Background
Plasmodium falciparum malaria remains a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality[
1]. Recent advances in malaria treatment and prevention, including first-line therapy with artemisinin-based drugs[
2] and increased use of insecticide-treated bed nets[
3] have the potential to reduce the global impact of malaria. However, severe malaria (SM) continues to be associated with a high risk of mortality and long-term morbidity in survivors. A detailed understanding of the key events mediating pathogenesis may facilitate improved management of SM, including the development of novel prognostic tools and therapeutic interventions. Although an appropriate immune response is important for parasite control and development of immunological memory for subsequent infection, an unbalanced or dysregulated inflammatory response to infection has been associated with deleterious clinical outcomes in malaria[
4].
High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a ubiquitous nuclear protein with recently described properties as a mediator of inflammation[
5]. Release of HMGB1 into the extracellular milieu, by either active secretion from immune effector cells and/or passive release from dying cells, acts as a ‘danger signal’ to trigger inflammation via interaction with pattern recognition receptors (PRR), including receptor for advanced glycation end product (RAGE) and toll-like receptor (TLR) family members, resulting in increased pro-inflammatory cytokine gene transcription and production[
5].
Studies in experimental models of sepsis, a life threatening syndrome of systemic inflammation with pathophysiological features resembling SM (including vascular permeability, and multi-organ dysfunction)[
4], suggest that HMGB1 is involved in mediating sepsis-related pathology[
5]. Preclinical studies have reported that neutralizing anti-HMGB1 antibodies prevents organ damage and lethality in established models of experimental sepsis (both endotoxin induced- and cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)-induced models)[
6‐
8], even with late administration[
7]. These studies suggest that HMGB1 may represent a novel therapeutic target to reduce deleterious inflammation during systemic infection[
5].
The potential role of HMGB1 in the pathogenesis of infectious syndromes associated with pronounced systemic inflammation suggests that HMGB1 may contribute to disease severity and outcome in malaria. This study examined HMGB1 release during P. falciparum infection and the association of HMGB1 release with disease severity and mortality. The potential therapeutic efficacy of HMGB1 neutralization was investigated in a murine model of SM using an anti-HMGB1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) with previously validated therapeutic benefit in experimental sepsis models.
Methods
Study population and ethics statement
Febrile pediatric patients (ages 6 months to 12 years) with microscopy-confirmed
P. falciparum infection were eligible for enrollment in a prospective observational nested case-controlled study conducted at Mulago Hospital’s Acute Care Unit in Kampala, Uganda between October 15, 2007 and October 30, 2009, as described[
9,
10]. Exclusion criteria included any of the following: severe malnutrition, HIV co-infection, known previous enrolment in the study, absence of adequate consent or absence of any laboratory specimens.
Upon enrollment, clinical and demographic data and venous blood samples were collected. Citrate plasma derived from venous blood samples was aliquoted and stored at −80°C until testing. Thin and thick blood smears obtained at presentation were reviewed at a reference parasitology laboratory by two independent experts to determine parasite density using leucocyte counts and confirm malaria diagnosis. Samples for biomarker testing were derived from the larger study cohort based on availability of sufficient volume of unthawed plasma samples. Patients who fulfilled World Health Organization (WHO) sub-categorization of malaria syndromes, including cerebral malaria (CM), severe malaria anaemia (SMA) and/or respiratory distress with either hypoxia or lactic acidosis[
11], and were under inpatient treatment, were categorized as severe malaria (SM). Patients not fulfilling this criteria and under treatment as outpatients were defined as having uncomplicated malaria (UM) and enrolled as age-matched controls.
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Mulago Hospital Research Ethics Committee, Makerere University Faculty of Medicine Research Ethics Committee, Uganda National Council for Science & Technology, and Toronto Academic Health Sciences Network Research Ethics Board (University Health Network). Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or guardians of all participants.
Measurement of human plasma HMGB1 levels by ELISA
Plasma HMGB1 levels were quantified using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit, according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Shino-Test Corporation).
Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-Plasmodium falciparum co-culture system
Human PBMCs were isolated from malaria naïve volunteers using Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare). Cells were cultured at 1.5 × 106 cells/well in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 2.5% gentamycin (Invitrogen) in the presence of P. falciparum (confirmed Mycoplasma-free ITG strain)-infected erythrocytes (PEs; 4.5 × 106/well), uninfected erythrocytes (uEs; 4.5 × 106/well), lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 100 ng/ml), or RPMI 1640 alone for two, six, or 24 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2. At each of the time point, supernatant was collected and concentrated 10-fold with Vivaspin 10000 MWCO centrifugal concentrators at 15,000 g, 10 min, room temperature.
Measurement of HMGB1 in cultured supernatants by Western blot
Cultured supernatants were concentrated 10-fold with Vivaspin 10000MWCO centrifugal concentrators (15, 000 g), resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a PVDF membrane for immunoblotting. Blots were probed with with a rabbit polyclonal anti-HMGB1 antibody (1:2,000; Abcam) and secondary HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (1:3000). Protein bands were visualized using SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce).
Murine experimental severe malaria model
Infection in eight- to 10-week old female C57BL/6 mice (Jackson Laboratories) was initiated by intraperitoneal (ip) injection of 1 × 106 freshly isolated Plasmodium berghei ANKA (MR4)-PEs. Parasitaemia was monitored by thin-blood smear stained with modified Giemsa (Sigma). Mice were monitored twice daily for signs of experimental severe/cerebral malaria (paralysis, ataxia, convulsions and/or coma). Mice judged as developing severe/cerebral malaria were euthanized by CO2. Experiments mice were performed in accordance with the University Health Network Animal Care Committee guidelines and regulations.
For antibody administration, animals were randomized to receive either anti-HMGB1 monoclonal antibody (2G7, mouse IgG2b; 50 ug/mouse), isotype (non-immune IgG2b; 50 ug/mouse) or vehicle (PBS) control via ip injection every other day beginning one day prior to PbA infection until day 5 (d5) post PbA infection (pi).
Measurement of mouse plasma HMGB1, TNF, IFNγ, IL-6, IL-10, MCP-1 and IL-12 levels
Peripheral blood was collected by either saphenous venipuncture on day 0 (d0; prior to PbA infection) and d5 post pi in heparinized tubes (Starstedt) or, for time course analysis experiments, blood was collected at specified time points by cardiac puncture into heparinized syringe following euthanasia by CO2. Blood was centrifuged and plasma was collected and stored at −80°C. Plasma cytokine (TNF, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12 and IFNγ) and chemokine (MCP-1) levels were measured using the mouse inflammation cytometric bead array kit (CBA; BD Biosciences), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Plasma HMGB1 levels were quantified (i) using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit, according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Shino-Test Corporation) and (ii) by western blot analysis, as follows. Plasma samples were diluted in cell lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology), mixed with an equivalent volume of the 2× Laemmli buffer containing 100 mM dithiothreitol, and boiled for 5 min. Plasma samples were separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred onto PVDF membrane for immunoblotting. Blots were probed with rabbit HMGB-1 monoclonal antibody (clone EPR3507, 1:1000, Abcam). For quantification, blots were scanned and band densities determined by using the NIH Image-J software.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Prism v4 (GraphPad). Differences between groups were assessed using a non-parametric Mann–Whitney or Fischer test, as appropriate, except for the comparison of HMGB1 expression in plasma collected from the same mouse at different time points, which was measured by the paired t-test. Multiple groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were generated to assess the predictive accuracy. To correct for multiple comparisons, p values were adjusted using Bonferroni-Holm’s correction. ECM survival studies were compared by Log-rank test and visualized by generation of Kaplan-Meier plots. Statistical significance was defined as a p value of less than 0.05, unless otherwise specified.
Discussion
Prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers of underlying pathological processes may represent promising tools to supplement clinical and laboratory assessment and improve triage and clinical management of SM. In this study, HMGB1 levels at clinical presentation were increased in a cohort of Ugandan children with severe
P. falciparum malaria, confirming and extending previous reports of elevated extracellular HMGB1 in fatal paediatric falciparum cases[
18]. Moreover, HMGB1 levels were predictive of malarial disease severity and clinical outcome, suggesting that quantification of extracellular HMGB1 may be a useful prognostic marker of severe and fatal malaria. HMGB1 performed better as a prognostic indicator than the peripheral blood parasite count, a parameter commonly used as a prognostic indicator in falciparum malaria. The predictive accuracy of HMGB1 was comparable to other acute phase biomarkers associated with inflammatory conditions, such as procalcitonin (PCT) (AUC = 0.72) and soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) (AUC = 0.76), previously reported to improve clinical performance (sensitivity >90% and specificity >80%) when used in biomarker combinations to predict mortality in children with severe malaria[
19]. These results indicate that HMGB1 may represent a novel host-derived biomarker that may contribute unique information and further improve predicative accuracy when integrated into combinatorial biomarker panels.
Extracellular HMGB1 is believed to act as a danger signal and initiates a host immune response resulting in increased pro-inflammatory production. Using a peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-
P. falciparum co-culture approach,
P. falciparum-PEs were shown in this study to induce HMGB1 release from human PBMCs, which may account for elevated plasma/serum levels observed in malaria patients. It was hypothesized that malaria-induced release of HMGB1 from immune effector cells could be involved in the propagation of inflammation leading to malaria-associated immunopathology. If so, HMGB1-based strategies might represent a novel therapeutic approach for severe
P. falciparum infection, as proposed for sepsis[
5]. In the
P. berghei ANKA murine model, the development of ECM is highly dependent on host genetics and immune response to infection. Mice lacking key inflammatory mediators, such as IFN-γ and members of the TNF superfamily (e g, LTα), are protected against the development of ECM[
12‐
16]. Specific strategies to modulate the host immune response in this model have been reported to decrease disease severity and improve survival[
12].
In this study, HMGB1 release was modulated by
Plasmodium infection and increased in the peripheral blood of ECM-susceptible mice following infection, similar to observation in human populations, suggesting a potential role for HMGB1 in disease progression. However, administration of a monoclonal anti-HMGB1 antibody (2G7), given prophylactically at a dose previously shown to confer protection in experimental sepsis models[
8], did not improve survival or modulate peripheral levels of key inflammatory markers. This study suggests that, unlike sepsis models, HMGB1-based interventions directed at the specific epitope targeted by anti-HMGB1 2G7 are not likely to be efficacious in the prevention of experimental SM in PbA-infected C57BL/6 mice.
Further studies are required to explain the failure of anti-HMGB-1 antibody-based intervention in this model. In the current study, anti-HMGB1 treatment did not affect circulating levels of inflammatory cytokines induced by PbA infection, although the same antibody has been shown to attenuate levels of inflammatory cytokines induced by CLP in an experimental sepsis model[
8]. This could suggest that excessive pro-inflammatory responses in this model are not mediated by HMGB1, as has been previously described for other inflammatory diseases. Some, but not all, studies suggest that HMGB1 does not have direct cytokine activity but instead functions as a complex with TLR ligands (e g, LPS) to enhance or promote their effects, a function that may not be relevant for severe malaria pathology caused by malaria toxins or by-products. TLR4 has been identified as a principal receptor that meditates HMGB1-induced cytokine production and immunopathology[
5]. Although the exact role for TLRs in CM remains to be elucidated, a number of studies suggest that the pathogenesis of PbA-induced SM is independent of TLR4[
20], unlike the pathogenesis of sepsis where mice deficient in TLR4 are highly resistant to the development of LPS-induced septic shock[
21]. Although the study does not support the use of this anti-HMGB1 mAb, at the dose employed, as treatment in this context, it does not rule out a role for extracellular HMGB1 in the pathogenesis of
P. falciparum-induced CM in humans. Further studies to elucidate the role of HMGB1, using strategies not employed and/or outside the scope of the current study, are warranted. It is also important to note that this study was carried out with a single neutralizing monoclonal antibody. It is possible that additional strategies to block HMGB1, including antibodies raised against the B box subunit domain of HMBG1, may yield more favourable outcomes.
Accumulating evidence indicates that the host response to infection contributes to the pathogenesis of SM. Improved understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of SM may lead to novel prognostic tools and therapeutic strategies to improve clinical outcome. In this study, HMGB1 levels at presentation were correlated with falciparum malaria disease severity in a cohort of paediatric patients, and there was a significant difference in admission HMGB1 levels between children who subsequently died from their infection versus those who survived. This study supports further investigation into the potential use of HMGB1 as a biomarker to assess disease severity and prognosis in paediatric malaria. Additional prospective, multicentre studies of SM in areas of varying malaria transmission are required to validate the clinical utility of HMGB1. However, based on the results of this study in a mouse model of SM, HMGB1 neutralization using anti-HMGB1 2G7 mAb does not appear to be a viable therapeutic strategy to improve clinical outcome in this model of severe malaria. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the role of HMGB1 in the pathogenesis of human and experimental SM and CM.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the patients and their families for participating in the study and Dr A Conroy for assistance with statistical analysis.
This work was supported in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR CTP-79842) Team Grant in Malaria (KCK), CIHR MOP-13721 and MOP-115160 (KCK), CIHR Canada Research Chairs (KCK, WCL). SJH is supported by a CIHR Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
SJH performed experiments, statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. KX performed the immunoassay. HK and DCK participated in the murine studies. FW performed the in vitro studies. AD, CM and CMC-G contributed to the study design and collection of patient samples. KJT provided reagents. KCK and WCL were involved in the conception and design of the study and drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.