Background
Canine distemper virus (CDV) is an enveloped negative-strand RNA virus classified into the genus Morbillivirus within the family Paramyxoviridae. CDV has a very broad host range, having been isolated from dogs, red pandas, foxes, raccoon dogs and tigers, and also identified in giant pandas, lions, lynxes, golden cats, bears and wolves [
1‐
4]. Since 1972, the number of clinical cases of distemper in dogs and fur animals increased rapidly, when large mink and fox farms were established in China. CDV infection results in systemic disease with involvement of the central nervous system and the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts [
5]. The economic loss is significant due to CDV infection.
Although vaccination against CDV with attenuated virus can protect the majority of animals, this protection does not necessarily extend to the field strains. The accurate diagnosis of CDV infection can be made with the use of methods based on molecular biological techniques. In recent years, the application of nucleic acid hybridization, PCR and other techniques[
6‐
9] has improved the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of CDV diagnosis. The detection of CDV based on N gene has been established by many researchers [
10‐
14]. Recently, real-time RT-PCR targeting the hypervariable C-terminal domain of the nucleocapsid (N) gene was established and shown to be more sensitive and effective [
15]. The use of RT-PCR-RFLP to detect the hemagglutinin (H) gene of CDV was reported by Calderon [
16]. However, the CDV N gene is more conserved than H gene, and therefore, provides a better target for CDV detection.
Identification of vaccine and field strains of CDV is very important for control the disease. The contagious nature and the high mortality rates of canine distemper make it necessary to speed up the diagnostic procedure in order to quarantine infected animals and start appropriate treatments early. CDV is a highly effective prophylactic. Accurate vaccination and good surveillance programs are of great importance, and reliable detection methods are needed. So the tool of differentiation of vaccine and field strains is the first step to do. In this study, an RT-PCR-RFLP method based on CDV N gene was established, which could effectively differentiate the vaccine and field strains of CDV. This method not only met the need for veterinary technology in the fur industry, but also supplied a theoretical foundation for field strain genotyping and furthered the basic research of CDV.
Methods
Viral strains, cells and samples
The vaccine strain, CDV3, which has been most widely used in the prevention of canine distemper in domestic fur animals, was identified and preserved by the Zoonosis Lab, Institute of Special Field Economic Animal and Plant Science, the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The commercial vaccine products included vaccine 1: INTERVET DHPPI (Holland), vaccine 2: VIRBAC hexade vaccine (France), vaccine 3: Norden Chimeric quadruple vaccine (USA) and vaccine 4: Laboratories HIPRA septuple vaccine (Spain). All the N gene segments of CDV in these combinative vaccines of the present study were respectively labeled as vaccine 1, vaccine 2, vaccine 3, vaccine 4. African green monkey kidney cells were purchased from China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control. The blood or tissue samples from infected animals were collected from breeding fields in different provinces of northeast China.
Primers
GenBank sequence analysis revealed a Bam HI site at position 1086 in the genome of CDV field strains [GenBank: AY443350, GenBank: AY649446, GenBank: AY445077, GenBank: AY542312, GenBank: AY466011, GenBank: AY386315, GenBank: AY386316] and the standard virus strain (A75/17) but not in the vaccine strain (Onderstpoort). After analysis of the N gene in other field isolates [GenBank: AY390348, GenBank: AJ009656, GenBank: DQ887066, GenBank: DQ003302, GenBank: EF445056, GenBank: DQ435615, GenBank: EF445050, GenBank: DQ522030] and the vaccine strain [GenBank: EF418783], a difference in the Bam HI site was observed. Therefore, this could serve as a valuable tool in the differentiation of field strains from vaccine strains.
A conserved segment (372-1200 bp) of CDV N gene (Onderstepoort) was selected and primers designed (P1: 5'TTCTG AGGCA GATGA GTTCT TC 3', P2: 5'CTTGG ATGCT ATTTC TGACA CT 3'), with a product length of 829 bp. The primer set was synthesized by Shanghai Yingjun biotechnological Co. Ltd (Invitrogen, Beijing, China).
Preparation of the viral RNA
The tissues and blood of infected animals were collected using sterile technique. The tissues were ground after adding 1:1 PBS (weight: volume). The total RNA was extracted using the RNAeasy kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacture's instructions. Total RNA of virus culture was extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen) and eluted using DEPC (diethyl pyrocarbonate)-treated water. The RNA was either directly used in RT-PCR or preserved at -70°C for later use.
RT-PCR
The PCR amplication cycle was optimized as follows: 94°C 45 s, 52.2°C 45 s and 72°C 45 s, for 35 cycles with a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. Five microliters of the amplified products were visualized using gel electrophoresis in a 1.0% agarose gel in the presence of ethidium bromide. Bands were visualized by ultraviolet light transillumination and compared with a 100 bp Ladder (TakaRa).
Recovery, purification and RFLP analysis on PCR products
The positive bands were purified by gel extraction (TIANGEN) and subsequently used for the RFLP experiment. The RFLP reaction was performed as follows. Two μl 10× buffer, 1μl Bam HI (TaKaRa), 6μl PCR product and 11μl aseptic deionized water were combined into 20 ul total reaction volume. The reaction was then incubated in 37°C water bath for 1-1.5 h, after which time, 2 μl of 10× Loading buffer was added. The results of agarose gel electrophoresis were used to determine the type of virus in the sample.
Sequencing and genetic analysis of N gene of isolated CDV field virus strains
To confirm the occurrence of the target gene sequence and Bam HI site, all of the amplified segments were cloned into the pMD18-T vector (TaKaRa) and sequenced at Shanghai Yingjun Biotechnological Co. Ltd (Invitrogen, Beijing, China). The sequencing result was analyzed and 829 bp segments of 19 field strains were compared to cognate sequences of a selection of 21 CDV strains of various animal and geographical origins and 5 vaccine strains. Phylogenetic analysis was performed.
Discussions
Due to a worldwide distribution and the broad host-range of CDV including a vast wildlife reservoir, and available in large amounts of unrelated species of animals in interspecific spreads, eliminate CDV is unlikely, therefore, prevention of disease is very important. Timely diagnosis, differential detection of strain type of CDV, reasonable utilization of vaccine to prevent the disease effectively, can obtain the effective control of canine distemper. So the method of differentiation of CDV vaccine and field strains is needed to construct. Nucleocapsid protein (N) gene is most conserved structural proteins gene of CDV.
Sidhu et al have found the 981
st base of N gene originating from some CDV vaccines has changed from G to A in the field strains [
17]. This leads an additional
Bam HI site, which allows for the clinical discrimination. During sequence alignment of the CDV genome, a difference between CDV field strains and vaccine strains was observed and therefore a method developed to identify them.
In present study, we report on the development of RT-PCR-RFLP suitable for the rapid and sensitive discrimination of CDV field strains and vaccine strains. The assay is based on the conserved CDV N gene. An 829 bp segment between 372 bp and 1200 bp of the CDV N gene was amplified and used in RFLP analysis. By the result banding pattern, one could identify the strain as vaccine or field. After digestion by Bam HI, electrophoresis showed two fragments (659 and 153 bp) in the vaccine strain and three fragments (455, 220 and 153 bp) in the field strains. Due to fur animal breeding at present mainly concentrated in north and northeast of China, we collected several CDV vaccine on the domestic and international markets and animal organs suspected happening distemper in north and northeast of China. The collected tissues were investigated including 19/83 RT-PCR positive (data not shown).
When Calderon characterized CDV from vaccinated and non-vaccinated dogs, he found that the CDV H gene RFLP analysis by
Nhe I could identify vaccine and field virus strains of CDV [
16]. But CDV H gene had more variable than N gene [
18‐
20]. This novel method (RT-PCR-RFLP) to identify vaccine and field virus strains of CDV targets the conserved N gene and the amplified segment (829 bp) is easy to manipulate. Confirmation of field virus infection (or vaccine virus artifact) animals in the clinic could be completed in 6 hours. Five CDV vaccines on the market, including vaccines from China, Holland, France, USA, and Spain, were analyzed, and only 2 fragments by the 829 bp fragment of CDV N gene RFLP analysis were observed, coinciding with one
Bam HI digestion site. Furthermore, the sequences were identical to the Onderstepoort strain displayed in GenBank [
16]. The 19 field isolates coming from northeast and north of China from 2005 to 2007, all displayed 3 fragments and contain 2
Bam HI sites, identical to the N gene sequence of CDV isolates in GenBank. Then this new assay is suitable to accurately distinguishing between the CDV vaccine and field strains. The assay is also precise, and efficient and will give an excellent technological support that will in turn cultivate the fur industry in China. To demonstrate the novelty and utility of this new assay, a patent invention (CN200710056023.4) was awarded.
Phylogenetic analysis based on H gene[
16,
21,
22], there are Aisa-1, Aisa-2, Aisa-3, Europe, Europe wild-life, America-2 and Arctic genotype CDV field strains. In this study, the part of CDV N genes of 19 Chinese field CDV strains detected from breeding foxes, raccoons and minks strains were sequenced and analyzed. A genetic analysis of the N gene 829 bp segments of these field CDV strains was performed. Phylogenetic distances suggested that there are three types CDV field strains in fur animals in Northern China. Most of the field CDV strains coming from northeast and north of China from 2005 to 2007 belong to Asia-1 type. Two strains from Jilin (JSY06-R1 and JSY06-R2) must be mentioned, as they are remarkably different from other isolates and presumably have diversity due to gene mutation. In previous report, three different CDV genotypes (Asia-1, Arctic, and Asia-3) were currently circulating in breeding foxes, raccoon dogs and minks in China based on H gene of CDV phylogenetic analysis[
22]. Here, strains JSY06-R1 and JSY06-R2, identified from Jilin province in 2006, displayed the highest identity to HL strain, belong to Arctic genotype. Arctic CDVs had been reported since 1980 s [
23,
24] and then widespread in Europe[
25,
21,
26]. In the late 1990 s, Arctic CDVs arised in China[
27]. At present, Arctic CDVs, such as strain HL from Heilongjiang province[
22], strain Liu from Jilin province[
27] and JSY06-R1 and JSY06-R2 from Jilin province in this study, are all exist in northeast of China.
Asia-3 CDV in breeding foxes, raccoon dogs and minks in China were firstly described in 2010[
22]. However, the present study further revealed the existence of America-2 genotypes of CDV in breeding foxes in China. By phylogenetic analysis, strain JDH07-F1 from fox had been found to belong to the branch with classical virulent virus A75/17, which belonged to CDV America-2 genotypes (Figure
3). Wild-type CDV strain A75/17 is a highly virulent strain, which induces a persistent infection in the central nervous system with demyelinating disease[
28]. Strain JDH07-F1 was highly identical (99.2% nucleotide) with Wild-type strain A75/17 in the N protein gene. So it was speculated that the virulence of JDH07-F1 strain must be strong. Further study will explore the biological characteristics of these virulent virus strains.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
FXW was responsible for experimental design, analyses and drafting of the manuscript, and performed RT-PCR and RFLP assays, and analyze sequence. XLC and HLZ participated in virus culture and virus isolation. JJZ did the work of collection of specimens. XJY and WW were responsible for supervision of the study. YJW review the manuscript and make figures and tables. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.