity
ADR with dose interruption (temporary discontinuation) of PHI-101 for > 4 weeks
Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine transferase; AST, aspartate transferase; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; ECG, electrocardiography; GGT, γ-glutamyl transferase; ULN, upper normal limit; WBC, white blood count.
×
The study scheme for the cohort assignment is described in Fig. 2 [11]. The accelerated dose escalation scheme, which assesses DLT in a single subject in each cohort, will be applied for this phase I study. This accelerated dose-escalation scheme will be sustained until adverse drug reaction related to investigational product (IP) same or greater than grade 2 occurs. If IP-related toxicity ≥ grade 2 does not occur, DLT can be assessed at the higher dose cohort according to the recommendation of the safety review committee (SRC). If IP-related toxicity ≥ grade 2 occurs, additional two subjects will be enrolled in the same dose cohort, and the study will be switched to the standard 3+3 scheme. If DLT is observed in > 1 out of 6 subjects in a specific cohort (χ) and DLT is observed in ≤ 1 out of 6 subjects in the cohort (χ-1) that is one level lower than the specific cohort, the one level lower cohort (χ-1) will be considered as MTD. The dose of PHI-101 will be escalated until MTD is determined, and if the MTD is not determined at the maximum planned dose, dose-escalation will be ended at that dose.
Fig. 2
Accelerated dose escalation and switching to standard 3+3 dose escalation scheme.
×
Anzeige
Participants
Major inclusion criteria
(1)
Females aged ≥ 19 years
(2)
Histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer regardless of initial stage at diagnosis
(3)
Platinum-refractory (disease progression during platinum-based chemotherapy) or platinum-resistance cancer (disease progression within 24 weeks from completion of platinum-based chemotherapy) in which patients progressed after second-line or more platinum-containing chemotherapy will be included
(4)
A life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks assessed by investigators comprehensively judging clinical status
(5)
A prior number of cytotoxic chemotherapy lines ≤ 5
(6)
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 1
Major Exclusion Criteria
(1)
Platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (disease progression after 24 weeks from completion of platinum-based chemotherapy)
(2)
Prior number of cytotoxic chemotherapy lines > 5
(3)
Known or suspected hypersensitivity or intolerance to the active ingredient or excipients of PHI-101
(4)
Patients with severe cardiovascular disease, intake or absorption disability (dysphagia, intestinal paralysis or obstruction, and history of gastrointestinal surgery significantly affect absorption), autoimmune or inflammatory disease, severe respiratory disease, active hepatitis B or C, and several infectious diseases will be excluded.
(5)
ECOG performance status ≥ 2
Primary Endpoints
Primary objectives
The primary objective of this study is to assess DLT and MTD of PHI-101. In addition, the presented by the cohort and MTD will be determined. The definition of DLT is presented in Table 1.
Secondary objectives
Secondary objectives include assessing the IP tolerability by dose interruption, dose reduction, and dose termination due to adverse events. In addition, IP safety will be assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events, adverse drug reactions, serious adverse events, serious adverse drug reactions, and adverse events leading to withdrawal. Adverse events are defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease during the study period. Adverse events will be assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 criteria. Also, physical examination, laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiogram will be performed for safety evaluation, and the investigators, including physicians and coordinating research nurse, will assess the adverse events for every visit.
Pharmacokinetic assessment will be done on cycle 1 day 1 (pre-dose, 0.5-, 1-, 2-, 4-, 6-, 8- and 24-hours post-dose), day 8 (pre-dose), day 15 (pre-dose, 0.5-, 1-, 2-, 4-, 6-, 8- and 24 hours post-dose), day 22 (pre-dose), cycle 2 day 1 (pre-dose and 2-4 hours post-dose), cycle 2 day 1 (pre-dose and 1-3 hours post-dose), and then every three cycles on day 1 to end of treatment (EOT). For pharmacokinetic analysis of PHI-101, 6mL of blood will be collected using a K2 EDTA tube and then centrifuged at 2,000g at 4°C for 10 minutes. The separated supernatant (plasma) will be dispensed into two tubes by 1mL or more and stored in a freezer at -70°C or lower.
Genetic variation, including HRD related genes including BRCA mutation based on tumour next-generation sequencing test results, will be collected for exploratory assessment. Additional biopsy or sequencing is not mandatory for the participants, but previously performed analysis results based on medical records will be analysed. For the efficacy assessment, a radiologic tumour response assessment will be done based on RECIST version 1.1.
The participants will be required to write a drug diary to improve adherence. Adequate and optimal supportive care will be permitted during the study, and therapies that may affect the efficacy and safety assessment of IP will be prohibited.
Sample size
Given the characteristics of a phase I study, calculating the sample size based on a statistical hypothesis was not conducted in this study. Instead, the target number of subjects will be determined to ensure the smallest possible number of subjects participating in the study. A total of six cohorts are planned in the study, and a minimum of one to a maximum of six subjects will be enrolled in each cohort (Table 2). Therefore, approximately we expect six to 36 patients to be enrolled.
Table 2
Dose cohort and escalation increment
Dose level (cohort)
Daily dose of PHI-101 (once daily)
Escalation increment from the previous dose
-1
20 mg
1 tab.
- 20 mg
- 50%
1 (starting dose)
40 mg
2 tab.
-
-
2
80 mg
4 tab.
40 mg
100%
3
120 mg
6 tab.
40 mg
50%
4
160 mg
8 tab.
40 mg
33%
5
200 mg
10 tab.
40 mg
25%
6 (maximum planned dose)
240 mg
12 tab.
40 mg
20%
Statistical method
Safety analysis will be done on the subjects who received at least a single dose of the IP, and the number of events will be presented using the number of events by cohort. In addition, the DLT assessment will be done on the subjects who received at least a single dose of the IP and had DLT assessments during cycle 1. PK parameters including Cmax, Cmax,ss, Cmin,ss, Cav,ss, AUCt, AUCτ, AUCinf, Tmax, Tmax,ss, t1/2, peak-trough fluctuation (PTF), accumulation ratio (AR), CL/F, CLss/F, and Vz/F will be calculated.
Data monitoring and management
The SRC will periodically review the adverse events and risk assessment. SRC consists of the coordinating investigator, the principal investigators, the sponsor, and medical advisors. Data will be recorded in the electronic case report form (e-CRF), and only authorised personnel can access the data. The sponsor may conduct audits to ensure that the study is conducted in compliance with the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP), Korea Good Clinical Practice (KGCP), and basic principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Protocol amendment is not permitted once after study initiation without the consent of the other. Once initiated, amendments can be made only in the exceptional case, and all involved parties must provide a written consent form.
Discussion
PHI-101 is the first orally available and a selective inhibitor of Chk2. In vivo and ex vivo experimental results imply that PHI-101 may allow ovarian cancer cells to obtain synthetic lethality, especially when combined with PARP inhibitors [10]. In detail, PHI-101 and olaparib showed a synergistic effect in ovarian and breast cancer cell lines, regardless of BRCA and p53 expression status [10]. Therefore, Chk2 inhibitor is expected to be a new treatment strategy for ovarian cancer, either alone or in combination with PARP inhibitors.
Molecular characteristics such as HRD or p53 alteration of ovarian cancer tumours allow high sensitivity to cytotoxic chemotherapy, anti-angiogenetic agent, and PARP inhibitors, a part of molecular deficiencies is known to be restored in some platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancers. Increasing DNA repair and restoration of HR repair are known to be one of the mechanisms of platinum-resistance in recurrent ovarian cancer [12, 13]. To overcome platinum-resistance, several new combinations with targeted therapy or immune checkpoint blockade agents are investigated [14, 15]. Still, only bevacizumab has been shown to improve progression-free survival in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer [15]. As PARP inhibitors or anti-angiogenic agents are now actively incorporated into the primary setting due to recent study results [3, 4, 16], discovering a new targeted drug is desperately required to treat recurrent ovarian cancer. Thereafter, disease progression after PARP inhibitors may alter pre-existing PARP1 activity or restore the HR repair pathway [12, 13]. Therefore, new molecular targets such as Chk2 inhibitors are expected to overcome the resistance to PARP inhibitors as well as platinum-resistance for recurrent ovarian cancer.
In conclusion, PHI-101, a selective Chk2 inhibitor, is a promising molecule to overcome the current treatment for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer, and it is necessary to conduct a study to assess the safety and tolerability of PHI-101.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable
Anzeige
Declarations
Study status
This study is ongoing and have not completed participant recruitment.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study protocol was approved by institutional review board of each participating institutions as follows:
Seoul National University College of Medicine Institutional Review Board: H-2010-032-1164
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Institutional Review Board: B-2011-651-404
Anzeige
Institutional Review Board The Catholic University of Korea: KC20MDDF0946
Ajou University Hospital Institutional Review Board: AJIRB-MED-CT1-20-409
The participants will sign the written informed consent form to participate this trial.
Consent for publication
HSK received grant from Pharos iBio Co., LTd.
Anzeige
Pharos iBio Co., LTd. participated the study design
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Immunchemischer Stuhltest positiv, Koloskopie negativ – in solchen Fällen kann die Blutungsquelle auch weiter proximal sitzen. Ein Forschungsteam hat nachgesehen, wie häufig und in welchen Lokalisationen das der Fall ist.
Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.
In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.
Welchen Nutzen es trägt, wenn die Strahlentherapie nach radikaler Prostatektomie um eine Androgendeprivation ergänzt wird, hat die RADICALS-HD-Studie untersucht. Nun liegen die Ergebnisse vor. Sie sprechen für länger dauernden Hormonentzug.
Update Onkologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletterund bleiben Sie gut informiert.
